DİJİTAL SAĞLIK DİPLOMASİSİ: SİSTEMATİK DERLEME

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 26, 173 - 193, 30.12.2024

Hatice Mutlu

https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1548858

Öz

Bu makalenin amacı, dijital sağlık diplomasisi üzerine yapılan çalışmaları sistematik bir derleme yöntemi kullanarak incelemek ve dijital sağlık diplomasisinin sağlık politika ve stratejileri bağlamında nasıl yönetildiğini belirlemektir. 2019-2024 yılları arasında yapılan toplam 39 çalışma incelenmiş, dâhil edilme kriterlerini karşılayan 5 çalışma araştırmaya dâhil edilmiştir. Sistematik inceleme aracı olarak PRISMA akış diyagramı kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, halk sağlığı teknolojisi uygulamalarında bilgi güvenliği konularının yanı sıra geliştirme ve çözüm odaklı stratejik iş birliklerinin öne çıktığını ortaya koymaktadır. Dijital sağlık diplomasisinin sosyoteknik egemenliğin sağlanmasında ve toplumsal krizlere hızlı çözümler üretilmesinde önemli bir rol oynadığı tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmada ayrıca dijital sağlık diplomasisinin yapılandırılması ve sürdürülebilmesi için güçlü bir dijital altyapı, yetkin diplomatlar ve sistematik yöntemlerin gerekli olduğu vurgulanmıştır. Sonuç olarak, halk sağlığı bağlamında küresel ve ulusal dijital sağlık stratejilerinin entegrasyonu, bir diplomasi aracı olarak bütüncül bir yaklaşımla değerlendirilmelidir. Dijital sağlık diplomasisi kapsamında yapılandırılan girişimlerin uygulanması için kaynak planlaması (bütçe, dijital altyapı, insan kaynakları vb.) strateji ile uyumlu hale getirilmelidir. Bu stratejilerin eyleme dönüştürülmesi sürecinde, tasarlanan süreçler etkin bir şekilde planlanmalı, izlenmeli ve uçtan uca optimize edilmelidir. Bu yaklaşım, tüm paydaşlar arasında koordinasyon sağlayarak süreçlerin sorunsuz bir şekilde yürütülmesini ve hedeflere ulaşılmasını mümkün kılacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dijital Sağlık Diplomasisi, Sağlık Diplomasisi, Dijital Sağlık, Sistematik Derleme

DIGITAL HEALTH DIPLOMACY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Öz

The aim of this article is to examine studies on digital health diplomacy using a systematic review method and to determine how digital health diplomacy is managed within the context of health policies and strategies. A total of 39 studies conducted between 2019 and 2024 were reviewed, with 5 studies meeting the inclusion criteria included in the research. The PRISMA flow diagram was used as the systematic review tool. The findings revealed that development- and solution-oriented strategic collaborations, along with information security issues, are prominent in public health technology applications. It was found that digital health diplomacy plays a significant role in ensuring sociotechnical sovereignty and providing rapid solutions to social crises. The study also highlighted that a robust digital infrastructure, competent diplomats, and systematic methods are necessary to structure and sustain digital health diplomacy. In conclusion, the integration of global and national digital health strategies in the context of public health should be evaluated through an integrated approach as a tool of diplomacy. Resource planning (budget, digital infrastructure, human resources, etc.) should be aligned with the strategy for the implementation of initiatives structured under digital health diplomacy. During the process of translating these strategies into action, the designed processes must be effectively planned, monitored, and optimized end-to-end. This approach will ensure coordination among all stakeholders, enabling the smooth execution of processes and the achievement of objectives.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digital Health Diplomacy, Health Diplomacy, Digital Health, Systematic Review

Kaynakça

• Abdurahmanlı, E. ve Bağış, E. (2021). Diplomasi tanımı ve uluslararası konjonktürde mevcut olan diplomasi türleri. Anadolu Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1), 140-160.
• Abernethy, A., Adams, L., Barrett, M., Bechtel, C., Brennan, P., Butte, A. ... ve Valdes, K. (2022). The promise of digital health: Then, now, and the future. 13 Ağustos 2024 tarihinde https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9499383/pdf/nampsp-2022-202206e.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
• Adler-Nissen, R. ve Eggeling, K. A. (2022). Blended diplomacy: The entanglement and contestation of digital technologies in everyday diplomatic practice. European Journal of International Relations, 28(3), 640-666.
• Al Knawy, B., McKillop, M. M., Abduljawad, J., Tarkoma, S., Adil, M., Schaper, L. ... ve Rhee, K. (2022). Successfully implementing digital health to ensure future global health security during pandemics: A consensus statement. JAMA Network Open, 5(2), e220214-e220214.
• Amir-Behghadami, M., ve Janati, A. (2020). Population, ıntervention, comparison, outcomes and study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews. 10 Ekim 2024 tarihinde https://emj.bmj.com/content/37/6/387 adresinden edinilmiştir.
• Aslan, A. (2018). Sistematik derleme ve meta-analizi. Acta Medica Alanya, 2(2), 62-63.
• Bjola, C. ve Manor, I. (2022). The rise of hybrid diplomacy: From digital adaptation to digital adoption. International Affairs, 98(2), 471-491.
• Brewer, L. C., Fortuna, K. L., Jones, C., Walker, R., Hayes, S. N., Patten, C. A. ve Cooper, L. A. (2020). Back to the future: Achieving health equity through health informatics and digital health. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(1), e14512.
• Brown, T. M., Cueto, M., ve Fee, E. (2006). The World Health Organization and the transition from “international” to “global” public health. American Journal of Public Health, 96(1), 62-72.
• Buitchoho, I, M. (2024). Digital health security regimes against covid-19 in multilateral system: From cleavage to utopia?. Journal of Security and Strategic Affairs, 1(3), 71-88.
• Chattu, V. K. (2022). “Digital global health diplomacy” for climate change and human security in the Anthropocene. Health Promotion Perspectives, 12(3), 277.
• Cory, N.ve Stevens, P. (2020). Building a global framework for digital health services in the era of COVID-19. 9 Ekim 2024 tarihinde https://itif.org/publications/2020/05/26/building-global-framework-digital-health-services-era-covid-19/ adresinden edilinmiştir.
• Çınar, N. ve Suzan, Ö. K. (2022). Sistematik derleme metodolojisi ve yazımı. Akademisyen Kitabevi.
• Fidler, D. P. (2001). The globalization of public health: the first 100 years of international health diplomacy. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79(9), 842-849.
• Getachew, E., Adebeta, T., Muzazu, S. G., Charlie, L., Said, B., Tesfahunei, H. A., ... ve Manyazewal, T. (2023). Digital health in the era of COVID-19: Reshaping the next generation of healthcare. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 942703.
• Gheorghiu, B. ve Hagens, S. (2017). Quantifying the benefits of digital health investments in Canada. International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, 9(3), 145-150.
• Godinho, M. A., Liaw, S. T., Kanjo, C., Marin, H. F., Martins, H. ve Quintana, Y. (2023). Digital vaccine passports and digital health diplomacy: An online model WHO simulation. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 30(4), 712-717.
• Godinho, M. A., Martins, H., Al-Shorbaji, N., Quintana, Y. ve Liaw, S. T. (2022). “Digital health diplomacy” in global digital health? A call for critique and discourse. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 29(5), 1019-1024.
• Gostin, L. O., Friedman, E. A., ve Wetter, S. A. (2020). Responding to COVID-19: How to navigate a public health emergency legally and ethically. Hastings Center Report, 50(3), 8-12.
• Ibeneme, S., Karamagi, H., Muneene, D., Goswami, K., Chisaka, N. ve Okeibunor, J. (2022). Strengthening health systems using innovative digital health technologies in Africa. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4, 854339.
• Kaboré, S. S., Ngangue, P., Soubeiga, D., Barro, A., Pilabré, A. H., Bationo, N. ... ve Savadogo, G. B. L. (2022). Barriers and facilitators for the sustainability of digital health interventions in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4, 1014375.
• Karaçam, Z. (2013). Sistematik derleme metodolojisi: Sistematik derleme hazırlamak için bir rehber. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 6(1), 26-33.
• Kemp, E., Trigg, J., Beatty, L., Christensen, C., Dhillon, H. M., Maeder, A. ... ve Koczwara, B. (2021). Health literacy, digital health literacy and the implementation of digital health technologies in cancer care: The need for a strategic approach. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 32, 104-114.
• Khan, S. ve Hoque, A. (2016). Digital health data: A comprehensive review of privacy and security risks and some recommendations. Computer Science Journal of Moldova, 71(2), 273-292.
• Kickbusch, I. ve Liu, A. (2022). Global health diplomacy—reconstructing power and governance. The Lancet, 399(10341), 2156-2166.
• Kobierecka, A. (2023). Post-covid China:‘vaccine diplomacy’and the new developments of Chinese foreign policy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 19(3), 280-293.
• Lee, K. ve Gomez, E. (2011). Global health diplomacy: A conceptual review. Global Health Governance, 5(1),1-12.
• LoTempio, J., Spencer, D., Yarvitz, R., Vilain, A. D.,ve Vilain, E. (2020). We can do better: lessons learned on data sharing in COVID-19 pandemic can inform future outbreak preparedness and response. Science ve Diplomacy, 9(2).
• Martinez, E. C., Valdés, J. R. F., Castillo, J. L., Castillo, J. V., Montecino, R. M. B., Jimenez, J. E. M., ... ve Diarte, E. (2023). Ten steps to conduct a systematic review. Cureus, 15(12), 1-11.
• Martins, H. M. (2020). Digital Health Diplomacy in chained globalised health context. Health Management Journal, 20(10), 712-715.
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. ve PRISMA Group, T. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269.
• Naderbagi, A., Loblay, V., Zahed, I. U. M., Ekambareshwar, M., Poulsen, A., Song, Y. J. ... ve LaMonica, H. M. (2024). Cultural and contextual adaptation of digital health interventions: Narrative review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e55130.
• Nittas, V., Daniore, P., Chavez, S. J. ve Wray, T. B. (2024). Challenges in implementing cultural adaptations of digital health interventions. Communications Medicine, 4(1), 7.
• Özen, O. (2017). Sağlık diplomasisi sağlık politikaları sistem analisti eğitimi. Medipol Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Raina MacIntyre, C., Engells, T. E., Scotch, M., Heslop, D. J., Gumel, A. B., Poste, G. ... ve Broom, A. (2018). Converging and emerging threats to health security. Environment Systems and Decisions, 38, 198-207.
• Sembajwe, R., Moeketsi, K. ve Wetzel-Chen, C. (2023). Impactful approach to identify national digital health investments for scale, with an aim towards sustainability. [Bildiri sunumu]. Proceedings of the 14th Health Informatics in Africa Conference.
• Towett, G., Snead, R. S., Grigoryan, K. ve Marczika, J. (2023). Geographical and practical challenges in the implementation of digital health passports for cross-border COVID-19 pandemic management: A narrative review and framework for solutions. Globalization and Health, 19(1), 98.
• ULAKBİM. (2017). ULAKBİM. 13 Ekim 2024 tarihinde https://ulakbim.tubitak.gov.tr/sites/images/Ulakbim/tubitak_ulakbim_eng.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
• van de Vijver, S., Tensen, P., Asiki, G., Requena-Méndez, A., Heidenrijk, M., Stronks, K., ... ve Agyemang, C. (2023). Digital health for all: how digital health could reduce inequality and increase universal health coverage. Digital Health, 9, 20552076231185434.
• Wang, B. ve Ping, Y. (2022). A comparative analysis of COVID-19 vaccination certificates in 12 countries/regions around the world: Rationalising health policies for international travel and domestic social activities during the pandemic. Health Policy, 126(8), 755-762.
• Wang, Q., Su, M., Zhang, M. ve Li, R. (2021). Integrating digital technologies and public health to fight Covid-19 pandemic: Key technologies, applications, challenges and outlook of digital healthcare. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 6053.
• Wells, C. R., Pandey, A., Fitzpatrick, M. C., Crystal, W. S., Singer, B. H., Moghadas, S. M. ... ve Townsend, J. P. (2022). Quarantine and testing strategies to ameliorate transmission due to travel during the COVID-19 pandemic: A modelling study. The Lancet Regional Health–Europe, 14, 100304.
• Whitehead, L., Talevski, J., Fatehi, F. ve Beauchamp, A. (2023). Barriers to and facilitators of digital health among culturally and linguistically diverse populations: Qualitative systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e42719.
• WHO ve ITU. (2020). Digital health platform: Building a digital information infrastructure (infostructure) for health. 1 Eylül 2024 tarihinde https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/337449/9789240013728-eng.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
• WHO. (2021). Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025. 15 Ağustos 2024 tarihinde https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/gs4dhdaa2a9f352b0445bafbc79ca799dce4d.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
• WHO. (2024). Health diplomacy. 10 Ağustos 2024 tarihinde https://www.emro.who.int/health-topics/health-diplomacy/index.html adresinden edinilmiştir.