Yenilebilir Yabani Otların Kullanım Biçimleri ve Yenilebilir Yabani Otlara İlişkin Geleneksel Bilginin Aktarımı: Orta Karadeniz Örneği

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 3, 1255 - 1281, 29.09.2025

Ayla Aydın

https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.1461451

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacını Anadolu mutfak kültüründe tüketilen yenilebilir yabani ot çeşitleri, etnobotanik özellikleri, kullanım alanları, kullanım biçimleri ve yöreye özgü yabani otların kullanımını etkileyen faktörlerin tespit edilmesi oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma alanını Orta Karadeniz Bölgesi (Tokat, Samsun, Ordu illeri) oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama tekniği olarak doküman analizi ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme kullanılmıştır. Veri analiz yöntemi olarak da içerik analizi kullanılmıştır. Görüşmeler gönüllülük esasına dayalı olarak seçilen 18 katılımcı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Görüşmelerde kullanılan yarı yapılandırılmış soru formu, konuya ilişkin yapılan doküman incelemesi doğrultusunda oluşturulmuştur. Alanda yapılan görüşmelere ilişkin bulgular ve içerik analizi sonucu elde edilen dört ana kategoriyi yenilebilir yabani otların Karadeniz mutfağında kullanım alanları, yenilebilir yabani otların elde edilme ve muhafaza yöntemleri, yabani bitkilere ilişkin bilginin edinilme şekli, yöreye özgü yabani otların kullanımını etkileyen faktörler oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma sonuçları yenilebilir yabani bitkileri kullanma geleneğinin, Orta Karadeniz’de halen canlılığını koruduğuna ve yenilebilir yabani bitkilere ilişkin ortak bir kültürel mirasın varlığına işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yenilebilir Yabani Bitkiler, , Geleneksel Bilginin Aktarımı , Anadolu , Nitel Araştırma

Etik Beyan

Araştırma kapsamında kullanılan verilerin toplanabilmesi için gerekli olan etik kurul izin belgesi Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştırmaları Etik Kurulu 06.11.2023 tarihi ve 359554 karar/sayı numarası ile alınmıştır.

Dynamics of Usage and Transmission of Traditional Knowledge of Edible Wild Plants: The Case of Central Black Sea Region

Öz

The purpose of this study was to determine the types, ethnobotanical characteristics, usage fields, and usage patterns of edible wild plants consumed Central Black Sea Region (Tokat, Samsun, Ordu provinces) in Turkey. In the study, document analysis and semi-structured interviews were used as data collection techniques and content analysis was applied as the data analysis method. The interviews were carried out with 18 participants selected on a voluntary basis. The semi-structured question form used in interviews was developed in line with the document review on the subject. The findings of the field interviews and the literature review revealed four main categories: the uses of edible wild plants in Black Sea cuisine, the methods of collecting and preserving edible wild plants, the way of obtaining information on wild plants, and the factors affecting the use of local wild plants. The results of the research have shown that the tradition of using edible wild plants is still widespread in the Central Black Sea region and that there is a common cultural heritage regarding them.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Edible Wild Plants , Traditional Knowledge , Anatolia , Qualitative Research

Etik Beyan

The ethics committee permission required for the collection of data used within the scope of the research was obtained from Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University Social and Human Sciences Research Ethics Committee with the decision/number 359554 dated 06.11.2023.

Kaynakça

• Abbasi, A. M., Khan, M. A., Khan, N., & Shah, M. H., (2013). Ethnobotanical survey of medicinally important wild edible fruits species used by tribal communities of lesser Himalayas-Pakistan. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 148, 528-536.
• Akcicek, E., & Vural, M. (2003). Local names and ethnobotanical features of some plants in Kumalar Mountain (Afyon) and its vicinity. The Herb Journal of Systematic Botany, 10, 151–162.
• Altıok, A., & Behçet, L. (2005). The Flora of Bitlis River Valley. Turkish Journal of Botany, 29 (5), 355–387. https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/botany/vol29/iss5/3
• Ali-Shtayeh, M. S., Jamous, R. M., Al-Shafie', J. H., Elgharabah, W. A., Kherfan, F. A., Qarariah, K. H., & Nasrallah, H. A. (2008). Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants used in Palestine (Northern West Bank): A comparative study. Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 4, 1-13.
• Avcı, E. (2021). The Determination of the Factors Affecting the Unique Festival Experience: The Case of Alaçatı Herb Festival. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 9 (3), 1722–1740. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2021.864
• Aydin, A. (2021). Anadolu Mutfak Kültürünün Oluşumunda Hitit Mutfağının Rolü: Etno arkeolojik Bir Araştırma, Yayımlanmış doktora tezi. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Bacchetta, L., Visioli, F., Cappelli, G., Caruso, E., Martin, G., Nemeth, E.,& Eatwild Consortium. (2016). A manifesto for the valorization of wild edible plants. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 191, 180-187.
• Bağcı, Y. (2000). Ethnobotanical features of Aladağlar (Yahyalı, Kayseri) and its vicinity. The Herb Journal of Systematic Botany, 7(1), 89–94.
• Belli, S. & Uluer, C. (2023). Yenilebilir Otların Yöresel Mutfaklarda Kullanım Şekilleri. Journal of Gastronomy, Hospitality and Travel. 6(4). 1558-1567.
• Bhatia, H., Sharma, Y. P., Manhas, R. K.,& Kumar, K. (2018). Traditionally used wild edible plants of district Udhampur, J&K, India. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 14, 1-13.
• Bloor, M. & Wood, F. (2006). Keywords in Qualitative Methods. New York: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209403
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. New York: SAGE Publications.
• Çetinkaya, N., & Yıldız, S. (2018). Erzurum’un Yenilebilir Otları ve Yemeklerde Kullanım Şekillerine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Güncel Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 482-503.
• Demir, E., Sürmen, B., Özer, H., & Kutbay, H.G. (2017). Ethnobotanical Characteristics of Plants Growing Naturally in Salipazarı and Its Surroundings. Black Sea Journal of Science, 7(2), 68.
• Dinc, L., & Huang, R. (2024). Organic food consumption at casual and fine dining restaurants in the UK: Restaurant managers’ perspectives. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Tourism, 10(1), 1-12.78.
• De Toni, D., Eberle, L., Larentis, F., & Milan, G. S. (2018). Antecedents of perceived value and repurchase intention of organic food. Journal Of Food Products Marketing, 24 (4), 456-475.
• Dogan, Y., Baslar, S., Ay, G., & Mert, H. H. (2004). The Use of Wild Edible Plants in Western and Central Anatolia (Turkey). Economic Botany, 58(4), 684–690. https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2004)058[0684:TUOWEP]2.0.CO;2
• Duguma, H. T. (2020). Wild edible plant nutritional contribution and consumer perception in Ethiopia. International Journal of Food Science, (1), 295-623.
• Dyer, T. F. T. (2015). The Folk-lore of Plants (2nd ed.). Tulsa: Mythik Press.
• Findley, M. G., Kikuta, K., & Denly, M. (2021). External validity. Annual Review Of Political Science, 24 (1), 365-393.
• Geng, Y., Zhang, Y., Ranjitkar, S., Huai, H., & Wang, Y. (2016). Traditional knowledge and its transmission of wild edibles used by the Naxi in Baidi Village, northwest Yunnan province. Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 12, 1-21.
• Glesne, C. (2013). Nitel araştırmaya giriş (3. Basım). A. Ersoy ve P. Yalçınoğlu (Çev. Edt.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Göktaş, Ö., & Gıdık, B. (2019). Uses of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. Bayburt Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.2307/3647306
• González-Zamorano, L., Cámara, R. M., Morales, P., & Cámara, M. (2025). Harnessing Edible Wild Fruits: Sustainability and Health Aspects. Nutrients, 17(3), 412.
• Govaerts, R. (2001). How many species of seed plants are there? Taxon, 50(4), 1085–1090. https://doi.org/10.2307/1224723
• Guba, E.G. & Lincon, Y.S. (1982), Epistemological and methodological bases for naturalistic inquiry, Educational Communications and Technology Journal, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 363-381.
• Guil Guerrero., J. L., Giménez Martı́nez, J. J. & Torija Isasa, M. E. (1998). Mineral Nutrient Composition of Edible Wild Plants. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 11(4), 322–328. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfca.1998.0594
• Guil-Guerrero, J. L. (2014). The safety of edible wild plants: Fuller discussion may be needed. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 35(1), 18-20.
• Güner, A., Akyıldırım, B., Alkayış, M. F. Çıngay B., Kanoğlu, S.S., Özkan, A.M., Öztekin, M. & Tuğ, G. N. (2012). Turkish names of plants. In Güner, A., aslan, S. Ekim, T. Vural, M. & Babaç, M. T. (Ed.), List of Plants of Türkiye (Veinous Plants). Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler). Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi Yayınları Flora Dizisi 1.
• Heinrich, M., Kufer, J., Leonti, M., & Pardo-de-Santayana, M. (2006). Ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology—Interdisciplinary links with the historical sciences. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 107(2), 157–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2006.05.035
• Jabbar, A., Zaman, M. A., Iqbal, Z., Yaseen, M., & Shamim, A. (2007). Anthelmintic activity of Chenopodium album (L.) and Caesalpinia crista (L.) against trichostrongylid nematodes of sheep. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 114(1), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2007.07.027
• Kadıoğlu, Z., Çukadar, K., Kandemir, A., Kalkan, N. N et al. (2020). Kars İlinde Sebze Olarak Tüketilen Yabani Bitki Türlerinin Tespiti ve Kullanım Şekilleri. Anadolu Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 30(1), 11-32. https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.727146
• Kala, C. P. (2015). Medicinal and aromatic plants: Boon for enterprise development. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 2(4), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2015.05.002
• Karaca, O. B., Yıldırım, O., & Çakıcı, C. (2015). An Evaluation on Their Relation to Health and Wild Plant Meals, Wild Edible Plants in Gastronomy Tourism. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 3(3), 27-42. https://jotags.net/index.php/jotags/issue/view/26/36
• Karadağ, Ü., & Özer, Ç. (2022). Gastronomi Turizmi Açısından Yenilebilir Otların Önemi: Ege Bölgesi Örneği. Asya Studies-Academic Social Studies/Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar, 6(22), 249-256.
• Kökler, N., & Çetinkaya, N. (2022). Yenilebilir Yabani Bitkilerin Gastronomik Açıdan Değerlendirilmesi: Erzurum Uzundere Örneği. Turar Turizm ve Araştırma Dergisi, 11(1), 50-74
• Kendir, G., & Güvenç, A. (2010). An Overview of Ethnobotany and Ethnobotanical Studies in Turkey. Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Pharmacy, 30(1), 49–80.
• Keykubat, B. (2017). Tibbi Aromatik Bitkiler ve Iyi Yaşam.( Medical Aromatic Plants and Well Life). Izmir Commodity Exchange. https://itb.org.tr/makale/5-tibbi-aromatik-bitkiler-ve-iyi-yasam
• Kızılcalıoğlu, G., Aybar, D., & Şen, Ö. (2019). A Study on the Perceived Food Image, Satisfaction Levels and Behavioral Intentions for the Future of the Tourists Attending the Alaçatı Herb Festival. 510–517.
• Kindscher, K. (2024). Edible Wild Plants of the Prairie: An Ethnobotanical Guide. Revised and Expanded. University Press of Kansas.
• Kocabaş, Y. Z., & Gedik, O. (2016). An Ethnobotanical Study of wild plants sold in district bazaar in Kahramanmaras. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 4(6), 41–41. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.2016624154
• Kozak, M. (2014). Scientific Research: Design, Writing and Publication Techniques. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Lesko CR, Buchanan AL, Westreich D, Edwards JK, Hudgens MG, Cole SR. (2017). Generalizing study results. Epidemiology, 28:553–61
• Low Dog, T. (2006). A Reason to Season: The Therapeutic Benefits of Spices and Culinary Herbs. Explore, 2(5), 446–449.
• Luković, M., Pantović, D., Kostić, M., Veljović, S., Bugarćič, J. (2023). Food Plant Diversity in Cultural Ecosystem Services Perspective: Edible Plants as a Driver for Improving the Offer of Gastro-Tourism, Ecologica. 30 (110). 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2006.06.010
• Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13–17. doi:10.3102/ 0013189X017002013
• Miles, B. M. ve Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Source Book. New York: SAGE Publications.
• Neuman, L. W. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative And Quantitative Approaches (Seventh Ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
• Noble, N., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. BMJ Journals, 22(3). https://ebn.bmj.com/content/22/3/67
• Motti, R. (2022). Wild edible plants: a challenge for future diet and health. Plants, 11(3), 344.
• Oğan, Y., & Cömert, M. (2022). Artvin yöre gastronomisinde tıbbi ve aromatik bitkiler. Aydın Gastronomy, 6 (1), 29-38.
• Ohmagari, K., & Berkes, F. (1997). Transmission of indigenous knowledge and bush skills among the Western James Bay Cree women of subarctic Canada. Human Ecology, 25, 197-222.
• Ordu Metropolitan Municipality. (2021). Geographical Indication of Roasted Melocan (1217). https://ci.turkpatent.gov.tr/Files/GeographicalSigns/c23ff970-cdb2-408c-96de-7a9e3f44063e.pdf
• Özkan, E., Curkan, S. C., & Sarak, E. C. (2015). The Effects of Festivals on Festival Visitors: The Case of Alaçatı Herb Festival. Gumushane Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Elektronik Dergisi, 6(14). https://doi.org/10.17823/gusb.247
• Palhares, R. M., Gonçalves Drummond, M., Dos Santos Alves Figueiredo Brasil, B., Pereira Cosenza, G., Das Graças Lins Brandão, M., & Oliveira, G. (2015). Medicinal Plants Recommended by the World Health Organization: DNA Barcode Identification Associated with Chemical Analyses Guarantees Their Quality. Plos One, 10(5), e0127866. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127866
• Pang, S. M., Tan, B. C., & Lau, T. C. (2021). Antecedents of Consumers’ Purchase Intention towards Organic Food: Integration of Theory of Planned Behavior and Protection Motivation Theory. Sustainability, 13(9), 5218.
• Patton, M. Q. (2022). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd Edition). Kaliforniya: Sage Publications.
• Paunović, I., & Jovanović, V. (2017). Implementation of sustainable tourism in the German Alps: A case study. Sustainability, 9(2), 226.
• Pearl J, Bareinboim E. (2014). External validity: from do-calculus to transportability across populations. Stat. Sci. 29:579–95
• Pehlivan, T. (2023). Some Important Edible Wild Plants of Türkiye and Their Use in Culinary. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 11(2), 363-371.
• Peters, C. R., O’Brien, E. M., Boaz, N. T., Conroy, G. C., Godfrey, L. R., Kawanaka, K., Kortlandt, A., Nishida, T., Poirier, F. E., & Smith, E. O. (1981). The Early Hominid Plant-Food Niche: Insights From an Analysis of Plant Exploitation by Homo, Pan, and Papio in Eastern and Southern Africa [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology, 22(2), 127–140. JSTOR.
• Project, T. T. (2020). Beyond internal validity: Towards a broader understanding of credibility in development policy research. World Development, 127, 104802.
• Rasool Hassan, B. A. (2012). Medicinal Plants (Importance and Uses). Pharmaceutica Analytica Acta, 03(10). https://doi.org/10.4172/2153-2435.1000e139
• Salmerón-Manzano, E., Garrido-Cardenas, J. A., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2020). Worldwide Research Trends on Medicinal Plants. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103376
• Schippmann, U., Leaman, D., & Cunningham, A. (2002). Impact of Cultivation and Gathering of Medicinal Plants on Biodiversity: Global Trends and Issues. In Biodiversity and the Ecosystem Approach in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 142–167.
• Schunko, C., Li, X., Klappoth, B., Lesi, F., Porcher, V., Porcuna-Ferrer, A. & Reyes-García, V. (2022). Local communities’ perceptions of wild edible plant and mushroom change: A systematic review. Global Food Security, 32, 100601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100601
• Shumsky, S. A., Hickey, G. M., Pelletier, B., & Johns, T. (2014). Understanding the contribution of wild edible plants to rural social-ecological resilience in semi-arid Kenya. Ecology and Society, 19(4).
• Silverman, D. (2005 ). Instances or sequences? Improving the state of the art of qualitative research. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6, (3).
• Skinner, A. (1911). A Comparative Sketch of the Menomini. American Anthropologist, 13(4), 551–565. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1911.13.4.02a00050
• Şimşek, A., Durmuş, E. N. İ. & Çakmak, S. D. (2020). Yenilebilir otlar ve mutfaklarda kullanım şekilleri: Kastamonu örneği. Tourism and Recreation, 2(1), 8-12.
• Temizkan, S. P., & Uslu, A. N. (2023). Safranbolu’daki Yenilebilir Otlar ve Yemeklerde Kullanımı. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 11(1), 434-452
• Travers, M. (2001). Qualitative Research Through Case Studies. New York: SAGE Publications.
• Turner, N. J., Łuczaj, Ł. J., Migliorini, P., Pieroni, A., Dreon, A. L., Sacchetti, L. E., & Paoletti, M. G. (2011). Edible and tended wild plants, traditional ecological knowledge and agroecology. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30(1-2), 198-225.
• Turreira-García, N., Theilade, I., Meilby, H., & Sørensen, M. (2015). Wild edible plant knowledge, distribution and transmission: a case study of the Achí Mayans of Guatemala. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 11, 1-17.
• Tutar, H. (2022). Nitel araştırmalarda geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik: Bir model önerisi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22 (Özel Sayı 2), 117-140.
• Uğur, A., Saka, A. K., & Uçan, U. (2021). Ordu Vegetable Culture and Edible Herbs. In Ordu with Its Historical and Cultural Dimensions-Volume II (Erzurum). Ankara: Fenomen Yayıncılık.
• Valdes, B., Kozuharova, E., & Stoycheva, C. (2025). A Review of Edible Wild Plants Recently Introduced into Cultivation in Spain and Their Health Benefits. International Journal of Plant Biology, 16(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijpb16010005
• Walker, H., Di Sisto, L., & McBain, D. (2008). Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: Lessons from the public and private sectors. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 14(1), 69-85.
• Wu, J., Hou, Y., & Wen, Y. (2018). Tourist behavior and conservation awareness on eating wild edible plants in mountainous protected areas: a case study in Northwest China. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 37(5), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2018.1428901
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (1999). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin yayıncılık.