Using the Mind Mapping Method in Web-Based Teaching: Pre-Service Teachers' Metacognitive Learning Strategies and Self-Directed Learning Skills

Abstract

The study was carried out to determine the effects of the mind mapping method in web-based courses on students' metacognitive learning strategies and self-regulated learning skills and to determine the students' views on this.The study findings showed that there was a significant difference between the pretest and posttest scores of the students in the experimental group regarding their metacognitive learning strategies and self-regulated learning skill levels. In addition, it was understood from the study findings that there was a significant difference in favor of the experimental group between the scores of the experimental and control groups regarding metacognitive learning strategies and self-regulated learning skill levels. On the other hand, the findings on student opinions showed that students generally had positive opinions about the mind mapping method. In addition, it was understood from the findings of the students' opinions that the use of the mind mapping method had significant contributions to the students' metacognitive learning strategies and self-learning skill levels. Considering the results of this study, the use of the mind mapping method in web-based courses significantly supported the metacognitive learning strategies of the students and contributed positively to the increase in self-learning skill levels.

Keywords

• mind mapping
• web-based teaching
• metacognition
• self-management
• learning strategies and skills

Kaynakça

1. Abdel-Hamid, G. A. (2017). Mind maps as a new teaching strategy for medical students. MOJ Anat & Physiol, 3(3), 00090.
2. Al Rawashdeh, A. Z., Mohammed, E. Y., Arab, A., Alara, A. R., M., & Al-Rawashdeh, B. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of using e-Learning in University Education: Analyzing students’ perspectives. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 19(3), 107–117.
3. Al-Jarf, R. (2011). Teaching spelling skills with a mind-mapping software. Asian EFL Journal Professional Teaching Articles, 53, 4-16.
4. Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Kirschner, P. (2009). Field dependence–independence and instructional-design effects on learners’ performance with a computer-modeling tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), 1355-1366.
5. Aydar, G. (2021). The role of metacognitive awareness and digital literacy levels in predicting early childhood pre-service teachers' self directed learning skills [Master's thesis, Kocaeli University]. Head of higher education institution thesis center https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=8tbPippmWV_bIrrn9YEAva3MlpeB1H5bFAzOPt1wmrUAsNC51GJc4T7j1RTa9gs.
6. Boekaerts, M., & Simons, P. R. J. (1995). Leren en instructie. Uitgeverij Van Gorcum.
7. Brinkmann, A. (2003). Graphical knowledge display–mind mapping and concept mapping as efficient tools in mathematics education. Mathematics Education Review, 16(4), 35-48.
8. Buran, A. & Filyukov, A. (2015). Mind mapping technique in language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 215-218.

9. Buzan, T. (2008). Use your mind: new learning techniques to use your mental potential. (trans. by E.Lakşe). Alfa Publishing.
10. Buzan, T. (2009). Mind maps: Mobilize your creativity and transform your life. Boyut Publishing.
11. Buzan, T. (2009a). Mind maps: Activate and transform your creativity. H. Öneş (Ed.). Boyut Publishing.
12. Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (2006). The mind map book (3th ed.). BBC Active.
13. Christensen, W. D., & Hooker, C. A. (2000). An interactivist-constructivist approach to intelligence: Self-directed anticipative learning. Philosophical Psychology, 13(1), 5–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080050002717
14. Cohen, A. D. (2014). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Routledge.
15. Cook, D. A. (2007). Web-based learning: Pros, cons and controversies. Clinical Medicine, 7(1), 37–42.
16. Corebima, A.D., Hariyadi, S., Ibrohim, Zubaidah, S. (2018). Contribution of mind mapping, summarizing, and questioning in the RQA learning model to genetic learning outcomes. Journal of Turkısh Scıence Educatıon, 15(1), 80-88.
17. Çamlı, H. (2009). Effect of computer based mind mapping technique on fifth grade students? academic achievements in science and technology lessons and attitudes towards science and computers [Master’s thesis, Ege University]. Head of higher education institution thesis center https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=NtBAevXNhYaNqJFoAcdBdqezYriQll3o8uCLa6jLQblTLU5WQFDlpVN-BKGvjXQX.
18. Çoban, S., & Selçuk, E. (2017). The effect of mind mapping technique on students’ achievements in music lesson and on their attitudes towards the mind mapping technique. Education ve Science, 42(190), 423-435.
19. D‟Antoni, A. V. (2009). Relationship between the mind map learning strategy and critical thinking in medical students [Doctoral dissertation, Seton Hall University]. ProQuest dissertations publishing https://www.proquest.com/docview/304996755?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true.
20. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22.
21. Dhindsa, H. S., Kasim, M., & Anderson, O. R. (2011). Constructivist-visual mind map teaching approach and quality of students‟ cognitive structures. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(2), 186-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9245-4.
22. Donker, A. S., de Boer, H., Kostons, D., Dignath van Ewijk, C. C., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2014). Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 11, 1–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.002.
23. Edwards, S. & Cooper, N. (2010). Mind mapping as a teaching resource. The Clinical Teacher, 7, 236–239.
24. Eppler, M. J. (2006). A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams: And visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Information Visualization, 5, 202–210.
25. Erdem, A. (2017). Mind Maps as a lifelong learning tool. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(n12A), 1-7. http://10.13189/ujer.2017.051301.
26. Eşmekaya, F. (2019). The effect of using mind maping technique in social sciences teaching on academic success and retention [Master's thesis, Niğde University]. Head of higher education institution thesis center https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=FgmkGchPKo23qQqBeqzVZqzJyCA1ioUmP3WznkBzMP2N8_iGhrtLGl0kVYXTEV6a.
27. Evrekli, E. & Balım, A., G. (2010). The effect of use of mind mapping and concept cartoons in science and technology education on students’ academic achievements and inquiry learning skill perceptions. Western Anatolian Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(2), 76- 98.
28. Evrekli, E., Balım, A., G., & İnel, D. (2011). A research on the effects of using concept cartoons and mind maps in science education. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(2), 58-85.
29. Felix, U. (2001). A multivariate analysis of students’ experience of web based learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 21–36.
30. Flavell, J. H. (1981). Monitoring social cognitive enterprises: Something else that may develop in the area of social cognition. Social cognitive development: Frontiers and Possible Futures, 11, 272-287
31. Fraenkel, J.R. & Wallen, N.E. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education (4th ed.). McGraw Hill.
32. Fu, Q. K., Lin, C. J., Hwang, G. J., & Zhang, L. (2019). Impacts of a mind mapping-based contextual gaming approach on EFL students’ writing performance, learning perceptions and generative uses in an English course. Computers & Education, 137(3), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.005.
33. Güven, M., & Çögenli, A. G. (2014). Validity and Reliability of Metacognitive Learning Strategies Determining Scale. Journal of Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, (22), 283-297.
34. Hardy, I., & Stadelhofer, B. (2006). Concept maps wirkungsvoll als strukturierungshilfen einsetzen: Welche rolle spielt die selbstkonstruktion?. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 20(3), 175-187.
35. Ismail, M. N., Ngah, N. A. & Umar, I. N. (2010). The Effects of mind mapping with cooperative learning on programming performance, problem solving skill and metacognitive knowledge among computer science students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42 (1), 35-61.
36. Israel, C., Zipp, G. P., D'Abundo, M. & Deluca, D. (2020). Mind mapping to enhance critical thinking skills in physician assistant education: a randomized controlled study. Journal of Allied Health, 49(2), 135-140.
37. Jingyu, L. (2014, June 14-15). Pros and cons: Web-based education [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Education, Management and Computing Technology, Tianjin.
38. Jones, B. D. & Ruff, C. & Snyder, J. D. & Petrich, B. & Koonce C. (2012). The effects of mind mapping activities on students' motivation. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 1- 21.
39. Jude-York, D. A. (1991). Organizational learning climate, self-directed learners, and performance at work [Doctoral dissertation, The Fielding Institute]. ProQuest dissertations publishing https://www.proquest.com/docview/303980177?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true.
40. Kartal, A. & Turan, İ. (2015). The impact of mind mapping technique in social studies course on students' success and the permanence of knowledge. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 33, 443-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS2827.
41. Kelepçe, O. (2021). The effect of using mind mapping in science course on 4th grade students' achievement, scientific process skills, attitudes and cognitive loads [Master's thesis, Fırat University]. Head of higher education institution thesis center https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=wf-FPgY-5qjHEzEoOgvMs9YyOJzqXHxPINoqSuSrUhSyWplw5IwmXKMF9iZ2hU73.
42. Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. IL Follett Publishing Company.
43. Livingston, J. A. (2003). Metacognition: An overview. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED474273.pdf.
44. Lutfia, F. (2020). The effect of mind mapping of writing achievement ın descriptive text of grade x students. Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran, 15(21).
45. Maltepe, S., & Gültekin, H. (2017). The effect of the mind map technique on secondary school students’ reading comprehension and writing skills. HAYEF Journal of Education, 14(2), 79-92.
46. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
47. McMillan J.H. & Schumacher S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-basedinquiry (7th ed.). Pearson.
48. Merriam, S. B., Caffarella, R. S. ve Baumgartner, L. M. (2007). Learning in adulthood (A Comprehensive Guide) (3th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
49. Mohaidat, M., M., T. (2018). The Impact of electronic mind maps on students’ reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 11(4), 32-42 http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n4p32.
50. Mutlu, Y., Deniz, D. & Polat, S. (2019). Opinions of class teachers on use of mind maps in mathematics courses. Turkish Studies Educational Sciences, 14(4), 1631-1644. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.23356.
51. Nebojsa, S., Carisa, B, Milos, P., & Veljko A. (2011). The evaluation of using mind maps in teaching.TTEM- Technics Technologies Education Management 6(2), 337.
52. Nesbit, J., C., & Adesope, O., O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 76, 413-448.
53. Nurlaila, A. P. (2013). The use of mind mapping technique in writing descriptive text. Journal of English and Education, 1(2), 9-15.
54. Pacheco, A. Q. (2005). Web-based learning (WBL): A challenge for foreign language teachers. Revista Electrónica “Actualidades Investigativas en Educación”, 5(2), 1–25.
55. Parikh, N. D. (2016). Effectiveness of teaching through mind mapping technique. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(3), 148-156.
56. Pennebaker, J. W. (2017). Mind mapping: Using everyday language to explore social & psychological processes. Procedia Computer Science, 118, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.150.
57. Peterson, A.R., & Snyder, P.J. (1998, August 20-22 ). Using mind maps to teach social problems analysis [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study for Social Problems. San Francisco.
58. Pullu E.K., & Kan, A.Ü. (2022). The effect of mind mapping on academic achievement of vocational school students. International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture, 7(16), 238-268.
59. Radnitzer, K. (2010). Emotional intelligence and self-directed learning readiness among college students participating in a leadership development program. Journal of Leadership Development, 12(8), 124-130.
60. Saori, S. (2020). The use of mind mapping to teach reading comprehension. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 8(2), 66-75.
61. Sarıpınarlı, L. (2018). Integrating brain maps into the steam cycle. Journal of STEAM Education (J-STEAM), 2(1), 50- 78.
62. Shafer, R. Z. (2003). The zen of listening (trans. by Uckun, I.). Spirit and Matter Publications.
63. Shavelson, R. J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Wiley, E. (2005). Windows into the mind. Higher Education, 49, 413–430.
64. Shihusa, H. & Keraro, F. N. (2009). Using advance organizers to enhance students‟ motivation in learning biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5 (4), 413-420.
65. Siochos, V. ve Papatheodorou, C. (2011, March 30-31). Developing a formal model for mind maps [Paper presentation]. First Workshop on Digital Information Management, Corfu.
66. Somers, M. J., Passerini, K., Parhankangas, A., & Casal, J. (2014). Using mind maps to study how business school students and faculty organize and apply general business knowledge. International Journal of Management in Education, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2013.11.001.
67. Soussi, K. (2020). Web-based learning: Characteristics, practices, challenges and recommendations. International Journal of Science and Research, 9(3), 936–943.
68. Stankovic, N. & Besic, C. & Papic, M. & Aleksic, V. (2011). The evaluation of using mind maps in teaching. Technics Technologies Education Management, 6(2), 337-343.
69. Sungur, S., & Kahraman, N. (2011). The contribution of motivational beliefs to students' metacognitive strategy use. Education and Science, 36(160), 3-10.
70. Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
71. Şen, S., & Yılmaz, A. (2016). Devising a structural equation model of relationships between preservice teachers' time and study environment management, effort regulation, self-efficacy, control of learning beliefs, and metacognitive self-regulation. Science Education International, 27(2), 301-316.
72. Şendağ, S. (2016). Öğretim teorileri ve öğretim teknolojileri. In K. Çağıltay & Y. Göktaş (Eds.), Fundamentals of Instructional Technologies (pp. 143-157). Pegem.
73. Şeyihoğlu, A. & Kartal, A., (2010). The Views of the Teachers about the mind mapping technique in the Elementary Life Science and Social Studies lessons Based on the Constructivist Method, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10(3), 1613-1656.
74. Tekkol, İ. A., & Demirel, M. (2018). Self Directed Learning Skills Scale: Validity and Reliability Study. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 9(2), 85-100.
75. Thi Van Anh, D. (2020). The effects of mind-mapping on vietnamese efl students’ reading skills. Journal of Inquiry into Languages and Cultures, 4(2).
76. Tonga, D. (2022). Social studies and mind map examples. Turkish Scientific Researches Journal, 7(1), 189-204.
77. Trevino, C. (2005). Mind mapping and outlining: comparing two types of graphic organizers for learning seventh-grade life science [Doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University]. Texas tech university libraries https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/bitstream/handle/2346/1058/Cynthia_Trevino_diss.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
78. Tucker, J. M., Armstrong, G. R., & Massad, V. J. (2010). Profiling a Mind Map User: A Descriptive Appraisal. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 2, 1-13.
79. Warian, C (2003). Metacognition: Metacognitive skills and strategies in young readers [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Kean University.
80. Wen-Cheng, W., Chung-Chieh, L. ve Ying-Chien, C. (2010). A brief review on developing creative thinking in young children by mind mapping. International Business Research, 3(3), 233-238.
81. Wilson, B., & Cole, P. (1992). A critical review of elaboration theory. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 63-79.
82. Yan, V. X., Thai, K.-P., & Bjork, R. A. (2014). Habits and beliefs that guide self-regulated learning: Do they vary with mindset?. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3, 140–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.04.003.
83. Yang, T., & Gao, M. (2020). Studying Chinese characters in a web-based learning environment: A case study of Swedish university students. Chinese Language Teaching Methodology and Technology, 3(2). https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cltmt/vol3/iss2/2
84. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2021). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seçkin Publisher.
85. Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2021). A state-of-the-art review of the modes and effectiveness of multimedia input for second and foreign language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-27. https://doi.org/10 .1080/09588221.2021.1896555
86. Zhao, Y. (2003). The use of a constructivist teaching model in environmental science at Beijing Normal University. The China Papers, 2, 78-83.