The Impact of Responsible Leadership on Employees' Organizational Identification and Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety

Abstract

This research aimed to examine the impact of responsible leadership behaviors on the organizational identification levels and job performance of managers working in the tourism sector. Furthermore, it was confirmed that psychological safety plays a mediating role in these relationships. The study's population consisted of managers (n=711) working in accommodation facilities certified by the Ministry of Tourism operating in the Avanos, Ürgüp, and Kozaklı districts of Nevşehir province. An online survey form, comprising scales for responsible leadership, organizational identification, job performance, and psychological safety, was used as the data collection tool. The analyses conducted revealed that responsible leadership behaviors positively affected managers' organizational identification levels and job performance. The findings demonstrated that psychological safety significantly mediated the relationships between responsible leadership and both organizational identification and job performance. These results contribute to the literature by explaining the positive effects of responsible leadership on organizations through the mechanism of psychological safety. Additionally, the research findings offer significant insights for business managers in the tourism sector regarding their leadership practices.

Keywords

• Responsible Leadership
• Organizational Identification
• Job Performance
• Psychological Safety

Sorumlu Liderliğin Çalışanların Örgütsel Özdeşleşmesi ve İş Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Psikolojik Güvenliğin Aracılık Rolü

Öz

Bu araştırma sorumlu liderlik davranışlarının turizm sektöründe çalışan yöneticilerin örgütsel özdeşleşme düzeyleri ve iş performansları üzerindeki etkisini incelemiştir. Ayrıca psikolojik güvenliğin bu ilişkilerde aracı bir rol oynadığı doğrulanmıştır. Araştırmanın evrenini Nevşehir ili Avanos, Ürgüp ve Kozaklı ilçelerindeki Turizm Bakanlığı belgeli konaklama tesislerinin yöneticileri (n=711) oluşturmaktadır. Veri toplama aracı olarak sorumlu liderlik, örgütsel özdeşleşme, iş performansı ve psikolojik güvenlik ölçeklerinden oluşan online bir anket formu kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda sorumlu liderlik davranışlarının yöneticilerin örgütsel özdeşleşme düzeylerini ve iş performanslarını pozitif yönde etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular psikolojik güvenliğin sorumlu liderlik ile örgütsel özdeşleşme ve iş performansı arasındaki ilişkilerde anlamlı bir aracı rol oynadığını göstermiştir. Bu sonuçlar sorumlu liderlik anlayışının örgütler üzerindeki olumlu etkilerinin psikolojik güvenlik mekanizması üzerinden işlediğini ortaya koyarak literatüre katkı sağlamaktadır. Ayrıca araştırma bulguları turizm sektöründeki işletme yöneticilerine liderlik uygulamaları konusunda önemli içgörüler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Örgütsel Özdeşleşme
• İş Performansı
• Psikolojik Güvenlik
• Sorumlu Liderlik

Kaynakça

1. Alfes, K., Truss, C., Soane, E. C., Rees, C., & Gatenby, M. (2013). The relationship between line manager behavior, perceived psychological contract fulfillment and employee engagement. Personnel Review, 42(6), 726-747. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2012-0071
2. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
4. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1992). Some methods for assessing measurement error in structural equation models. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(4), 457-468. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379202900407
5. Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of felt obligation to repay the organization. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), 1360-1385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00730.x
6. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999
7. Aydın, S., & İlhan, M. M. (2016). Responsible leadership scale: Validity and reliability study. Business and Economics Research Journal, 7(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2016115629
8. Babalola, M. T., Ogunnaike, O. O., & Ojedokun, O. A. (2019). Responsible leadership and employee commitment: The mediating role of ethical climate. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(1), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2018-0275

9. Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety as critical factors for the success of innovation in organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12(1), 41-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320344000007
10. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
11. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
12. Bayram, M. (2021). The mediating role of organizational trust in the effect of ethical leadership on employee performance. Social Sciences Studies Journal, 7(82), 1735-1748. https://doi.org/10.26733/sssj.3232
13. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons.
14. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). Jossey-Bass.
15. Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
16. Bystroe, V. V., & Shpak, N. A. (2017). Psychological safety as a factor of leadership development in the organization. Social-Economic Phenomena and Processes, 12(11), 12-17.
17. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35-70). Jossey-Bass.
18. Carmeli, A., Ben-Hador, B., Waldman, D. A., & Galvin, B. M. (2017). Psychological capital, organizational identification and multiple dimensions of job performance. Personnel Review, 46(4), 670-690. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09- 2015-0239
19. Carmeli, A., Brueller, D., & Dutton, J. E. (2010). Collective relational energy and organizational innovativeness: The mediating role of psychological safety. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.618
20. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equation modeling. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(4), 386-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033004005
21. Cole, M. S., & Bruch, H. (2006). Organizational identity strength, identification, and employees’ attitudes and behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 675-705. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.378
22. Çalışkan, A., & Köroğlu, Ö. (2022). Job performance, task performance, contextual performance: Development and validation of a new scale. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 8(2), 180-201. https://doi.org/10.29131/uiibd.1201880
23. Çekmecelioğlu, H. G., & Özbağ, G. K. (2016). The relationship between psychological safety and creativity in the workplace: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 284-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.031
24. De Clercq, D., Fatima, T., Nazam, M., & Saeed, N. (2020). Responsible leadership and organizational citizenship behaviors: The roles of organizational identification and relational social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(3), 535-550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4062-1
25. De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader's social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates' optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 297-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.002
26. De Roeck, K., & Delobbe, N. (2017). Do environmental CSR initiatives influence employees’ organizational identification? Business Ethics: A European Review, 26(2), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12140
27. Doğan, Y. (2005). A study in Kayseri to determine the effect of positive and negative affectivity on employees' task and contextual performance in organizations [Master's thesis, Erciyes University].
28. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
29. Edwards, B. J., & Peccei, R. (2018). Organizational identification and employee well-being: A meta-analytic review. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1402041
30. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
31. Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Aguilera, R. V., & Pearce, J. L. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review and extension. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12183
32. Ganguli, S., & Baul, P. K. (2020). Organizational identification and turnover intention: The mediating roles of perceived organizational support and psychological climate. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 24(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262919860217
33. Giao, H. N. K., Vuong, B. N., Hung, N. M., & Linh, P. T. (2020). The impact of organizational culture on job performance through employee engagement: A case study of Vietnamese small and medium-sized enterprises. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1740309. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1740309
34. Gondal, U. H., Hussain, N., & Anwar, F. (2021). The impact of responsible leadership on job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(3), 573-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04351-z
35. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
36. Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634443
37. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2017). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
38. Haque, A. U., Baloch, A., & Yasmeen, H. (2019). The impact of responsible leadership on employee trust and organizational commitment. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 35(4), 575-592. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-04-2019-0070
39. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.
40. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (2016). Social identity theory. In Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 26-47). SAGE Publications.
41. Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., Otten, S., & Hinkle, S. (2004). The social identity perspective: Intergroup relations, self-categorization, and the nature of group life. In Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 3-27). Blackwell Publishing.
42. Hu, J., Mao, Y., Zhang, Y., & Li, C. (2018). The impact of psychological safety on knowledge sharing in teams: The mediating role of perceived team support and the moderating role of team identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1778. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01778
43. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
44. Hussain, S., Lei, S., Akram, T., Eadrees, F., Hussain, M. A., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Relationship between ethical leadership and employee performance: The mediating role of employee well-being. Sustainability, 11(11), 3127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113127
45. Imran, M. K., Majeed, M., & Ayub, A. (2018). Impact of transformational leadership on employee performance in banking sector of Pakistan. Journal of Business and Economic Review, 3(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.35609/jber.2018.3.1(2
46. Jaiswal, D., & Dhar, R. L. (2017). The influence of perceived organizational support, psychological climate and organizational identification on job performance. Personnel Review, 46(8), 1666-1682. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2016-0082
47. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
48. Khan, A. N., Nawaz, A., & Valeri, M. (2020). The impact of high-performance work systems on employee performance: The mediating role of employee engagement. International Journal of Manpower, 41(8), 1203-1220. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-05-2019-0257
49. Kim, S., Lee, K., & Park, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and organizational reputation: The moderating role of responsible leadership. Sustainability, 9(11), 2007. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112007
50. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Publications.
51. Kooij, D. T. A. M., Van Woerkom, M., Wilkenloh, J., & Dorenbosch, L. (2016). Organizational identification as a moderator of the relationship between age and job satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.004
52. Kreiner, G. E., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.234
53. Lee, J., Lee, H., Moon, S., & Sung, T. K. (2019). The influence of authentic leadership on organizational identification and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating role of trust in leader. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(1), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2018-0188
54. Lei, Z., Liu, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2018). The impact of psychological safety on employees’ learning behavior in the workplace: The mediating role of proactive personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1826. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01826
55. Li, W., Zhao, H., Zhang, R., Chen, J., & Wang, B. (2020). Responsible leadership and employee proactive behavior: The mediating role of psychological capital and moderating role of power distance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1879. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01879
56. Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0176
57. Maak, T., & Lundgren, S. (2009). The dimensions of corporate social responsibility. In A. Kakabadse & M. Morsing (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility: Reconciling aspirations with application (pp. 17-36). Palgrave Macmillan.
58. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99-128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
59. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(6), 673-685. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130608
60. Malhotra, N. K., & Dash, S. (2011). Marketing research: An applied orientation. Pearson Publishing. Newman, A. H., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety climate: A review and directions for future research. Group & Organization Management, 42(1), 119-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116686623
61. Oh, J., Chang, Y. K., & Park, M. S. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The moderating role of industry characteristics and responsible leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 53(8), 1431-1455. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12214
62. Olcay, G. (2010). Organizational identification: Conceptual framework and an application [Unpublished master's thesis, Dokuz Eylül University].
63. O'Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492-499. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.492
64. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books.
65. Organ, D. W., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.157
66. Özdemir, M. S., & Arslan, S. (2018). The relationship between responsible leadership and organizational identification: The mediating role of perceived organizational support. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27(4), 325-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12191
67. Özkan, O. S., & Üzüm, B. (2021). Responsible leadership: A scale adaptation study. Journal of Management Economics Research, 19(4), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1020593
68. Park, S., Kim, H. K., & Zhou, J. (2019). The role of psychological safety in promoting employees' adaptive behaviors during organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 32(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-05-2018-0134
69. Piccolo, R. F., Greenbaum, D., Den Hartog, D. N., & Folger, R. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2-3), 259-278. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.627
70. Riketta, M. (2015). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 87, 20-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.12.003
71. Siu, O. L., Bakker, A. B., & Jiang, X. (2019). Psychological capital and job satisfaction: The mediating role of social support and psychological safety. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(1), 187-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9947-6
72. Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2016). Translating organizational identification to extra-role behavior: The mediating role of job autonomy and team climate. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(1), 149-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9410-4
73. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
74. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Nelson-Hall.
75. Uporov, I. P., & Zaytseva, N. A. (2018). The influence of organizational culture on the effectiveness of personnel activities. Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series Economics and Management, 12(1), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.14529/em180116
76. Van Dick, R., Grojean, M. W., Christ, O., & Wieseke, J. (2018). Identity, identification, and the need for belonging: Toward a unifying model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(5), 577-596. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2261
77. Vinod Kumar, K., & Ramakrishnan, P. M. (2017). Impact of leadership styles on employee performance with mediating effect of motivation. International Journal of Management Studies, 4(7), 23-34.
78. Viswesvaran, C. (2015). Conscientiousness and work performance: A meta-analytic investigation using overall measures of conscientiousness. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(4), 611-627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9387-y
79. Voegtlin, C. (2011). Developing a scale measuring responsible leadership behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0772-y
80. Voegtlin, C., Frisch, C., Walther, A., & Schwab, S. (2020). How responsible leadership impacts employees’ organizational identification and voluntary engagement: The mediating role of collective identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(3), 489-506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04143-5
81. Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913
82. Yılmaz, A. (2018). Adaptation of the psychological safety scale into Turkish: A validity and reliability study [Unpublished master's thesis, Istanbul University].
83. Yunus, M. A., Khan, S. A. R., Hussain, M., & Umar, M. (2022). Does responsible leadership foster ethical perceptions and behaviors? The mediating role of organizational justice. Sustainability, 14(3), 1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031682
84. Yolcu, E., & Kılınç, Z. (2020). The effect of ethical leadership on organizational identification: The mediating role of leader-member exchange. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 6(14), 1-13.
85. Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Zhang, Z., & Zhao, X. (2019). Responsible leadership and team innovation: The roles of shared vision and team psychological safety. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(3), 793-809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3617-y
86. Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257