Güçlendirici Liderliğin Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Bağlılığı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Lidere Güvenin Aracılık Rolü

Öz

Öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılığını etkileyen çeşitli liderlik tarzları kapsamlı biçimde incelenmiş olsa da, güçlendirici liderlik çerçevesinde liderlere duyulan güvenin aracılık mekanizması, özellikle merkezi ve hiyerarşik eğitim sistemlerinde sınırlı biçimde araştırılmıştır. Bu çalışma, güçlendirici liderliğin öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılığı üzerindeki doğrudan ve dolaylı etkilerini, liderlere duyulan güvenin aracılık rolüne odaklanarak incelemektedir. Türkiye’nin bölgesel çeşitliliğini yansıtan on ilden 694 lise öğretmeninin katılımıyla kesitsel bir araştırma deseni uygulanmıştır. Katılımcılar, güçlendirici liderlik, lidere güven ve örgütsel bağlılık düzeylerini ölçen daha önce geliştirilmiş ve Türkçe’ye uyarlanmış geçerli ve güvenilir ölçekleri yanıtlamıştır. Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi sonuçları, güçlendirici liderliğin hem lidere güveni hem de örgütsel bağlılığı pozitif yönde yordadığını; ayrıca lidere güvenin bu ilişkiye kısmen aracılık ettiğini göstermiştir. Bulgular, güçlendirici liderliğin güven temelli ve katılımcı ilişkileri teşvik ederek öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılığını güçlendirdiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Araştırma, güçlendirmeye dayalı liderlik davranışlarını örgütsel bağlılığa bağlayan psikolojik bir mekanizma olarak güvenin rolünü açıklığa kavuşturarak literatüre katkı sağlamaktadır. Ayrıca, liderlik geliştirme programlarının örgütsel bağlılığı artırmak için güven oluşturma yeterliklerine öncelik vermesi önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• güçlendirici liderlik
• örgütsel bağlılık
• lidere güven
• öğretmen
• aracılık analizi

The Effect of Empowering Leadership on Teachers' Organizational Commitment: The Mediating Role of Trust in Leader

Öz

Although various leadership styles influencing teachers’ organizational commitment have been extensively examined, the mediating mechanism of trust in leaders within the empowering leadership framework has received limited empirical attention, particularly in centralized and hierarchical education systems. This study investigates the direct and indirect effects of empowering leadership on teachers’ organizational commitment, emphasizing the mediating role of trust in leaders. A cross-sectional research design was utilized, involving 694 high school teachers from ten provinces that reflect the regional diversity of Türkiye. Participants responded to previously developed and validated scales adapted into Turkish measuring empowering leadership, trust in leader, and organizational commitment. Structural equation modeling (SEM) results indicated that empowering leadership positively predicted both trust in leaders and organizational commitment, while trust in leaders partially mediated the relationship between empowering leadership and organizational commitment. These findings suggest that empowering leadership enhances teachers’ organizational commitment primarily by fostering trust-based and participative relationships. The study contributes to leadership and organizational psychology literature by clarifying the role of trust as a psychological mechanism linking empowerment-oriented leadership behaviors to organizational attachment. Furthermore, the findings offer practical implications, indicating that leadership development programs should prioritize trust-building competencies alongside the promotion of empowerment practices to strengthen organizational commitment within centralized educational systems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• empowering leadership
• organizational commitment
• trust in leader
• teacher
• mediation analysis

Kaynakça

1. Akdeniz, A., & Korkmaz, M. (2023). Relationships between empowering leadership, supportive work environment and organizational commitment: Example of guidance and research centers (GRC). Education and Science, 48(216), 113–138. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2023.11998
2. Alazmi, A. A., & Hammad, W. (2023). Modeling the relationship between principal leadership and teacher professional learning in Kuwait: The mediating effects of trust and teacher agency. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(5), 1141–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211038007
3. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
4. Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø. L. (2014). Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 487–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.009
5. Bellibaş, M. Ş., Polatcan, M., & Akyürek, M. İ. (2024). Principal leadership typologies and their relationship with teacher self-efficacy and commitment: A latent profile mediation analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(6), 1497–1518. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221139932
6. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
7. Burke, C. S., Sims, D. E., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. (2007). Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(6), 606–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.09.006
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.

9. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education (5th ed.). Routledge Falmer.
10. Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611
11. Dou, D., Devos, G., & Valcke, M. (2017). The relationships between school autonomy gap, principal leadership, teachers’ job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(6), 959–977. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216653975
12. Firestone, W. A. (1996). Images of teaching and proposals for reform: A comparison of ideas from cognitive and organizational research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(2), 209–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X96032002003
13. Freire, C., & Fernandes, A. (2016). Search for trustful leadership in secondary schools: Is empowerment the solution? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(6), 892–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215578447
14. Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2003). Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 228–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230310474403
15. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
16. Hallinger, P., & Bryant, D. A. (2013). Mapping the terrain of educational leadership and management in East Asia. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(5), 618–637. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-05-2012-0066
17. Hallinger, P., Hosseingholizadeh, R., Hashemi, N., & Kouhsari, M. (2018). Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(5), 800–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217700283
18. Han, B., Dağlı, A., & Elçiçek, Z. (2018). Adaptation of the organizational commitment scale into Turkish: Validity and reliability study. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 17(68), 1788–1800. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.445932
19. Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9(3), 184–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268469900900301
20. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
21. Hulpia, H., Devos, G., Rosseel, Y., & Van Keer, H. (2012). Dimensions of distributed leadership and the impact on teachers’ organizational commitment: A study in secondary education. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(7), 1745–1784. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00917.x
22. Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers' and teacher leaders' job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(3), 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450902909840
23. Kandemir, A. (2025). The mediating function of organizational commitment in the relationship between teachers' job satisfaction and principals' empowering leadership. Acta Psychologica, 260, 105715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105715
24. Kasapoğlu Tankutay, H., & Çolak, İ. (2025). How school principals' empowering leadership influences teacher autonomy: The mediating role of teachers' academic optimism. British Educational Research Journal, 51, 1255–1270. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4125
25. Kavgacı, H. (2024). Does relational context matter? Trust in principal as a moderator between distributed leadership and organisational citizenship behaviours in Turkish schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 54(2), 496-516. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432241292938
26. Khan, F. (2023). Transformational leadership and teacher work performance: Mediating effect of job autonomy and trust in school principal–insights from senior secondary school data in India. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(2), 318-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231172359
27. Khasawneh, S., Omari, A., & Abu-Tineh, A. (2012). The relationship between transformational leadership and organizational commitment: The case for vocational teachers in Jordan. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(4), 494–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143212438217
28. Kılınç, A. Ç., Polatcan, M., Savaş, G., & Er, E. (2022). How transformational leadership influences teachers’ commitment and innovative practices: Understanding the moderating role of trust in principal. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(2), 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221082803
29. Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2018). Organization-based self-esteem and meaningful work mediate effects of empowering leadership on employee behaviors and well-being. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(4), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818762337
30. Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). Guilford Press.
31. Konan, N., & Çelik, O. T. (2018). Adaptation of the empowering leadership scale for educational organizations: Validity and reliability study. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(4), 1043–1054. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.434140
32. Konczak, L. J., Stelly, D. J., & Trusty, M. L. (2000). Defining and measuring empowering leader behaviors: Development of an upward feedback instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(2), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970420
33. Kondakçı, Y., & Beycioğlu, K. (2020). Social justice in Turkish education system: Issues and interventions. In R. Papa (Ed.), Handbook on promoting social justice in education (pp. 309–329). Springer.
34. Kushman, J. W. (1992). The organizational dynamics of teacher workplace commitment: A study of urban elementary and middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(1), 5–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X92028001002
35. Lee, A., Willis, S., & Tian, A. W. (2018). Empowering leadership: A meta‐analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2220
36. Limon, I. (2022). Relationship between empowering leadership and teachers’ job performance: Organizational commitment as mediator. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 15(1), 16–41. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.945201
37. Liu, Y., & Bellibas, M. S. (2018). School factors that are related to school principals’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.04.002
38. Ma, L., Yao, H., & Sun, M. (2024). Distributed leadership mirrors teacher professionalism via collaborative learning and relational trust: Evidence from China. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 9(4), 340–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-11-2023-0076
39. Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X03253412
40. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
41. Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
42. Morrow, P. C. (1983). Concept redundancy in organizational research: The case of work commitment. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/257837
43. Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership—Improvement through empowerment? An overview of the literature. Educational Management & Administration, 31(4), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X030314007
44. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
45. Okçu, V., Cemaloğlu, N., & Ay, İ. (2025). The effect of school principals’ empowering leadership behaviors on well-being at work: The mediating role of organizational ostracism. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34, 777–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00895-6
46. Özdemir, M., Küçükçene, M., Abaslı, K., Pektaş, V., & Ayhan, E. (2024). The effect of empowering leadership and teacher autonomy on affective commitment: The mediating role of teacher self-efficacy. Education and Science, 49(219), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2024.12663
47. Özdemir, M., Kaymak, M. N., & Çetin, O. U. (2025). Unlocking teacher potential: The integrated influence of empowering leadership and authentic leadership on teacher self-efficacy and agency in Türkiye. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(5), 1083-1104. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231217136
48. Özdemir, M., Mavi, D., & Tuti, G. (2026). Cultivating teacher academic aspiration: Unveiling the impact of empowering leadership, teacher professional learning, and academic optimism. Irish Educational Studies, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2026.2614085
49. Park, S., Mao, X., & Choi, S. (2025). Understanding the relationship between teacher collaboration and instructional clarity via teacher self-efficacy: A moderated mediation model of organizational commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 156, 104922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104922
50. Pazetto, C. F., Luiz, T. T., & Beuren, I. M. (2024). Empowering leadership for contextual performance: Serial mediation of organizational support and commitment. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(4), 1005–1026. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2022-0195
51. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
52. Polatcan, M., Özkan, P., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2024). Cultivating teacher innovativeness through transformational leadership and teacher agency in schools: The moderating role of teacher trust. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 9(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-01-2024-0008
53. Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership: Volume 1: Policy and practice. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264044715-en
54. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
55. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
56. Rego, A., Vitória, A., Magalhães, A., Ribeiro, N., & Cunha, M. P. (2013). Are authentic leaders associated with more virtuous, committed and potent teams? The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.08.002
57. Ross, J. A., & Gray, P. (2006). Transformational leadership and teacher commitment to organizational values: The mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565795
58. Tschannen-Moran, M. (2014). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools (2nd ed.). Wiley.
59. Turkish Statistical Institute (TSI). (2023). Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics (NUTS). https://tuikweb.tuik.gov.tr
60. Tuti, G., & Özdemir, M. (2024). Charismatic leadership, trust in leader, and emotional labor: Perspectives of teachers in Trabzon. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 61, 164–186. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.1314078
61. Tuti, G., & Özdemir, M. (2021). Development of a trust in leader scale for educational organizations: Validity and reliability study. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(Special Issue on Educational Sciences), 4850–4874. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.861588
62. Yalçın, M. T., Atasoy, R., & Göçen, A. (2025). Trust, professionalism and empowerment: How school leaders shape instructional practices. European Journal of Education, 60, e70087. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70087
63. Yenel, K., Ünal, A., & Cemaloğlu, N. (2025). The mediating role of teacher agency in the relationship between empowering leadership and teacher professional learning. Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Faculty of Education Journal, 26(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.1521725
64. Yao, J., You, Y., & Zhu, J. (2020). Principal-teacher management communication and teachers’ job performance: The mediating role of psychological empowerment and affective commitment. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(4), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00490-0
65. Yin, H. B., Lee, J. C. K., Jin, Y. L., & Zhang, Z. H. (2013). The effect of trust on teacher empowerment: The mediation of teacher efficacy. Educational Studies, 39(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2012.666339
66. Yorulmaz, Y. İ., Çolak, İ., & Sağlam, A. Ç. (2018). The relationship between teachers' structural and psychological empowerment and their autonomy. Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(2), 81–96.
67. Wang, Z., Zhao, L., Song, H., Du, J., & Wang, Y. (2024). Linking empowering leadership with older teachers’ knowledge-sharing behaviour: The roles of organization-based self-esteem and organizational status. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(4), 807–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2022.2151412
68. Zadok, A., & Benoliel, P. (2023). Middle-leaders’ transformational leadership: Big five traits and teacher commitment. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(4), 810–829. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2022-0541