Öğrenme Merkezli Liderlik ve Mesleki Öğrenme İlişkisi: BİLSEM Öğretmenlerine Yönelik Bir Araştırma

Öz

Bu araştırmada Biilim ve Sanat Merkezi (BİLSEM) öğretmenlerinin görüşlerine göre müdürlerin öğrenme merkezli liderliği ile öğretmenlerin mesleki öğrenmesi arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Daha önce benzer çalışmalar yapılmış olsa da farklı bir bağlam olarak BİLSEM öğretmenlerinin algılarının önemli çıkarımlar sağlayabileceği düşünülmüştür. Araştırmaya 112 BİLSEM öğretmeni katılmıştır. Veriler betimsel istatistikler, korelasyon analizi, basit ve çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizleri ile analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular doğrultusunda, BİLSEM öğretmenlerinin öğrenme merkezli liderlik ve mesleki öğrenme algılarının yüksek olduğu söylenebilir. Araştırma sonucunda, öğrenme merkezli liderliğin öğretmenlerin mesleki öğrenmesini yordadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Öğrenme merkezli liderliğin öğrenmeye dönük bir vizyon oluşturma ve öğrenme desteği sağlama boyutları, mesleki öğrenme ile ilişkilidir. Ancak öğrenme programını yönetme ve model olma boyutu, mesleki öğrenmeyi yordamamaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında ulaşılan bu bulgular yorumlanmış, literatürdeki benzer çalışmalarla benzerlik ve farklılıkları tartışılmıştır. BİLSEM müdürlerinin göreve başlamadan önce bir eğitim sürecinden geçmeleri, BİLSEM müdürlerine özerklik tanınması gibi önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• öğrenme merkezli liderlik
• öğretmen mesleki öğrenmesi
• bilim ve sanat merkezi
• BİLSEM

The Relationship Between Learning-Centered Leadership and Professional Learning: A Study on SAC Teachers

Abstract

In this study, the relationship between principals' learning-centered leadership and teachers' professional learning was examined according to the views of Science and Art Center (SAC) teachers. Although similar studies have been carried out before, it was thought that SAC teachers' perceptions as a different context could provide important implications. 112 SAC teachers participated in the research. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, simple and multiple linear regression analysis. In line with the findings, it can be said that SAC teachers have high perceptions of learning-centered leadership and professional learning. As a result of the research, it was concluded that learning-centered leadership predicted teachers' professional learning. The dimensions of learning-centered leadership, building a learning vision and providing learning support, are related to professional learning. However, the dimension of managing the learning program and modelling does not predict professional learning. These findings reached within the scope of the research were interpreted, and their similarities and differences with similar studies in the literature were discussed. Suggestions were made that SAC principals should go through a training process before starting their duties and that SAC principals should be granted autonomy.

Keywords

• learning-centered leadership
• teacher professional learning
• science and art centers
• SAC

Kaynakça

1. Alazmi, A. A., & Hammad, W. (2021). Modeling the relationship between principal leadership and teacher professional learning in Kuwait: The mediating effects of trust and teacher agency. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211038007
2. Alfayez, A. A., Noman, M., Saeed Alqahtani, A., Ibrahim Altuwaijri, A., & Kaur, A. (2021). Principal’s learning-centred leadership practices and teacher’s wellbeing: a self-determination theory perspective. Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.1960150
3. Al-Mahdy, Y. F. H., Hallinger, P., Emam, M., Hammad, W., Alabri, K. M., & Al-Harthi, K. (2021). Supporting teacher professional learning in Oman: The effects of principal leadership, teacher trust, and teacher agency. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211064428
4. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond and G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 3–31). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2021). The effect of learning-centred leadership and teacher trust on teacher professional learning: Evidence from a centralised education system. Professional Development in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1879234
6. Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, S., & Kılınç, A. Ç. (2020). Principals supporting teacher leadership: The effects of learning‐centred leadership on teacher leadership practices with the mediating role of teacher agency. European Journal of Education, 55(2), 200–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12387
7. Bellibaş, M. Ş., Kılınç, A. Ç., & Polatcan, M. (2021). The moderation role of transformational leadership in the effect of ınstructional leadership on teacher professional learning and instructional practice: An integrated leadership perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(5), 776–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211035079
8. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003

9. Bouley, F., Wuttke, E., Schnick-Vollmer, K., Schmitz, B., Berger, S., & Seifried, J. (2015). Professional competence of prospective teachers in business and economics education: Evaluation of a competence model using structural equation modeling. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(4), 491-502. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2015.1068076
10. Can, A. (2016). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi (4th edition). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
11. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.) Boston: Pearson Education.
12. Dimmock, C. (2012). Leadership, capacity building and school improvement: Concepts, themes and impact. London: Routledge.
13. Drago-Severson, E. (2012). New opportunities for principal leadership: Shaping school climates for enhanced teacher development. Teachers College Record 114(3), 1–44.
14. Dutta, V., & Sahney, S. (2022). Relation of principal instructional leadership, school climate, teacher job performance and student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(2), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-01-2021-0010
15. Ertürk, R. (2022). Öğretmen algılarına göre okul yöneticilerinin öğrenme merkezli liderlik davranışları ile öğrenen okul arasındaki ilişki. E-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 161–182.
16. Farnsworth, S. J., Hallam, P. R., & Hilton, S. C. (2019). Principal learning-centered leadership and faculty trust in the principal. NASSP Bulletin, 103(3), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636519871624
17. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd edition). London: Sage Publications.
18. Fullan, M. (1992). Successful school improvement: The implementation perspective and beyond. Buckingham: Open University Press.
19. Geijsel, F. P., Sleegers, P. J. C., Stoel, R. D., & Krüger, M. L. (2009). The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers' professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal 109(4), 406–427. https://doi.org/10.1086/593940
20. Goldring, E., Huff, J., Spillane, J. P., & Barnes, C. (2009). Measuring the learning-centered leadership expertise of school principals. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(2), 197–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760902737170
21. Goldring, E., Porter, A., Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., & Cravens, X. (2009). Assessing learning-centered leadership: Connections to research, professional standards, and current practices. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760802014951
22. Green, S. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(3), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7
23. Gümüş, S., Apaydın, Ç., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2018). Öğretmen mesleki öğrenme ölçeğinin türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, 9(17), 108–124.
24. Hallinger, P., & Liu, S. (2016). Leadership and teacher learning in urban and rural schools in China: Meeting the dual challenges of equity and effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Development, 51, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.10.001
25. Hallinger, P., Liu, S., & Piyaman, P. (2019). Does principal leadership make a difference in teacher professional learning? A comparative study China and Thailand. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 49(3), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1407237
26. Hallinger, P., Piyaman, P., & Viseshsiri, P. (2017). Assessing the effects of learning-centered leadership on teacher professional learning in Thailand. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 464–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.07.008
27. Hammad, W., Abu Shindi, Y., Morad, H., Al-Mahdy, Y. F. H., & Al-Harthi, K. (2021). Promoting teacher professional learning in Egyptian schools: The contribution of learning-centered leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1969038
28. Hany, E. A. (1995). Teachers’ cognitive processes of identifying gifted students. In: M. K. Katzko & F. J. Mönks (Eds.), Nurturing talent: Individual needs and social ability (pp. 184-198). Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorkum.
29. Huang, L., Zhang, T., & Huang, Y. (2020). Effects of school organizational conditions on teacher professional learning in China: The mediating role of teacher self-efficacy. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100893
30. Kılınç, A. Ç., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2017). Öğrenme merkezli liderlik ölçeğinin (ÖMLÖ) Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(3), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.315124
31. Kılınç, A. Ç., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Polatcan, M. (2020). Learning-centred leadership and change in teacher practice in Turkey: exploring the mediating effects of collaboration. Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1828833
32. Kontaş, H. (2009). BİLSEM öğretmenlerinin program geliştirme ihtiyaçlarına ilişkin geliştirilen programın etkililiği. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe University Graduate School of Social Sciences, Ankara.
33. Kulophas, D., & Hallinger, P. (2020). Leadership that matters: Creating cultures of academic optimism that support teacher learning in Thailand. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(6), 605–627. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-12-2019-0222
34. Kulophas, D., & Hallinger, P. (2021). Does leadership make a difference in teacher learning: A contextual analysis of learning centered leadership in rural Thailand. International Journal of Leadership in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1980911
35. Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 149-170.
36. Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership ınfluences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10377347
37. Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2016a). Learning-centered leadership and teacher learning in China: Does trust matter? Journal of Educational Administration, 54(6), 661–682. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2016-0015
38. Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2016b). Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: Does principal leadership make a difference? Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.023
39. Liu, L., Hallinger, P., Kennedy, K. J., & Walker, A. (2017). Mediating effects of trust, communication, and collaboration on teacher professional learning in Hong Kong primary schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(6), 697-716.
40. Louis, K. S. (2006). Changing the culture of schools: professional community, organizational learning, and trust. Journal of School Leadership, 16(5), 477–487.
41. MEB. (2016). Bilim ve Sanat Merkezleri Yönergesi. https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2016_10/07031350_bilsem_yonergesi.pdf
42. MEB. (2018). Özel Eğitim Hizmetleri Yönetmeliği. https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2018_07/09101900_ozel_egitim_hizmetleri_yonetmeligi_07072018.pdf
43. Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., Goldring, E., & Porter, A. C. (2006). Learning-centered leadership: A conceptual foundation. The Wallace Foundation.
44. Myers, R. H. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications (2nd ed.). Boston: PWS-KENT. NAGC. (2019). 2019 Pre-K-grade 12 gifted programming standards. Washington: National Association for Gifted Children.
45. Özdemir, N., Gün, F., & Yirmibeş, A. (2021). Learning–centred leadership and student achievement: Understanding the mediating effect of the teacher professional community and parental involvement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211034167
46. Parise, L. M., & Spillane, J. (2010). Teacher learning and instructional change: How formal and on-the-job learning opportunities predict change in elementary school teachers’ practice. The Elementary School Journal 110(3), 323–346.
47. Pituch, K. A., & Stevens, J. P. (2016). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM‘s SPSS (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.
48. Porter, A. C., Murphy, J., Goldring, E., Elliott, S. N., Polikoff, M. S., & May, H. (2008). Vanderbilt assessment of leadership in education: Technical manual. https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/pages/vanderbilt-assessment-of-leadership-in-education-technical-manual-1.aspx
49. Printy, S. M., Marks, H. M., & Bowers, A. J. (2009), Integrated leadership: How principals and teachers share transformational and instructional influence. Journal of School Leadership, 19(5), 504-532.
50. Privitera, G. J. (2016). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
51. Reardon, R. M. (2011). Elementary school principals’ learning-centered leadership and educational outcomes: Implications for principals’ professional development. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760903511798
52. Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
53. Sağır, M. (2015). Öğretimsel liderlik. In Eğitim yönetiminde yeni liderlik yaklaşımları (pp. 133–155). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
54. Sebastian, J., Huang, H., & Allensworth, E. (2017). Examining integrated leadership systems in high schools: connecting principal and teacher leadership to organizational processes and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(3), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1319392
55. Smith, W. F., & Andrews, R. I. (1989). Instructional leadership. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
56. Sparks, D., & Loucks Horsley, S. (1989). Five models of staff development. Journal of Staff Development, 10(4).
57. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
58. Talebizadeh, S. M., Hosseingholizadeh, R., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2021). Analyzing the relationship between principals’ learning-centered leadership and teacher professional learning: The mediation role of trust and knowledge sharing behavior. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100970
59. Tayag, J., & Ayuyao, N. (2020). Exploring the relationship between school leadership and teacher professional learning through structural equation modeling. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(8), 1237–1251. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2018-0372
60. Thoonen, E. E., Sleegers, P. J., Oort, F. J., & Peetsma, T. T. (2012). Building school-wide capacity for improvement: The role of leadership, school organizational conditions, and teacher factors. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 23(4), 441–460.
61. Uzun, M. (2004), Üstün yetenekli çocuklar el kitabı. I. Türkiye üstün yetenekli çocuklar kongresi yayın dizisi. İstanbul: Çocuk Vakfı Yayınları.
62. Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 420-432.