Examination of the Variables Explaining School Effectiveness by CHAID Analysis

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In parallel with the increase in social expectations regarding education and its outcomes, studies on school effectiveness continue unabated. The ability of educational organizations to provide qualitatively higher education has become the focus of the researches. In this direction, school governance, the adaptation of governance principles to educational organizations, has come to the fore. The purpose of this research is to examine school effectiveness and to determine the significant variables in explaining school effectiveness. The study group of this research consists of 502 teachers working in Yozgat. Within the scope of this research, CHAID analysis was used to explain school effectiveness with school governance with the factors -participation, transparency, rule of law - and teachers' demographic variables. In terms of demographic variables, teachers' age, gender, union membership, education degree, seniority, working time with the current manager, year of employment at the current school were analyzed. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the first significant variable in explaining school effectiveness was rule of law. Participation was found to be the second significant variable in predicting school effectiveness. It was inferred from the finding that adopting accountability within the rule of law dimension at school means taking steps to monitor the school's performance. Therefore, the rule of law has an impact on school effect. Furthermore, it was observed that accountability and equality practices positively affect school effectiveness. Based on the results, it was concluded that that better school performance can be increased depending on good governance practices like of the rule of law and following a participatory policy.

Keywords

• school effectiveness
• school governance
• rule of law
• participation

Kaynakça

1. Ambrosio, J. (2013). Changing the subject: Neoliberalism and accountability in public education. Educational Studies 49(4), 316–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2013.783835
2. Avşar, A. Ş., & Yalçın, S. (2015). Öğrencilerin okuma başarılarını açıklayan ailesel değişkenlerin CHAID analizi ile belirlenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 40(179), 1-9.
3. Backman, E., & Trafford, B. (2007). Democratic governance of schools. Council of Europe Publishing.
4. Boeve-de Pauw, J., Gericke, N., Olsson, D., & Berglund, T. (2015). The effectiveness of education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 7, 15693–15717.
5. Chapman, C., Muijs, D., Raynolds, D., Sammons, P., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2016). The Routledge International handbook of educational effectiveness and improvement research, policy, and practice. New York: Routledge.
6. Coleman, J. S. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
7. De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., & Onghena, P. (2002). Accountability of schools and teachers: What should be taken into account? European Educational Research Journal, 1(3), 403–428.
8. Demirkasımoğlu, N., & Taşkın, P. (2015). Yetenek yönetiminin örgütsel etkililik ile ilişkisi özel öğretim kurumları örneği. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4, 268-285.

9. Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2011). Leadership. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The Sage handbook of governance (Chapter 27, pp. 419–435). London, UK: SAGE Publications.
10. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: Mc Graw Hill.
11. Graham, J., Amos, B., & Plumptre, T. (2003). Principles for good governance in the 21st century (Policy brief no. 15). Institute on Governance. Retrieved 28 March 2017fromhttp://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UNPAN/UNPAN011842.pdf
12. Gözlügöl, S. V. (2013). Uluslararası hukuk boyutuyla hukukun üstünlüğü. Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1-2), 1423-1453.
13. Gunter, H. M., Grimaldi, E., Hall, D., & Serpieri, R. (2016). New public management and the reform of education: European lessons for policy and practice. London and New York: Routledge.
14. Hoy, W. K. (2009). School effectiveness index. Retrieved from http://www.waynekhoy.com /school_effectiveness_index.html on 01/05/2023.
15. Kayri, M., & Boysan, M. (2007). Using CHAID analysis in researches and an application pertaining to coping strategies. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 40(2), 133-149. https://10.1501/Egifak_0000000182
16. Kefela, G. (2011). Good governance enhance the efficiency and effectiveness public spending -Sub Saharan countries. African Journal of Business Management, 5(11), 3995–3999. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM09.111
17. Lenkeit, J., & Caro, D. H. (2014). Performance status and change - measuring education system effectiveness with data from PISA 2000-2009. Educational Research and Evaluation, 20(2), 146–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2014.891462
18. Lewis, M., & Pettersson, G. (2009). Governance in education: raising performance. World Bank human development network working paper draft. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228247190_Governance_in_Education_Raising_Performance/link/5a19389d4585155c26a96dc9/download
19. Lijmbach, S., Van Arcken, M. M., Van Koppen, C. S. A., & Wals, A. E. (2002). Your view of nature is not Mine!: learning about pluralism in the classroom. Environmental Education Research, 8, 121–135.
20. Lingard, B., Hayes, D., & Mills, M. (2002). Developments in schoolbased management: The specific case of Queensland, Australia. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230210415625
21. Murillo, J. (2007). School effectiveness research in Latin America. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 75–92). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5747-2_5
22. Niemann, D., Martens, K., & Teltemann, J. (2017). PISA and its consequences: shaping education policies through international comparisons. European Journal of Education, 52(2), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12220
23. Ordofa, B., & Asgedom, A. (2022). School accountability and its relationship with learning outcomes: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100358.
24. Risteska, M., Mickovskall, A., & Kraja, M. (2010). Good governance in education case studies: Municipalities of Kisela Voda, Kriva Palanka, Vrapchishte, Bitola, Strumica, Shtip, Kicevo and Veles. Shqipe Gerguri - SEEU.
25. Roksa, J., & Kinsley, P. (2019). The role of family support in facilitating academic success of low-income students. Research in Higher Education, 60(4), 415–437. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45180388
26. Rosenblatt, Z., & Wubbels, T. (2021). Accountability and culture of school teachers and principals: An eight-country comparative study. Routledge.
27. Samar Ali, S., Kaur, R., Ersöz, F., Lotero, L., & Weber, G. W. (2019). Evaluation of the effectiveness of green practices in manufacturing sector using CHAID analysis. Journal of Remanufacturing, 9(1), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13243-018-0053-y
28. Scheerens, J. (1991). Process indicators of school functioning: a selection based on the research literature on school effectiveness. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 17(2), 371–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(05)80091-4.
29. Sheng, K. (2009). What is good governance? United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved on 22 January 2014 from http://www.unescap.org/pdd/prs/ProjectActivities/Ongoing/gg/governance.asp.
30. Supriadi, D., Usman, H., Jabar, A., & Widyastuti, I. (2021). Good school governance: An approach to principal's decision-making quality in Indonesian vocational school. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 6(4), 796-831. https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2021.4.2
31. Şişman, M. (2002). Eğitimde mükemmellik arayışı -etkili okullar. Ankara: Pegem.
32. Verhelst, D., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2021). School effectiveness for education for sustainable development (ESD): What characterizes an ESD-effective school organization? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(2), 502–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220985196
33. Vyas, S., Doorgapersad, -., & Aktan, C. C. (2017). Progression from ideal state to good governance: an introductory overview. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 9(1), 29-49. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ijbms/issue/36086/405191
34. Widanto, A., & Satrya, A. (2019). The role of participative decision making and psychological ownership in enhancing organizational commitment and knowledge sharing behavior. The 1st Workshop on Multimedia education, learning, assessment and its implementation in game and gamification in conjunction with COMDEV 2018. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.26-1-2019.2283200
35. World Bank. (1994). Governance: The World Bank's experience / The World Bank. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
36. Yüner, B. (2019). Okul yönetişimi ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 49, 171- 186.
37. Yüner, B., & Burgaz, B. (2019). Okul yönetişimi ile okul iklimi arasındaki ilişkinin öğretmen görüşlerine göre incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 44(199), 373-390.