Gebelerde Pelvik Kuşak Anketinin Kültürel Adaptasyonu, Güvenilirliği ve Geçerliği

Yıl 2019, , 513 - 523, 30.09.2019

Gül Deniz Yilmaz Yelvar , Yasemin Çırak Yasemin Parlak Demir Emine Seda Türkyılmaz

https://doi.org/10.17098/amj.624417

Cited By: 2

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı gebe kadınlarda
Pelvik Kuşak Anketi'ni (PKA) Türkçe'ye çevirmek ve test-tekrar test
güvenilirliği ve geçerliğini değerlendirmekti.

Materyal ve Metot: Çalışmaya pelvik kuşak ağrısı olan 135 gebe
alındı. Ağrı şiddetini değerlendirmek için görsel analog skalası, duruma özel
sağlık ile ilgili yaşam kalitesine için PKA, sağlıkla ilgili yaşam kalitesi
için Nottingham Sağlık Profili, özürlülük düzeyi için Oswestry Özürlülük
İndeksi, PKA'da kültürlerarası uyum için kılavuzlar kullanılmıştır.

Bulgular: Çalışmaya yaş ortalaması 30 ± 4,77 olan
135 gebe dahil edildi. Test-tekrar test güvenirliği için sınıflar arası
korelasyon katsayısı puanı, PKA aktivite alt boyutu için 0,972 (% 95 CI =
0,968-0,977), PKA semptom alt boyutu için 0,910 (% 95 CI = 0,905-0,915) ve PKA
toplam için 0,979 (% 95 CI = 0,905-0,915) olarak bulundu.

Sonuç: Çalışma, pelvik kuşak ağrısı olan
Türkçe konuşan gebelerde PKA'nin Türkçe versiyonunun hem sakatlığı hem de
semptomu ölçmek için geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olduğunu ve iyi psikometrik
özelliklere sahip olduğunu göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Pelvik kuşak ağrısı, Türkçe versiyon, geçerlik, güvenirlik, kültürel adaptasyon, gebelik

Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of The Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire in Pregnant Women

Öz

Objectives: The aims of
this study were to translate the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire(PGQ) to Turkish
and to assess its test-retest reliability and validity in pregnant women.

Materials and
Methods: One hundred and thirty-five pregnant with pelvic
girdle pain were recruited in the study. Visual analog scale was used to
evaluate pain intensity, PGQ for condition-specific health related quality of
life, Nottingham Health Profile for health related quality of life, Oswestry
Disability Index for disability level, The guidelines for cross-cultural
adaptation in PGQ was used.

Results: A total of 135
pregnant with a mean age of the 30±4.77 years included in the study. Interclass
correlation coefficient score for test-retest reliability was 0.972 (95% CI=
0.968-0.977) for PGQ activity subscale, 0.910 (95% CI=0.905-0.915) for PGQ symptom
subscale and 0.979 (95% CI= 0.975-0.983) for PGQ total.

Conclusion: The study
demonstrated that Turkish version of PGQ is a valid and reliable tool for
measuring both disability and symptom and good psychometric properties in
Turkish speaking pregnants with pelvic girdle pain.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Pelvic girdle pain, Turkish version, reliability, validity, cultural adaptation, pregnancy

Kaynakça

• Vermani E, Mittal R, Weeks A. Pelvic girdle pain and low back pain in pregnancy: a review. Pain Pract 2010;10:60-71.
• Vleeming A, Albert HB, Ostgaard HC, Sturesson B, Stuge B. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J 2008;17:794-819.
• Yoo H, Shin D, Song C. Changes in the spinal curvature, degree of pain, balance ability, and gait ability according to pregnancy period in pregnant and nonpregnant women. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27:279-84.
• Takeda K, Shimizu K, Imura M. Changes in balance strategy in the third trimester. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27:1813-7.
• Wu WH, Meijer OG, Uegaki K, et.al. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. Eur Spine J 2004;13:575-89.
• Bjelland EK, Stuge B, Engdahl B, Eberhard-Gran M. The effect of emotional distress on persistent pelvic girdle pain after delivery: a longitudinal population study. BJOG 2013;120:32-40.
• Stuge B, Garratt A, Krogstad Jenssen H, Grotle M. The pelvic girdle questionnaire: a condition-specific instrument for assessing activity limitations and symptoms in people with pelvic girdle pain. Phys Ther 2011;91:1096-108.
• Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1417-32.
• Gul ED, Yilmaz O, Bodur H. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score-physical function short-form (KOOS-PS). J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2013;26:461-6.
• Melikoglu MA, Kocabas H, Sezer I, Bilgilisoy M, Tuncer T. Validation of the Turkish version of the Quebec back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:219-24.
• Grotle M, Garratt AM, Krogstad Jenssen H, Stuge B. Reliability and construct validity of self-report questionnaires for patients with pelvic girdle pain. Phys Ther 2012;92:111-23.
• Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brein JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980;66:271-3.
• Yakut E, Duger T, Oksuz C et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:581-5.
• Baum FE, Cooke RD. Community-health needs assessment: use of the Nottingham health profile in an Australian study. Med J Aust 1989;150:581-90.
• Kucukdeveci AA, McKenna SP, Kutlay, Gursel Y, Whalley D, Arasıl T. The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int J Rehabil Res 2000;23:31-8.
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186-91.
• Feise RJ, Michael Menke J. Functional rating index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:78-86.
• Portney LG, Watkins MP Foundation of clinical research: applications to practice. Boston: Prentice Hall; 2000.