Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES): Adaptation to Turkish Culture, Validity and Reliability Study

Öz

Within this study, it was aimed to adapt Mullen et. al.’s Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale into Turkish and to apply it on Turkish population to find out validity and reliability of the scale. The scale in question consists of 8 articles and one dimension. Attitude of the participants was gathered via a 7-point Likert scale. The sample was selected via convenience sampling method of non-probabilistic sampling methods. The sample group consists of 1573 students (56,6% female, 43,4% male) who are having education at different levels (38,4% middle school, 30,1% high school, 31,5% university). Age of the participants vary between 11 and 35 (X ̅= 15.92, SS= 4.76). Ethics Committee Report of the Research; It has been taken from the Social and Human Sciences Research Ethics Committee of Sakarya University of Applıed Scıences, with the Meeting Number 9 and Decision E-26428519-044-12079, dated 21.05.2021. Linguistic equivalence of the scale was evaluated through correlation analysis. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was utilized with the purpose of exhibiting the factor structure of the scale. For the validity of the EFA outcome, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was carried out. Reliability level of the scale was evaluated via calculation of Cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficient and composite reliability values. According to the findings, it was determined that the Turkish scale, consisting of 8 items and one dimension, explained 76% of the total variance. It was also observed that the fit indices, which were attained via CFA, are among the acceptable and good fit indices (GFI = .98, CFI = .99, RMSEA = .042). It can be stated that the Turkish version of the scale can be used safely as a valid and reliable tool.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Physical Activity
• Enjoyment
• Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale
• Validity
• Reliability

Fiziksel Aktivitelerden Keyif Alma Ölçeği (FAKÖ): Türk Kültürüne Uyarlama, Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Mullen ve arkadaşları (2011) tarafından geliştirilen Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES), “Fiziksel Aktivitelerden Keyif Alma (FAKÖ)” Ölçeği’ni Türkçe’ye ve Türk popülasyonuna uyarlayarak geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Söz konusu ölçek 8 madde ve tek boyuttan oluşmakta olup 7’li likert tipi derecelendirmeye sahiptir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu, olasılığa dayalı olmayan örnekleme yöntemlerinden kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilmiş, yaşları 11 ile 35 arasında değişen (X ̅= 15.92, SS = 4.76), ortaokul (%38.4), lise (%30.1) ve üniversite (%31.5) düzeyinde eğitim gören toplam 1573 öğrenci (%56.6’sı kadın, %43.4’ü erkek) oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın etik kurul izni Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Etik Kurulu Başkanlığının “21.05.2021 tarihli, 09 no'lu toplantısında almış olduğu E-26428519-044-12079 sayılı” kararı ile alınmıştır. Ölçeğin dilsel eşdeğerliliği korelasyon analizi yapılarak incelenmiştir. Ölçeğin faktör yapısını ortaya koymak amacıyla açıklayıcı faktör analizi (AFA) gerçekleştirilmiştir. AFA sonucu elde edilen faktör yapısının doğruluğu için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) yapılmıştır. Ölçeğin güvenirliği Cronbach alfa iç tutarlılık katsayısı ve bileşik güvenilirlik değeri hesaplanarak incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, 8 madde tek boyuttan oluşan Türkçe ölçeğin toplam varyansın %76’sını açıkladığı belirlenmiştir. DFA sonucunda elde edilen uyum indekslerinin kabul edilebilir ve iyi uyum indeksleri arasında yer aldığı (GFI= .98, CFI= .99, TLI= .99 ve RMSEA= .042) görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak, FAKÖ’nün Türkçe formunun geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçüm aracı olarak kullanılabileceği ifade edilebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fiziksel Aktivite
• Keyif Alma
• Fiziksel Aktivitelerden Keyif Alma Ölçeği
• Geçerlik
• Güvenirlik

Kaynakça

1. Akbaba, S. (2006). Eğitimde motivasyon. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (13), 343-361.
2. Alkaabi, S. A. R., Alkaabi, W., & Vyver, G. (2017). Researching student motivation. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 10(3), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v10i3.9985
3. Alves, E. D., Panissa, V. L. G., Barros, B. J., Franchini, E., & Takito, M. Y. (2018). Translation, adaptation, and reproducibility of the physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES) and feeling scale to Brazilian Portuguese. Sport Sciences for Health, 15(2), 329-336.
4. Aslan, M , Doğan, S . (2020). Dışsal motivasyon, içsel motivasyon ve performans etkileşimine kuramsal bir bakış . Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi , 11 (26) , 291-301 . DOI: 10.21076/vizyoner.638479
5. Başusta, N. B., & Gelbal, S. (2015). Gruplararası karşılaştırmalarda ölçme değişmezliğinin test edilmesi: PISA öğrenci anketi örneği. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(4), 80-90.
6. Burns, R. D., Fu, Y., & Podlog, L. W. (2017). School-based physical activity interventions and physical activity enjoyment: A meta-analysis. Preventive medicine, 103, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.011 Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara.: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
7. Carraro, A., Young, M. C., & Robazza, C. (2008). A contribution to the validation of the physical activity enjoyment scale in an Italian sample. Social Behavior and Personality: An İnternational Journal, 36(7), 911-918.
8. Chen, H., Dai, J., & Sun, H. (2019). Validation of a Chinese version of the physical activity enjoyment scale: Factorial validity, measurement equivalence, and predictive validity. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(4), 367-380.

9. Craike, M. J., Hibbins, R., & Cuskelly, G. (2010). The influence of various aspects of enjoyment on participation in leisure time physical activity. World Leisure Journal, 52(1), 20–33. doi:10.1080/04419057.2010.9674619
10. Crocker, P. R., Bouffard, M., & Gessaroli, M. E. (1995). Measuring enjoyment in youth sport settings: A confirmatory factor analysis of the physical activity enjoyment scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,17(2), 200–205.
11. Cüceloğlu, D. (2018). İnsan ve davranışı. İstanbul: 36. Baskı, Remzi Kitap Evi. ISBN: 978-975-14-1869-2
12. Çiçek, Ş , İnce, M . (2005). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik uygulaması sürecine ilişkin görüşleri. . Spor Bilimleri Dergisi , 16 (3) , 146-155 .
13. Demirtoz, B , Alpkaya, U . (2016). Okul çocuklarının fiziksel aktiviteden hoşlanma düzeyleri . Marmara Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi , 1 (1) , 23-30
14. Dimitrov, D. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(2), 121-149.
15. Dishman, R. K., Motl, R. W., Saunders, R., Felton, G., Ward, D. S., Dowda, M., & Pate, R. R. (2005). Enjoyment mediates effects of a school-based physical-activity intervention. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 37(3), 478-487. Dismore, H., & Bailey, R. (2011). Fun and enjoyment in physical education: young people’s attitudes. Research Papers in Education, 26(4), 499–516. doi:10.1080/02671522.2010.484866
16. Dogra, S., MacIntosh, L., O’Neill, C., D’Silva, C., Shearer, H., Smith, K., & Côté, P. (2018). The association of physical activity with depression and stress among post-secondary school students: A systematic review. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 14, 146–156. doi:10.1016/j.mhpa.2017.11.001
17. Dunton, G. F., Tscherne, J., & Rodriguez, D. (2009). Factorial validity and gender invariance of the physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES) in older adolescents. Research Quarterly for Exercise And Sport, 80(1), 117-121.
18. El-Sherif, J. L. (2016). The value of fun in physical activity. Strategies, 29(2), 3–8. doi:10.1080/08924562.2015.1133353
19. Ertaş, M , Aktaş, G . (2019). Rekreatif gruplara üyelik: Motosiklet grupları üzerine bir inceleme . anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi , 30 (1) , 19-30 . DOI: 10.17123/atad.580615
20. Fernández García, E., Sánchez Bañuelos, F., Salinero Martín, J. J. (2008). Validación y adaptación de la escala PACES de disfrute con la práctica de la actividad física para adolescentes españolas [Validation and adaptation of the PACES scale of enjoyment with the practice of physical activity for Spanish adolescents]. Psicothema, 20(4), 890–895.
21. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
22. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Fuentesal-García, J., Baena-Extremera, A., & Sáez-Padilla, J. (2019). Psychometric characteristics of the physical activity enjoyment scale in the context of physical activity in nature. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16 (24), 488
24. George, D.,ve Mallery, P. (2016) IBM spss statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference. (14 th ed.) New York: Routledge.
25. Graves, L. E., Ridgers, N. D., Williams, K., Stratton, G., Atkinson, G., & Cable, N. T. (2010). The physiological cost and enjoyment of wii fit in adolescents, young adults, and older adults. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 7 (3), 393-401.
26. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. ve Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, Prentice-Hall, NJ, USA.
27. Hattie, J., Hodis, F. A., & Kang, S. H. K. (2020). Theories of motivation: Integration and ways forward. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 101865. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101865
28. Heesch, K. C., Masse, L. C., & Dunn, A. L. (2006). Using Rasch modeling to re-evaluate three scales related to physical activity: enjoyment, perceived benefits and perceived barriers. Health Education Research, 21(suppl_1), i58-i72.
29. Hopple, C. J. (2018). Top 10 reasons why children find physical activity to be fun. Strategies, 31(3), 40-47.
30. Hu, L.T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
31. Jekauc, D., Voelkle, M., Wagner, M. O., Mewes, N., & Woll, A. (2013). Reliability, validity, and measurement invariance of the German version of the physical activity enjoyment scale. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 38(1), 104-115.
32. Jekauc D, Nigg C, Nigg CR, Reichert M,Krell-Roesch J, Oriwol D, et al. (2020). Measurement properties of the german version of the physical activity enjoyment scale for adults. Plos One 15(11): e0242069
33. Karagöz, Y. (2016). SPSS ve AMOS 23 uygulamalı istatistiksel analizler. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
34. Kartal, M. & Bardakçı, S. (2018). SPSS ve AMOS uygulamalı örneklerle güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik analizleri, Ankara: Akademisyen Yayıncılık
35. Kendzierski, D. & DeCarlo K. (1991). Physical activity enjoyment scale: Two validation studies. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13, 50-64.
36. Kenyon, G. S., & McPherson, B. D. (1973). Becoming involved in physical activity and sport: A process of socialization. Physical activity: Human growth and development, 303-332.
37. Liang, Y., Lau, P. W., Huang, W. Y., Maddison, R., & Baranowski, T. (2014). Validity and reliability of questionnaires measuring physical activity self-efficacy, enjoyment, social support among hong kong chinese children. Preventive Medicine Reports, 1, 48-52.
38. Lindqvist, A.-K., Kostenius, C., & Gard, G. (2014). Fun, feasible and functioning: Students’ experiences of a physical activity intervention. European Journal of Physiotherapy, 16(4), 194–200. doi:10.3109/21679169.2014.946089
39. Locke, E. A., & Schattke, K. (2019). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Time for expansion and clarification. Motivation Science, 5(4), 277.
40. Latorre Roman, P. A., García Pinillos, F., Navarro Martinez, A. V., & Izquierdo Rus, T. (2014). Validity and reliability of physical activity enjoyment scale questionnaire (PACES) in children with asthma. Journal of Asthma, 51(6), 633-638.
41. Massey, W. V., Szarabajko, A., Thalken, J., Perez, D., & Mullen, S. P. (2021). Memories of school recess predict physical activity enjoyment and social-emotional well-being in adults. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 55, 101948.
42. Mardia, K. V. (1985). Mardia’s test of multinormality. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, Vol. 5 (pp. 217–221). New York, NY: Wiley.
43. McAuley, E. (1994). Physical activity and psychosocial outcomes. In C. Bouchard, R. J. Shephard, & T. Stephens (Eds.), Physical activity, fitness, and health: International proceedings and consensus knowledge. (pp. 551–568).
44. Mirzeoğlu, A. D., & Çoknaz, D. (2014). Fiziksel etkinlikten hoşlanma ölçeği-kısa formunun Türk çocuk ve gençleri için geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. International Journal of Human Sciences, 11(1), 672-687.
45. Monteiro, D., Nunes, G., Marinho, D. A., Couto, N., Antunes, R., Moutão, J., & Cid, L. (2017). Translation and adaptation of the physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES) in a sample of Portuguese athletes, invariance across genders nature sports and swimming. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano, 19(6), 631-643.
46. Moreno, J. A., González-Cutre, D., Martínez, C., Alonso, N., & López, M. (2008). Propiedades psicométricas de la physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES) en el contexto español. Estudios de Psicología, 29(2), 173-180.
47. Moore, J. B., Yin, Z., Hanes, J., Duda, J., Gutin, B., & Barbeau, P. (2009). Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in children: validation of the physical activity enjoyment scale. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21(S1), S116-S129.
48. Motl, R. W., Dishman, R. K., Saunders, R., Dowda, M., Felton, G., & Pate, R. R. (2001). Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in adolescent girls. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 21(2), 110-117.
49. Mullen, S. P., Olson, E. A., Phillips, S. M., Szabo, A. N., Wójcicki, T. R., Mailey, E. L., Neha P. G. , Jason T. F., Arthur F. K., McAuley, E. (2011). Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in older adults: invariance of the physical activity enjoyment scale (paces) across groups and time. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8(1), 103. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-103
50. Murrock, C. J., Bekhet, A., & Zauszniewski, J. A. (2016). Psychometric evaluation of the physical activity enjoyment scale in adults with functional limitations. Issues in mental health nursing, 37(3), 164-171.
51. Nahas, M. V., Goldfine, B., & Collins, M. A. (2003). Determinants of physical activity in adolescents and young adults: The basis for high school and college physical education to promote active lifestyles. Physical Educator, 60(1), 42
52. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders, 97-146.
53. O’Reilly, E., Tompkins, J., & Gallant, M. (2001). “They ought to enjoy physical activity, you know?”: Struggling with fun in physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 6(2), 211–221. doi:10.1080/13573320120084281
54. Paxton, R. J., Nigg, C., Motl, R. W., Yamashita, M., Chung, R., Battista, J., & Chang, J. (2008). Physical activity enjoyment scale short form—does It Fit for children?. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79(3), 423-427.
55. Perttula, A., Kiili, K., Lindstedt, A., & Tuomi, P. (2017). Flow experience in game based learning – a systematic literature review. International Journal of Serious Games, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v4i1.151
56. Rodrigues, F., Forte, P., teixeira, d. s., cid, l., & monteiro, d. (2021). the physical activity enjoyment scale (paces) as a two-dimensional scale: Exploratory and ınvariance analysis. Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 10(1), 61-66.
57. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), pp. 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
58. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
59. Seker, S. E. (2015). Motivasyon teorisi (motivation theory). YBS Ansiklopedi, 2(1), Ss. 22-26.
60. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, M., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 6(2), 23-74.
61. Şimşek, A., & Eroğlu, Ö. (2013). Davranış bilimleri. Konya: Eğitim Yayınevi. Ss. 3-4 ISBN. 978-506-5176-30-3
62. Şimşek, M. Ş., Çelik, A., & Akgemci, T. (2015). Davranış bilimlerine giriş ve örgütlerde davranış (Yenilenmiş 9. baskı). Konya: Eğitim Yayınevi. Ss. 3-29
63. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
64. Teques, P., Calmeiro, L., Silva, C., & Borrego, C. (2020). Validation and adaptation of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) in fitness group exercisers. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 9(4), 352-357.
65. Wankel, L. M. (1993). The importance of enjoyment to adherence and psychological benefits fromphysical activity. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 24, 151–69
66. Wininger, S. R., & Pargman, D. (2003). Assessment of Factors Associated with Exercise Enjoyment. Journal of Music Therapy, 40(1), 57–73. doi:10.1093/jmt/40.1.57
67. Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of ıntrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 271–360. doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60019-2
68. Vallerand, R. J., & Losier, G. F. (1999). An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11(1), 142–169. doi:10.1080/10413209908402956
69. Yannakakis, G. N., Maragoudakis, M., & Hallam, J. (2009). Preference learning for cognitive modeling: a case study on entertainment preferences. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 39(6), 1165–1175. doi:10.1109/tsmca.2009.2028152