Investigation of the Relationship Between Perceived Helicopter Parenting and Self-Handicapping: A Research on University Students

Öz

The research aims to examine the relationship between perceived helicopter parenting and self-handicapping. In addition, it was also examined whether the perceived helicopter parenting levels showed a statistically significant difference according to the variables of gender, time spent for university education, and whether they lived in the same house with their parents. The research was carried out with the participation of 931 university students who could be reached online. Personal Information Form, Perceived Helicopter Parental Attitude Scale and Self-Handicapping Scale were used as data collection tools. IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 program was used in the analysis of the data. Pearson product-moment correlation analysis, simple linear regression analysis, independent groups t-test and one-way analysis of variance were used in the analysis of the data. The results of the research showed that university students’ perceived helicopter parenting levels were low and self-handicapping levels were moderate. It was observed that 7.6% of the students perceived their mothers as helicopter parents and 2.9% of them perceived their fathers as helicopter parents. A positive, low-level and statistically significant relationship was found between perceived helicopter mother and father attitudes and self-handicapping. It has been determined that this relationship is valid for all sub-dimensions of the Perceived Helicopter Mother and Father Attitude Scale. In addition, it was observed that the perceived helicopter mother and father attitudes had a statistically significant predictive role on self-handicapping levels. Statistically significant differences were found in the level of helicopter mother attitude perceived by university students according to the variables of gender, duration of university education and whether they live in the same house with their parents. It was concluded that there was no statistically significant difference in perceived helicopter father attitude levels according to these variables. The results of the research were discussed and interpreted within the framework of the literature, and some suggestions were presented based on the results.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Parental Attitudes
• Helicopter Parenting
• Self-Handicapping
• University Students

Algılanan Helikopter Ebeveyn Tutumları ve Kendini Sabotaj Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma

Öz

Bu araştırmada, algılanan helikopter ebeveyn tutumları ve kendini sabotaj arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bunun yanında, algılanan helikopter ebeveyn tutumu düzeylerinin cinsiyet, üniversite öğreniminde tamamlanan süre ve ebeveynlerle aynı evde yaşayıp yaşamama durumu değişkenlerine göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık gösterip göstermediği de incelenmiştir. Araştırma, çevrimiçi ortamda ulaşılabilen 931 üniversite öğrencisinin katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veri toplama aracı olarak Kişisel Bilgi Formu, Algılanan Helikopter Ebeveyn Tutum Ölçeği ve Kendini Sabotaj Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Toplanan veriler IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde, parametrik testler olan Pearson momentler çarpımı korelasyon analizi, basit doğrusal regresyon analizi, bağımsız gruplar t testi ve tek yönlü varyans analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, üniversite öğrencilerinin algıladıkları helikopter ebeveyn tutumu düzeylerinin düşük, kendini sabotaj düzeylerinin ise orta seviyede olduğunu göstermiştir. Öğrencilerin %7.6’sının annelerini, %2.9’unun ise babalarını helikopter ebeveyn olarak algıladıkları görülmüştür. Algılanan helikopter anne ve baba tutumları ile kendini sabotaj arasında pozitif yönlü, düşük düzeyde ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Bu ilişkinin Algılanan Helikopter Anne ve Baba Tutum Ölçeği’nin tüm alt boyutları için de geçerli olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, algılanan helikopter anne ve baba tutumu düzeylerinin kendini sabotaj düzeyleri üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir yordayıcı rolü olduğu görülmüştür. Üniversite öğrencilerinin algıladıkları helikopter anne tutumu düzeylerinde cinsiyet, üniversite öğreniminde tamamlanan süre ve ebeveynlerle aynı evde yaşayıp yaşamama durumu değişkenlerine göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmuştur. Algılanan helikopter baba tutumu düzeylerinde ise bu değişkenlere göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçları literatür çerçevesinde tartışılmış ve yorumlanmış, sonuçlardan hareketle bazı öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ebeveyn Tutumları
• Helikopter Ebeveynlik
• Kendini Sabotaj
• Üniversite Öğrencileri

Kaynakça

1. Abacı, R. & Akın, A. (2011). Kendini sabotaj: İnsanoğlunun sınırlı doğasının bir sonucu. Pegem Akademi.
2. Akça, F. (2012). An investigation into the self-handicapping behaviors of undergraduates in terms of academic procrastination, the locus of control and academic success. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 288-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jel.v1n2p288
3. Akın, A. (2012). Kendini sabotaj ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(164), 176-187.
4. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469-480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
5. Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
6. Berglas, S., & Jones, E. E. (1978). Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(4), 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.4.405
7. Boslaugh, S., & Watters, P. A. (2008). Statistics in a nutshell. O’reilly Media.
8. Bradley-Geist, J. C., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2014). Helicopter parents: An examination of the correlates of over-parenting of college students. Education + Training, 56(4), 314-328. http://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2012-0096

9. Buchanan, T., & LeMoyne, T. (2020). Helicopter parenting and the moderating impact of gender and single-parent family structure on self-efficacy and well-being. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 28(3), 262-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480720925829
10. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2022). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (32. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
11. Christopher, A. N., Lasane, T. P., Troisi, J. D., & Park, L. E. (2007). Materialism, defensive and assertive self-presentational tactics and life satisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(10), 1145-1162. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2007.26.10.1145
12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Coudevylle, G. R., Gernigon, C., & Ginis, K. A. M. (2011). Self-esteem, self-confidence, anxiety and claimed self-handicapping: A mediational analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(6), 670-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.05.008
14. Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge University Press.
15. Darlow, V., Norvilitis, J. M., & Schuetze, P. (2017). The relationship between helicopter parenting and adjustment to college. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(8), 2291-2298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0751-3
16. Dickhauser, C., & Dickhauser, O. (2021). ‘‘Engagierte eltern-engagierte kinder?’’ Zum zusammenhang zwischen helicopter parenting und selbstwirksamkeit, autonomie und engagement im studium. Perspektiven der Empirischen Kindheits-und Jugendforschung, 7(2), 113-134.
17. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (2003). A motivational analysis of defensive pessimism and self‐handicapping. Journal of Personality, 71(3), 369-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.7103005
18. Faal Meskin, L., & Zinali, A. (2015). The relationship between parenting styles with self-handicapping and self-efficacy among clients relief committee of Imam Khomeini (rah). Quarterly Journal of Health Breeze, 4(1), 48-55.
19. Firoozi, M., Zadebagheri, G., Kazemi, A., & Karami, M. (2016). An investigation on the relationship between perfectionism beliefs, self-efficacy, and test anxiety with self-handicapping behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 10(2), 45-49.
20. Flower, A. T. (2021). The effects of helicopter parenting in emerging adulthood: An investigation of the roles of involvement and perceived intrusiveness [Honors thesis]. University of Dayton.
21. Harris, R. N., Snyder, C. R., Higgins, R. L., & Schrag, J. L. (1986). Enhancing the prediction of self-handicapping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1191-1199. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1191
22. Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Kuo, Y. C., & Hsu, W. Y. (2015). Parental monitoring and helicopter parenting relevant to vocational student’s procrastination and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 42, 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.003
23. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2007). Helicopter parents in the workplace. New Paradigm Learning Corporation, 1-16.
24. Jones, E. E., & Rhodewalt, F. (1982). Self-handicapping scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/t09528-000
25. Kearns, H., Forbes, A., & Gardiner, M., & Marshall, K. (2008). When a high distinction isn’t good enough: A review of perfectionism and self-handicapping. Australian Educational Researcher, 35(3), 21-36.
26. Kolditz, T. A., & Arkin, R. M. (1982). An impression management interpretation of the self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(3), 492-502. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.492
27. Köklü, N., Büyüköztürk, Ş. & Çokluk, Ö. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik (2. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
28. Lampert, J. N. (2009). Parental attachment styles and traditional undergraduates’ adjustment to college: Testing the ‘‘helicopter parent’’ phenomenon [Doctoral dissertation]. Pacific University.
29. LeMoyne, T., & Buchanan, T. (2011). Does “hovering” matter? Helicopter parenting and its effect on well-being. Sociological Spectrum, 31(4), 399-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2011.574038
30. Leondari, A., & Gonida, E. (2007). Predicting academic self‐handicapping in different age groups: The role of personal achievement goals and social goals. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 595-611. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X128396
31. Martin, K. A., & Brawley, L. R. (2002). Self-handicapping in physical achievement settings: The contributions of self-esteem and self-efficacy. Self and Identity, 1(4), 337-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860290106814
32. Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. L. (2003). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: A model of self-protection from a longitudinal perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00008-5
33. Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1041
34. Midgley, C. (2001). A goal theory perspective on the current status of middle level schools. In T. Urdan & F. Pajares (Eds.), Adolescence and education: General issues in the education of adolescents (pp. 33-59). Information Age Publishing.
35. Odenweller, K. G., Booth-Butterfield, M., & Weber, K. (2014). Investigating helicopter parenting, family environments, and relational outcomes for millennials. Communication Studies, 65(4), 407-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2013.811434
36. Özlü, G. (2017). Üniversite öğrencilerinde kendini sabotajın yordayıcısı olarak cinsiyet, yaş ve farklı mükemmeliyetçilik tarzları [Yüksek lisans tezi]. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi.
37. Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Nelson, L. J. (2012). Black hawk down?: Establishing helicopter parenting as a distinct construct from other forms of parental control during emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1177-1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.03.007
38. Pautler, L. R. (2017). Helicopter parenting of college students [Master’s thesis]. Eastern Illinois University.
39. Reed, K., Duncan, J. M., Lucier-Greer, M., Fixelle, C., & Ferraro, A. J. (2016). Helicopter parenting and emerging adult self-efficacy: Implications for mental and physical health. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(10), 3136-3149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0466-x
40. Rhodewalt, F., Tragakis, M. W., & Finnerty, J. (2006). Narcissism and self-handicapping: Linking self-aggrandizement to behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 573-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.05.001
41. Sansone, R. A., McLean, J. S., & Wiederman, M. W. (2008). The relationship between medically self-sabotaging behaviors and borderline personality disorder among psychiatric inpatients. Primary Care Companion to the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 10(6), 448-452. https://doi.org/10.4088/pcc.v10n0604
42. Schiffrin, H. H., Liss, M., Miles-McLean, H., Geary, K. A., Erchull, M. J., & Tashner, T. (2014). Helping or hovering? The effects of helicopter parenting on college students’ well-being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(3), 548-557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9716-3
43. Segrin, C., Woszidlo, A., Givertz, M., Bauer, A., & Taylor Murphy, M. (2012). The association between overparenting, parent‐child communication, and entitlement and adaptive traits in adult children. Family Relations, 61(2), 237-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00689.x
44. Segrin, C., Woszidlo, A., Givertz, M., & Montgomery, N. (2013). Parent and child traits associated with overparenting. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 32(6), 569-595. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2013.32.6.569
45. Smith, T. W., Snyder, C. R., & Handelsman, M. M. (1982). On the self-serving function of an academic wooden leg: Test anxiety as a self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(2), 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.2.314
46. Stewart, M. A., & George-Walker, L. D. (2014). Self-handicapping, perfectionism, locus of control and self-efficacy: A path model. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 160-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.038
47. Sun, C., & Zhang, Z. (2019). Family parenting pattern and self-handicapping. Advances in Psychology, 9(9), 1563-1572. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2019.99190
48. Tice, D. M. (1991). Esteem protection or enhancement? Self-handicapping motives and attributions differ by trait self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 711-725. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.711
49. Turner, L. A., Faulk, R. D., & Garner, T. (2020). Helicopter parenting, authenticity, and depressive symptoms: A mediation model. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 181(6), 500-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2020.1775170
50. Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 115-138. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009061303214
51. Üzbe, N. (2013). Başarı hedef yönelimi, benlik saygısı ve akademik başarının kendini engellemeyi yordamadaki rolü [Yüksek lisans tezi]. Gazi Üniversitesi.
52. Van Ingen, D. J., Freiheit, S. R., Steinfeldt, J. A., Moore, L. L., Wimer, D. J., Knutt, A. D., Scapinello, S., & Roberts, A. (2015). Helicopter parenting: The effect of an overbearing caregiving style on peer attachment and self‐efficacy. Journal of College Counseling, 18(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2015.00065.x
53. Want, J., & Kleitman, S. (2006). Imposter phenomenon and self-handicapping: Links with parenting styles and self-confidence. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(5), 961-971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.005
54. Yalnız, A. (2014). Algılanan anne baba tutumları, kendini sabotaj ve öz-yeterlik arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Yüksek lisans tezi]. Sakarya Üniversitesi.
55. Yılmaz, H. (2019). İyi ebeveyn, çocuğu için her zaman her şeyi yapan ebeveyn değildir: Algılanan helikopter ebeveyn tutum ölçeği (AHETÖ) geliştirme çalışması. Erken Çocukluk Çalışmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.24130/eccd-jecs.1967201931114
56. Yılmaz, H. & Büyükcebeci, A. (2019). Bazı pozitif psikoloji kavramları açısından helikopter ebeveyn tutumlarının sonuçları. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 9(54), 707-744.
57. Yılmaz, H. (2021). Özel yetenekli ergenlerin algıladıkları helikopter ebeveyn tutumunun psikolojik sağlamlık düzeylerine etkileri [Yüksek lisans tezi]. KTO Karatay Üniversitesi.
58. Zuckerman, M., & Tsai, F. F. (2005). Costs of self‐handicapping. Journal of Personality, 73(2), 411-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00314.x