Türkiye’de Hemşirelik Alanında Bakım Paketleri ile Yapılmış Deneysel Lisansüstü Tez Çalışmalarının İncelenmesi: Sistematik Derleme

Öz

Amaç Bakım paketi kullanımı hasta memnuniyeti ve bakım kalitesi üzerinde olumlu etkilere sahiptir. Çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’de hemşirelik alanında bakım paketleri ile yürütülen deneysel lisansüstü tez çalışmalarında bakım paketlerinin etkinliğini gözden geçirmek ve bu çalışmalardan elde edilen verileri sistematik olarak incelemektir. Yöntem Çalışmanın evrenini Türkiye’deki Yükseköğretim Kurulu Tez Merkezi (YÖKTEZ) veri tabanından 24 Kasım 2023 ve 6 Aralık 2023 tarihleri arasında erişilen lisansüstü tez çalışmaları oluşturmaktadır. İncelemede, hemşirelik bakımında bakım paketi uygulamalarının çıktılara etkisinin değerlendirildiği, yayın dili Türkçe, araştırma tasarımı randomize kontrollü, yarı deneysel ve deneysel olan, açık erişime sahip, “bakım paketi”, “bakım protokolü”, “hemşirelik bakımı” ve “lisansüstü tez çalışmaları” anahtar kelimelerini içeren yüksek lisans ve doktora tezleri seçilmiştir. Bu tezler arasından araştırma kriterlerini karşılayan altı lisansüstü tez çalışması sistematik incelemenin örneklemini oluşturmuştur. Bulgular Çalışmaya dahil edilen lisansüstü tezlerin %66,6’ sı yarı deneysel, %16,6’sı deneysel ve %16,6’sı da deneysel çalışma türündedir. Sistematik incelemenin protokolü ve makalenin yazımı için PRISMA-P kullanılmıştır. Çalışmaya dahil edilen altı tez sonucunda kullanılan bakım paketlerinin tümünde incelenen parametreler üzerinde olumlu etkileri olduğu bulunmuştur (%100). Sonuç Bu derleme ile kanıt temelli yaklaşımlar doğrultusunda yapılan bakım paketi uygulamalarının komplikasyonları azalttığı, enfeksiyon kontrol ve önlenmesinde yarar sağladığı görülmektedir. Bu doğrultuda bakım paketlerinin yaygınlaştırılması önerilmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• bakım paketi
• bakım protokolü
• hemşirelik bakımı
• lisansüstü tez çalışması

Examination of Experimental Postgraduate Thesis Studies Conducted with Care Bundles in The Field of Nursing in Türkiye: A Systematic Review

Öz

Aim The use of care packages has positive effects on patient satisfaction and quality of care. The study aims to review the effectiveness of care packages in experimental postgraduate theses conducted with care packages in the nursing field in Turkey and to examine the data obtained from systematically. Method The universe of the study consists of postgraduate theses accessed from the database of the Council of Higher Education Thesis Center (YÖKTEZ) in Türkiye between 24 November 2023 and 6 December 2023. In the review, master’s and doctoral theses that evaluated the effects of care package applications in nursing care on outcomes, published in Turkish, research design randomized controlled, quasi-experimental and experimental, open access, and containing the keywords “care package”, “care protocol”, “nursing care” and “postgraduate thesis studies” were selected. Six postgraduate theses that met the research criteria constituted the sample of the systematic review. Results Of the graduate theses included in the study, 66.6% were quasi-experimental, 16.6% were experimental, and 16.6% were experimental. PRISMA-P was used as the protocol for the systematic review and writing of the article. As a result of the six theses included in the study, it was found that all the care packages used had positive effects on the examined parameters (100%). Conclusion It is seen that care package applications made in line with evidence-based approaches reduce complications and provide benefits in infection control and prevention. In this direction, it is recommended that care packages be disseminated

Anahtar Kelimeler

• care protocol
• nursing care
• postgraduate thesis study
• care package

Kaynakça

1. Ballantyne H. Beyond the nursing care plan: an introduction to care bundles. Veterinary Nursing Journal. 2016;31(2):43-46.
2. Blot S, Ruppé E, Harbarth S, Asehnoune K, Poulakou G, Luyt CE, et al. Healthcare-associated infections in adult intensive care unit patients: Changes in epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and contributions of new technologies. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 2022;70:103227.
3. Borgert M, Binnekade J, Paulus F, Goossens A, Dongelmans D. A flowchart for building evidence- based care bundles in intensive care: based on a systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2017;29(2):163- 175.
4. Lavallée JF, Gray TA, Dumville J, Russell W, Cullum N. The effects of care bundles on patient outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Implementation Science. 2017;12(1):1-13.
5. Resar R, Griffin FA, Haraden C, Nolan TW. Using care bundles to improve health care quality. IHI innovation series white paper. Cambridge (MA): Institute for Healthcare Improvement.2012.
6. Fulbrook P, Mooney S. Care bundles in critical care: a practical approach to evidence‐based practice. Nursing in Critical Care. 2003;8(6):249- 255.
7. Devlin JW, O’Neal Jr, HR, Thomas C, Daly MAB, Stollings JL, Janz DR, Lin JC. Strategies to optimize ICU liberation (A to F) bundle performance in critically ill adults with coronavirus disease 2019. Critical Care Explorations. 2020;2(6).
8. Candaş B, Gürsoy A. Time to take action for nurses: from evidence-based practices to care packages. Journal of Education & Research in Nursing. 2017;14(3).

9. Chaboyer W, Bucknall T, Webster J, McInnes E, Gillespiea BM, Banks M, et al. The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): A cluster randomised trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2016; 64:63-71.
10. Sayın Y. What is a care package? 10th National Turkish Surgical and Operating Room Nursing Congress Congress Book. November. 2015;12- 16:110-112.
11. Skaggs MKD, Daniels JF, Hodge AJ, DeCamp VL. Using the evidence-based practice service nursing bundle to increase patient satisfaction. Journal of emergency Nursing. 2018;44(1):37-45.
12. http://www.ihi.org Accessed on: 6 December 2023.
13. Weiser MR, Gonen M, Usiak S, Pottinger T, Samedy P, Patel D, et al. Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary patient care bundle for reducing surgical- site infections. Journal of British Surgery. 2018;105(12):1680-1687.
14. Yazıcı G, Bulut H, Kahraman BB, Palteki T. Analysis of the efficiency and cost of a care bundle for prevention of common infections in an intensive care unit: A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design study. Konuralp Medical Journal. 2022;14(2):398-405.
15. Gel KT, Yaşacak A, Yorgun S. Nurses’ views on care package practices. Anatolian Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences. 2020;23(3):383- 388.
16. Zuo XL, Meng FJ. A care bundle for pressure ulcer treatment in intensive care units. International Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2015;2(4):340- 347.
17. Anderson M, Guthrie PF, Kraft W, Reicks P, Skay C, Beal AL. Universal pressure ulcer prevention bundle with WOC nurse support. Journal of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing. 2015;42(3):217-225. https://doi.org/10.1097/ WON.0000000000000109.
18. Şen S, Uğur E, Afacan S, Sönmezoğlu M. Use of care packages in the prevention of intensive care infections. Journal of Intensive Care Nursing. 2019;23(1):27-35.
19. Kaya K. The Determination of The Effect of A Constipation Prevention Care Package on Postoperative Constipation Severity in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery, Gaziantep, Hasan Kalyoncu University Graduate School of Education, Master’s Thesis. 2023.
20. Yılmaz Y. Investigation of The Effect of Care Bundle Implementation on Recovery Process in Open Heart Surgery Patients, Gaziantep, Hasan Kalyoncu University Graduate Education Institute, Doctoral Thesis. 2022.
21. Altaş G. Evaluation of Pressure Injury Prevention Care Bundle Application in Intensive Care Unit Patients Diagnosed with Internal Diseases, Istanbul, University of Health Sciences, Hamidiye Institute of Health Sciences, Master’s Thesis. 2022.
22. Eğilmez H. Investigation of the Effect of Pressure Wound Care Package in Reducing the Development of Pressure Wound in the Operating Room in Orthopedic Surgery Patients, Gaziantep, Hasan Kalyoncu University Graduate School of Education, Doctoral Thesis. 2022.
23. Ongün P. Effect of A Preoperative Care Package on Recovery in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery, Istanbul, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Institute of Postgraduate Education, Doctoral Thesis. 2021.
24. Kutluğ S. The Evaluation of The Effect of Care Package Application on Urinary Catheter-Related Infection and Incontinence of Female Patients in Intensive Care Unit, Sakarya, Sakarya University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Master’s Thesis. 2021.
25. Alcan AO, Korkmaz FD. Prevention of ventilator- associated pneumonia: A care package approach. Izmir University Medical Journal. 2015; 3:38-47.
26. Irmak B, Bulut H. Use of non-pharmacologic methods to improve bowel function after abdominal surgery: What does the evidence say? Istanbul Gelişim University Journal of Health Sciences. 2021;(14):336-350.
27. Hodges LA, Hughes A, Targett D, Durcan MJ. Does a hot drink provide faster absorption of paracetamol than a tablet? A pharmacoscintigraphic study in healthy male volunteers. Pharm Res. 2014;31(8):2078-2085.
28. Mcnıchol L, Mackey D, Watts C, Zuecca N. Choosing a support surface for pressure injury prevention and treatment. Nursing. 2020;50(2).
29. Dale CM, Rose L, Carbone S, Pinto R, Smith OM, Burry L, et al. Effect of oral chlorhexidine de-adoption and implementation of an oral care bundle on mortality for mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (CHORAL): a multi-center stepped wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Medicine. 2021; 47:1295-1302.
30. Dennison C, Prasad M, Lloyd A, Bhattacharyya SK, Dhawan R, Coyne K. The health-related quality of life and economic burden of constipation. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005; 23:461-476.
31. Pérez-Granda MJ, Barrio JM, Muñoz P, Hortal J, Rincón C, Bouza E. Impact of four sequential measures on the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care. 2014;18(2):1-8.
32. Fischer MO, Brotons F, Briant AR, Suehiro K, Gozdzik W, Sponholz C, et al. Postoperative pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery: the VENICE international cohort study. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2022; 36:23442-351.
33. Strobel RJ, Harrington SD, Hill C, Thompson MP, Cabrera L, Theurer P, et al. Evaluating the impact of pneumonia prevention recommendations after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110(3):903-910.
34. Fleming IO, Garratt C, Guha R, Desai J, Chaubey S, Wang Y, et al. Aggregation of marginal gains in cardiac surgery – feasibility of a perioperative care bundle for enhanced recovery in cardiac surgical patients, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2016;30(3):665-670.
35. Yılmazer T. Current approach in the prevention of pressure sores; care package approach. Nursing and Innovation Izmir: Güven Plus A.Ş. Publications. 2018;280-298.
36. Al-Otaibi YK, Al-Nowaiser N, Rahman A. Reducing hospital-acquired pressure injuries. BMJ Open Quality. 2019;8(1):e000464.
37. Lavallée JF, Gray TA, Dumville J, Cullum N. Preventing pressure ulcers in nursing homes using a care bundle: a feasibility study. Health & Social Care in The Community. 2019;27(4):e417-e427.
38. Tayyib N, Coyer F, Lewisa PA. Implementing a pressure ulcer prevention bundle in an adult intensive care. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 2016; 37:27-36.
39. Tschannen D, Bates O, Talsma A, Guo Y. Patient‐ Specific and Surgical Characteristics in The Development Of Pressure Ulcers. American Journal of Critical Care. 2012;21(2):116‐124.
40. Roberts S, McInnes E, Bucknall T, Wallis M, Banks M, Chaboyer W. Process evaluation of a cluster-randomised trial testing a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle: a mixed-methods study. Implementation Science. 2017; 12:1-9.
41. Şahin G, Başak T. Intraoperative pressure injury risk assessment of patients over 65 years of age undergoing orthopedic surgery. SBÜ Journal of Nursing. 2020;2(2):55-62.
42. Shafipour V, Ramezanpour E, Gorji MA, Moosazadeh M. Prevalence of postoperative pressure ulcer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Electron Physician. 2016;8(11):3170-3176.
43. Gilhooly D, Green SA, McCann C, Black N, Moonesinghe SR. Barriers and facilitators to the successful development, implementation and evaluation of care bundles in acute care in hospital: a scoping review. Implementation Science. 2019;14(1):1-12.
44. Clark K, Curry T, Byfieldt N. The effect of a care bundle on nursing staff when caring for the dying. International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 2015;21(8):392-398.
45. Clarkson DM. The role of ‘care bundles’ in healthcare. British Journal of Healthcare Management. 2013;19(2):63-68.
46. Conway A, Gow J, Ralph N, Duff J, Edward KL, Alexander K, et al. Implementing a thermal care bundle for inadvertent perioperative hypothermia: A cost-effectiveness analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2019; 97:21-27.
47. Chan JL, Miller JG, Murphy M, et al. A multidisciplinary protocol driven approach to improve extubation times following cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;(18):S0003-4975.
48. Markham T, Wegner R, Hernandez N, Lee JW, Choi W, Eltzschig HK, et al. Assessment of a multimodal analgesia protocol to allow the implementation of enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery: retrospective analysis of patient outcomes. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2019; 54:76-80.
49. Eastwood D, Manson N, Bigney E, Darling M, Richardson E, Paixao R, et al. Improving postoperative patient reported benefits and satisfaction following spinal fusion with a single preoperative education session. The Spine Journal. 2019;19(5):840-845.
50. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations: World Journal of Surgery. 2019; 43:659-695.