EFL Instructors’ Majors and Their Speaking Activity Choices for Informal Oral Assessment

Öz

The purpose of the study is to investigate frequently used speaking tasks in English classes at tertiary level in Turkey and differences in language instructors’ speaking activity choices for informal oral assessment with regard to their academic majors. As data collection tool, an electronic questionnaire was sent to 82 participant language instructors from different universities in Turkey in the academic year 2016-2017. The questionnaire included speaking activities that can be used with assessment purpose and the participants were asked to report the frequency of the activities they used. The data which was collected through the electronic questionnaire was analysed by using SPSS 22 software. Kruskal-Wallis test revealed statistically significant differences between participants’ academic majors and speaking activities they used for informal oral assessment. Seven oral assessment activities were found to differ in frequency according to academic majors; picture-cued tasks, giving instructions/directions, role-play, discussions/conversations, games, picture-cued storytelling, and retelling story/news event. The differences were compared by mean ranks and medians, and these differences were classified according to the creativity the task required. In the light of the findings, practical and theoretical implications are given with concluding remarks.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Speaking,oral assessment,communicative competence,academic major

Kaynakça

1. Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education.
2. Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education.
3. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Cheng, L., Rogers, T. & Hu, H. (2004). ESL/ EFL instructors’ classroom assessment practices: purposes, methods, and procedures. Language Testing, 21 (3) 360–389. doi: 10.1191/0265532204lt288oa
5. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. USA: MIT Press.
6. Chuang, Y. Y. (2009). An investigation of how teachers evaluate collage non-English major students’ oral proficiency and their attitude toward teaching speaking skills. Journal of Cheng Shiu University, Vol.22, 335-356.
7. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, U.K: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
8. Gulluoglu, O. (2004). Attıtudes towards Testıng Speakıng at Gazi Unıversıty Preparatory School of Englısh and Suggested Speakıng Tests. (Unpublished master thesis). Gazi University, Ankara

9. Höl, D. (2010). Perceptıons and attıtudes of the Englısh Language ınstructors and preparatory students towards testıng speakıng communıcatıvely ın the School of foreıgn languages at Pamukkale University. (Unpublished master thesis). Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
10. Hosseini, A.S. & Azarnoosh, M. (2014). Iranian EFL instructor’s oral Assessment practices: purposes, methods, procedures. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 98 (2014). 653 – 658. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.464
11. Kalayci, S. (2016). Spss uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayıncılık.
12. Kellermeier, G. M. (2010). Foreign Language Oral Assessment Practices in Florida Middle and High Schools. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Central Florida, U.S.A.
13. Louma, S. (2004). Assessing Speaking. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
14. McDonough, J. & McDonough, H.S. (1997). Research Methods for English Language Teachers. London: Arnold Publishing.
15. McDonough, J. (1993). Materials and Methods in ELT: A Teacher's Guide. Oxford, Cambridge: Blackwell.
16. Morrow, K. E. (1977). Techniques of Evaluation for a Notional Syllabus. London: University of Reading Centre for Applied Language Studies.
17. Nunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Oz, H. (2014). Turkish teachers’ practices of assessment for learning in the English as a foreign language classroom. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. Vol. 5, No. 4, 775-785. doi: 10.4304/jltr.5.4.775-785
19. Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS Survival Manual. Fourth Edition. England. Open University Press. ISBN: 0335242391
20. Rivera, C. (1984). Communicative Competence Approaches to Language Proficiency Assessment: Research and Application. England: Multilingual Matters
21. Roberts, J. (1998). Language Teacher Education. London; Arnold Publication. ISBN: 9780340646250
22. Seliger, H.W. & Shohamy E. (1990). Second Language Research Methods. England: Oxford University Press.
23. Shahzad, K. (2018). Spoken Language Testing Practices in National University of Modern Languages. Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 6(1), 291-314.
24. Siwathaworn, P., & Wudthayagorn, J. (2018). The impact of dynamic assessment on tertiary EFL students’ speaking skills. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 142-155.
25. Tarighat, S., & Khodabakhsh, S. (2016). Mobile-assisted language assessment: Assessing speaking. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 409-413.
26. Valette, R. M. (1977). Modern Language Testing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
27. Yorke, M. (2006) Employability in Higher Education: What It is-What It is Not. Learning & Employability Series 1. York: The Higher Education Academy.