Moda Tasarımı Alanında Atölye Derslerine İlişkin E-Öğrenmeye Yönelik Öğrenci Görüşlerinin Belirlenmesi

Öz

Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri alanındaki yeni uygulamaların yansımaları e-öğrenme, mobil öğrenme ve uzaktan eğitim yaklaşımlarını ortaya çıkarmıştır. Yaşanan değişim, temel eğitimden mesleki eğitime kadar tüm eğitim olgusunu değişime zorlamaktadır. Bu durum yükseköğretim başta olmak üzere eğitim kalitesini artırmak, bütünleştirmek, dijital okuryazarlığı geliştirmek gibi konulara yönelime sevk etmiştir. Uzaktan eğitimin önemi; 2019 Aralık ayında ortaya çıkan Korona virüs enfeksiyonunun birkaç haftada bütün dünyayı etkileyen pandemi olmasıyla daha da artmıştır. Dünyanın tümü için uzaktan eğitim artık son çare değil, tek çare olmuştur. Salgının yayılmasına karşı alınan tedbirlere paralel olarak, eğitim sürecinin sürdürülebilirliği ve öğrencilerin boşluğa düşmemesi amacıyla imkânları doğrultusunda uzaktan eğitim sistemlerine yönelmişlerdir. Araştırma kapsamında, Moda Tasarımı alanındaki atölye derslerine yönelik e-öğrenme yönteminin etkililiği belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada betimsel model kullanılmıştır. Çalışma verileri anket ile elde edilmiş olup, veriler SSPS programında analiz edilerek ilgili grafiklerle yüzde değer olarak verilmiştir. Moda tasarımı alanında %80 uygulamalı gerçekleştirilen atölye dersleri için önerilen e-öğrenme modelinin, öğrencilerin başarı düzeylerine olan etkisi nicel verilerle ortaya konulmuştur. Çalışma sonucunda, Moda Atölyesi I ve II dersi için öğrencilerin online eğitimde yönelik; dersin takibini bilgisayar ile yaptıkları, sohbet, tartışma panosu, özel mesajlaşma uygulamalarını sık kullandıkları tespit edilmiştir. Öğrenciler derse asenkron olarak katılmayı, senkron katılmaya göre daha fazla tercih etmişlerdir. Dersin öğrenme çıktılarına yönelik olarak Moda Atölyesi I dersi için öğrenciler genel dikim becerilerini iyi düzeyde uygulamalarına rağmen pantolon dikim becerilerinden patlet dikimini kısmen ve kötü düzeyde yapabildiklerini belirtmişlerdir. Moda Atölyesi II dersi için öğrenciler kapama payı, pervaz ve yaka dikim becerilerini iyi düzeyde uyguladıklarını fakat basit kol yırtmaç tekniğini kısmen dikebildiklerini ifade etmişlerdir. Genel olarak öğrencilerin uzaktan eğitimden memnun oldukları, Moda Atölyesi dersleri için uygulamaya yönelik sadece belirli konularda problem yaşadıkları ortaya çıkmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Moda Tasarımı
• E-Öğrenme
• Uzaktan Eğitim
• Yüz Yüze Eğitim

Determination of Student Views on E-Learning Regarding Workshop Courses in the Field of Fashion Design

Abstract

Reflections of new applications in the field of information and communication technologies have revealed e-learning, mobile learning and distance education approaches. The change experienced forces the whole education phenomenon, from basic education to vocational education, to change. This situation has led to a tendency towards issues such as increasing the quality of education, integrating it, and improving digital literacy, especially in higher education. In order for higher education to gain 4.0 qualification, It is necessary to realize blended, flexible or online learning applications, to open training-certificate programs that meet the needs of the learners in order to gain vocational qualifications, to gain career management skills, and to establish continuous connections between industry, researchers and learners. The importance of distance education; the coronavirus infection, which emerged in December 2019, has increased even more with the pandemic affecting the whole world in a few weeks. For the whole world, online education is no longer the last resort, but the only resort. In parallel with the measures taken against the spread of the epidemic, they have turned to online education systems in line with their possibilities in order to ensure the sustainability of the education process and not to let students fall into a vacuum. Within the scope of the research, it was aimed to determine the effectiveness of the e-learning method for workshop courses in the field of Fashion Design. The descriptive model was used in the research. The study data were collected with a questionnaire and the data were analysed and the effect of the e-learning model recommended for the workshop courses in the field of fashion design, which was carried out with 80% practice, on the success levels of the students was reve aled with quantitative data. As a result of his study, students' opinions on online education for fashion workshop I and II courses; It has been determined that they follow the course with the computer, and they frequently use chat, discussion board, and private messaging applications. They preferred attending the course asynchronously more than synchronously. In terms of the learning outcomes of the course, for the fashion workshop I lesson, the students stated that although they applied their general sewing skills at a good level, they could only partially and poorly perform the trousers sewing skills. For the Fashion Atelier II course, the students stated that they applied their covering margin, sill and collar sewing skills at a good level, but they could partially sew the simple sleeve slit technique. In general, it has been revealed that students are satisfied with distance education and that they have problems in certain issues related to practice for fashion workshop lessons.

Keywords

• Fashion Design
• E-Learning
• Distance Education
• Face-to-Face Education.

Kaynakça

1. Akyürek, R. (2020). The Views of Lectures about Distance Music Education Process in the Pandemic Period. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 5(13), 1790-1833.
2. Anna, Y. N. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and çevrimiçi learning: Teaching research methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 199-215.
3. Arnett, G. (2020). Vogue Business. The world’s top fashion schools scramble to teach rising talent remotely. https://www.voguebusiness.com/fashion/fashion-schools-remote-working-csmifm-polimoda.
4. Aydın, M., Şahin, C. & Kulakaç, N. (2021). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin E-Öğrenmeye Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği: Metodolojik bir çalışma. Türkiye Klinikleri Hemşirelik Bilimleri Dergisi.
5. Attwell, G. (2007) Personal Learning Environments—The Future of eLearning? Elearning Papers, 2, 1-8.
6. Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2006). The ICT impact report: A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe, European Commission, Brussels. Retrieved from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/unpan/unpan037334.pdf
7. Baltacı, A., Mercan Annak, İ., Akbay, C., Akaydın, H., Sökmensüer, T. Ş. (2021). Üniversite Öğrencilerine Yönelik Uzaktan Eğitim Uygulamaları İçin Bir Memnuniyet Ölçeği Önerisi. 2. Uluslararası İstanbul Modern Bilimsel Araştırmalar Kongresi. 23-25 Aralık 2021, İstanbul.
8. Başaran, M., Doğan, E., Karaoğlu, E., & Şahin, E. (2020). Koronavirüs (Covıd-19) pandemi sürecinin getirisi olan uzaktan eğitimin etkililiği üzerine bir çalışma. Academia Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 368-397.

9. Brolpito, A., Lightfoot, M., Radisic, J., & Scepanovis, D. (2016). Digital And Çevrimiçi Learning In Vocational Education And Training In Serbia, European Training Foundation. Retrieved From https://www.etf.europa.eu/webatt.nsf/0/DC024C02AA9B9384C12580280043A0B6/$file/DOL%20in%20V ET%20in%20Serbia.pdf.
10. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç, Ç., E., Akgün, Ö., E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (11. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
11. Chandasiri, O. (2020). The Covid-19: impact on education. Journal of Asian and African Social Science and Humanities, 6, 37-42.
12. Crawford-Ferre, H. G., Wiest, L. R. (2012). Effective Çevrimiçi Instruction in Higher Education. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 11-14.
13. Daubney, A., & Fautley, M. (2020). Editorial Research: Music education in a time of pandemic. British Journal of Music Education, 37(2), 107-114. (31)
14. Dutton, J., Dutton, M., Perry, J. (2001’a). Do Çevrimiçi Students Perform as Well as Lecture Students? Journal of Engineering Education, 90(1), 131–136.
15. Dutton, J., Dutton, M., Perry, J. (2002 b). How Do Çevrimiçi Learning Students Differ from Lecture Students? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1). Retrieved from http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/sites/default/files/v6n1_dutton_1.pdf
16. Ergin, D. Y., Gurbuz, A., & Sakarya, G. (2021). Fine Arts Education with Distance Education in Pandemic Period. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 20(3), 72-84.
17. Fleischmann, K., (2020). Online design education: Searching for a middle Ground. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education.19(1) 36–57.
18. Im, T. (2021). Online And Blended Learning in Vocational Training Institutions in South Korea. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 13(2), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.011
19. Halaçeli M., H., & Yılmaz, H. (2021). Covid 19 Sürecinde Moda Tasarımında Sürdürülebilirlik Yaklaşımları. Idil, 88 (Aralık): s. 1747–1757. doi: 10.7816/idil-10-88-04.
20. Hamilton, D., Dahlgren, E., Hult, A., Roos, B., & Söderström, T. (2004). When performance is the product: Problems in the analysis of online distance education. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 841-854.
21. Hopcraft, A. (2002). Commentary. E-learning and Educational Diversity. Nurse Education Today, 26, 494–500.
22. Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080–1090. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004.
23. Gabriel, M. A., & Kaufield, K. J. (2008). Reciprocal mentorship: An effective support for online instructors. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16(3), 311-327.
24. Ghavifekr, S., Wong, S., Y. (2022). Technology Leadership in Malaysian Schools: The Way Forward to Education 4.0 – ICT Utilization and Digital Transformation, International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management,3:2, 1-18.DOI: 10.4018/IJABIM.20220701.oa3.
25. Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
26. Kadhila, N., & Nyambe, J. (2021). Barriers to the quality of emergency online pedagogies in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study from the University of Namibia. Journal of Learning for Development, 8(3), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v8i3.517 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
27. Kahraman, E., M., (2020). COVID-19 Salgınının Uygulamalı Derslere Etkisi ve Bu Derslerin Uzaktan Eğitimle Yürütülmesi: Temel Tasarım Dersi Örneği, Medeniyet Sanat- İMÜ Sanat Tasarım ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6, Sayı: 1, s. 44-56, E-ISSN: 2587-1684
28. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2016). Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the cookie monster. Business Horizons. 59(4), 441- 450. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03
29. Keswani, R. N., Sethi, A., Repici, A., Messmann, H., & Chiu, P. W. (2020). How to maximize trainee education during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic: perspectives from around the world. Gastroenterology,159(1), 26-29.
30. Kışla, T. (2016). Uzaktan Eğitime Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 17 (1), 258-271. Kornilov, Iu.P., Danilov, D.A., Kornilova, A.G., Golikov, A.I., & Gosudarev, I.B. (2020). Different Approaches to the Development of Online Learning in Higher Education. Propósitos y Representaciones, 8 (SPE3), e706. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2020.v8nSPE3.706
31. Kolburan-Geçer, A. ve Deveci-Topal, A. (2015). E-Derslere Yönelik Memnuniyet Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 11(4), 1272-1287.
32. Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet Self-efficacy, and Self-regulated Learning as Predictors of Student Satisfaction in Online Education Courses”. The Internet and Higher Educatin
33. Lindfors, M., Petterssonm F., Olofsson, A. (2021). Conditions For Professional Digitalcompetence: The Teacher Educators’ View.,12:4, 390- 409.https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1890936.
34. Lynch, M. (2020). E-Learning during a global pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 189- 195.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3881785
35. Marchionini G. (2003). Video and learning redux: new capabilities for practical use. Educ Technol-Saddle Brook Then Englewood Cliffs NJ-. 43(2):36–41.
36. McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortege, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 165–193. Milman, N. B. 2015. Distance Education. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition. Vol. 6. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92001-4
37. Moore, M. G., & Thompson, M. M. (1990). The effects of distance learning: A summary of literature. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 330 321.
38. Mortera-Gutierrez F. 2006. Faculty best practices using blended learning in e-learning and face-to-face instruction. Int J e-Learn. 5(3):313–337.
39. Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., Sethi, A. (2020). Advantages, Limitations and Recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 36(COVID19-S4), S27.
40. Ng, D. T. K. (2022). Online Aviation Learning Experience During The COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong And Mainland China. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13185
41. Özer, B., Üstün, E. (2020). Evaluation of Students' Views on the COVID-19 Distance Education Process in Music Departments of Fine Arts Faculties. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 6(3), 556-568.
42. Özdemir, C. (2013) Yabancılara Türkçe Öğretiminde Ders Malzemelerinin Önemi ve İşlevsel Ders Malzemelerinin Nitelikleri. Turkish studies, 8(1), 2049-2056.
43. Rao, K., & Tanners, A. (2011). Curb Cuts İn Cyberspace: Universal İnstructional Design For Online Courses. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(3), 211-229.
44. Rinaldi M. 2013. Perception of students towards e-learning. Paper presented at: 2013 IEEE 63rd Annual Conference International Council for the Educational Media (ICEM). Singapore.
45. Romeo, L. D., Lee, Y.-A. (2013). Creative And Technical Design Skills: Are College Apparel Curriculums Meeting Industry Needs? International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 6, 201–209. doi:10.1080/17543266.2013.78362
46. Peng, H., Tsai, C.C. Wu Y.T. (2006). University students’ self-efficacy and their attitudes toward the Internet: the role of students’ perceptions of the Internet Educational Studies, 32 (1) , 73-86.
47. Santosh, S., & Panda, S. (2016). Sharing Of Knowledge Among Faculty İn A Mega Open University. Open Praxis, 8(3), 247–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.317.
48. Skahill, M. P. (2003). The Role Of Social Support Network İn College Persistence Among Freshman Students. Journal of College Student Retention, 4 (1), 39–52.
49. Shevtsova, P., & Kozubai, I. (2020). Distance Foreing Language Learnin During Pandemic As A Challenge For The Education System. Матеріали конференцій Молодіжної наукової ліги, 57-59.
50. Shin, J., M., & Cassidy, T., D., (2015). Designing A Fashion Driving Forces Website as An Educational Resource, International Journal Of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 8:2, 173-183, DOI: 10.1080/17543266.2015.1045042.
51. Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 157-190. Retrieved from
52. Stone, M. T., & Perumean-Chaney, S. (2011). The benefits of online teaching for traditional classroom pedagogy: A case study for improving face-to-face instruction. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 393-400.
53. Torun, E. D. (2020). Online distance learning in higher education: E-learning readiness as a predictor of academic achievement. Open Praxis, 12(2), 191-208.
54. Terenko, O., & Ogienko, O. (2020). How to Teach Pedagogy Courses Online at University in COVID-19 Pandemic: Search for Answers. Romanian Journal for Multidimensional Education/Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12.
55. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (5. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık
56. Yick, K., Yip, J. Au, S., Lai, Y. & Yu, A. (2019). Effectiveness of blended learning in the first year of fashion education, International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 12:2, 178-188, DOI: 10.1080/17543266.2018.1546910
57. Zhang D, Zhou L, Briggs R., & Nunamaker JF. (2006). Instructional Video İn E-Learning: Assessing The İmpact Of İnteractive Video On Learning Effectiveness. Inform Manage. 43(1):15–27.
58. Watson MK, & Barrella E. 2016. Using concept maps to explore the impacts of a learning-cycle-based sustainability module implemented in two institutional contexts. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract. 143(2). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943- 5541.0000304.
59. Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic Politics, Pedagogies And Practices: Digital Technologies And Distance Education During The Coronavirus Emergency. 45:2, 107-114, DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641.