The Relationship Between Metacognitive Awareness and Academic Self Efficacy Levels with Academic Achievement of Medical Students

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 339 - 348, 29.09.2025

Kübra Uyar Zekey , Meral Demirören

https://doi.org/10.53394/akd.1514696

Öz

Objective: Metacognitive awareness and academic self-efficacy are the basic concepts that affect academic achievement. Individuals who have their own study strategy, have sufficient motivation and also belief that they can succeed, have higher academic achievement. In this study, the relationship between metacognitive awareness and academic self-efficacy levels with academic achievement in medical students was analysed.
Materials and Methods: The study utilized descriptive- relational screening model and 396 medical students were included in the study. Personal information form, metacognition scale and academic self-efficacy scale were used in the study.
Results: As a result of the study, it was found that the scores of the students get from metacognition scale differed significantly and increased with age and class level (p<0.05). Metacognition scale scores of the students who voluntarily chose the medical school and did not fail the class, had high grades (p<0.05). Academic self-efficacy levels were higher in older students and those who graduated from Anatolian high school (p<0.05).The levels of metacognitive awareness and academic self-efficacy have been found to have a positive correlation with academic achievement (p<0.05).
Conclusion: It has been determined that who have high metacognitive awareness and academic self-efficacy levels also have high academic achievement. In order to raise students with high academic achievement, curriculum arrangements should be made to develop students' metacognitive awareness and academic self-efficacy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

metacognitive awareness , academic self efficacy , academic achievement , medical student

Tıp Fakültesi Öğrencilerinde Bilişüstü Farkındalık ve Akademik Öz Yeterlik Düzeylerinin Akademik Başarı ile İlişkisi

Öz

Amaç: Bilişüstü farkındalık ve akademik öz yeterlik, akademik başarıyı etkileyen temel kavramlardır. Kendi çalışma stratejisine ve yeterli güdülenmeye sahip olup başarabileceğine inanan bireylerin akademik başarıları da yüksek olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinde bilişüstü farkındalık ve akademik öz yeterlik düzeylerinin akademik başarı ile ilişkisi değerlendirilmiştir.
Materyal ve Yöntem: Çalışma tanımlayıcı-ilişkisel tarama modeline göre gerçekleştirilmiş olup 396 tıp öğrencisi çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Kişisel bilgi formu, bilişüstü farkındalık ölçeği ve akademik öz yeterlik ölçeği çalışmada kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular: Çalışmanın sonucunda, öğrencilerin bilişüstü farkındalık ölçeğinden aldıkları puanların yaş ve sınıf düzeyi ile önemli ölçüde farklılaştığı ve yaş ilerledikçe arttığı bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Tıp fakültesini isteyerek seçen ve sınıf tekrarı olmayan öğrencilerin bilişüstü farkındalık ölçeği puanları daha yüksektir (p<0.05). Akademik öz yeterlik düzeyleri ileri yaşta olan öğrencilerde ve anadolu lisesinden mezun olanlarda daha yüksektir (p<0.05). Bilişüstü farkındalık düzeyleri ve akademik öz yeterlik düzeylerinin akademik başarıyla pozitif korelasyonu bulunmuştur (p<0.05).
Sonuç: Yüksek bilişüstü farkındalık ve akademik öz yeterlik düzeyine sahip olanların yüksek akademik başarıya sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Akademik başarısı yüksek düzeyde öğrencilerin yetiştirilmesi için öğrencilerin bilişüstü farkındalıklarını ve akademik öz yeterliklerini geliştirmeye yönelik eğitim programı düzenlemeleri yapılmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

bililşüstü farkındalık , akademik öz yeterlik , akademik başarı , tıp fakültesi öğrencisi

Etik Beyan

Yazarlar çalışmanın Helsinki Bildirgesi ve İyi Klinik Uygulamalar Kılavuzuna göre yürütüldüğünü beyan eder.

Destekleyen Kurum

Bu çalışmayı destekleyen herhangi bir kurum/ kuruluş yoktur.

Teşekkür

-

Kaynakça

• 1. Eğmir E, Koçyiğit M. Higher education, why and how: a glance from university students. Route Educational and Social Science Journal 2015; 2(4):241-56.
• 2. Sarıer Y. The factors that affects students’ academic achievement of students in Turkey: A meta-analysis study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2016; 31(3):609-27.
• 3. Polat S. Analyzing academic failure based on social inequality. Eğitim Bilim Toplum Dergisi 2009; 7(25):46-61.
• 4. Özer Y, Anıl D. Examining the factors affecting students' science and mathematics achievement with structural equation modeling. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2011; 41:313-24.
• 5. Dağdelen S. Investigating the relationship between teachers' interpersonal behavior, classroom learning environment, and student achievement in biology classes [Master's thesis]. Istanbul: Marmara University; 2003.
• 6. Yıldız D. Metacognitive awareness and academic self-efficacy levels, motivational belief of secondary school 8th grade students and their turkish points on the system for transition to secondary education from basic education examination: A structural equation model trial. Tarih Okulu Dergisi 2015; 8(23):41-61.
• 7. Elaldı Ş. The effect of the mastery learning with reflective thinking activities on medical students’ metacognitive skills. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2016; 5(1):63-82.
• 8. Wang MC, Haertel GD, Walberg HJ. What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Educational Research 1990; 84:30-43.
• 9. Bandura A, Freeman WH, Lightsey R. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy 1999; 13(2).
• 10. Otacıoğlu SG. A research concerning the level of self efficacy-sufficiency of the apprentices ın music teaching who took a part in the test of school experience I. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2008; 32(1):163-70.
• 11. Akyürek M. The relationship between academic self-efficacy and academic motivation in teacher candidates: Hacettepe University example. Medeniyet Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 2020; 4(2):36-50.
• 12. Yılmaz M, Gürçay D, Ekici G. Adaptation of the academic self-efficacy scale to turkish. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2007; 33(33):253-59.
• 13. Karasar N. Scientific research method. Nobel Academic Publishing. Ankara; 2018.
• 14. Schraw G, Dennison S. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1994; 19: 460-75.
• 15. Turan S. The relationships between attitudes to problem-based learning, learning skills and achievement [Ph D Dissertation]. Ankara: Hacettepe University; 2009.
• 16. Turan S, Valcke M, De Maeseneer J, Aper L, Koole B, De Wispelaere CA, Deketelaere A, Derese A. A novel medical achievement self-efficacy scale (MASS): a valid and reliable tool. Medical Teacher 2013; 1-14.
• 17. Turan S, Elcin M, Derese A. Adaptation of the Medical Achievement Self-Efficacy Scale (MASS) into Turkish. The Bulletin of Contemporary Clinical Medicine 2017; 10: 53-7.
• 18. Turan S, Demirel Ö, Sayek İ. Metacognitive awareness and self-regulated learning skills of medical students in different medical curricula. Medical Teacher 2009; 31(10):e477-83.
• 19. Raeisi E, Solati K, Aazami MH, Shamsipour N, Sadeghian Z, Ahmady S. The impact of demographic and academic factors on metacognition and academic self-efficacy: A study on Iranian students in health sciences. Journal of Education and Health Promotion 2020; 1:8.
• 20. Bidjerano T. Gender differences in self-regulated learning. Paper presented at: The Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association; 2005; Kerhonkson, NY.
• 21. Ibrahim Ismail Ibrahim Z, Mohamed Rashad Ebrahim R. Metacognitive ability and academic self-efficacy: Their relations to role transition as perceived by nursing students. Egyptian Journal of Health Care 2021; 12: 1362-79.
• 22. Aykut Ç, Karasu N, Kaplan G. Determining the metacognitive awareness of special education teacher candidates. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi 2016; 17(3):231-45.
• 23. Kaçar M, Sarıçam H. The examination of the relationship between metacognitive awareness and math anxiety levels in pre-service primary school teachers. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2015; 5(2):137-52.
• 24. Yeniçıkan S. The relationship between self-regulation strategies and academic achievement at a university context [PhD thesis]. Mersin: Çağ University; 2020.
• 25. Oguz A, Ataseven N. The relationship between metacognitive skills and motivation of university students. Educational Process: International Journal 2016; 5(1):54-64.
• 26. Anderson NJ. The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest 2002; 1-4.
• 27. Özsoy G, Günindi Y. Prospective preschool teachers’ metacognitive awareness. Elementary Education Online 2011; 10(2):430-40.
• 28. Memnun DS, Akkaya R. The levels of metacognitive awareness of primary teacher trainees. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2009; 1(1):1919-23.
• 29. Birsen KN. Meta cognıtıve awareness and self-effıcacy of nursıng students and related factors [Master's thesis]. Istanbul: Istanbul Arel University; 2019.
• 30. Vural L, Gündüz GF. The relationship between academic procrastination behaviors and cognitive awareness levels of teacher candidates. Elementary Education Online 2019; 18(1):307-30.
• 31. Turan S, Demirel Ö. The relationship between self-regulated learnıng skills and achievement: A case from Hacettepe Unıversity Medical School. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2010; 38:279-91.
• 32. Bland LS. The effects of a self-reflective learning process on student art performance [PhD thesis]. Florida: Florida State University School of Visual Arts and Dance; 2005.
• 33. Hayat AA, Shateri K, Amini M, Shokrpour N. Relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning-related emotions, and metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students: a structural equation model. BMC Medical Education 2020; 20:76.
• 34. Young A, Fry JD. Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2008; 8(2):1-10.
• 35. Parlak A. The relationship among the medical student’s academic locus of control, self-efficacy and achivement. [Master's thesis]. Ankara: Hacettepe University; 2015.
• 36. Gül İ, Adıgüzel O. Examination of self-efficacy levels of undergraduate students studying in the department of health institutions management. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 2015; 8(36):864-75.
• 37. Özgül F, Diker G. Examination of academic self-efficacy and motivation according to demographic characteristics of graduate education candidates (Cumhuriyet University example). Journal of Human Sciences 2017; 14(2):2129-39.
• 38. Hongbin W, Shan L, Juan Z, Jianru G. Medical students’ motivation and academic performance: The mediating roles of self-efficacy and learning engagement. Medical Education Online 2020; 25:2-8.
• 39. Kafkas ME, Açak M, Çoban B, Karademir T. Investigation of the relationship between preservice physical education teachers’ sense of self-efficacy and professional concerns. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2010; 11(2):93-111.
• 40. Derman A. Chemistry student teachers` self efficacy beliefs and attitudes toward teaching profession [Ph D thesis]. Konya: Selçuk University; 2007.
• 41. Akkoyunlu B, Orhan F. The relationship between computer use self-efficacy belief and demographic characteristics of students in the Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technologies. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 2003; 2(3):86-93.
• 42. Liu X, Koirala H. The effect of mathematics self-efficacy on mathematics achievement of high school students. Paper presented at: The Annual Conference of the Northeastern Educational Research Association; 2009; University of Connecticut.
• 43. Klomegah RY. Predictors of academic performance of university students: An application of the goal efficacy. College Student Journal 2007; 41(2):407-15.
• 44. Emrahoğlu N, Öztürk A. The effect of metacognıtıon on the prospectıve scıence teachers’ academıc achıevement: An ex post facto research. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2010; 19(2):18-30.
• 45. Alimoğlu MK, Gürpınar E, Şenol Y, Çubukçu S, Aktekin M. Satisfaction of term I students of Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine with problem-based learning practices. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası 2004; 14:8-14.
• 46. Yardım S. The effects of feedback from standardized patients and faculty members in standardized patient practices on student motivation and communication skills [Master's thesis]. Antalya: Akdeniz University; 2016.