The Legitimacy Of Humanitarian Intervention Issue And Liability Protection As A New Approach Search For Legitimacy

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 140 - 162, 01.05.2014

Ertuğrul Eryücel

Öz

This study examines the problem of the legitimacy of humanitarian intervention. Purpose of the study primarily humanitarian intervention about the legitimacy of the theoretical approaches to explain and then post-Cold War humanitarian intervention sample by addressing the international system of humanitarian intervention in a new search for legitimacy presented as “the responsibility to protect approach” is to explain.About the legitimacy of humanitarian intervention are two theoretical approaches. First opinion humanitarian intervention is evaluated as a practice contrary to international law because international law humanitarian intervention “equal sovereignty of states”, “prohibition of the use of force” and “prohibition interference in internal affairs” is contrary to the fundamental principles. Second opinion regarding human rights provisions in the UN Treaty and customary international law, citing argues that humanitarian intervention is legitimate.Post-Cold War humanitarian intervention as a result of the bad reputation of samples, the UN humanitarian intervention has addressed the issue again. UN adopted the “responsibility to protect approach”, as a search for a new legitimacy in humanitarian intervention is presented

Anahtar Kelimeler

Humanitarian intervention, legitimacy, responsibility to protect

İnsani Müdahalenin Meşruluğu Sorunu ve Yeni Bir Meşruiyet Arayışı Olarak Koruma Sorumluluğu Yaklaşımı

Öz

This study examines the problem of the legitimacy of humanitarian intervention.

Purpose of the study primarily humanitarian intervention about the legitimacy of the

theoretical approaches to explain and then post-Cold War humanitarian intervention

sample by addressing the international system of humanitarian intervention in a

new search for legitimacy presented as “the responsibility to protect approach” is to

explain.

About the legitimacy of humanitarian intervention are two theoretical approaches. First

opinion humanitarian intervention is evaluated as a practice contrary to international

law because international law humanitarian intervention “equal sovereignty of

states”, “prohibition of the use of force” and “prohibition interference in internal

affairs” is contrary to the fundamental principles. Second opinion regarding human

rights provisions in the UN Treaty and customary international law, citing argues that

humanitarian intervention is legitimate.

Post-Cold War humanitarian intervention as a result of the bad reputation of samples,

the UN humanitarian intervention has addressed the issue again. UN adopted the

“responsibility to protect approach”, as a search for a new legitimacy in humanitarian

intervention is presented.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Humanitarian intervention, Legitimacy, Responsibility to protect

Kaynakça

• Ağca, F., (2013), Suriye Krizinin Orta Doğu’daki Dönüşüm ve Bütünleşme Dinamikle- rine Etkisi, Bilge Strateji, Cilt 5, Sayı 8, Bahar 2013, ss.95-117.
• Arsava, A. F., (2011), Kuvvet Kullanma Yasağı-Egemenlik Prensibi ve İnsani Müdaha- le”, 21. Yüzyıl Türkiye Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı:34, Ekim, 2011, s.1-17.
• Aslan, G., (2000), Milletlerarası Hukuk, Temel Belgeler-Örnek Kararlar, İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi
• Bozkurt, E., (2011), İnsan Hakları Temel Metinler, Ankara: Asil Yayıncılık.
• Bozkurt, E., (1996), Birleşmiş Milletler Sisteminde Kuvvet Kullanımı ve Körfez Krizi Örneği, Konya: Atlas Kitabevi.
• Brownlie, I., (1995), Principles of Public İnternational Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Cassesse, A., (2005), International Law, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Chaumont, C., (1995), Birleşmiş Milletler, (çev.) Radi Başgut, İstanbul: İletişim Yayın- ları.
• Coıcoud, J. M., (2002), Legitimacy and Politics, New York: Chambridge University Press.
• Donnelly, J., (1995), Teoride ve Uygulamada Evrensel İnsan Hakları, (çev.) Mustafa Er- doğan ve Levent Korkut, Ankara: Yetkin Yayınevi.
• Dunne, T., and Gifkins, J., (2011), Libya and State of İntervention, Australian Journal of İnternational Affairs, 65(5), pp.1-15.
• Erdoğan, M., (2003), Anayasal Demokrasi, Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
• Hancılar, Ö., Uluslararası Hukukta İnsani Müdahale, Çankaya Üniversitesi Journal of Law, 7/2, Şubat, 2011, s.97-125.
• Hanover, J., and White, J., (2011), U.S.-NATO İntervention in Libya: Risks and Benefits, The Washington Institute, Policy Watch: 1763, February, pp.1-3.
• Heinze, E.A., (2006), Humanitarian Intervention and the War in Iraq: Norms, Discour- se and State Practice, Parameters: US Army War College Quarterly, Vol.36, No.1 pp.20-35.
• Hinsley, F. H., (1966), Sovereignty, New York: Basic Books.
• Hoffman, J., (1998), Sovereignty, Buckhingam: Open University Press.
• Göktürk, G., (2011), İnsani Müdahale Ne Kadar İnsani ve Lale Tarlasında Su Aygırı, 21. Yüzyıl Türkiye Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı:34, Ekim 2011, s.27-35.
• Gündüz, A., (2000), Milletlerarası Hukuk, Temel Belgeler-Örnek Kararlar, İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi, 2000.
• Jakobsen, P.V., (2002), Un Peace Operation in Africa Today and Tomorrow, İnternati- nal Peacekeeping: The Yearbook Of İnternational Peace Operation, (ed.) Michael Bothe and Boris Kondoch, Vol.7, Kluwer Law İnternational Hague, 2002, pp.153- 181.
• Kapani, M., (1992), Politika Bilimine Giriş, Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi.
• Keskin, F., (1998), Uluslararası Hukukta Kuvvet Kullanma: Savaş, Karışma ve Birleşmiş Milletler, Ankara: Mülkiyeliler Birliği Vakfı Yayınları.
• Keskin, F., (2006-2007), İnsancıl Müdahale: 1999 Kosova ve 2003 Irak Sonrası Durum, Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, Cilt: 3, Sayı:12, Kış 2006-2007, ss.49-70.
• Meray, S. L., (1977), Uluslararası Hukuk ve Uluslararası Örgütler, Ankara: Ankara Üni- versitesi Basımevi.
• Mohan, R. C., (2011), India, Libya and Principle of Non İnterventin, İnstitute of South Asian Studies, Nu:122, April 2011, pp.1-17.
• Özman, M. A., (1964), Devletlerin Egemenliği ve Milletlerarası Teşekküller, Ankara Üni- versitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt:21, Sayı:1-4, s.53-121.
• Öztürk, Z. A., (2011), İnsani Müdahale: Ne Kadar insani, Ne Kadar Siyasi?, 21. Yüzyıl Türkiye Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı:30, Haziran 2011, ss.23-28.
• Pazarcı, H., (1997), Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri III, Ankara: Turhan Kitabevi.Türk Dil Kurumu, Türkçe Sözlük, II. Cilt, s. 1545.
• Straus, S., (2005), Darfur and the Genocide Debate, Foreign Affairs, Vol: 84, Nu.1, Janu- ary/February 2005, pp.123-133.
• Telli, A., (2012), İnsani Müdahaleden Koruma Sorumluluğuna Geçiş: Eski Sorun, Yeni Kavram, Nevşehir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (1), 2012, ss.206- 220.
• Valentino, B. A., (2011), The True Costs of Humanitarian Intervention: The Hard Truth About a Noble Notion, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 90, Nu. 6, November-December 2011, pp.60-73.
• Vesel, D., (2004), The Lonely Pragmatist: Humanitarian Intervention in an Imperfect World, Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law, January 2004, pp.3-56.
• Western, J., and Goldstein, J. S., (2011), Humanitarian Intervention Comes of Age: Les- sons From Somalia to Libya, Foreign Affairs, Vol.90, Nu.6, November-December 2011, pp.48-59.
• Weber, M., (1962), Basic Concepts in Sociology, (çev.) H.P. Secher, New York: Cıtadel Press.
• Wheeler, N. J., (2000), Saving Strangers: Humanitarian İntervention in International Society, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Wheeler, N. J., (2004), The Humanitarian Responsibilities of Sovereignty: Explai- ning the Development of a New Norm of Military Intervention for Humanitarian Purposes in International Society, Humanitarian Intervention and Internatio- nal Relations, (ed.) Jennifer M. Welsh, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, pp.29-52.
• Yılmaz, S., (2011), Uluslararası Müdahale ve Meşruiyet, Libya Örneği, 21. Yüzyıl Türki- ye Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı:34, Ekim 2011, s.35-40.
• Report Of The İnternational Commission On İntervention And State Sovereignty, The Responsibility To Protect, International Development Research Centre, 2001.
• Rwanda: The Preventable Genocide İnternational Panel Of Eminent Personalities, Chap- ter:14-15.
• www.africa-union.org/official_documents/reports/report_rowanda_genocide.pdf
• http://www.unhcr.org/4fc88090b.html