Yapay Zekâ ve Eleştirel Düşünmenin Kesişiminde: 1992–2025 Arası Araştırmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışma, yapay zekâ ve eleştirel düşünme alanlarında yürütülen akademik araştırmaların eğilimlerini, etki düzeylerini ve tematik gelişimini bibliyometrik yöntemler aracılığıyla incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu kapsamda, Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection veri tabanından 1992–2025 yılları arasında yayımlanmış toplam 522 bilimsel doküman elde edilmiş ve Bibliometrix paketinin Biblioshiny arayüzü kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, özellikle son beş yılda araştırma üretkenliğinde belirgin bir artış olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu süreçte Amerika Birleşik Devletleri (%16,7) ve Çin (%14,4) alanın en önde gelen katkı sağlayıcıları olarak öne çıkmaktadır. En üretken yazarlar arasında Dai Y, Mishra P, Xu S ve Lee AVY yer almaktadır. En fazla atıf alan dergiler ise Computers & Education, Education and Information Technologies ve British Journal of Educational Technology olarak belirlenmiştir. Tematik analiz sonuçları, “yapay zekâ”, “eleştirel düşünme”, “eğitim”, “etik” ve “yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı” kavramlarının alanın çekirdeğini oluşturduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca 2020 sonrası çalışmalarda üretken yapay zekâ, etik sorumluluk ve pedagojik bütünleştirme konularına artan bir odaklanma olduğu görülmektedir. Genel olarak bulgular, yapay zekâ ve eleştirel düşünme alanının hızla çeşitlenen konulara sahip, bilimsel görünürlüğü giderek artan ve belirgin biçimde disiplinlerarası bir araştırma alanına dönüştüğünü göstermektedir. Bu gelişmelerin sistematik biçimde haritalandırılması yoluyla, mevcut çalışma gelecekte yürütülecek araştırmalar için ampirik ve metodolojik bir çerçeve sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yapay Zekâ
• Eleştirel Düşünme
• Sosyal Bilgiler
• Bibliyometrik Analiz

At the Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Critical Thinking: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research from 1992 to 2025

Öz

This study aims to examine the trends, impact levels, and thematic development of academic research conducted in the fields of artificial intelligence and critical thinking through bibliometric methods. A total of 522 scientific documents published between 1992 and 2025 were retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection and analyzed using the Biblioshiny interface of the Bibliometrix package.bThe findings reveal a marked increase in research productivity in the last five years, with the United States (16.7%) and China (14.4%) emerging as the leading contributors. Among the most prolific authors are Dai Y, Mishra P, Xu S, and Lee AVY. The most highly cited journals include Computers & Education, Education and Information Technologies, and the British Journal of Educational Technology. The thematic analysis indicates that the concepts “artificial intelligence,” “critical thinking,” “education,” “ethics,” and “AI literacy” constitute the core of the field, while post-2020 studies increasingly focus on generative artificial intelligence, ethical responsibility, and pedagogical integration. Overall, the research landscape demonstrates that the field of artificial intelligence and critical thinking has evolved into a distinctly interdisciplinary domain, with rapidly diversifying topics and growing scientific visibility. By systematically mapping these developments, the present study provides an empirical and methodological framework that may guide future research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Artificial Intelligence
• Critical Thinking
• Social Studies
• Bibliometric Analysis

Kaynakça

1. Almeida, L. S., & Franco, A. H. R. (2011). Critical thinking: Its relevance for education in a shifting society. Revista de Psicología, 29(1), 175–195.
2. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
3. Arıkan, A. (2025). The Effect of Artificial Intelligence-Supported Activities on Academic Achievement, Critical Thinking and Innovation Skills in Social Studies Classes. Anadolu Kültürel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(4), 917-950.
4. Bianchi, I. (2024). Enhancing critical thinking in education: Leveraging AI tools and technologies in pedagogical practice.
5. Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence trends in education: A narrative overview. Procedia Computer Science, 136, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233
6. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
7. Chiu, T. K. F., & Chai, C. S. (2020). Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: A self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability, 12(14), 5568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145568
8. Cotton, D. R. E. (2024). Artificial intelligence and education: Understanding ethics and agency in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 845–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13489

9. Dai, Y. (2024). Effect of an analogy-based approach of artificial intelligence pedagogy in upper primary schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(3), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241231122
10. Dwivedi, Y. K., et al. (2023). Opinion paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
11. Facione, P. A. (2010). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae, CA: Insight Assessment.
12. Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07- 9492LSF
13. Heard, J., Scoular, C., Duckworth, D., Ramalingam, D., & Teo, I. (2020). Critical thinking: Definition and structure. Australian Council for Educational Research. https://research.acer.edu.au/ar_misc/41
14. Heldt, A. (2019). Let’s meet halfway: Sharing new responsibilities in a digital age. Journal of Information Policy, 9, 411–438. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.9.2019.0411
15. Lo, C. K. (2023). Generative AI in higher education: Implications for critical thinking development. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100166
16. Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2016). What does it mean for teachers to be data literate: Laying out the skills, knowledge, and dispositions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.011
17. Mishra, P. (2024). Artificial intelligence and teacher knowledge: Designing for generative AI in education. TechTrends, 68(2), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00842-9
18. Morris, S. A., & Van der Veer Martens, B. (2008). Mapping research specialties. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42(1), 213–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2008.1440420112
19. National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). (2013). The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards. Silver Spring, MD: NCSS. Retrieved from https://www.socialstudies.org/standards
20. Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8
21. Spector, J. M., & Ma, S. (2019). Inquiry and critical thinking skills for the next generation: From artificial intelligence back to human intelligence. Smart Learning Environments, 6(8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0088-z
22. Suriano, R., Plebe, A., Acciai, A., & Fabio, R. A. (2025). Student interaction with ChatGPT can promote complex critical thinking skills. Learning and Instruction, 95, 102011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102011
23. Syahputra, R., Simanjuntak, E., & Nababan, D. (2024). The impact of generative AI on students’ critical thinking in higher education. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2334412. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2334412
24. Turkish Ministry of National Education (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı – MEB). (2024). Sosyal Bilgiler Dersi Öğretim Programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 4–5–6–7. Sınıflar).
25. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
26. Willingham, D. T. (2019). How to teach critical thinking. Education: Future Frontiers, 1(1), 1-17.
27. Wu, Y. (2024). Critical thinking pedagogics design in an era of ChatGPT and other AI tools. Journal of Education and Development, 8(1), 1–12.
28. Xu, S. (2024). ChatGPT awareness, acceptance, and adoption among higher education students. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 9471–9493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12391-0
29. Yusuf, A., Bello, S., Pervin, N., & Tukur, A. K. (2024). Implementing a proposed framework for enhancing critical thinking skills in synthesizing AI-generated texts. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 53, 101619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101619