Monitoring Postseismic Deformations in Izmir and Its Surroundings After the 30 October 2020 Mw:6.9 Samos Earthquake

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 6, 1442 - 1455, 02.12.2024

Halil İbrahim Solak , İbrahim Tiryakioğlu , Sefa Yalvaç , Cemal Özer Yiğit , Bahadır Aktuğ , Haluk Özener , Ergin Dönmez , Ertuğrul Demirelli , Eda Esma Eyübagil , Ece Bengünaz Çakanşimşek , Cemil Gezgin , Furkan Şahiner

https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.1465489

Öz

On October 30, 2020, an earthquake with a magnitude of Mw:6.9 occurred north of Samos Island. This earthquake caused loss of life and property in Izmir city center and some districts. Studies conducted in Izmir and its south showed that there was a horizontal displacement of 4-14 cm in Izmir and its south, the largest of which was in Seferihisar. In this region, however, there are many active faults with the potential to produce earthquakes between Mw:6.1 and Mw:6.9. A 27-site GNSS network has been established to monitor the postseismic deformation in this region since an earthquake can affect the earthquakes that may be caused by nearby faults. In this network, 4 campaign GNSS measurements were carried out in 6-month periods between 2020-2022. Eurasian fixed velocities of all sites were obtained using GNSS data. The results show that the differences between the points in the network both between themselves after the earthquake and between the pre-earthquake velocities reached 6 mm, indicating that the postseismic effect continues in the region.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Samos earthquake, GNSS, postseismic deformation, tectonic

30 Ekim 2020 Mw:6.9 Sisam Depremi Sonrası İzmir ve Çevresinde Postsismik Deformasyonların İzlenmesi

Öz

30 Ekim 2020 tarihinde Sisam adası kuzeyinde Mw:6.9 büyüklüğünde bir deprem meydana gelmiştir. Bu deprem İzmir şehir merkezinde ve bazı ilçelerinde can ve mal kayıplarına yol açmıştır. Deprem sonrası İzmir ve güneyinde yapılan çalışmalar, en büyüğü Seferihisar'da olmak üzere İzmir ve güneyinde 4-14 cm arasında değişen miktarlarda yatay atım meydana geldiğini göstermiştir. İzmir ve güneyinde ise Mw:6.1 ile Mw:6.9 arasında deprem üretme potansiyeline sahip olan diri faylar yer almaktadır. Meydana gelen bir depremin civardaki fayların neden olabileceği depremleri etkileyebilmesi nedeniyle bu bölgede postsismik deformasyonun takip edilmesi amacıyla 27 noktalık bir GNSS ağı kurulmuştur. Bu ağda 2020-2022 arasında 6 aylık periyotlar halinde 4 kampanya GNSS ölçümü gerçekleştirilmiştir. GNSS verileri kullanılarak tüm noktaların Avrasya sabit hızları elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar ağdaki noktaların hem deprem sonrasında kendi aralarındaki hem de deprem öncesi hızlarla aralarındaki farkların 6 mm'ye ulaştığını, buna bağlı olarak bölgede postsismik etkinin devam ettiğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sisam depremi, GNSS, postsismik deformasyon, tektonik

Kaynakça

• Akıncı, A,, Cheloni, D. and Dindar, A.A, 2021. The 30 October 2020 Samos (Eastern Aegean Sea) Earthquake: effects of source rupture, path and local-site conditions on the observed and simulated ground motions, PREPRINT (Version 1). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-215817/v1
• Aktar, M., Karabulut, H., Özalaybey, S., Childs, D., 2007. A conjugate strike-slip fault system within the extensional tectonics of Western Turkey, Geophysical Journal International, 171(3), 1363-1375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365246X.2007.03598.x
• Aktuğ B., Tiryakioğlu İ., Sözbilir H., Özener H., Özkaymak Ç., Yiğit C.Ö., Solak H.İ., Eyübagil E.E., Gelin B., Tatar O., Softa M., Kavak S., 2021. GPS derived finite source mechanism of the 30 October 2020 Samos earthquake, Mw =6.9, in the Aegean extensional region, Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 30( 8), 718-737. https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-2101-18
• Akurgal, E., 1997. Eski İzmir I Yerleşme Katları ve Athena Tapınağı, Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 264.
• Akyol, N., Zhu, L., Mitchell, B. J., Sözbilir, H. Kekovalı, K., 2006. Crustal structure and local seismicity in western Anatolia. Geophysical Journal International, 166(3), 1259-1269.
• Ambraseys, N.N., 2009. Earthquakes in the Mediterranean and Middle East: a multidisciplinary study of seismicity up to 1900. Cambridge University Press.
• Ambraseys, N.N., and Finkel, C., 1995. The seismicity of Turkey and adjacent areas: a historical review 1500-1800, Virginia University, 240.
• Cadoux, C.J., 1938. Ancient Smyrna: a history of the city from the earliest times to 324 AD, Oxford: Blackwell, 438.
• Baykara, T., 1974. İzmir şehri ve tarihi, Ege Üniversitesi Matbaası, 173.
• Bonito, M., 1691. Terra tremante, o vero continuatione de’terremoti dalla Creatione del Mondo sino al tempo presente, Napoli, 460 p.
• Bozkurt, E., 2001. Neotectonics of Turkey–a synthesis, Geodinamica acta, 14(1-3), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09853111.2001.11432432
• Bozkurt, E., 2003. Origin of NE-trending basins in western Turkey, Geodinamica acta,16(2-6), 61-81.
• Bozkurt, E. and Sözbilir, H., 2004. Tectonic evolution of the Gediz Graben: field evidence for an episodic, two-stage extension in western Turkey, Geological Magazine, 141(1), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756803008379
• Calvi, V.S., 1941. Erdbebenkatalog der Turkei und Einiger Benaehbarter Gebiete, MTA Enstitüsü, 276.
• Caputo, R. and Helly, B., 2005. The Holocene activity of the Rodia Fault, Central Greece. Journal of Geodynamics, 40(2-3), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2005.07.004
• Çırmık, A., Pamukçu, O. and Gönenç, T., 2017. The Stress/Strain Analysis of Kinematic Structure at Gülbahce Fault and Uzunkuyu Intrusive (İzmir, Turkey). Pure and Applied Geophysics, 174, 1425-1440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1474-5
• Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Deprem Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi (DUAM) 2020, 30 EKİM 2020 Sisam (Samos) depremi (Mw: 6.9) değerlendirme raporu.
• Dewey, J.F. and Şengör, A.M.C., 1979. Aegean and Surrounding Regions: Complex Multiple and Continuum Tectonics In a Convergent Zone, Geological Society of America Bulletin, 90, 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1979)90<84:AASRCM>2.0.CO;2
• Döğer, E., 2006. İzmir'in Smyrna'sı: Paleolitik Çağ'dan Türk Fethine Kadar, İletişim Yayıncılık, 196.
• Duman, T.Y., Emre, Ö., Özalp, S., Çan, T., Olgun, Ş., Elmacı, H., Şaroğlu, F., 2017. Türkiye Sismotektonik Haritası Açıklama Kitabı, Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Özel Yayınlar Serisi, 34-12.
• Emre, Ö., Özalp, S., Doğan, A., Özaksoy, V., Yıldırım, C., Göktaş, F., 2005. İzmir yakın çevresinin diri fayları ve deprem potansiyelleri, 10754, MTA, 1-80.
• Emre, Ö., Duman, T.Y., Özalp, S., Olgun, Ş., Elmacı, H., 2011. Active Fault Map of Turkey (Scale 1:250,000), General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration Special Publication Series, MTA, Quadrangle,16, (NJ 36-5).
• Emre, Ö., Duman, T.Y., Özalp, S., Olgun, Ş., Elmacı, H., Şaroğlu, F., Çan, T. 2018. Active fault database of Turkey, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16(8), 3229-3275 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0041-2
• Emre, T. and Sözbilir, H., 1997. Field evidence for metamorphic core complex, detachment faulting and accommodation faults in the Gediz and Büyük Menderes grabens, western Anatolia, Iesca Proceedings, 1, 73-93.
• Ersoy, E.Y., Helvaci, C., Uysal, I., Karaoğlu, O., Palmer, M.R., ve Dindi, F., 2012. Petrogenesis of the Miocene volcanism along the Izmir–Balıkesir Transfer Zone in western Anatolia, Turkey: implications for origin and evolution of potassic volcanism in postcollisional areas. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 241–242: 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2012.05.022
• Eyübagil, E.E., 2020. GNSS ölçüleri ile tektonik hareketlerin modellenmesi: Gülbahçe fayı örneği , Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Afyonkarahisar, 87.
• Eyübagil, E.E., Solak, H.İ., Kavak, U.S., Tiryakioğlu, İ., Sözbilir, H., Aktuğ, B., Özkaymak, Ç., 2021. Present-day strike-slip deformation within the southern part of İzmir Balıkesir Transfer Zone based on GNSS data and implications for seismic hazard assessment, western Anatolia, Turkish Journal of Earth Science, 30, 143-160. https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-2005-26
• Foumelis, M., Papazachos, C., Papadimitriou, E., Karakostas, V., Ampatzidis, D., Moschopoulos, G., Chatzipetros, A., 2021. On rapid multidisciplinary response aspects for Samos 2020 M7. 0 earthquake, Acta Geophysica, 69, 1025-1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-021-00578-6
• Geçkin, B.Ş. 2021. Gülbahçe Fay Zonunun Paleosismolojisi ve Deprem Üretme Potansiyeli, İzmir, Batı Anadolu, Doktora Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir, 219
• Guidoboni, E., Traina, G. and Comastri, A., 1994. Catalogue of ancient earthquakes in the Mediterranean sea up to the 10th century. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica, 486. https://hdl.handle.net/11587/112165
• Herring, T.A., King, R.W., Floyd, M.A., McClusky, S.C., 2018. Introduction to GAMIT/GLOBK, Release 10,7, Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Mass. Inst. of Technology,168.
• Kavak, U.S., 2020. GNSS ölçüleriyle fayların izlenmesi: Karaburun Fayı Örneği, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Afyonkarahisar, 47.
• Kiratzi, A., Papazachos, C., Özacar, A., Pinar, A., Kkallas, C., Sopac, E., 2021. Characteristics of the 2020 Samos earthquake (Aegean Sea) using seismic data, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering,07713–7735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01239-1
• Koçyiğit, A., Yusufoğlu, H. and Bozkurt, E., 1999. Evidence from the Gediz Graben for episodic two-stage extension in western Turkey, Journal of Geological, 79, 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.156.3.0605
• Lahn, N.P.E. and PINAR, N., 1952. Türkiye depremleri izahlı kataloğu, Akın Matbaacılık. 153.
• Lentas, K., Gkarlaouni, C.G., Kalligeris, N., Melis, N. S. (2022). The 30 October 2020, Mw= 7.0, Samos earthquake: aftershock relocation, slip model, Coulomb stress evolution and estimation of shaking. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 20(2), 819-851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01260-4
• Lentas, K., Gkarlaouni, C.G. and Kalligeris, N., Melis, N.S., 2022. The 30 october 2020, mw = 7.0, samos earthquake: aftershock relocation, slip model, coulomb stress evolution and estimation of shaking, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 20, 819–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01260-4
• Le pichon, X. and Angelier, J., 1979. The Hellenic Arc and Trench System: a key to the neotectonic evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean Area, Tectonophysics , 60(1-2), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(79)90131-8
• Lips, A.L., Cassard, D., Sözbilir, H., Yilmaz, H.,Wijbrans, J. R. (2001). Multistage exhumation of the Menderes massif, western Anatolia (Turkey), International Journal of Earth Sciences, 89, 781-792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005310000101
• Mallet, R., and Mallet, J.W., 1858. The Earthquake Catalogue of the British Association: With the Discussion, Curves, and Maps, Taylor & Francis, 136.
• McKenzie, D.P., 1972. Active Tectonics of the Mediterranean Region, Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 30, 109-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365246X.1972.tb02351.x
• McKenzie, D.P., 1978. Active Tectonics of the Alpin-Himalayan Belt: The Aegean sea and Surrounding Regions, Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 55, 217- 254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365246X.1978.tb04759.x
• McClusky, S., Balassanian, S., Barka, A., Demir, C., Ergintav, S., Georgiev, I., Gurkan, O., Mahmoud, S., Mishin, A., Nadriya, M., Ouzounis, A., Paradissis, D., Peter, Y., Prilepin, M., Reilinger, R, Sanli, I., Seeger, H., Tealeb, A., Toksoz, M.N., Veis, G., 2000. Global Positioning System Constraints On Plate Kinematics and Dynamics in The Eastern Mediterranean and Caucaus, Journal of Geophysical Research, 105, 5695-5719. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900351
• Öncü, U., Sözbilir, H., Özkaymak, Ç., Softa, M., Sümer, Ö., Eski, S., Topaksu, M., 2024. Palaeoseismological assessment for a seismic gap located very close to the epicentre of the 30 October 2020 Samos Earthquake (M6. 9), western Anatolia, Turkey, Natural Hazards, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06290-6
• Özarpacı, S., 2024. Stability Analysis of GNSS Stations Affected by Samos Earthquake, Applied Sciences, 14(6), 2301. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14062301
• Özkaymak, Ç. and Sözbilir, H., 2008. Stratigraphic and structural evidence for fault reactivation: the active Manisa fault zone, western Anatolia, Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 17(3), 615-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2012.06.004
• Özkaymak, Ç., Sözbilir, H., Uzel, B., Akyüz, H.S., 2011. Geological and palaeoseismological evidence for late Pleistocene− Holocene activity on the Manisa Fault Zone, western Anatolia. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 20(4), 449-474.
• Özkaymak, Ç., Sözbilir, H., & Uzel, B. 2013. Neogene–Quaternary evolution of the Manisa Basin: Evidence for variation in the stress pattern of the İzmir-Balıkesir Transfer Zone, western Anatolia. Journal of Geodynamics, 65, 117-135.
• Özkaymak, Ç., 2015. Tectonic analysis of the Honaz Fault (western Anatolia) using geomorphic indices and the regional implications, Geodinamica Acta, 27(2-3), 110-129.
• Papadimitriou, P., Kapetanidis, V., Karakonstantis, A., Spingos, I., Kassaras, I., Sakkas, V., Kouskouna, V., Karatzetzou, A., Pavlou, K., Kaviris, G., Voulgaris, N., 2020. First Results on the Mw=6.9 Samos Earthquake of 30 October 2020, Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, 56(1), 251-279. https://doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.25359 ,2020
• Papazachos, B. and Papazachou, C., 1989. The earthquakes of Greece, Ziti, P., & Co. I.K.E., 356.
• Pavlides, S. and Caputo, R., 2004. Magnitude versus faults' surface parameters: quantitative relationships from the Aegean Region, Tectonophysics, 380(3-4), 159-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2003.09.019
• Plicka, V., Gallovič, F., Zahradník, J., Serpetsidaki, A., Sokos, E., Vavlas, N., Kiratzi, A., 2022. The 2020 Samos Mw7 earthquake: Source model depicting complexity and rupture directivity, Tectonophysics,843, 229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2022.229591
• Reilinger, R.E., McClusky, S.C., Oral, M.B., King, R.W., Toksöz, M.N., Barka, A.A., Kinik, I., Lenk, O., Sanli, I., 1997. Global Positioning System measurements of present-day crustal movements in the Arabia-Africa-Eurasia plate collision zone, Journal Of Geophysıcal Research, 102 (b5), 9983-9999. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JB03736
• Sakkas, V., 2021. Ground deformation modelling of the 2020 Mw6. 9 Samos earthquake (Greece) based on INSAR and GNSS data, Remote Sensing, 13(9), 1665. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091665
• Schmidt, J.J., 1881. Studien über Vulkane und Erdbeben., 361.
• Seyitoğlu, G. and Scott, B.C., 1991. Late Cenozoic crustal extension and basin formation in west Turkey, Geological Magazine, 128, 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756800018343
• Solak, H.İ. 2020. İzmir-Balıkesir transfer zonu ve çevresindeki güncel deformasyonların GNSS yöntemi ile incelenmesi, Doktora Tezi, Afyonkocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Afyonkarahisar, 147 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2023.230194
• Solak, H.İ., Tiryakioğlu, İ., Özkaymak, Ç., Sözbilir, H., Aktuğ, B., Yavaşoğlu, H.H., Özkan, A., 2024. Recent tectonic features of Western Anatolia based on half-space modeling of GNSS Data, Tectonophysics, 872, 230194.
• Sözbilir, H., 2001. Extensional tectonics and the geometry of related macroscopic structures: field evidence from the Gediz detachment, western Turkey, Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 10(2), 51-67.
• Sözbilir, H., 2005. Oligo-Miocene extension in the Lycian orogen: evidence from the Lycian molasse basin, SW Turkey. Geodinamica Acta, 18(3-4), 255-282.
• Sözbilir, H., Uzel, B., Sümer, Ö., İnci, U., Ersoy, E. Y., Koçer, T., Demirtaş, R., Özkaymak, Ç., 2008. D-B Uzanımlı İzmir Fayı ile KD-Uzanımlı Seferihisar Fayı’nın birlikte çalıştığına dair veriler: İzmir Körfezi’ni oluşturan aktif faylarda kinematik ve paleosismolojik çalışmalar, Batı Anadolu, Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni, 51(2), 91-114.
• Sözbilir, H., Sümer, Ö., Uzel, B., Ersoy, Y., Erkül, F., İnci, U., Özkaymak, Ç., 2009. 17-20 Ekim 2005-Sığacık Körfezi (İzmir) depremlerinin sismik jeomorfolojisi ve bölgedeki gerilme alanları ile ilişkisi Batı Anadolu, Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni, 52(2), 217-238.
• Şafak, Ş., 2019. Gnss Hız Doğruluklarına Etki Eden Parametrelerin Belirlenmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Fen bilimleri Enstitüsü, Afyonkarahisar, 87.
• Şafak,Ş., Tiryakioğlu, İ., Erdoğan, H., Solak, H. İ., Aktuğ, B. 2020. Determination of parameters affecting the accuracy of GNSS station velocities”, Measurement, 164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108003
• Şengör, A.M.C., 1979. The North Anatolian transform fault: its age, offset and tectonic significance, Journal of the Geological Society of London, 136, 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.136.3.0269
• Şengör, A.M.C., 1980. Türkiye’nin Neotektoniğinin Esasları, Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu, 40.
• Şengör, A.M.C., Görür, N. and Şaroğlu, F., 1985. Strike-slip faulting and related basin formation in zones of tectonic escape: Turkey as a case study, Society for Sedimentary Geology, 37. https://doi.org/10.2110/pec.85.37
• Tan, O., Tapirdamaz, M. C. and Yörük, A., 2008. The earthquake catalogues for Turkey, Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 17(2), 405-418.
• Taymaz, T., Jackson, J.A. and McKenzie, D., 1991. Active tectonics of the North and Central Aegean Sea, Geophysical Journal International, 106, 433-490. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365246X.1991.tb03906.x
• Tepe, Ç., Sözbilir, H., Eski, S., Sümer, Ö., Özkaymak, Ç., 2021. Updated historical earthquake catalog of İzmir region (western Anatolia) and itsimportance for the determination of seismogenic source, Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 30(8), 779-805. https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-2101-14
• Tiryakioğlu, İ., Çalışkan, K., Yigit, C., Hastaoğlu, K., Poyraz, F., Baybura, T., Özkaymak, Ç., 2022. The velocity of aseismic surface deformations between 2016-2020 detected by precise leveling surveys of the Akşehir Simav Fault System in the Bolvadin district, western Anatolia. Annals of Geophysics, 65(5) https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8784
• Uzel, B., Sözbilir, H., and Özkaymak, Ç., 2012. Neotectonic evolution of an actively growing superimposed basin in western Anatolia: The inner bay of Izmir, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 21(4), 439-471. https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-0910-11
• von Hoff, K.E.A., 1840. Chronik der Erdbeben und Vulcan-Ausbrüche (Vol. 1), 4, Gotha Bei Justus Perthes, 469 .
• Wells, D.L. and Coppersmith, K.J. 1994. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, Bulletin of the seismological Society of America, 84(4), 974-1002. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0840040974
• Wessel, P., Luis, J. F., Uieda, L., Scharroo, R., Wobbe, F., Smith, W. H. F., & Tian, D. (2019). The Generic Mapping Tools version 6. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 20, 5556–5564. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008515
• Zhu, L., Akyol, N., Mitchell, B. J., & Sozbilir, H., 2006. Seismotectonics of western Turkey from high resolution earthquake relocations and moment tensor determinations, Geophysical Research Letters, 33(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025842