Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Academician Views on the Use of MS Teams in Distance Education: A Case Study

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1, 81 - 92, 03.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.1306960

Öz

Distance education, which is one of the basic parts of our lives with technological developments, has been an interesting subject in the field of educational technologies since the first days it started to make a name for itself. In addition to being independent from place and time, the availability of simultaneous and different time options has made distance education more attractive, especially in higher education. Learning management systems are needed in order for distance education to continue effectively and to increase the quality and permanence of learning materials. In this study, the opinions of the instructors regarding the learning management systems, which are frequently used in distance education in higher education, were taken. Nine academicians participated in the study, in which case study was preferred as one of the qualitative study methods. The study data were collected through face-to-face interviews with the participants and the semi-structured interview form used in these interviews. By applying content analysis to the obtained data, the answers were grouped; themes and sub-themes were obtained. When the study findings were examined, it was seen that the answers given by the participants were grouped under three themes. These themes were named as “problems”, “benefits and advantages” and “expectations and solutions” regarding the learning management system.

Kaynakça

  • Akram, M., & Muhammad Khan, A. (2020). Exploring e-leadership of principals: Increasing school effectiveness by learning management system. Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 8(1), 15-30.
  • Almarashdeh, I. (2016). Sharing instructors experience of learning management system: A technology perspective of user satisfaction in a distance learning course. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 249-255.
  • Altıparmak, M., Kurt, İ. D., & Kapıdere, M. (2011). E-öğrenme ve uzaktan eğitimde açık kaynak kodlu öğrenme yönetim sistemleri [Open source learning management systems in e-learning and distance education]. XI. Akademik Bilişim Kongresi, 4(5).
  • Chung, C.-H., Pasquini, L. A., & Koh, C. E. (2013). Web-based learning management system considerations for higher education. Learning and Performance Quarterly, 1(4), 24-37.
  • Coldeway, D.O. (1986). Learner characteristics and success. In I. Mugridge, D. Kaufman (Eds.), Distance Education in Canada, (pp. 81-87). London: Croom Helm.
  • Çavuşoğlu, Ö. H. (2013). Mimarlık Eğitim Programında Uzaktan Eğitim Yönetimi [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
  • da Costa, R. D., de Souza, G. F., de Castro, T. B., de Medeiros Valentim, R. A., & de Pinho Dias, A. (2020). Identification of learning styles in distance education through the interaction of the student with a learning management system. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 15(3), 148-160.
  • Embi, M. A. (2011). E-learning in Malaysian higher education institutions: Status, trends, & challenges. Putrajaya, Malaysia. Department of Higher Education Ministry of Higher Education.
  • Emelyanova, N., & Voronina, E. (2014). Introducing a learning management system at a Russian university: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 272-289.
  • Epping, R. (2010). Innovative use of Blackboard (R) to assess laboratory skills. Journal of Learning Design, 3(3), 32-36.
  • Falvo, D. A., & Johnson, B. F. (2007). The use of learning management systems in the United States. TechTrends, 51(2), 40.
  • Fritz, J. (2011). Classroom walls that talk: Using online course activity data of successful students to raise self-awareness of underperforming peers. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 89-97.
  • Gülbahar, Y. (2009). E-öğrenme [E-learning]. Pegem Akademi.
  • Han, I., & Shin, W. S. (2016). The use of a mobile learning management system and academic achievement of online students. Computers & Education, 102, 79-89.
  • İşman, A. (2008). Uzaktan eğitim [Distance education]. Pegem Akademi.
  • Khan, B. S., Makhdum, F. N., & Jabeen, S. (2022). Study to Assess Students’ Readiness for Online Learning at Higher Education Level. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 42(2), 417-429.
  • Kılınç, H. (2017). Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Fakültesi öğrenenlerinin Anadolum eKampüs öğrenme yönetim sistemine ilişkin görüşlerinin kuşaklar bağlamında incelenmesi [Examining the views of Anadolu University Open Education Faculty learners on Anadolum eCampus learning management system in the context of generations]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3), 104-124.
  • Kumar, S., Gankotiya, A. K., & Dutta, K. (2011). A comparative study of moodle with other e-learning systems. 2011 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology.
  • Eden M. Laquindanum. (2022). Effectiveness of Microsoft Teams: A Study of Perception among Tertiary Learners. International Journal of Recent Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(2), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6477320
  • Llamas-Nistal, M., Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., & Castro, M. (2010). Use of e-learning functionalities and standards: the Spanish case. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(4), 540-549.
  • Lonn, S., Teasley, S. D., & Krumm, A. E. (2011). Who needs to do what where?: Using learning management systems on residential vs. commuter campuses. Computers & Education, 56(3), 642-649.
  • Naveh, G., Tubin, D., & Pliskin, N. (2010). Student LMS use and satisfaction in academic institutions: The organizational perspective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 127-133.
  • Nurakun Kyzy, Z., Ismailova, R., & Dündar, H. (2018). Learning management system implementation: A case study in the Kyrgyz Republic. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(8), 1010-1022.
  • Özonur, M., Kamışlı, H., Yelken, T. Y., & Tokmak, H. S. (2019). Uzaktan eğitim öğrencilerinin Enocta öğrenme yönetim sistemi hakkında görüşlerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of distance education students' opinions about Enocta learning management system]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (50), 283-302.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Sage.
  • Petrakova, E. A., Divina, T. V., & Beliakova, M. U. (2022). A system for evaluating student learning outcomes with a differentiated approach using the LMS moodle electronic educational platform. AIP Conference Proceedings.
  • Saygılı, H., & Çetin, H. (2021). The Effects of Learning Management Systems (LMS) on Mathematics Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen Ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 15(2), 341-362. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1026534
  • Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
  • Sezer, C., & Korucu, A. T. (2019). Bilişim teknolojileri ve yazılım dersinde öğrenme yönetim sistemi kullanımının öğrenci akademik başarısına etkisi [The effect of learning management system usage on student academic achievement in information technologies and software course]. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5, 157-176.
  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
  • Szabo, M. (2002). Cmi theory and practice: Historical roots of learning managment systems. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 929-936). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  • Tagoe, M. A., & Cole, Y. (2020). Using the Sakai Learning Management System to change the way Distance Education nursing students learn: are we getting it right? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(3), 201-221.
  • Yapici, I. U., & Akbayin, H. (2012). The Effect of Blended Learning Model on High School Students' Biology Achievement and on Their Attitudes towards the Internet. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(2), 228-237.
  • Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research. Sage.

Uzaktan Eğitimde Öğrenme Yönetim Sistemlerine İlişkin Akademisyen Görüşleri: Bir Durum Çalışması

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1, 81 - 92, 03.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.1306960

Öz

Teknolojik gelişmelerle birlikte hayatımızın temel parçalarından biri olan uzaktan eğitim, adından söz ettirmeye başladığı ilk günlerden bu güne eğitim teknolojileri alanında ilgi çeken bir konu olmuştur. Yer ve zamandan bağımsız olmasının yanı sıra eş zamanlı ve farklı zaman seçeneklerinin bulunması özellikle yükseköğretimde uzaktan eğitimi daha cazip hale getirmiştir. Uzaktan eğitimin etkin bir şekilde devam edebilmesi, öğrenme materyallerinin kalitesinin ve kalıcılığının artırılabilmesi için öğrenme yönetim sistemlerine ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Bu çalışmada yükseköğretimde uzaktan eğitimde sıklıkla kullanılan öğrenme yönetim sistemlerine ilişkin öğretim elemanlarının görüşleri alınmıştır. Nitel çalışma yöntemlerinden durum çalışmasının tercih edildiği çalışmaya dokuz akademisyen katılmıştır. Çalışma verileri, katılımcılarla yüz yüze yapılan görüşmeler ve bu görüşmelerde kullanılan yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Elde edilen verilere içerik analizi uygulanarak cevaplar gruplandırılmış; temalar ve alt temalar elde edilmiştir. Çalışma bulguları incelendiğinde katılımcıların verdikleri cevapların üç tema altında toplandığı görülmüştür. Bu temalar öğrenme yönetim sistemine ilişkin "sorunlar", "fayda ve avantajlar" ve "beklentiler ve çözümler" olarak adlandırılmıştır.

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmanın tüm hazırlanma süreçlerinde etik kurallara ve bilimsel atıf gösterme ilkelerine riayet edildiğini yazar(lar) beyan eder. Aksi bir durumun tespiti halinde Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi’nin hiçbir sorumluluğu olmayıp, tüm sorumluluk makale yazarlarına aittir. Yazarlar etik kurul izni gerektiren çalışmalarda, izinle ilgili bilgileri (kurul adı, tarih ve sayı no) yöntem bölümünde ve ayrıca burada belirtmişlerdir. Kurul adı: Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulu Tarih:01.03.2021 No: 95 ARAŞTIRMACILARIN MAKALEYE KATKI ORANI BEYANI 1. yazar katkı oranı : %100

Kaynakça

  • Akram, M., & Muhammad Khan, A. (2020). Exploring e-leadership of principals: Increasing school effectiveness by learning management system. Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 8(1), 15-30.
  • Almarashdeh, I. (2016). Sharing instructors experience of learning management system: A technology perspective of user satisfaction in a distance learning course. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 249-255.
  • Altıparmak, M., Kurt, İ. D., & Kapıdere, M. (2011). E-öğrenme ve uzaktan eğitimde açık kaynak kodlu öğrenme yönetim sistemleri [Open source learning management systems in e-learning and distance education]. XI. Akademik Bilişim Kongresi, 4(5).
  • Chung, C.-H., Pasquini, L. A., & Koh, C. E. (2013). Web-based learning management system considerations for higher education. Learning and Performance Quarterly, 1(4), 24-37.
  • Coldeway, D.O. (1986). Learner characteristics and success. In I. Mugridge, D. Kaufman (Eds.), Distance Education in Canada, (pp. 81-87). London: Croom Helm.
  • Çavuşoğlu, Ö. H. (2013). Mimarlık Eğitim Programında Uzaktan Eğitim Yönetimi [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
  • da Costa, R. D., de Souza, G. F., de Castro, T. B., de Medeiros Valentim, R. A., & de Pinho Dias, A. (2020). Identification of learning styles in distance education through the interaction of the student with a learning management system. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 15(3), 148-160.
  • Embi, M. A. (2011). E-learning in Malaysian higher education institutions: Status, trends, & challenges. Putrajaya, Malaysia. Department of Higher Education Ministry of Higher Education.
  • Emelyanova, N., & Voronina, E. (2014). Introducing a learning management system at a Russian university: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 272-289.
  • Epping, R. (2010). Innovative use of Blackboard (R) to assess laboratory skills. Journal of Learning Design, 3(3), 32-36.
  • Falvo, D. A., & Johnson, B. F. (2007). The use of learning management systems in the United States. TechTrends, 51(2), 40.
  • Fritz, J. (2011). Classroom walls that talk: Using online course activity data of successful students to raise self-awareness of underperforming peers. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 89-97.
  • Gülbahar, Y. (2009). E-öğrenme [E-learning]. Pegem Akademi.
  • Han, I., & Shin, W. S. (2016). The use of a mobile learning management system and academic achievement of online students. Computers & Education, 102, 79-89.
  • İşman, A. (2008). Uzaktan eğitim [Distance education]. Pegem Akademi.
  • Khan, B. S., Makhdum, F. N., & Jabeen, S. (2022). Study to Assess Students’ Readiness for Online Learning at Higher Education Level. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 42(2), 417-429.
  • Kılınç, H. (2017). Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Fakültesi öğrenenlerinin Anadolum eKampüs öğrenme yönetim sistemine ilişkin görüşlerinin kuşaklar bağlamında incelenmesi [Examining the views of Anadolu University Open Education Faculty learners on Anadolum eCampus learning management system in the context of generations]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3), 104-124.
  • Kumar, S., Gankotiya, A. K., & Dutta, K. (2011). A comparative study of moodle with other e-learning systems. 2011 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology.
  • Eden M. Laquindanum. (2022). Effectiveness of Microsoft Teams: A Study of Perception among Tertiary Learners. International Journal of Recent Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(2), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6477320
  • Llamas-Nistal, M., Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., & Castro, M. (2010). Use of e-learning functionalities and standards: the Spanish case. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(4), 540-549.
  • Lonn, S., Teasley, S. D., & Krumm, A. E. (2011). Who needs to do what where?: Using learning management systems on residential vs. commuter campuses. Computers & Education, 56(3), 642-649.
  • Naveh, G., Tubin, D., & Pliskin, N. (2010). Student LMS use and satisfaction in academic institutions: The organizational perspective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 127-133.
  • Nurakun Kyzy, Z., Ismailova, R., & Dündar, H. (2018). Learning management system implementation: A case study in the Kyrgyz Republic. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(8), 1010-1022.
  • Özonur, M., Kamışlı, H., Yelken, T. Y., & Tokmak, H. S. (2019). Uzaktan eğitim öğrencilerinin Enocta öğrenme yönetim sistemi hakkında görüşlerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of distance education students' opinions about Enocta learning management system]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (50), 283-302.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Sage.
  • Petrakova, E. A., Divina, T. V., & Beliakova, M. U. (2022). A system for evaluating student learning outcomes with a differentiated approach using the LMS moodle electronic educational platform. AIP Conference Proceedings.
  • Saygılı, H., & Çetin, H. (2021). The Effects of Learning Management Systems (LMS) on Mathematics Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen Ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 15(2), 341-362. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1026534
  • Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
  • Sezer, C., & Korucu, A. T. (2019). Bilişim teknolojileri ve yazılım dersinde öğrenme yönetim sistemi kullanımının öğrenci akademik başarısına etkisi [The effect of learning management system usage on student academic achievement in information technologies and software course]. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5, 157-176.
  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
  • Szabo, M. (2002). Cmi theory and practice: Historical roots of learning managment systems. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 929-936). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  • Tagoe, M. A., & Cole, Y. (2020). Using the Sakai Learning Management System to change the way Distance Education nursing students learn: are we getting it right? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(3), 201-221.
  • Yapici, I. U., & Akbayin, H. (2012). The Effect of Blended Learning Model on High School Students' Biology Achievement and on Their Attitudes towards the Internet. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(2), 228-237.
  • Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research. Sage.
Toplam 34 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular İnsan Bilgisayar Etkileşimi, Öğretim Teknolojileri
Bölüm Eğitim
Yazarlar

Tayfun Yörük 0000-0002-4900-5705

Yayımlanma Tarihi 3 Mart 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 30 Mayıs 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Yörük, T. (2025). Academician Views on the Use of MS Teams in Distance Education: A Case Study. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 27(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.1306960