Okul Müdürlerinin Dönüşümcü Liderlik Davranışları ve Öğretmen Refahı Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Öz

Bu çalışma, okul müdürlerinin sergiledikleri dönüşümcü liderlik davranışları ile öğretmen refahı arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. İlişkisel tarama modelinden yararlanılan araştırmanın katılımcılarını 2024-2025 eğitim-öğretim yılında Isparta merkezi ve ilçelerinde görev yapmakta olan 440 öğretmen oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmada okul müdürlerinin sergiledikleri dönüşümcü liderlik davranışları için “Kısa Dönüşümcü Liderlik Ölçeği”; öğretmenlerin refah düzeyleri için “Çalışan Refahı Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Öğretmen refahının dört alt boyutu sosyal refah, psikolojik refah, iş yeri refahı ve öznel refahtır. Öğretmenlerin psikolojik ve iş yeri refah algılarının çok yüksek; sosyal ve öznel refah algılarının ise yüksek düzeyde olduğu görülmüştür. Çalışma; cinsiyet, yaş, eğitim düzeyi ve okul türüne göre de incelenmiştir. Öğretmen refahı ve eğitim düzeyi değişkeni arasında anlamlı bir farklılık gözlenmemiştir. Ancak ölçekler ve diğer değişkenler arasında anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmuştur. Okul müdürlerinin dönüşümcü liderlik davranışları ve öğretmen refahı için erkek öğretmenlerin algılarının kadın öğretmenlerin algılarına göre daha olumlu olduğu görülmüştür. Okul müdürlerinin dönüşümcü liderliği ile öğretmen refahı arasında ise güçlü ve pozitif yönde bir ilişki olduğu saptanmıştır. Ayrıca okul müdürlerinin dönüşümcü liderlik davranışlarının öğretmen refahının orta düzeyde anlamlı bir yordayıcısı olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Okul Müdürü
• Dönüşümcü Liderlik
• Öğretmen
• Öğretmen Refahı

An Investigation on School Principals' Transformational Leadership Behaviors and Teacher Well-being

Öz

This study aimed to investigate of the relationship between school principals’ transformational leadership behaviors and teacher well-being. The participants of the study consist of 440 teachers working in public schools in the province of Isparta during the 2024-2025 academic year. The study utilizied a relational survey design to investigate the relationships between variables. Short Transformational Leadership Scale was used to determine the transformational leadership behaviors of school principals. Employee Well-being Scale was used to determine the well-being of teachers. The teacher well-being scale has 4 sub-dimensions; social well-being, psychological well-being, workplace well-being and subjective well-being. It was determined that the psychological well-being and workplace well-being perceptions of the teachers were very high, while their subjective and social well-being perceptions were high. The study examined resist to gender, age, level of education and school type veriables. The between teacher well-being and level of education submission did not a significant difference. On the other hand, a significant difference was found between the scales and other veriables. In addition, male teachers' perceptions are more positive than female teachers' perceptions for both scales. A high positive and significant correlation was identified between school principals’ transformational leadership behaviors and teacher well-being. Moreover, it was observed that school principals’ transformational leadership behaviors predicted teacher well-being at a moderate level and significantly.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• School Principal
• Transformational Leadership
• Teacher
• Teacher Well-Being

Kaynakça

1. Akçakaya, M. (2010). 21. yüzyılda yeni liderlik anlayışı (1. baskı). Adalet Yayınevi.
2. Avcı, A. (2015). Investigation of transformational and transactional leadership styles of school principals, and evaluation of them in terms of educational administration. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(20), 2758-2767. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2483
3. Aydın, A., Sarıer, Y., & Uysal, S. (2013). The effect of school Principals’ leadership styles on teachers’ organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 805-811.
4. Balyer, A., & Özcan, K. (2012). Cultural adaptation of headmasters' transformational leadership scale and a study on teachers' perceptions. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 49(1), 103-128.
5. Bardach, L., Klassen, R. M., & Perry, N. E. (2022). Teachers’ psychological characteristics: Do they matter for teacher effectiveness, teachers’ well-being, retention, and interpersonal relations? An integrative review. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 259-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09614-9
6. Bass, B. M. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership, theory, research and managerial applications. (4th ed.). Free Press.
7. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum
8. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.

9. Bennis, W. (1982). The artform of leadership. Training and Development Journal, 36(4), 44-46.
10. Bozacı, İ., & Gürer, A. (2024). Effect of leader kindness on service sabotage and the role of feeling of elevation and employee wellbeing: A study of municipal employees in Kırıkkale Province of Turkey. SAGE Open, 14(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241293554
11. Burke, R. J., & Greenglass, E. (1996). Work stress, social support, psychological burnout and emotional and physical well-being among teachers. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 1(2), 193-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548509608400018
12. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
13. Bush, T. (2008). From management to leadership: Semantic or meaningful change? Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 36(2), 271-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143207087777
14. Büyüköztürk S. (2023). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (30. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
15. Cemaloğlu, N. & Duran, A. (2024). Liderliğin tanımı ve doğası. Cemaloğlu, N. & Karaferye, F. (Ed.), Liderliğin meydan okuyucuları içinde. Pegem Akademi.
16. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Araştırma deseni: Nitel, nicel ve karma yöntemler. (Çev. S. B. Demir, 3. baskı). Eğiten Kitap.
17. Çakır, T. (2022). Okul müdürlerinin dönüşümcü liderlik stilinin okul mutluluğuna etkisinde okul kültürünün aracılık rolü [Yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim Üniversitesi]. YÖK Tez Merkezi.
18. Çetin, A. (2019). Öğretmenlerin öznel iyi oluşları ile mesleki dayanıklılıkları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 9(3), 506-521. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.533847
19. Dess, G. G., & Picken, J. C. (2000). Changing roles: Leadership in the 21st century. Organizational Dynamics, 28(3), 18-34.
20. Dike, V. E., Odiwe, K., & Ehujor, D. M. (2015). Leadership and management in the 21st century organizations: A practical approach. World Journal of Social Science Research, 2(2), 139-159.
21. Echon, J. F. E., & Cabal, E. M. (2022). School principal-teachers' interactions in relation to teachers' professional well-being. Online Submission, 6(8), 175-184.
22. Haj, S. J., & Jubran, A. M. (2016). The extent of principals' application of the transformational leadership and its relationship to the level of job satisfaction among teachers of Galilee Region. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(11), 114-119.
23. Haskew, L. D. (1949). Society's responsibility for teacher welfare. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 265(1), 142-150.
24. Hessel, M. G., & Symonds, P. M. (1949). Chapter XIII: Welfare of the individual teacher. Review of Educational Research, 19(3), 265-272.
25. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., & Dorfman, P. W.(2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Gupta, V. (Eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Ibrahim, M. S., Ghavifekr, S., Ling, S., Siraj, S., & Azeez, M. I. K. (2014). Can transformational leadership influence on teachers’ commitment towards organizational, teaching profesion and students learning? A quantitative analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(2), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9308-3
27. Kelloway, E. K., Turner, N., Barling, J., & Loughlin, C. (2012). Transformational leadership and employee psychological well-being: The mediating role of employee trust in leadership. Work & Stress, 26(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2012.660774
28. Kline, R. B. (2019). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesinin ilkeleri ve uygulaması (Çev. S. Şen). Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
29. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
30. Kyriacou, C., & Sutcliffe, J. (1978). Teacher stress: Prevalence, sources, and symptoms. British Journal of Educational Ppsychology, 48(2), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1978.tb02381.x
31. Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2012). The Nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 387-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436268
32. Leithwood K, & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 17(2), 201- 227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565829
33. Liu, P., Chen, X. F., Cheng, Y. X., & Xiao, S. S. (2023). Understanding the relationship between teacher leadership and teacher well-being: The mediating roles of trust in leaders and teacher efficacy. Journal of Educational Administration, 61(6), 646–661. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2022-0152
34. Lord, R., & Maher, K. J. (1993). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance (1st ed.). Unwin-Everyman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203423950
35. Louis, K. S., & Smith, B. (1991). Restructuring, teacher engagement and school culture: Perspectives on school reform and the improvement of teacher's work. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(1), 34-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345910020104
36. Lui, K. F., Yip, K. H., & Wong, A. C. (2021). Gender differences in multitasking experience and performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(2), 344-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820960707
37. Lunenburg F.C., & Ornstein A.C. (2013). Eğitim yönetimi (Çev. G. Arastaman). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. Meidelina, O., Saleh, A. Y., Cathlin, C. A., & Winesa, S. A. (2023). Transformational leadership and teacher well-being: A systematic review. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 17(3), 417-424. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i3.20858
38. Melliofatria, M., Corrina, F., & Zulammar, Z. (2022). The importance of teacher welfare improvement. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 11(2), 313-320. https://doi.org/10.34006/jmbi.v11i2.519
39. Nielsen, M. B. (2013). Bullying in work groups: The impact of leadership. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54(2), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12011
40. Okan, N. & Okan, Y. T. (2021). Kısa dönüşümcü liderlik ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması ve psikometrik yönden incelenmesi. Turkish Studies, 16(2), 687-700. https://dx.doi.org/10.47356/TurkishStudies.48329
41. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(3), 293-315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
42. Short, P. M. (1994). Defining teacher empowerment. Education, 114(4), 488-492.
43. Stoeber, J., & Rennert, D. (2008). Perfectionism in school teachers: Relations with stress appraisals, coping styles, and burnout. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 21(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800701742461
44. Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson
45. Tavşancıl, E. (2006). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi (3. baskı). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
46. Van der Vyver, C. P., Kok, T., & Conley, L. N. (2020). The relationship between teachers’ professional wellbeing and principals’ leadership styles. Perspectives in Education, 38(2), 86-102. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v38.i2.06
47. Weng, Q., McElroy, J. C., Morrow, P. C., & Liu, R. (2010). The relationship between career growth and organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(3), 391-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.05.003
48. Yarar, F. N. & Babaoğlan, E. (2025). Okul yöneticilerinin liderlik stillerinin öğretmenlerin psikolojik iyi oluş düzeylerini yordama gücü. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 85-108.
49. Yukl, G. A., & Gardner, W. L. (2019). Leadership in organizations. (9th ed.). Pearson.
50. Yüksel, A. & Yılık, P. (2022). Çalışan refahı ölçeği: Türk kültürüne uyarlama çalışması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(3), 1959-1975. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1097377
51. Zakaria, Z., Don, Y., & Yaakob, M. F. M. (2021). Teachers' well-being from the social psychological perspective. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 641-647. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21115