Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2005, , 49 - 72, 01.05.2005
https://doi.org/10.1501/andl_0000000321

Öz

For no apparent reason, Central Anatolian Paleolithic Age studies have been neglected since the mid 20th century. And it seems that our knowledge is very poor about knapped stone findings in this region. The goal of this study is hopefully to provoke a debate among the Paleolithic Age archaeologists. Some of previous researchers such as Kansu, Kökten, Ozansoy, Pfannenstiel etc. mainly focused on Ankara’s knapped stone findings during the mid 20th century. We must also acknowledge Campbell-Thompson, Bittel, İnan and Pittard who had worked in this region in the first half of the 20th century prior to Kansu and his friends. What we mainly find in the papers of these researchers are impressive terms such as: “levalloiso-moustérien”, “aurignacien” and “tardenoasian”. But today, some questions that come to mind are “Are these the correct terms for Central Anatolia?”, “What were the shortcomings of earlier research?” and “What answers can we propose today?”

YONTMATAŞ BULUNTU TOPLULUKLARI IŞIĞINDA ANKARA: Neyi Biliyoruz? Neyi Bilmiyoruz? Yeni Değerlendirmeler ve Sonuçlar

Yıl 2005, , 49 - 72, 01.05.2005
https://doi.org/10.1501/andl_0000000321

Öz

For no apparent reason, Central Anatolian Paleolithic Age studies have been neglected since the mid 20th century. And it seems that our knowledge is very poor about knapped stone findings in this region. The goal of this study is hopefully to provoke a debate among the Paleolithic Age archaeologists. Some of previous researchers such as Kansu, Kökten, Ozansoy, Pfannenstiel etc. mainly focused on Ankara’s knapped stone findings during the mid 20th century. We must also acknowledge Campbell-Thompson, Bittel, İnan and Pittard who had worked in this region in the first half of the 20th century prior to Kansu and his friends. What we mainly find in the papers of these researchers are impressive terms such as: “levalloiso-moustérien”, “aurignacien” and “tardenoasian”. But today, some questions that come to mind are “Are these the correct terms for Central Anatolia?”, “What were the shortcomings of earlier research?” and “What answers can we propose today?”

Toplam 0 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Arkeoloji
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Metin Kartal Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mayıs 2005
Gönderilme Tarihi 1 Ocak 2005
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2005

Kaynak Göster

Chicago Kartal, Metin. “YONTMATAŞ BULUNTU TOPLULUKLARI IŞIĞINDA ANKARA: Neyi Biliyoruz? Neyi Bilmiyoruz? Yeni Değerlendirmeler Ve Sonuçlar”. Anatolia, sy. 28 (Mayıs 2005): 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1501/andl_0000000321.

Anatolia Dergisi Başvuru Tarihleri:

Makalelerin teslimi 01 Ocak ile 15 Eylül tarihleri arasındadır.

Dergipark sisteminde problem yaşanması halinde lütfen makalelerinizi anatolia@ankara.edu.tr mail adresine bu tarih aralığında gönderiniz; posta veya kargo kabul edilmeyecektir. Başvurular 15 Eylül'e kadar yapılmalıdır.

Anadolu Anatolia Dergisi, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) ile lisanslanmıştır.