From the Metaphysical Sanctıty to Virtual Reality: Digıial Religion

Yıl 2022, , 253 - 278, 16.05.2022

Mustafa Alıcı

https://doi.org/10.31126/akrajournal.1052248

Cited By: 1

Öz

It is seen that the phenomenon of religion comes to the forefront as virtual reality, as the internet becomes more and more globally widespread and has multiple systems with technological tools. In the postmodern age, its digital religion, which transforms everything into a virtual character, especially in the reality-virtual dichotomy, has gained the "ubiquitos" and "always accessible" feature. "Digital religion" or "e-din", as a unique spirituality field of the digital age, has been the most important indicator of the fact that the "updating" of religion in accordance with this age is the basic and essential form. Thus, digital religion operates in a "virtual realization" with a more eclectic definition in accordance with postmodernity. In this state, digital religion, as a cyber- cult, acquires a structure of "virtual accuracy" with its own authority in the virtual world with forms of spirituality such as cyber religiosity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

digital religion, postmodernism, virtual reality, hermeneutics, internet

Metafizik Kutsallıktan Sanal Gerçekliğe: Dijital Din

Öz

İnternet’in küresel açıdan gittikçe yaygınlaşması ve teknolojik araçlarla çoklu sistemlere sahip olmasıyla din olgusunun sanal gerçeklik olarak öne çıktığı görülmektedir. Postmodern çağda bilhassa realite- virtüalite dikotomisinde her şeyi virtüel karakterini baskın hâle dönüştüren dijital din, “her yerde bulunan (ubiquitos)” ve “her zaman erişebilen” özelliğe kavuşmuştur. Dijital çağın kendine özgü bir maneviyat alanı olarak “dijital din” veya “e-din”, dinin bu çağa uygun olarak “güncellenmesinin” temel ve asli form olmasının en önemli göstergesi olmuştur. Böylece dijital din, kendini postmoderniteye uygun olarak daha eklektik bir tanımla “virtüel bir realizasyon” içinde işlemektedir. Bu hâliyle dijital din, sanal bir kült formunda sanal dünyada siber dindarlıklar gibi maneviyat formlarıyla kendi otoritesine sahip “virtüel doğruluğa malik bir yapıya kavuşmaktadır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

dijital din, postmodernizm, sanal gerçeklik, Hermenötik, internet

Kaynakça

• Alıcı, Mustafa. “Post-Hermeneutica: Postmodern Dönem Din Bilimlerinde Hermenötik”. Akra Kültür- Sanat ve Edebiyat Dergisi, 21/8 (2020), 13- 54.
• Anderson, J. “Internet and Islam’s New Interpreters”. New Media in the Muslim World, ed. D. Eickelman, 45-60. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999.
• Ameli, Saied Reza. “Virtual Religion and Duality of Religious Spaces”. Asian Journal of Social Science, 37/2 (2009), 208-231.
• Brasher, B. Give Me that Online Religion. San Fransisco: Jossey- Bass, 2001.
• Campbell, Heidi A. “Community”, Digital Religion: Understanding Religius Practive in New Media Worlds. ed. Heidi A. Campbell. 57- 71. London-New York: Routledge, 2013.
• Campbell, Heidi A. “Introduction- The Rise of the Study of Digital Religion”, Digital Re-ligion: Understanding Religius Practive in New Media Worlds. ed. Heidi A. Campbell. 1- 2. London-New York: Routledge, 2013.
• Campbell Heidi- M. Lövheim. “Studying the Online –Offline Connection in Religion On-line”. Information, Communication and Society, 14/8, 1083- 1096.
• Cheong, Pauline Hope. “Authority”. Digital Religion: Understanding Religius Practive in New Media Worlds. ed. Heidi A. Campbell. 72- 87. London-New York: Routledge, 2013.
• Cowan, Douglas E., Cyberhenge: Modern Pagan of the Internet. New York– London: Ro-utledge, 2005.
• Dawson Lorne. - Douglas Cowan E., Religion Online: Finding Faith on the Internet. New York: Routledge, 2004.
• Dawson, Lorne. “Researching Religion in Cyberspace: Issues and Strategies”, Religion on the Internet: Research Prospects and Promises, ed. J. K. Hadden- D. E. Cowan. 25-54. New York: JAI Press, 2000.
• Doorn, N. Van. “Digital Spaces, Material Traces: How Matter Comes to Matter in Online Performances of Gneder, Sexuality and Embdoiment”. Media, Culture and Society, 33(2011), 531- 547.
• Foucault, Michel. Aesthetics, Method, And Epistemology. ed. James D. Faubion, trans. Robert Hurley, New York: New Press, 1998.
• Foucault, Michel. The Politics of Truth, ed. Sylvere Lotringer, New York: New Press, 1997.
• Handler, Richard. “Authencity”. Anthropology Today, 2/1 (1986), 2-4.
• Helland, Christopher. “Ritual”. Digital Religion: Understanding Religius Practive in New Media Worlds, ed. Heidi A. Campbell. 25- 40. London-New York: Routledge, 2013.
• Hewitt, J. P. Self and Society: A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology. Needham He-ights: Allyn and Bacon, 2000.
• Hojsgaard, M. “Cyber- Religion: On the Cutting Edge between the Real and the Virtual”. Religion and Cyberspace, ed. M. Hojsgaard- M. Warburg. 50-63. London: Routledge, 2005.
• Hoover, Steward. “Foreword”, Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practices and Futures, ed. P. H. Cheong- P. Fisher- Nielsen. VII- XI. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2012.
• Grimes, R. Beginnings in Rituel Studies. Washington: University Press of America, 1982.
• Grieve, Gregory Price. “Religion”. Digital Religion: Understanding Religius Practive in New Media Worlds, ed. Heidi A. Campbell. 104- 118. London-New York: Routledge, 2013.
• Kim, M. C. “Online Buddhist Community”. Religion in Cyberspace, Routledge, 2005, 138- 148.
• King, Ursula. “Historical and Phenomenological Approaches to the Study of Religion”. Contemporaray Approaches to The Study of Religion. 29- 164. ed. Frank Whaling, Berling- New York: Mouton Publishers, Moulton Publishers, 1983, vol I.
• Kitchin, R. Cyberspace: The World in Wires. Chichester: Wiley, 1998.
• Lövheim, Mia. “Identity”. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds, ed. Heidi A. Campbell. 41- 56. London-New York: Routledge, 2013.
• Meyrowits, J. No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.
• Palmer, E. Richard. “Postmodernity and Hermeneutics”. Boundry 2, 5/2 (Winter 1977), 363- 394.
• Palmer, E. Richard. “Postmodern Hermeneutics and The Act of Reading”, Notre Dame English Journal, 15/3 (Summer 1983), 55- 84.
• Patton, Kimberly C.- Benjamin C. Ray. “Introduction”. A Magic Still Dwells- Comparative Religion in the Postmodern Age, ed. Kimberly C. Patton- Benjamin C. Ray. 1-19. Los Angeles- London: Berkeley, 2000.
• Radde- Antweiler, Kerstin, “Authenticity”. Digital Religion: Understanding Religius Practive in New Media Worlds, ed. Heidi A. Campbell, 88-103. London-New York: Routledge, 2013.
• Rheingold, H. The Virtual Community. New York: Harper Perennial, 1993.
• Ricoeur, Paul. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Çev- ed. John B. Thomson, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
• Ricoeur, Paul. Interperation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Texas Christian University Press, Forth Worth 1976.
• O’leary, Stephen. “Cyberspace as Sacred Sace: Communicating Religion on Computer Networks”. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 64/4 (1996), 781- 808.
• Taylor, T. L. “Life in Virtual Worlds: Plural Existence, Multimodalities, and Other Online Research Challenges”. American Behavioral Scientist, 43/3 (1996), 435- 449.
• Turner, B. S. “Religious Authority and the New Media”. Theory, Culture and Society, 24/2 (2007), 117- 134.
• Zaleski, J. The Soul of Cyberspace: How Technology is Changing Our Spiritual Lives. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco, 1997.