Ezafe (Genitive) in Zaza Language

Abstract

Ezafe, which is known as Genitive in European languages and used in Turki, Iranian and Sami languages spoken in the Middle East, is used to link two syntactic elements. Generally, one of the elements is the possessor and the other one is the modifier. There are grammatical elements that link these syntactic structures which at least consist of two units. The historical development of these elements, which varies according to languages, in Iranian languages did not follow the same process. While the languages classified in Northwest Iranian languages, such as Zazaki, varies with a nominal construction, , there are some similarities with Zazaki in the languages belonging to the Southwest Iranian languages group. The purpose of this article is to explore the structures of the nominal phrase in Zaza Language. Both noun and adjective phrases will be analyzed in detail, and other nominal phrases will also be scrutinized. It will also be examined whether these syntactic structures have semantic functions. The origin of Ezafe will be traced back to the Old Iranian languages, and its structure in the Modern Iranian languages will also be investigated. The similarities and differences will be discussed by comparing the functioning of the Zaza language with other Iranian languages. In addition, the nominal phrase constructions in many Zaza dialects will be examined, and it will be investigated whether there are differences between them.

Keywords

• Zaza
• Ezafe
• Izafe
• Genitive
• İranian Languages

Zaza Dilinde Tamlama

Öz

Avrupa Dillerinde Genitive olarak bilinen, Ortadoğuda konuşulan Turki, İrani ve Sami dillerinde kullanılan Ezafe kavramı iki sentaktik öğeyi birbirine bağlamak için kullanılır. Genellikle öğelerden biri tamlayan biri ise tamlanan olur. En az iki birimden oluşan bu sentaktik yapıları birbirine bağlayan gramer öğeleri mevcuttur. Dilden dile farklılık gösteren bu öğelerin irani dillerdeki tarihi gelişimleri aynı seyri izlememiştir. Zazaca gibi Kuzeybatı irani diller grubunda tasnif edilen diller tamlama konusunda ayrışırken güneybatı irani diller grubuna ait dillerde Zazaca ile benzeşenler vardır. Bu makalenin amacı Zaza Dilinde var olan tamlama yapısını incelemektir. Gerek isim gerekse sıfat tamlamaları detaylı olarak analiz edilerek bunların dışındaki tamlama şekillerine de göz atılacaktır. Bu sentaktik yapının semantic işlevlerinin olup olmadığı da incelenecektir. Ezafenin tarihi eski irani dillere kadar götürülerek yeni irani dillerdeki yapılarına da bakılacaktır. Zaza Dili ile diğer irani dillerdeki işleyiş karşılaştırılarak benzerlikler ve farklılıklar ele alınacaktır. Ayrıca birçok Zaza ağızlarından tamlama verileri de incelenerek kullanım farklılıklarının olup olmadığı araştırılacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Zaza
• Ezafe
• Izafe
• tamlama
• İrani diller

Kaynakça

1. Arslan, İ. (2016). Ergativität und verbfunktionalität in der Zaza Sprache [Doctoral dissertation, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf]. https://docserv.uni-duesseldorf.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-39270/Arslan_Dissertation_Submit_Bib_A1.pdf.
2. Arslan, İ, (2018). Zaza Dilinde lehçe farklılıkları. Bingöl Üniversitesi Yaşayan Diller Enstitüsü Dergisi 4(7), 51-66.
3. Den Dikken, M. (2006). Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. MIT press.
4. Erbaşı, B. & Gündoğdu, S. (2017, April 29). Ezafe across language families: Iranian and Altaic. First North American Conference in Iranian Linguistics (NACIL-1), Stony Brook University, NY.
5. Ghomeshi, Jila. (1997). Non-Projecting nouns and the ezafe: Construction in Persian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. 15(4): 729-788.
6. Gündoğdu, S., Kahnemuyipour A., & Peters, A. (2020). Revisiting “doubled” Ezafe in southern Zazaki. Proceedings of the 2020 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Western University.
7. Haghkerdar, M. (2009). Western Iranian ezafe: A comparative syntactic analysis [Doctoral dissertation, Yale University].
8. Haig, G. (2008). Alignment change in Iranian languages: A construction grammar approach. Mouton de Gruyter.

9. Haig, G. (2011). Linker, relativizer, nominalizer, tense-particle: On the ezafe in West Iranian. In F. H. Yap, K. Grunow-Hårsta, & J. Wrona (Eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives (ss. 363-390). John Benjamins Publishing..
10. Holmberg, A., & Odden, D. (2004). The izafe and NP structure in Hawrami. Durham Working Papers in Linguistics
11. Holmberg, A., & Odden, D. (2008). The noun phrase in Hawrami. In S. Karimi, S.V. Samiian & D. Stilo (Eds),Aspects of Iranian linguistics, 129-152. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
12. Kahnemuyipour, A. (2014). Revisiting the Persian ezafe construction: A roll-up movement analysis. Lingua, 150, 1-24.
13. Kahnemuyipour, A. (2016). The ezafe construction: Persian and beyond. In Ö. Özçelik & A. K. Kent (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Central Asian languages and linguistics. Indiana University.
14. Kahnemuyipour, A., Shabani, M., & Taghipour, S. (2020). The two faces of a nominal linker: Another look at reverse Ezafe in Gilaki. Proceedings of the 2020 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Western University.
15. Keskin, M. (2012). Orta ve eski irani dillerin Zazacaya tuttuğu ışık. II. Uluslararası Zaza Tarihi ve Kültürü Sempozyumu, 232-252.
16. Larson, R. K., & Yamakido, H. (2005). Ezafe and the position of nominal modifiers. Ms. Stony Brook University; presented at the LSA.
17. Larson, R. K., & Yamakido, H. (2006). Zazaki “double Ezafe” as double case-marking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Albuquerque, NM.
18. Larson, R. K., & Samiian, V. (2020). Ezafe, PP and the nature of nominalization. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 39(1), 157-213.
19. Mingazova, N., & Subich, V., & Carlson, C. (2018). Izafet vs non-izafet genitive patterns in non-related languages. XLinguae, 11(2), 34-50.
20. Mirdehghan, M., & Mehmanchian, S. (2012). The word order in Saravi dialect and spoken Persian Language: A Typological Comparative Study. Iranian Studies, 45(3), 371-394.
21. Parsafar, P. (2010). Syntax, morphology, and semantics of ezafe. Iranian Studies, 43(5), 637-666.
22. Paul, L. (1998). Zazaki: Grammatik und Versuch einer Dialektologie. Reichert Verlag.
23. Samvelian, P. (2007). The Ezafe as a head-marking inflectional affix: Evidence from Persian and Kurmanji Kurdish. S. Karimi, V. Samiian, D. Stillo. İn Aspects of Iranian Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Mohammad Reza Bateni, Cambridge Scholars ltd, pp.339-361, 2007.
24. Samvelian, P. (2007). A (phrasal) affix analysis of the Persian ezafe. Journal of Linguistics, 43 (3), 605-645. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40058014.
25. Samiian, V. (1983). Origins of phrasal categories in Persian: An X-bar analysis. [Doctoral dissertation, University of California].
26. Samiian, V. (1994). The Ezafe construction: Some implications for the theory of X-bar syntax. In M. Marashi (Ed.), Persian studies in North America (pp. 17-41). Iranbooks.
27. Samiian, V. (2017, April 28-30). Another Look at ezafe construction: Data from Caspian Languages. First North American Conference in Iranian Linguistics (NACIL 1), Stony Brook University.
28. Selcan, Z. (1998). Grammatik der Zaza-Sprache: Nord-Dialekt (Dersim-Dialekt). Berlin: Wissenschaft & Technik.
29. Werner, B. (2018). Forms and meanings of the ezafe in Zazaki. Reichert Verlag.
30. Skjærvø, P. O. (2002). Introduction to Old Persian. https://sites.fas.harvard.edu/~iranian/OldPersian/index.htmlToosarvandani, M., & Van Urk, C. (2012, October 19). Directionality and intervention in nominal concord: Evidence from Zazaki ezafe.
31. Yakubovich I. S. (2020). Persian ezāfe as a contact-induced feature. In Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 5: 91–114.