Classroom Management and Student Achievement: A Study on Five Elementary Classrooms

Öz

This study intended to investigate primary school teachers’ classroom management and student achievement in their classrooms. For this purpose, a total of 150 class-hours were spent on observing one first grade and four second grades in a primary school in Eskisehir city center between October 2013 and December 2013. Research participation criteria for teachers included volunteering for the study and having at least one special needs student in their classrooms for observation so that teacher behaviors towards the special needs students could be observed. Researcher-developed observation form was used in the study for data collection purposes to record teachers’ classroom management practices during observations. The form included several dimensions related to classroom management behaviors such as the exact moment of the lesson in which the teacher starts teaching, the locations of special needs students during the class period, use of rewards-punishment for special needs students and other students, use of individualized care for special needs students and the degree of effective use of classroom period. Data related to student achievement were obtained from the results of a general achievement test given to all students at the school based on their grade levels. Research data were analyzed via descriptive statistics and one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine the difference between groups. The findings showed that teachers tended to place special needs students at the back rows of the classroom and that they did not provide individualized teaching opportunities in line with the needs of special needs students. It was also found that number of correct answered in the general achievement test significantly changed according to students’ teachers. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Classroom management,Student achievement,Students with special need

Kaynakça

1. Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2006). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
2. Akiba, M., Le Tendre, K.L. & Scribner, J.P. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 369-387.
3. Akyüz, G. (2006). Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği ülkelerinde öğretmen ve sınıf niteliklerinin matematik başarısına etkisinin incelenmesi (Investigation of The Effect of Teacher and Class Characteristics on Mathematics Achievement in Turkey and European Union Countries). İlköğretim Online, 5(2), 61-74.
4. Ballard, K. (2013). Thinking in another way: ideas for sustainable inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(8), 762-775.
5. Baker, J. A., Clark, T. P., Maier, K. S., & Viger, S. (2008). The differential influence of instructional context on the academic engagement of students with behavior problems. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1876-1883.
6. Berry, B. (2002). What it means to be a “highly qualified teacher”. Southeast Center for Teaching Quality, University of North Carolina (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 480580).
7. Broomhead, K.E. (2013). Preferential treatment or unwanted in mainstream schools? The perceptions of parents and teachers with regard to pupils with special educational needs. Support for Learning, 28(1), 4-10.
8. Brophy, J. (1983). Classroom organization and management. The Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 265–285.

9. Brophy, J. (2006). History of research on classroom management. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice and contemporary issues (pp. 3–15). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (Scientific research methods). (17. bs). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
11. Chalk, K., & Bizo, L. A. (2004). Specific praise improves on-task behaviour and numeracy enjoyment: A study of year of pupils engaged in the numeracy hour. Educational Psychology in Practice, 20(4), 335-351.
12. Cook, B. G. (2002). Inclusive attitudes, strengths, and weakness of pre-service general educators enrolled in a curriculum infusion teacher preparation program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25(3), 262-277.
13. Cook, B.G., Cameron, D.L. & Tankersley, M. (2007). Inclusive teachers’ attitudinal ratings of their students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 40(4), 230-238.
14. Cullen, J. P., Gregory, J. L., & Noto, L. A. (2010). The Teacher Attitudes Toward Inclusion Scale (TATIS) Technical Report (ED509930).
15. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence. Center for the Study of teaching and Policy, University of Washington, http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/LDH_1999.pdf
16. Emmer, E.T., & Stough, L. M. (2001). Classroom management: A critical part of education. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 103-112.
17. Evertson, C. M. (1989). Improving elementary classroom management: A school based training program for beginning the year. Journal of Educational Research, 83(2), 82–90.
18. Evertson, C.M., & Harris, A.H. (1992). What we know about managing classrooms. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 74–78.
19. Ferguson, E., & Houghton, S. (1992). The effects of contingent teacher praise, as specified by Canter’s Assertive Discipline. Educational Studies, 18(1), 83-94.
20. Gallagher, H.A. (2002). The relationship between measures of teacher quality and student achievement: the case of Vaughn elementary. ERIC – ED 468254
21. Gao, W., & Mager, G. (2011). Enhancing preservice teachers’ sense of efficacy and attitudes toward school diversity through preparation: A case of one U.S. inclusive teacher education program. International Journal of Special Education, 26(2), 92-107.
22. Gettinger, M., & Kohler, K. M. (2006). Process-outcome approaches to classroom management and effective teaching. Evertson, C.M. & Weinstein, C.S. (Ed.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice and contemporary ıssues, 3–15. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
23. Gökdere, M. (2012). Sınıf öğretmenleri ile sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının kaynaştırma eğitimine yönelik tutum, endişe ve etkileşim düzeylerinin karşılaştırmalı incelemesi (A Comparative Study of the Attitude, Concern, and Interaction Levels of Elementary School Teachers and Teacher Candidates towards Inclusive Education). Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(4), 2789-2806.
24. Güner-Yıldız, N. (2015a). Individuals with mental retardation from the perspective of Turkish people. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(8), 1219-1226.
25. Güner-Yıldız, N. (2015b). Öğretmen adaylarının kaynaştırmayla ilgili olaylara bakışı. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 19-33.
26. Güner-Yıldız, N., & Sazak-Pınar, E. (2012). Examining teachers’ behavior related to students with special needs in inclusive classrooms. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 475-488.
27. Güner-Yıldız, N., & Sazak-Pınar, E. (2014). Examining approval and disapproval behaviors of teachers working in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Instruction, 7(1), 33-48.
28. Güner-Yıldız, N., Sazak-Pınar, E., & Melekoğlu, M.A. (2014). Türkiye’de sınıf yönetimi kitaplarında yetersizliği olan öğrencilere bakış (Examining Classroom Management Textbooks Published in Turkey in terms of Addressing Individuals with Disabilities). İlköğretim Online, 13(1).
29. Güven, D. & Gürsel, O. (2014). İlköğretimde kaynaştırılan zihinsel yetersizliği olan öğrencilerin başarılarının değerlendirilmesine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri (Educators’ Opinion about the Success Evaluation of Students with Intellectual Disabilities Included In Primary Education). İlköğretim Online, 13(1), 109-129.
30. Hanline, F.H. (2010). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of field experiences in inclusive preschool settings: implications for personnel preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(4), 335-351.
31. Hansen, J.H. (2012). Limits to inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(1), 89-98.
32. Hemmings, B. & Woodcock, S. (2011). Preservice teachers’ views of inclusive education: a content analysis. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 35(2), 103-116.
33. Jones, V. & Jones, L. (2001). Comprehensive classroom management creating communities of support and solving problems. 7.Edition. Pearson Education, Inc.
34. Jordan, A., Schwartz, E., & McGhie-Richmond, D. (2009). Preparing teachers for inclusive classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(4), 535-542.
35. Kargın, T., Güldenoğlu, B. & Şahin., F. (2010). Genel eğitim sınıflarındaki özel gereksinimli öğrenciler için yapılması gereken uyarlamalara ilişkin sınıf öğretmenlerinin görüşlerinin incelenmesi (Opinions of the General Education Teachers on the Adaptations for Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms). Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10(4), 2431-2464.
36. Killoran, I., Woronko, D. & Zaretsky, H. (2013). Exploring preservice teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(4):427-442.
37. Korkmaz, İ. (2011). Elementary teachers’ perceptions about implementation of inclusive education. US-China Education Review, 8(2), 177-183.
38. Kosir, K. & Tement, S. (2013). Teacher-student relationship and academic achievement: a cross-lagged longitudinal study on three different age groups. Eur J Psychol Educ, 29, 409-428.
39. Kunter, M., Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (2007). Effective classroom management and the development of subject-related ınterest. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 494-509.
40. Landrum, T. J., & Kauffman, J. M. (2006). Behavioral appro¬aches to classroom management. In C. M. Evertson, & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Rese-arch, practice and contemporary issues, (pp 3–15). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
41. La Salle, T.P., Roach, A.T., & McGrath, D.C. (2013). The relationship of IEP quality to curricular access and academic achievement for students with disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 28(1).
42. Available at: http://www.internationaljournalofspecialeducation.com/articles.cfm
43. Lemberger, M. E., & Clemens, E. V. (2012). Connectedness and self-regulation as constructs of the Student Success Skills program in inner-city African-American elementary students. Journal of Counseling and Development, 90(4), 450–458. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2012.00056.x
44. Logan, K. R., Bakeman, R., & Keefe, E. B. (1997). Effects of instructional variables on engaged behavior of students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 63, 481– 497.
45. McGee, M.R. (2001).Measuring effective teaching in inclusive classrooms. Thesis (M.A.)-University of Toronto.
46. McIntosh, R., Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., Haager, D., & Lee, O. (1993). Observations of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 60(3), 249-261.
47. Marzano, R. J., Marzano, J. S., & Pickering, D. J. (2003). Classroom management that works: research-based strategies for every teacher. Virginia: ASCD
48. Morrison, W.F., & Rude, H.A. (2002). Beyond textbooks: a rationale for a more inclusive use of literature in preservice special education teacher programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25(2), 114-123.
49. Özer, Y. & Anıl, D. (2011). Öğrencilerin fen ve matematik başarılarını etkileyen faktörlerin yapısal eşitsel modeli ile incelenmesi (Examining the factors affecting students’ science and mathematics achievement with structural equation modelling). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 41, 313-324.
50. Phillipson, S. & Phillipson, S.N. (2012). Childrens’ cognitive ability and their academic achievement: the mediation effects of parental expectations. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(3), 495-508.
51. Recchia, S. L., & Puig, V. I. (2011). Challenges and inspirations: student teachers' experiences in early childhood special education classrooms. Teacher Education & Special Education, 34(2), 133-151. doi:10.1177/0888406410387444
52. Ruble, L., & McGrew, J. H. (2013). Teacher and child predictors of achieving iep goals of children with Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(12), 2748-2763. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1884-x
53. Sadioğlu, Ö., Bilgin, A., Batu, S. & Oksal, A. (2013). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin kaynaştırmaya ilişkin sorunları, beklentileri ve önerileri (Problems, Expectations, and Suggestions of Elementary Teachers Regarding Inclusion). Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1743-65.
54. Sakız, H. & Woods, C. (2015). Achieving inclusion of students with disabilities in Turkey: current challenges and future prospects. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(1), 21-35.
55. Savaş, B. & Gürel, R. (2014). The variables affecting the success of students. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(1), 41-50.
56. Sazak-Pınar, E., & Güner-Yıldız, N. (2013). Investigating teachers’ approval and disapproval behaviors towards academic and social behaviors of students with and without special needs. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(1), 541-556.
57. Segedin, L. (2012). Listening to the student voice: understanding the school-related factors that limit student success. Journal of Education, 47(1).
58. Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D. & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31(3), 351-380.
59. Smith, R. M. (2000). Mystery or typical teen? The social construction of academic engagement and disability. Disability and Society, 15(6), 909-922.
60. Soodak, L.C., & McCarthy, M. R. (2006). Classroom management in ınclusive settings. Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (Ed.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice and contemporary ıssues, 3–15. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
61. Sucuoğlu, B., Bakkaloğlu, H., İşcen-Karasu, F., Demir, Ş. & Akalın, S. (2014). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin kaynaştırmaya ilişkin bilgi düzeyleri (Preschool Teachers’ Knowledge Levels about Inclusion). Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(4), 1467-1485.
62. Swinson, J., & Harrop, A. (2001). The differential effects of teac¬her approval and disapproval in junior and infant classrooms. Educational Psychology in Practice, 17(2), 157-167.
63. Thaver, T. & Lim, L. (2014). Attitudes of pre-service mainstream teachers in Singapore towards people with disabilities and inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(10), 1038-1052.
64. Thomson, C. (2013). Collaborative consultation to promote inclusion voices from the classroom. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(8), 882-894.
65. Tomlinson, C., & Jarvis, J. M. (2014). Case studies of success: Supporting academic success for students with high potential from ethnic minority and economically disadvantaged backgrounds. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37, 191–219.
66. Van Laarhoven, T., Munk, D.D., Lynch, K., Wyland, S., Dorsch, N., Zurita, L., Basma, J. & Rouse, J. (2006). Project ACCEPT: Preparing pre-servive special and general educators for inclusive education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 29(4), 209-212.
67. Varlıer, G. & Vuran, S. (2006). Okul öncesi eğitimi öğretmenlerinin kaynaştırmaya ilişkin görüşleri (The Views of Pre-School Teachers about Integration). Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 6(2), 553-585.
68. Walton, E. & Rusznyak, L. (2014). Affordances and limitations of a special school practicum as a means to prepare pre-service teachers for inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(9), 957-974.
69. Wang, M.C., Haertel, G.D., & Walberg, H.J. (1994). What helps students learn?. Educational Leadership, 51(4), 74–79.
70. Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57-67.