Kidfluencing as Child Abuse in the Digital Age: A Study on Instagram

Öz

The media tools created by the digital age have turned almost every individual into their own subject. Social media platforms have become a tool that allows individuals to share every person or event in their lives. ‘Kidfluencing,’ which refers to parents earning money on social media platforms through their children's cuteness, mischief, or talents, is a highly controversial area in terms of children's rights. Social media posts made without the consent of children can lead to numerous violations of children's rights in terms of privacy and child labour. In this context, the study examines five kidfluencer accounts (Instagram) with high follower and engagement counts in Türkiye, selected using random sampling, in a comparative analysis within the framework of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. This research, which examines Instagram posts using quantitative and qualitative content analysis methods, aims to emphasise child rights violations. The findings of the research reveal that the posts made by parents about their children are highly problematic in terms of children's rights. It was found that violations of privacy and freedom of expression, as stated in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, were more common in the posts, and that child labour and abuse were also prevalent. At this point, it is clear that there is a need for parental education, stricter legal frameworks, and the application of media ethics principles.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Instagram
• Children’s rights
• Privacy
• Kidfluencing

Dijital Çağda Çocuk İstismarı Olarak Kidfluencıng: Instagram Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Öz

Dijital çağın getirdiği medya araçları hemen her bireyi öznesi haline getirmektedir. Sosyal medya mecraları bireylerin yaşamlarındaki her kişi ya da olguyu paylaşabildiği araca dönüşmektedir. Ebeveynlerin çocuklarının sevimliliği, yaramazlıkları veya yetenekleri üzerinden maddi kazanç elde etmeleri olarak adlandırılan “kidfluencing” çocuk hakları açısından oldukça tartışılan bir alandır. Yapılan sosyal medya paylaşımları çocukların rızası gözetilmeden, mahremiyet ve çocuk işçiliği çerçevesinde birçok çocuk hakkı ihlalinin yaşanmasına sebep olabilmektedir. Bu doğrultuda çalışma rastgele örneklem yöntemiyle belirlenen Türkiye’de takipçi ve etkileşim sayısı yüksek 5 kidfluencer sayfasını (Instagram) BM Çocuk Hakları Sözleşmesi çerçevesinde karşılaştırmalı olarak incelemektedir. Instagram gönderilerini nicel ve nitel içerik analizi yöntemi ile ele alan bu araştırma, çocuk hakkı ihlallerine vurgu yapmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada elde edilen bulgularda ebeveynlerin çocuklarını konu edinen paylaşımlarının çocuk hakları açısından oldukça sorunlu yapısı açığa çıkmaktadır. Paylaşımlarda BM Çocuk Hakları Sözleşmesi’nde ifade edilen mahremiyet ve ifade özgürlüğü ihlallerinin daha sık öne çıktığı saptanmakta, çocuk işçiliği ve istismarının da yakın bir oranda seyrettiği gözlenmektedir. Bu noktada ebeveynlerin eğitimi, daha sert yasal çerçeveler ve medya etik ilkelerinin uygulanmasına ihtiyaç duyulduğu ortaya çıkmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Instagram
• Çocuk hakları
• Mahremiyet
• Kidfluencing

Kaynakça

1. ABİDİN, C. (2020). Preschool Stars on YouTube: Child Microcelebrities, Commercially Viable Biographies, and Interactions with Technology. L. GREEN, D. HOLLOWAY, K. STEVENSON, T. LEAVER and L. HADDON içinde, Routledge Companion to Digital Media and Children (ss. 226-234). London: Routledge.
2. AKTAY, M. (2020). İstismar ve İhmalin Çocuk Üzerindeki Etkileri ve Tedavisi. Gelişim ve Psikoloji Dergisi, 1(2), 169-184.
3. ARCHER, C. J. ve DELMO, K. (2023, 2 Mayıs). Kidfluencer’ culture is harming kids in several ways–and there’s no meaningful regulation of it. Erişim adresi: https://theconversation.com/kidfluencer-culture-is-harming-kids-in-several-ways-and-theres-no-meaningful-regulation-of-it-204277
4. ATALAY, G. E. (2019). Sosyal Medya ve Çocuk: “Babishko Family Fun TV” İsimli Youtube Kanalının Eleştirel Bir Analizi. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi Uluslararası Dijital Çağda İletişim Sempozyumu Özel Sayısı, 1, 179-202.
5. BALOĞLU, E. (2023). Instagram Çağının Dijital Ebeveynleri: Sharenting Bağlamında Bir İnceleme. TRT Akademi, 8(19), 766-785.
6. BAŞTEMUR, Ş., BORUCU, D. H. ve BULUT, S. (2021). Ebeveynlerin çocuklarının fotoğrafını sosyal medyada paylaşmasının (sharenting) psikolojik sonuçları: bir sharenting olgu incelemesi. Turkish Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 28(2), 166-173.
7. BARNES, R. ve POTTER, A. (2021). Sharenting and Parents’ Digital Literacy: An Agenda for Future Research. Communication Research and Practice, 7(1), 6-20.
8. BARTH, S. ve DE JONG, M. D. (2017). The Privacy Paradox–Investigating Discrepancies between Expressed Privacy Concerns and Actual Online Behavior–A Systematic Literature Review. Telematics and informatics, 34(7), 1038-1058.

9. BAXTER, K. ve CZARNECKA, B. (2025). Sharing Images of Children on Social Media: British Motherhood Influencers and the Privacy Paradox. PLoS ONE, 20(1), e0314472. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314472
10. BEHRİ, I. (2024). The Use of Children as Influencers and the Harmful Effects on their Health and Rights as Human Beings. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development, 11(2), 52-59.
11. BELLABABY (2020). The Rich List: 2020’s Highest-Earning Instakids. Erişim adresi: https://www.bellababy.co.uk/blog/the-rich-list-2020s-highest-earning-instakids-.html
12. BLANCO, E. F. ve GUTIERREZ, M. R. (2022). Kid influencers as content creators: Legal implications. Visual Review. International Visual Culture Review/Revista Internacional de Cultura Visual, 10(1), 1-16.
13. BM (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Geneva: UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.
14. BRAGG, M., POMERANZ, J., ve CASSIDY, O. (2022). Kid Influencer Marketing: Gaps in Current Policies and Research. Durham, NC: Healthy Eating Research.
15. BURROUGHS B. ve FELLER G. (2020). The Emergence and Ethics of Child-Created Content and the Media Industries. LELIA G., HOLLOWAY D., STEVENSON K., LEAVER T., LESLIE H. içinde, Routledge Companion to Digital Media and Children (ss. 217–25). London: Routledge.
16. CALLENS, H. (2020). Kidfluencer Marketing in the Video Game Industry. Interactive Entertainment Law Review, 3(1), 44–54.
17. CANÖZ, K., GÜLMEZ, Ö. ve EROĞLU, G. (2020). Pazarlamanın Yükselen Yıldızı İnfluencer Marketing: Influencer Takipçilerinin Satın Alma Davranışını Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 23(1), 73-91.
18. CARRÊLO, C. (2022). YouTube Family Vlogging as a Promoter of Digital Child Labour: A Case Study on ‘The Bucket List Family (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Malmö Universitesi, Malmö.
19. CBS NEWS. (2019, August 23). Kid Influencers: Few Rules, Big Money. Erişim adresi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XkaSouYTbg
20. CHILINGWORTH, A. (2025, 19 Mart). The most-subscribed and most-viewed YouTube channels in 2025. Erişim adresi: https://www.epidemicsound.com/blog/most-subscribed-and-viewed-youtube-channels/
21. CINO, D., ve WARTELLA, E. (2021). Privacy-protective behaviors in the mediatized domestic milieu: Parents and the intra-and extra-systemic governance of children's digital traces. Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica, 16, 133–153.
22. CLARK, D. R. VE JNO-CHARLES, A. B. (2025). The Child Labor in Social Media: Kidfluencers, Ethics of Care, and Exploitation. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-025-05953-7
23. COATES, A., ve BOYLAND, E. (2021). Kid influencers-a new arena of social media food marketing. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 17(3), 133-134.
24. CORDEIRO, F. C. (2021, 23 Şubat). Kidfluencers and Social Media: The Evolution of Child Exploitation in the Digital Age. Erişim adresi: https://www.humanium.org/en/kidfluencers-and-social-media-the-evolution-of-child-exploitation-in-the-digital-age/
25. CRUZ, P. M. M., CRUZ, R. V. D. M. ve JÚNIOR, A. J. P. (2025). Child influencers and the neuro rights of children and adolescents: an analysis of vulnerability in the digital environment. İçinde A. M. D’Ávila Lopes, S. Smart, ve K. Komamura (Eds.), Neurolaw: Legal Impacts of Neurotechnology (pp.199-209). Doadvogado, Porto Alegre.
26. DE VEİRMAN, M. CAUBERGHE, V. VE HUDDERS, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram Influencers: The Impact of Number of Followers and Product Divergence on Brand Attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798-828.
27. DİJİTAL 2024 (2024, 31 Ocak). Dijital 2024: 5 Milyar Sosyal Medya Kullanıcısı. Erişim adresi: https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2024/01/digital-2024-5-billion-social-media-users/
28. DUYGULU, S. (2019). Sosyal medyada çocuk fotoğrafları paylaşmanın mahremiyet ihlali ve çocuk istismarı açısından değerlendirilmesi. TRT akademi, 4(8), 428-487.
29. ERDOĞAN, E. (2023, 11 Mayıs). Kidfluencer’lar: Dijital Medyada Çocukların Güvenliği ve Emek Sömürüsü. Erişim adresi: https://dijitalmedyavecocuk.bilgi.edu.tr/2023/05/11/kidfluencerlar-dijital-medyada-cocuklarin-guvenligi-ve-emek-somurusu/
30. FEEDSPOT (2025, 20 Haziran). Top 100 Kid Influencers in 2025. Erişim adresi: https://influencers.feedspot.com/kids_instagram_influencers/
31. FEİIJOO, B. ve FERNANDEZ-GOMEZ, E. (2021). Child influencers on YouTube and Instagram: content and brand presence during confinement. Cuadernos Info, (49), 302-330.
32. FELLER, G. ve BURROUGHS, B. (2021). Branding Kidfluencers: Regulating Content and Advertising on YouTube. Television & New Media, 23(6), 575-592.
33. GOEL, V. ve EMBER, S. (2015, June 2). Instagram to Open Its Photo Feed to Ads, N.Y. Times. Erişim adresi: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/03/technology/instagram-to-announce-plans-to-expand-advertising.html
34. GÖZEN, Ö. ve ŞALDIRDAK, G. A. (2023). Çocuk İşçiliğinin Yeni Yüzü: Kidfluence. Çocuk ve Medeniyet, 8(14), 113-135.
35. GÜNGÖR, A. (2021). Sosyal medyada çocuk hakları ihlali ve çocuk istismarı: Instagram anneleri. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, 2021(54), 1-24.
36. HAENLEIN, M., ANADOL, E., FARNSWORTH, T., HUGO, H., HUNICHEN, J. ve WELTE, D. (2020). Navigating the New Era of Influencer Marketing: How to be Successful on Instagram, TikTok, & Co. California Management Review, 63(1), 5-25.
37. INHOPE (2022, 6 Eylül). What are kidfluencers?. Erişim adresi: https://www.inhope.org/EN/articles/what-are-kidfluencers
38. JOSS, D. D. (2023). Likes, Camera, Action: Safeguarding Child Influencers Through Expanded Coogan Protections and Increased Regulation of Social Media. Wm. & Mary Bus. L. Rev., 15, 441.
39. KARAKOÇ, E. ve ÜNLÜ T. T. (2021). Oyun mu İş mi? YouTube Kidfluencerları Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz. TRT Akademi, 6(12), 468-493.
40. KAVANAGH, E., JONES, I. ve SHEPPARD-MARKS, L. (2016). Towards Typologies of Virtual Maltreatment: Sport, Digital Cultures & Dark Leisure. Leisure Studies, 35(6), 783-796.
41. KESSEL, P. V., TOOR, S. ve SMITH, A. (2019). A Week in the Life of Popular YouTube Channels. Washington: Pew Research Center.
42. KOPECKY, K., SZOTKOWSKİ, R., AZNAR-DÍAZ, I. ve ROMERO-RODRÍGUEZ, J. M. (2020). The Phenomenon of Sharenting and its Risks in the Online Environment. Experiences from Czech Republic and Spain. Children and Youth Services Review, 110, 104812.
43. LAMBERT, H. (2019, 8 Ağustos). Why Child Social Media Stars Need a Coogan Law to Protect Them From Parents. Erişim adresi: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/why-child-social-media-stars-need-a-coogan-law-protect-parents-1230968/
44. LEE, S. ve KIM, E. (2020). Influencer marketing on Instagram: How sponsorship disclosure, influencer credibility, and brand credibility impact the effectiveness of Instagram promotional post. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 11(3), 232-249.
45. LIN, R. H., JAN, C. ve CHUANG, C. L. (2019). Influencer Marketing on Instagram. International Journal of Innovation in Management, 7(1), 33-41.
46. Maheshwari S. Online and Making Thousands, at Age 4: Meet the Kidfluencers. The New York Times. (2019, 1 Mart). Erişim adresi: www.nytimes.com/2019/03/01/business/media/social-media- influencers-kids.html
47. MARTINEZ ALLUÉ, M., ve MARTIN CÁRDABA, M. ÁNGEL. (2024). Kidfluencers: Children Influencers on YouTube and TikTok and their Impact on the Child Audience. International Visual Culture Review Revista Internacional De Cultura Visual, 16(5), 261–270.
48. MARTINEZ, E. (2024, 13 Ağustos). You’re on Your Own, Kid Influencers. Erişim adresi: https://www.theregreview.org/2024/08/13/martinez-youre-on-your-own-kid-influencers/
49. MASTERSON, M. A. (2021). When play becomes work: Child labor laws in the era of kidfluencers. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 169(2), 577-607.
50. MERMER ÜZÜMLÜ, A. ve GÜVEN, F. (2023). Bir Dijital Pazarlama Segmenti Olarak Çocuklar: YouTube. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(2), 550-564.
51. MERT, Y. L. (2018). Dijital Pazarlama Ekseninde Influencer Marketing Uygulamaları. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 6(2), 1299-1328.
52. MOHAN, P. (2019, 5 Ağustos). My kid is an Instagram Influencer. Here’s what I do with her Money. Erişim adresi: https://www.fastcompany.com/90343690/my-kid-is-an-instagram-influencer-heres-what-i-do-with-her-money
53. MOREHOUSE, L. (2024). The Kids Are Not Alright: A Look into the Absence of Laws Protecting Children in Social Media. Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 44(2), 74-125.
54. MORSE, J. (2019, 2 Mart). So It’s Come to This: An Unborn Baby ‘Kidfluencer’ Has 112,000 Instagram Followers. Erişim adresi: https://mashable.com/article/unborn-kidfluencer
55. MUMS AT THE TABLE. (2020, January 21). Kid influencers: Big money, millions of followers. Erişim adresi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywpRQioknk4
56. ÖZER, H. D. ve ALPSOY, F. N. (2024). Çocuk İşçiliğinin Yeni Görünümü: Kidfluencer. İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 241-274.
57. ORHAN KILIÇ, B., KILIÇ, S., KONUKSEVER, D. ve ULUKOL, B. (2024). The Relationship between Mothers' Instagram Follower Count and the Concept of Sharenting. Pediatrics International, 66(1), e15736.
58. PAPADATOU, A. (2019, Jan 31). 1 of 5 British Children Want a Career as Social Media Influencers. 2 Ağustos 2023 tarihinde https://hrreview.co.uk/hr-news/1-of-5-british-children-want-a-career-as- social-media-influencers/114597 adresinden alındı.
59. PARSA, A. F. ve AKMEŞE, Z. (2019). Sosyal Medya ve Çocuk İstismarı: İnstagram Anneleri Örneği. Kadem Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 163-191.
60. PEDERSEN, I. ve ASPEVIG, K. (2018). Being Jacob: Young Children, Automedial Subjectivity, and Child Social Media Influencers. M/C Journal, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.1352
61. RAFSANJANI, J. I. (2022). Legal Protection of Kid İnfluencers From Child Exploitation. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 22(1), 93-104.
62. SARAGOZA, A. (2020) The Kids Are Alright? The Need for Kidfluencer Protections, American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law: 28(4), 575-602.
63. SEBUKTEKİN, S. ve GÜLÇAY, H. (2024). Ticari Meta Haline Gelen Simule Şöhret Çocuk Youtuberlar. Socrates Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Researches, 10(37), 36-52.
64. STEINBERG, S. B. (2017). Sharenting: Children's privacy in the age of social media. Emory Law Journal, 66(4), 839-884.
65. STEPHENSON, S., PAGE, C. N., WEİ, M., KAPADİA, A. ve ROESNER, F. (2024, May). Sharenting on TikTok: Exploring Parental Sharing Behaviors and the Discourse Around Children’s Online Privacy. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-17).
66. TOSUN, E. ve DENİZ, Ş. (2023). Youtube’da Çocuğun Tüketim Odaklı Sömürüsü: Kidfluencerlar Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(2), 595-618.
67. TUR-VIÑES, V., NÚÑEZ-GÓMEZ, P. ve GONZÁLEZ-RIO, M. J. (2018). Kid influencers on YouTube. A space for responsibility. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (73), 1211-1230.
68. VENIS, J. (2022, 6 Eylül). Social media: Rise of ‘kidfluencers’ pushes legislators to engage with children’s rights online. Erişim adresi: https://www.ibanet.org/Social-media-Rise-of-kidfluencers-pushes-legislators-to-engage-with-childrens-rights-online
69. WONG, J.C. (2019, 24 Nisan). It´s not play if you’re making making money: How Instagram and YouTube disrupted child labour laws. Kidfluencers´ are earning millions on social media, but who owns that money? Erişim adresi: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/apr/24/its-not-play-if-youre-making-money-how-instagram-and-youtube-disrupted-child-labor-laws
70. WORLD FEDERATION OF ADVERTISERS (2018, 20 Temmuz). Brands to Invest More on Influencers-World Federation of Advertisers. Erişim adresi: https://wfanet.org/knowledge/item/2018/07/20/Brands-to-invest-more-on-influencers
71. XİAO, M., WANG, R. ve CHAN-OLMSTED, S. (2018). Factors affecting YouTube influencer marketing credibility: a heuristic-systematic model. Journal of Media Business Studies, 15(3), 188-213.
72. YATES, C. (2023). Influencing “Kidfluencing”: Protecting Children by Limiting the Right to Profit from “Sharenting”. Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L., 25, 845.
73. YÜKSEL, H. ve YÜKSEL, M. (2014). Çocuk İhmali ve İstismarı Bağlamında Türkiye’de Çocuk Gelinler Gerçeği. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 1-24.
74. YÜKSEL, H. (2021). Sharenting Bağlamında Sosyal Medyada Çocuk İmajının İnşası. Akademik Düşünce Dergisi, (4), 50-68.
75. ZANDT, F. (2023, 11 Ekim). What Do U.S. Teens Want To Be When They Grow Up? Erişim adresi: https://www.statista.com/chart/31014/most-popular-future-jobs-with-united-states-teenagers/