Yabancı Dil Eğitiminde Üstbiliş Stratejileri Eğitiminin Rolü: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması

Öz

Yeni bir dil öğrenilirken ana dil ile benzer beceriler kazanılsa da birinci ve ikinci dilin öğrenilme süreçleri birbirinden oldukça farklıdır. Birey ilk dili ailesinden ve yakın çevresinden doğal bir süreçte edinirken ikinci dili kendi iradesi ve çabasıyla öğrenir. Meta-bilişsel stratejilerin üç sürecini oluşturan planlama, izleme ve değerlendirme öğrenenin süreç boyunca aktif olmasını sağlamaktadır. Yabancı dil eğitiminde üst biliş stratejilerini kullanmak öğrencilerin dil becerilerini kazanmasını olumlu yönde etkilemektedir. Alanyazında üst biliş stratejileri eğitiminin öğrencilerin yabancı dili öğrenmesindeki etkisini inceleyen bir dizi araştırma yapılmıştır ancak tüm bu araştırmaları kapsayan ve strateji eğitiminin öğrencilerin yabancı dil öğrenimine etkisinin ne düzeyde olduğunu tespit eden bir çalışmaya rastlanamamıştır. Bu araştırmada Türkiye’de ve dünyada üst biliş stratejileri eğitiminin öğrencilerin yabancı dil öğrenmesine etkisini inceleyen çalışmalar meta-analiz yöntemiyle bir araya getirilmiştir. Yapılan analiz sonucunda üst biliş stratejileri eğitiminin öğrencilerin yabancı dil öğrenmesinde geniş düzeyde etkiye sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Yapılan alt grup analizleri sonucunda, dil becerilerine ve çalışma grubuna göre etki büyüklükleri arasında anlamlı farklılık tespit edilememiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dil Eğitimi
• Yabancı Dil Eğitimi
• Dil Becerileri

The Role of Metacognitive Strategies Training in Foreign Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis Study

Abstract

You similar skills are acquired when learning a new language; however, learning processes of the first and second languages are quite different from each other. While individuals acquire the first language from their family and close environment in a natural process, they learn a second language with their own will and effort. Planning, monitoring and evaluation, which constitute the three processes of meta-cognitive strategies, ensure that the learner is active throughout the learning process. Using metacognitive strategies in foreign language education positively affects students' acquisition of language skills. In the literature, there are studies examining the effect of metacognitive strategies training on students' foreign language learning; however, no study that discusses all these studies and determines the level of the effect of strategy training on students' foreign language learning was found. In this study, the studies investigating the effect of metacognitive strategies training on students' foreign language learning in Turkey and across the world were compiled using meta-analysis method. The results of the analysis showed that metacognition strategies training had a large effect on students' foreign language learning. As a result of the subgroup analysis, no significant difference was found between the effect sizes by language skills and study group.

Keywords

• Language Education
• Foreign Language Education
• Language Skills.

Kaynakça

1. Alamri, B. (2019). Exploring metacognitive strategies employed by esl writers: uses and awareness. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(1), 159-168. doi:10.5539/ijel.v9n1p159
2. *Al Qahtani, A. (2020). Investigating metacognitive think-aloud strategy in improving saudi EFL learners' reading comprehension and attitudes. English Language Teaching, 13(9), 50-62.DOI: 10.5539/elt.v13n9p50
3. Ateş, M. (2023). Examining the use of methods and techniques used in teaching writing skills in writing activities in Turkish course books. Ahmet Keleşoğlu Education Faculty Journal (AKEF) Journal, 5(3), 1173-1182.
4. Batang, B. L. (2015). Metacognitive strategy awareness and reading comprehension of prospective pre-service secondary teachers. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(4), 62-67.
5. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T. & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
6. Cemiloğlu, M. & Ogur, E. (2016). Cognition and metacognitive strategies in reading instruction. International Journal of Human and Art Studies, 1(1), 46-53.
7. Chon, Y. V. & Shin, T. (2019). Profile of second language learners' metacognitive awareness and academic motivation for successful listening: A latent class analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 70, 62-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.01.007
8. *Chou, M. (2016). A task-based language teaching approach to developing metacognitive strategies for listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 0(0), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2015.1098542

9. Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and metaanalysis (2nd edition). New York: Russell Sage Publication.
10. *Coşkun, A. (2010). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 4(1), 35-50.
11. Çırak Kurt, S., Yıldırım, İ., & Cücük, E. (2018). The effects of blended learning on student achievement: A meta-analysis study. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 33(3), 776-802. doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2017034685
12. *Çubukçu, F. (2008). How to enhance reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. The Journal of International Social Research, 1(2), 83-93.
13. *Dabarera, C., Renandya, W. A. & Zhang, L. J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding and monitoring on reading comprehension. System, 42,462-473.
14. Damanik, B. A. R. (2019). The effect of metacognitive strategy on the English learners’ vocabulary mastery. Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning (SALTeL) Journal, 2(2), 45-55. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35307/saltel.v2i2.31
15. Deniz, K. & Çekici, Y. E. (2023). List of current language functions based on needs analysis within the scope of teaching Turkish as a foreign language. Necmettin Erbakan University Ahmet Keleşoğlu Faculty of Education Journal, 5(2), 374-401.
16. Dinçer, S. (2014). Introduction to meta-analysis. Ankara: Ani Publishing
17. *Dousti, H. & Abolfathiasl, H. (2013). The effect of metacognitive listening strategy training on EFL learners’ listening sub-skills performance, International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2 (4), 50-55.
18. *Habibian, M. (2015). The impact of training metacognitive strategies on reading comprehension among ESL learner’s. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(28), 61-69.
19. Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring a new area of cognitive developmental ınquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
20. Ghapanchi, Z. & Taheryan, A. (2012). Roles of linguistic knowledge, metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive strategy use ın speaking and listening proficiency of ıranian EFL learners. World Journal of Education, 2(4), 64-75. DOI: 10.5430/wje.v2n4p64
21. *Jafari, D. & Ketabi, S. (2012). Metacognitive strategies and reading comprehension enhancement in Iranian ıntermediate EFL setting. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v4i3.1684
22. Karbalaei, A. (2011). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Íkala, Revista De Lenguaje Y Cultura, 16(28), 5-14.
23. *Katrancı, M. & Yangın, B. (2013). Üstbiliş stratejileri öğretiminin dinlediğini anlama becerisine ve dinlemeye yönelik tutuma etkisi. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(11), 733-771.
24. *Kramarski, B. & Feldman, Y. (2000). Internet in the classroom: effects on reading comprehension, motivation and metacognitive awareness. Educational Media International, 37(3), 149-155. DOI: 10.1080/09523980050184709
25. *Lv, F. & Chen, H. (2010). A study of metacognitive-strategies-based writing instruction for vocational college students. English Language Teaching, 3(3), 136-144.
26. *Mahdavi, M. (2014). Metacognitive strategy training and vocabulary learning in an “input -poor” environment. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research, 2, 389-398.
27. *Mehrdad, A. G., Ahghar, M. R. & Ahghar, M. (2012). The effect of teaching cognitive and metacognitive strategies on EFL students' reading comprehension across proficiency levels. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3757 – 3763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.142
28. *Muhid, A., Amalia, E. R., Hılalıyah, H., Budıana, N. & Wajdi, M. B. N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive strategies ımplementation on students’ reading comprehension achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 847-862. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13257a
29. *Nguyen, T. M. T. & Trinh, L. Q. (2011). Learners' metacognitive strategy use and reading comprehension: Insights from a vietnamese context. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 1(1), 9-19.
30. Osuji, C. J. (2017). Cognitive and metacognitive strategy use in first and second language reading comprehension [Phd Thesis, Essex University]. Department of Language and Linguistics. https://repository.essex.ac.uk/19961/1/Chinedu
31. *Pei, T. & Suwanthep, J. (2019). Effects of web-based metacognitive listening on Chienese university EFL learners' listening comprehension and metacognitive awareness. Indonesıan Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 480-492. doi: 10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20246
32. *Pitenoee, M. R., Modaberi, A. & Ardestani, E. M. (2017). The effect of cognitive and metacognitive writing strategies on content of the Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ writing. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(3), 594-600. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0803.19
33. *Rahimirad, M. & Shams, M. R. (2014). The effect of activating metacognitive strategies on the listening performance and metacognitive awareness of EFL students. International Journal of Listening, 28(3), 162-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2014.902315
34. *Rasouli, M., Mollakhan, K. & Karbalaei, A. (2013). The effect of metacognitive listening strategy training on listening comprehension in Iranian EFL context. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(1), 115-128
35. *Selamath, S. & Sidhu, G. K. (2012). Enhancing listening comprehension: The role of metacognitive strategy instruction (MetSI). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 421-430.
36. Sur, E. (2022). Okuduğunu anlama becerisini etkileyen çeşitli değişkenler: bir meta analiz çalışması. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 51(236), 3061-3080. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.941696
37. Suryantari, H. (2018). Children and adults in second-language learning. Tell Journal, 6(1), 30-38.
38. *Tabrizi, A. R. N. & Rajaee, M. (2016). The effect of metacognitive and cognitive writing strategies on Iranian elementary learners’ writing achievement. International Journal of Learning and Development, 6(3), 216-229. doi:10.5296/ijld.v6i3.9935
39. *Takallou, F. (2011). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on EFL learners’ reading comprehension performance and metacognitive awareness. Asian EFL Journal, 13(1), 272-300.
40. *Teng, F. (2019). The role of metacognitive knowledge and regulation in mediating university EFL learners’ writing performance. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(2), 1-15. DOI: 10.1080/17501229.2019.1615493
41. *Tišma, D. J. (2016). Improving listening comprehension skills relying on metacognitive strategies – focus on vocabulary and specific L2 instruction. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoska istrazivanja, 48(2), 2016-301.
42. *Wang, J., Spencer, K. & Xing, M. (2009). Metacognitive beliefs and strategies in learning Chinese as a foreign language. System, 37, 46–56.
43. Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 54-69.
44. Zhang, X. & Guo, M. (2019). Metacognition and second language learning. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 428, 88-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6325