Examination of Successful and Unsuccessful Humor in Terms of Self-Confidence and Competence Perceptions

Yıl 2019, , 63 - 69, 07.10.2019

Zeynep Oktuğ

https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.453825

Öz

The aim of this study is to
investigate the effects of successful and unsuccessful humor in terms of
self-confidence and competence perceptions. For this purpose, two different
recruitment interviews, each with successful and unsuccessful humor and
different genders were displayed. Four cases were watched by 255 psychology
undergraduate students as four separate short films. Differences were examined
by paired samples t-test. In terms of perceived self-confidence, there wasn’t
any difference; but the perceived competence level was significantly higher in
case of succesful humor compared to the case of unsuccessful humor. In case of
unsuccessful humor, there wasn’t any difference in perceived self-esteem for
both male and female candidate, but the competence of male candidate was
perceived lower than the female candidate’s competence. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Successful Humor, Unsuccessful Humor, Self-confidence, Competence

Başarılı ve Başarısız Mizahın Özgüven ve Yeterlilik Algıları Açısından İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırma, başarılı ve
başarısız mizahın etkilerinin, algılanan özgüven ve yeterlilik açısından
incelenmesi amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Başarılı ve başarısız mizahın
sergilendiği iki farklı işe alım mülakatı, bir kadın ve bir erkek aday
tarafından canlandırılmıştır. Oluşturulan dört durum (Başarılı mizah-kadın;
başarılı mizah-erkek; başarısız mizah-kadın; başarısız mizah-erkek) dört ayrı
kısa film olarak çekilmiş ve 255 psikoloji lisans öğrencisine izletilmiştir.
İzlenen dört durumun, özgüven ve yeterlilik algıları açısından oluşturduğu
farklar eşleştirilmiş örneklemler t-testi ile incelenmiştir. Algılanan özgüven
açısından fark oluşmazken, başarılı mizah sergileyen kadın ve erkek adayın
yeterlilik düzeyinin, başarısız mizah durumuna nazaran daha yüksek olarak
algılandığı belirlenmiştir. Başarılı mizah sergilenmesi durumunda, cinsiyetin
anlamlı bir fark yaratmadığı, ancak başarısız mizah durumunda, erkek adayın
yeterlilik düzeyinin kadın adaya nazaran daha düşük algılandığı görülmüştür

Anahtar Kelimeler

Başarılı Mizah, Başarısız Mizah, Özgüven, Yeterlilik

Kaynakça

• Anthony, D. B., Wood, J. V., Holmes, J. G. (2007). Testing sociometer theory: Self-esteem and the importance of acceptance for social decision-making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 425–432.
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of Personel and Collective Efficacy in Changing Socities. Self-Efficacy in Changing Socities. A. Bandura (Ed). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Bandura, A., (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control, New York: Freeman.
• Berryman-Fink, C. (1989). The manager’s desk reference. New York: Amacom
• Bitterly, T. B., Brooks, A. W. & Schweitzer, M. E. (2016). Risky Business: When Humor Increases and Decreases Status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Advance online publication. Erişim Aralık 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000079
• Chen, G., Bliese, P.D., Payne, S.C., Zaccaro, S.J., Simsarian W.S., Mathieu, J.E. & Born, D.H. (2002). Simultaneous Examination of the Antecedents and Consequences of Efficacy Beliefs at Multiple Levels of Analysis. Human Performance, 15(4), 381-409.
• Crawford, M. & Gressley, D. (1991). Creativity, Caring and Context – Women’s and Men’s Accounts of Humor Preferences and Practices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15(2), 217–231.
• Crawford, M. (1995). Talking Difference: On Gender and Language. Sage Publications. Davis, M.S. (1993). What's So Funny? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Duncan, W.J., Smeltzer, L.R. & Leap, T.L. (1990). Humor and Work: Applications of Joking Behavior to Management. Journal of Management, 16(2), 255–278.
• Edwardsa K.R. & Martin, R.A. (2014). The Conceptualization, Measurement, and Role of Humor as a Character Strength in Positive Psychology. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 505–519.
• Feltz, D. L., (1988). Self Confidence and Sport Performance, Exercise and Sports Science Reviews, 16, 423-458.
• Fine, G. A. (1983). Sociological Approaches to the Study of Humor. Handbook of Humor Research Vol 1: Basic Issues. Ed. Paul E. McGhee and Jeffrey H. Goldstein. Springer.
• Fiyaz, K., Majeed, S. & Khan, A.Q. (2016). Impact of Styles of Humor and Self Esteem on Psychological Wellbeing of Mental Health Professionals. The Journal of Pakistan Psychiatric Society, 13(2), 12-17.
• Francis, L.E. (1994). Laughter, the Best Mediation: Humor as Emotion Management in Interaction. Symbolic Interaction, 17, 47-63.
• Kuiper, N. A., Martin, R. A. & Olinger, L. J. (1993). Coping Humour, Stress, and Cognitive Appraisals. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 25, 81-96.
• Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. & Allen, J. A. (2014). How Fun Are Your Meetings? Investigating The Relationship Between Humor Patterns In Team Interactions and Team Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1278–1287.
• Mathews, L. (2016). Role of Humor in Emotion Regulation: Differential Effects of Adaptive and Maladaptive Forms of Humor. Unpublished Dissertation. New York: The Graduate Center, City University of New York. ErişimAralık2017, http://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1507.
• Martin, R. A. (2007). The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Waltham MA: University of Western Australia Academic Press.
• Martin, R. A. & Lefcourt, H. M. (1983). Sense of Humor as a Moderator of the Relation between Stressors and Moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1313-1324.
• Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J. & Weir, K. (2003). Individual Differences in Uses of Humor and Their Relation To Psychological Well-Being: Development of The Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48–75.
• Moore, D.A. (2017). How to Improve the Accuracy and Reduce the Cost of Personnel Selection. California Management Review, 60(1), 8–17.
• Newman, M. G. & Stone, A. A. (1996). Does Humor Moderate the Effects of Experimentally Induced Stress? Annuals of Behavioral Medicine, 18(2), 101-109.
• Palmer, T.E. (2010). The Potency of Humor and Instructional Self-Efficacy on Art Teacher Stress. Studies in Art Education, 52(1), 69-83.
• Romero, E. J. & Cruthirds, K. W. (2006). The Use of Humor in The Workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 58 – 69.
• Ruch, W., Attardo S. & Raskin, V. (1993). Toward an Empirical Verification of the General Theory of Humor. Humor, 6, 123-136.
• Shrauger, J. S. ve Schohn, M. (1995). Self-confidence in college students: Conceptualization, measurement, and behavioral implications. Assessment, 2(3), 255-278.
• Thorson, J. A., Powell, F. C., Sarmany-Schuller, I. & Hampes, W. P. (1997). Psychological Health and Sense of Humor. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53(6), 605-619.
• Wang, Y. ve Chang, Y. (2018). How specific and general self-confidence affect assortment decisions.Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 46, 1687-1696.