LİDERLİK KAVRAMI ÜZERİNE BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Öz

Liderlik kavramı uzun yıllardır yönetim literatüründe önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. Ancak liderlik, sosyal bilimlerde en fazla çalışılan ve en az anlaşılan konu niteliğindedir. Örgütlerde bu olgu zamanla değişime uğramakla birlikte liderlik teorileri de yeniden şekillenmektedir. Liderlik, önemli ölçüde karmaşık ve çok boyutlu olgulardan birisidir. Yıllardır incelenen bu kavram g ünümüzün hızlı, tempolu ve giderek küreselleşen iş dünyasında her zamankinden daha büyük öneme sahip hale geldi. Liderlik; değişimi yönetebilmekte, kurumsal hedeflere ulaşmakta ve toplumsal veya diğer zorluklarla başa çıkabilmekte oldukça büyük bir öneme sahiptir. Liderliğin bir dizi tanımı bulunmaktadır, ancak en genel ifadesi hedeflere ulaşmak için başkalarını etkileme yeteneği ile ilgilidir. Başkalarını en doğru şekilde etkileyebilmek için gerekli olan süreç ve nitelikler, liderlik anlayışının merkezinde yer almaktadır. Bu çalışmada, liderlik kavramının son zamanlarda nasıl değiştiği ve bu değişimle birlikte ortaya çıkan liderlik teorileri incelenmektedir. Bu bağlamda bibliyometrik analiz yapılarak son beş yıl içerisinde Web of Science (WOS) veri tabanında yer alan 2557 makale incelenmiştir. İncelenen makaleler neticesinde en fazla gündemde olan liderlik teorilerinin; dönüşümcü liderlik (252 kere), etik liderlik (181 kere), hizmetkar liderlik (136 kere) ve otantik liderlik (97 kere) olduğu görülmektedir. Çalışmanın bulgularının liderlik teorileri üzerine gelecekteki araştırmalar için güçlü bir temel sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir. Çalışmanın kısıtları; 2018-2022 yılları arasında, WOS veri tabanında yer alan işletme ve yönetim alanındaki SSCI endeksinde taranan dergilerdeki makaleleri içermesi olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Lider
• Liderlik
• Liderlik Teorileri

A BİBLİOMETRİC RESEARCH ON THE CONCEPT OF LEADERSHİP

Abstract

The concept of leadership has held a significant place in management literature for many years. However, leadership continues to be a subject that is extensively researched, yet its understanding within the field of social sciences remains limited. While this phenomenon undergoes change within organizations, leadership theories are also being reshaped. Leadership is a complex and multidimensional phenomenon. This concept, which has been examined for years, has gained even greater importance in today's fast-paced, rapidly globalizing world. Leadership plays a substantial role in managing change, achieving organizational goals, and effectively addressing societal or other challenges. In the rapidly changing landscape of today's world, leadership has taken on an even greater significance than ever before. Leadership encompasses the ability to manage change, achieve corporate goals, and effectively address societal or other challenges, making it of utmost importance. Although there are various definitions of leadership, its most general expression is related to the ability to influence others to achieve objectives. The processes and qualities necessary to influence others accurately are at the heart of the understanding of leadership. In this research, we explore the recent evolution of the leadership concept and investigate the emerging leadership theories that have arisen from this transformation. In this context, a bibliometric analysis was conducted, and 2557 articles published in the Web of Science (WOS) database over the past five years were examined. As a result of the examined articles, it is observed that the most prominent leadership theories are transformational leadership (252 times), ethical leadership (181 times), servant leadership (136 times), and authentic leadership (97 times). The findings of the study are believed to provide a strong foundation for future research on leadership theories. The limitations of the study emerge from its inclusion of articles from journals indexed in the SSCI index of business and management within the WOS database, spanning the years 2018 to 2022.

Keywords

• Leader
• Leadership
• Leadership Theories

Kaynakça

1. Ahmad, S., Islam, T., Sadiq, M., & Kaleem, A. (2021). Promoting green behavior through ethical leadership: a model of green human resource management and environmental knowledge. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(4), 531-547.
2. Akyürek, M. İ. (2020). Otantik liderlik: Bir alanyazın taraması. Uluslararası Liderlik Çalışmaları Dergisi: Kuram ve Uygulama, 3(3), 99-109.
3. Aksoy, C., Aslantaş, M. ve Arslan, V. (2016). Adaletin Çalışma Hayatındaki Yansıması: Örgütsel Adalet, International Journal of Innovative Strategical Social Research, 1(1), 19-32
4. Aslantaş, M. (2016). Yetenek Yönetiminin İşe Adanma, Performans ve İşten Ayrılma Niyetine Etkisi: Bankacılık Sektörü Örneği. Doktora Tezi, Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Diyarbakır
5. Ba Le, P., & Nguyen, D. (2023). Stimulating knowledge-sharing behaviours through ethical leadership and employee trust in leadership: the moderating role of distributive justice. Journal Of Knowledge Management, 27(3), 820-841.
6. Bavik, Y. L., Tang, P. M., Shao, R., & Lam, L. W. (2018). Ethical leadership and employee knowledge sharing: Exploring dual-mediation paths. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 322-332.
7. Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: a review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.
8. Begum, S., Ashfaq, M., Xia, E., & Awan, U. (2022). Does green transformational leadership lead to green innovation? The role of green thinking and creative process engagement. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 580-597.

9. Chen, C., Dubin, R., & Kim, M. C. (2014). Emerging trends and new developments in regenerative medicine: a scientometric update (2000 – 2014). Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 14(9), 1295-1317.
10. Çalişkan, N., & Özkoç, A. G. (2016). Örgütlerde paternalist liderlik algısına etki eden ulusal kültür tiplerinin belirlenmesi. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 11(44), 240-250.
11. Darvishmotevali, M., & Altinay, L. (2022). Green HRM, environmental awareness and green behaviors: The moderating role of servant leadership. Tourism Management, 88, 104401.
12. De Roeck, K., & Farooq, O. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and ethical leadership: Investigating their interactive effect on employees’ socially responsible behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 923-939.
13. Erer, B., & Demirel, E. (2018). Modern Liderlik Yaklaşımlarına Genel Bir Bakış. Journal of Institute of Economic Development and Social Researches, 4(13), 647-656.
14. Faraz, N. A., Ahmed, F., Ying, M., & Mehmood, S. A. (2021). The interplay of green servant leadership, self‐efficacy, and intrinsic motivation in predicting employees’ pro‐environmental behavior. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1171-1184.
15. Farrukh, M., Ansari, N., Raza, A., Wu, Y., & Wang, H. (2022). Fostering employee's pro-environmental behavior through green transformational leadership, green human resource management and environmental knowledge. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121643.
16. Fry, L. W., & Vu, M. C. (2023). Leading Without a Self: Implications of Buddhist Practices for Pseudospiritual Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-17.
17. Gündüz, Ş. (2020). Sürdürülebilir Stratejik Yönetim ve Kurumsal Yönetim. İstanbul: Maltepe Üniversitesi Yayınları.
18. Hensellek, S., Stegemann, L. K., & Kollmann, T. (2023). Entrepreneurial leadership, strategic flexibility, and venture performance: Does founders’ span of control matter? Journal of Business Research, 157, 1-14.
19. Herbst, T. H., & Roux, T. (2023). Toxic Leadership: A Slow Poison Killing Women Leaders in Higher Education in South Africa? Higher Education Policy, 36, 164-189.
20. Ho, G. K., Lam, C., & Law, R. (2023). Conceptual framework of strategic leadership and organizational resilience for the hospitality and tourism industry for coping with environmental uncertainty. ournal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 6(2), 835-852.
21. Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of management, 44(2), 501-529.
22. Jacobsen, C. B., Andersen, L. B., Bøllingtoft, A., & Eriksen, T. L. (2022). Can Leadership Training Improve Organizational Effectiveness? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment on Transactional and Transformational Leadership: Public Administration Review, 82(1), 117-131.
23. Joo, B.-K., Yoon, S., & Galbraith, D. (2023). The effects of organizational trust and empowering leadership on group conflict: psychological safety as a mediator. Organization Management Journal, 20(1), 4-16.
24. Kim, M., Beehr, T. A., & Prewett, M. S. (2018). Employee responses to empowering leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(3), 257-276.
25. Kimakwa, S., Gonzalez, J. A., & Kaynak, H. (2023). Social Entrepreneur Servant Leadership and Social Venture Performance: How are They Related? Journal of Business Ethics, 182(1), 95-118.
26. Kinicki, A., & Kreitner, R. (2008). Organizational Behaviour: Key Concepts, Skills&Best Practices. New York: McGraw-Hill Company Inc.
27. Koçel, T. (2020). İşletme Yöneticiliği. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
28. Kuknor, S. C., & Bhattacharya, S. (2022). Inclusive leadership: new age leadership to foster organizational inclusion. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(9), 771-797.
29. Le, P. B., & Lei, H. (2019). Determinants of innovation capability: the roles of transformational leadership, knowledge sharing and perceived organizational support. Journal of knowledge management, 23(3), 527-547.
30. Lee, A., Willis, S., & Tian, A. W. (2018). Empowering leadership: A meta‐analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 306-325.
31. Lei, H., Do, N. K., & Le, P. B. (2019). Arousing a positive climate for knowledge sharing through moral lens: the mediating roles of knowledge-centered and collaborative culture. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(8), 1586-1604.
32. Luedi, M. M., & Anaesthesiologist, A. (2022). Leadership in 2022: A perspective. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 36, 229-235.
33. Miao, Q., Eva, N., Newman, A., & Cooper, B. (2019). CEO entrepreneurial leadership and performance outcomes of top management teams in entrepreneurial ventures: The mediating effects of psychological safety. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(3), 1119-1135.
34. Nanjundeswaraswamy, T. S., & Swamy, D. R. (2014). Leadership styles. Advances In Management, 7(2), 57-62.
35. Newman, A., Herman, H. M., Schwarz, G., & Nielsen, I. (2018). The effects of employees' creative self-efficacy on innovative behavior: The role of entrepreneurial leadership. Journal of business research, 89, 1-9.
36. Niu, B., Yu, X., Li, Q., & Wang, Y. (2023). Gains and Losses of Key Opinion Leaders’ Product Promotion in Livestream E-commerce. Omega, 117, 1-19.
37. Northouse, P. G. (2007). Leadership Theory and Practice. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
38. Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership. ABD: Sage Publications.
39. Ufacık, O. E. (2023). Cam Uçurum Kavramı Üzerine Bibliyometrik Bir Araştırma. İçinde: Bayram, A. T. & Ali N. & Raza, A. (ed.), Sosyal Bilimlerde Kadın Çalışmaları I . Özgür
40. Randel, A. E., Galvin, B. M., Shore, L. M., Ehrhart, K. H., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., & Kedharnath, U. (2018). Inclusive leadership: Realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human resource management review, 28(2), 190-203.
41. Rost, J. C. (1993). Leadership for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Praeger Publishers.
42. SIĞRI, Ü., & TIĞLI, M. (2006). Hofstede'nin" Belirsizlikten Kaçınma" Kültürel Boyutunun Yönetsel-Örgütsel Süreçlere ve Pazarlama Açısından Tüketici Davranışlarına Etkisi. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 21(1), 327-342.
43. Singh, S. K., Giudice, M. D., Chierici, R., & Graziano, D. (2020). Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 150, 1-12.
44. Schoemaker, P. J., Heaton, S., & Teece, D. (2018). Innovation, dynamic capabilities, and leadership. California management review, 61(1), 15-42.
45. Soylu, Y., Tabak, A., & Polat, M. (2007). Ankara İlinde Savunma Sanayiinde Çalışan Orta Kademe Yöneticilerin Liderlik Bileşenini Algılamaları: Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci(AHS) İle Bir Çalışma. ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(5), 179-191.
46. Sreenivas, J. G. (2014). Impact of psychological empowerment on employee performance - A conceptual review. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 16(6), 1-5.
47. Şengüllendi, M. F. (2021). Dynamic of the evaluation of social entrepreneurship concept: a bibliometric analysis. In Creating Social Value Through Social Entrepreneurship (pp. 32-55). IGI Global.
48. Tuan, L. T. (2021). Effects of environmentally-specific servant leadership on green performance via green climate and green crafting. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(3), 925-953.
49. Üstün, A., & Çam, E. (2016). Müdür Yetkili Öğretmenlerin Liderlik Stilleri ile Okul Müdürlerinin Liderlik Stillerinin Karşılaştırılması. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(6), 63-73.
50. Yu, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Gu, Z., Zhong, H., Zha, Q., . . . Chen, E. (2020). A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer of publications on COVID-19. Annals of Translational Medicine, 4220-4235.