SOCIAL APPEARANCES-SEEN IN/FROM DWELLING-BUILT BY HEIDEGGER FOR DASEIN

Öz

One of the most important thinkers of the twentieth century, Heidegger’s phenomenological investigation of existence, had a notable influence on the world of thought. In this work, two planes that fold over each other and present a holistic structure in Heidegger’s thought have been wended at the same time. The first of these is the investigation of the social possibility of Dasein's aspects, Heidegger's main problematic, through spatial conceptualizations such as space, place, closeness and distance; the second plane is the reframing of Dasein's social aspects in the context of the concepts of 'dwelling' and 'construction'. This discussion also reveals the possibility of interaction between philosophy (ontic/ontological being, metaphysics, Dasein) and sociology (society, coexistence, social) in Heidegger's thought through the concepts of architectural discipline such as space, place, dwelling and building. All in all, it seems that the dwelling Heidegger built for Dasein offers a remarkable proposition to the social aspect of architecture; this points, above all, to the potential of “being with”, of human community, of a new relationship with the world.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hedigger
• Dasein
• Space
• Dwelling
• Social

HEİDEGGER’İN DASEİN İÇİN İNŞA ETTİĞİ-MESKENDE/N GÖRÜLEN-TOPLUMSAL TEZAHÜRLER

Öz

Yirminci yüzyılın önemli düşünürlerinden Heidegger’in varlığa ilişkin ontolojik soruşturmasının düşünce dünyasında önemli etkileri olmuştur. Bu çalışmada birbiri üzerine katlanan ve Heidegger’in düşüncesinde bütünlüklü bir yapı görünümü sunan iki düzlem aynı anda kat edilmektedir. Bunlardan birincisi, Heidegger’in temel sorunsalı Dasein’ın görünümlerinin, mekân, yer, yakınlık ve uzaklık gibi mekansal kavramsallaştırmalar dolayımında toplumsal imkanının soruşturulması; ikinci düzlem ise Dasein’ın toplumsal görünümlerinin ‘mesken’ ve ‘inşa’ kavramları bağlamında tekrar çerçevelenmesidir. Bu tartışma aynı zamanda Heidegger'in düşüncesindeki felsefe (ontik/ontolojik varlık, metafizik, Dasein) ile sosyoloji (toplum, bir arada var olma, toplumsal) arasındaki etkileşimin olasılığını mekân, yer, mesken ve bina gibi mimarlık disiplinin kavramları dolayımıyla ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuçta, Heidegger’in Dasein için inşa ettiği meskenin toplumsal yönüne dikkate değer bir teklif sunduğu görülmektedir; bu, her şeyden önce “-ile birlikte” varlığın, insan topluluğunun dünya ile yeni bir ilişkinin potansiyeline işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Heidegger
• Dasein
• Mekan
• Mesken
• Toplumsal

Kaynakça

1. Beistegui, M. d. (2003). Thinking with Heidegger: Displacements. Bloomington, IN : Indiana University Press.
2. Bianchin, L. (2021). The Social Hermeneutics of Dasein. C. D. Martino (Dü.) içinde, Heidegger and Contemporary Philosophy Technology, Living, Society & Science (s. 191-202). Cham: Springer.
3. Blackham, H. J. (2002). Six Existentialist Thinkers. London: New York: Routledge.
4. Bolt, B. (2013). Yeni Bir Bakışla, Heidegger. (M. Özbank, Çev.) İstanbul: Kolektif Kitap.
5. Capobianco, R. (2010). Engaging Heidegger. Toronto: Buffalo: London: University of Toronto Press .
6. Casey, E. S. (1997 ). The Fate of Place A Philosophical History. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. Dreyfus, H. (1995). A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge: Massachusetts: London: The MIT Press. Dungey, N. (2007). The Ethics and Politics of Dwelling. Polity, 39(2), 234-258.
8. Elden, S. (1999). Heidegger's Hölderlin and the Importance of Place. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 30(3), 258-274.

9. Elden, S. (2001). Mapping the Present Heidegger, Foucault and the Project of a Spatial History. London and New York: Continuum.
10. Gare, A. (2004). Architecture and the Global Ecological Crisis: From Heidegger to Christopher Alexander. The Structurist(43/44), 30-37.
11. Gorner, P. (2007). Heidegger's Being and Time: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Hale, J. A. (2000). Building Ideas An Introduction to Architectural Theory. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
13. Harries, K. (2018). Ut Architectura Philosophia? Questioning the Relationship of Architecture and Philosophy. Architecture Philosophy, 3(2), 190-213.
14. Hays, K. M. (2015). Mimarlığın Arzusu. (V. Atmaca, & B. Demirhan, Çev.) İstanbul: Yem Yayın.
15. Heidegger, M. (1971). The Nature of Language. M. Heidegger içinde, On the Way to Language (P. D. Hertz, Çev., s. 57-110). New York: Harper and Row.
16. Heidegger, M. (1985). History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena. (T. Kisiel, Çev.) Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
17. Heidegger, M. (1988). The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. (A. Hofstadter, Çev.) Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
18. Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and Time (A Translation of Sein und Zeit). (J. Stambaugh, Çev.) Albany: State University of New York Press.
19. Heidegger, M. (2001). Being and Time. (J. Macquarrie, & E. Robinson, Çev.) Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
20. Heidegger, M. (2001a). Building Dwelling Thinking. M. Heidegger içinde, Poetry, Language, Thought (A. Hofstadter, Çev., s. 143-159). NY: Harperperennial Modernclassics.
21. Heidegger, M. (2001b). The Thing. M. Heidegger içinde, Poetry, Language, Thought (A. Hofstadter, Çev., s. 161-184). New York: Harperperennial Modernclassics.
22. Heidegger, M. (2004). Varlık ve Zaman. (A. Yardımlı, Çev.) İstanbul: İdea.
23. Heidegger, M. (2008). Varlık ve Zaman. (K. H. Ökten, Çev.) İstanbul: Agora Kitaplığı.
24. Heidegger, M. (2010). Logic The Question of Truth. (T. Sheehan, Çev.) Bloomington: Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
25. Heidegger, M., & Fink, E. (1979). Heraclitus Seminar, 1966/67. (C. H. Seibert, Çev.) Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
26. Holst, J. (2014). Rethinking Dwelling and Building – On Martin Heidegger’s conception of Being as Dwelling and Jørn Utzon’s Architecture of Well-being. ZARCH, 1(2), 53-61.
27. Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: New York: Routledge.
28. Inwood, M. (1999). The Blackwell Philosopher Dictionaries: A Heidegger Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell.
29. King, M. (2001). A Guide to Heidegger's Being and Time. (J. Llewelyn, Çev.) Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
30. King, M. (2009). Heidegger and Happiness: Dwelling on Fitting and Being. London: New York: Continuum.
31. Malpas, J. (2006). Heidegger’s Topology: Being, Place, World. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
32. Malpas, J. (2012). Heidegger and the Thinking of Place: Explorations in the Topology of Being. Cambridge, Massachusetts: London: The MIT Press.
33. McMullin, I. (2013). Time and the Shared World: Heidegger on Social Relations. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
34. McNeill, W. (2006). The Time of Life: Heidegger and Ethos. New York: State University of New York Press.
35. Megill, A. (1998). Aşırılığın Peygaberleri Nietzsche, Heidegger, Foucault, Derrida. (T. Birkan, Çev.) İstanbul: Bilim ve Sanat.
36. Mitrović, B. (2011). Philosophy for Architects . New York : Princeton Architectural Press.
37. Mulhall, S. (1998). Heidegger ve 'Varlık ve Zaman'. (K. Öktem, Çev.) İstanbul: Sarmal Yayınevi.
38. Mulhall, S. (2013). The Routledge Guidebook to: Heidegger’s Being and Time. London: New York: Routledge.
39. Norberg-Schulz, C. (1983). Heidegger's Thinking on Architecture. Perspecta(20), 61-68.
40. Schalow, F., & Denker, A. (2010). Historical Dictionary of Heidegger's Philosophy. Lanham: Toronto: Plymouth: The Scarecrow Press.
41. Seamon, D. (1984). Heidegger's Notion of Dwelling and One Concrete Interpretation as Indicated by Hassan Fathy's Architecture for The Poor. Geoscience and Man(24), 43-53.
42. Sharr, A. (2013). Mimarlar için Heidegger. (V. Atmaca, Çev.) İstanbul: Yem Yayınları.
43. Soja, E. (1995). Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: New York: Verso.
44. Staehler, T. (2014). Social Networks as Inauthentic Sociality. Metodo: International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy, 2(2), 227-248.
45. Steiner, G. (1989). Martin Heidegger. Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
46. Takenouchi, H. (2018). Dwelling in the World with Others as Mortal Beings: “Well-Being” in Postdisaster Japanese Society. K. T. Galvin (Dü.) içinde, Routledge Handbook of Well-Being (s. 51-57). New York: Routledge.
47. Tonner, P. (2018). Dwelling: Heidegger, Archaeology, Mortality . New York: Routledge.
48. Vallega, A. A. (2003). Heidegger and the Issue of Space: Thinking on Exilic Grounds. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
49. Villela-Petit, M. (1996). Heidegger's Conception of Space. C. Macann (Dü.) içinde, Critical Heidegger (C. Macann, Çev., s. 117-140). London: New York: Routledge.
50. Watts, M. (2014). The Philosophy of Heidegger. New York: Routledge.
51. Wollan, G. (2003). Heidegger’s Philosophy of Space and Place. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography(57), 31-39.
52. Young, J. (2002). Heidegger's Later Philosophy . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.