Turizm Kentlerinde Ekonomik Farklılaşma ve İlgili Çeşitlilik

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2, 215 - 226, 01.12.2017

Hilal Erkuş Öztürk

https://doi.org/10.17123/atad.362563

Öz

Turizm, kentsel ekonomik kalkınmayı sağlamada sürücü bir rol üstlenmektedir. Ekonomik kalkınma yazınında, uzun vadede tek varlığa sahip olan kentlerin ekonomik büyüme açısından birçok varlığa sahip olan kentlere kıyasla daha kırılgan olduğu iddia edilmektedir. Ancak yüksek hızla gerçekleşen turizm büyümesinin bir kentte daha güçlü bir ekonomik aynılaşma yaratıp yaratmayacağı tartışmalı olup, bu makalede hızlı turizm büyümesinin sektörle ilgili ve dolaylı olarak ilgili sektörlerin gelişimini tetikleyebildiği, bu kapsamda turizmle ilişkili firmalarda ekonomik bir farklılaşmayı tetikleyeceği iddia edilmektedir. Bu amaçla (evrimsel) ekonomik coğrafya yazını ve turizm yazını eleştirel biçimde değerlendirildikten sonra, Antalya turizm kenti üzerinde il düzeyinde sektör verileri ve aynı zamanda turizmle ilgili ve dolaylı ilgili firmalarla yapılan anket verilerinin niceliksel ilişkisel analiz yöntemleri kullanılarak yapılan analizlerin bulguları bu makalede tartışılmaktadır. Bulgular ekonomik farklılaşmanın turizmle ilgili sektörlerde artarak gözlendiğini ve turizmde farklılaşan firmaların ilgili çeşitlilik gösteren firmalarla yakından ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ekonomik farklılaşma, Turizm kentleri, İlgili-çeşitlilik, İlgisiz çeşitlilik, Antalya

Economic Diversification and Related Variety in Tourism Cities

Öz

Tourism is taken as a driver of urban economic growth. It is claimed in the literature that single-asset cities are more fragile than multi asset cities. It is doubted whether a high urban tourism growth implies an ever stronger specialization and a locked-in process of path dependent urban economic development. In this paper, it is claimed that the growth of tourism, by time, stimulates the growth of related and unrelated industries, generates a diversification in the city and stimulates differentiation in tourism firms which have related variety connections. The aim of the paper is to evaluate evolutionary economic geography literature in a very critical way by combining it with tourism literature with a specific focus on tourism actors in Antalya by analyzing quantitatively both from primary interview data from tourism firms and secondary data on sectoral bases. Findings show an increase in economic diversification and strong association between differentiated tourism firms and related variety connections.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Economic diversification, Tourism cities, Related variety, Unrelated variety, Antalya

Kaynakça

• Arezki, R. Cherif, R. ve Piotrowski, J. (2009). Tourism Specialization and Economic Development: Evidence from the UNESCO World Heritage List, IMF Working Paper, 09/176.
• Braudel, F. (1982). The Wheels of Commerce. Londra: Collins.
• Boschma, R. ve Iammarino, S. (2007). Related Variety and Regional Growth in Italy, SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, 162.
• Boschma, R. ve Iammartino, S. (2009). Related Variety, Trade Linkages, and Regional Growth in Italy, Economic Geography, 85 (3): 289-311.
• Brohman, J. (1996). New Directions in Tourism for Third World Development, Annals of Tourism Research, 23 (1): 48-70.
• Brouder, P. (2014). Evolutionary Economic Geography and Tourism Studies: Extant Studies and Future Research Directions, Tourism Geographies, 16 (4): 540–545.
• Butler, R.W. (2011). Tourism Area Life Cycles, Contemporary Tourism reviews. Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers Ltd.
• Chen, A.G. J. (2011). Urbanization in China and The Coordinated Development Model-The case of Chengdu, Social Science Journal, 48 (3): 500-513.
• Cooke, P.N. ve Lazzeretti, L. (2008). Introduction Creative Cities, Cultural Clusters and Local Economic Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Copeland, B.R. (1991). Tourism, Welfare and Deindustrialization in a Small Open Economy, Economica, 232 (58): 515-529.
• Corden, W.M. (1984). Booming Sector And Dutch Disease Economics - Survey And Consolidation, Oxford Economic Papers-New Series, 36 (3): 359-380.
• Dwyer, L. Forsyth, P. ve Spurr, R. (2004). Evaluating Tourism’s Economic Effects: New and Old Approaches, Tourism Management, 25 (3): 307-317.
• Farmaki, A. (2012). A Supply-Side Evaluation of Coastal Tourism Diversification: The Case of Cyprus, Tourism Planning and Development, 9 (2): 183-203.
• Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s tyTransforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
• Frenken, K. ve Boschma, R.A. (2007). A Theoretical Framework for Evolutionary Economic Geography: Industrial Dynamics and Urban Growth as a Branching Process, Journal of Economic Geography, 7 (5): 635-649.
• Frenken, K. Van Oort, F. ve Verburg T. (2007). Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth, Regional Studies, 41 (5): 685-697.
• Glaeser, E.L. Kallal, H.D. Scheinkman, J.A. ve Shleifer, A.(1992). Growth in Cities, The Journal of Political Economy, 100 (6): 1126-1152.
• Goldstein, G.S., ve Gronberg, T.J. (1984). Economies of Scope and Economies of Agglomeration, Journal of Urban Economics, 16: 91-104.
• Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (2006). More Than an “Industry”: The Forgotten Power of Tourism as a Social Force, Tourism Management, 27 (6): 1192-1208.
• Hirsch, F. (1977). Social Limits to Growth. Londra: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
• Hobson, J.S.P. (1994). Growth of Tourism in East Asia and the Pacific, Tourism Management, 15 (2): 150-156.
• Jacobs, J. (1967). The Economy of Cities. Harmondsworth: Penquin.
• Lazzeretti, L. Capone, F. ve Cinti, T. (2010). The Regional Development Platform and “Related Variety”: Some Evidence from Art and Food in Tuscany, European Planning Studies, 18 (1): 27-45.
• Ma, M. ve Hassink, R. (2013). An Evolutionary Perspective on Tourism Area Development. Annals of Tourism Research, 41: 89–109.
• Mullins, P. (1991). Tourism Urbanization, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 15 (3): 326-342.
• Polèse, M. (2010). The Wealth and Poverty of Regions: Why Cities Matter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Poon, A. (1990). Flexible Specialization and Small Size: The Case of Caribbean Tourism, World Development, 18 (1): 109-123.
• Romer, P.M. (1987). Growth Based on Increasing Returns Due to Specialization, American Economic Review, 77 (2): 56-62.
• Schumpeter, J.A. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Boston: Harvard University Press.
• Sheng, L. (2010). Competing or Cooperating to Host Mega Events: A Simple Model, Economic Modelling, 27 (1): 375-379.
• Sheng, L. (2011). Specialisation versus Diversification: A Simple Model for Tourist Cities, Tourism Management, 32 (5): 1229-1231.
• Sheng, L. ve Tsui, Y. (2009). Casino Boom and Local Politics: The City of Macao, Cities, 26 (2): 67-73.
• Staber, U. (1997). Specialization in a Declining Industrial District, Growth and Change, 28 (4): 475–495.
• Stamboulis, Y. ve Skayannis, P. (2003). Innovation Strategies and Technology for Experience-Based Tourism, Tourism Management, 24 (1): 35-43.
• Wang, H.-J. ve Lee, H.-Y. (2008). How Government-Funded Projects Have Revitalized Historic Streetscapes – Two Cases in Taiwan, Cities, 25 (4): 197-206.
• Wijnbergen, S.V. (1984). The `Dutch Disease’: A Disease After All?, The Economic Journal, 373 (94): 41-55.
• Winter, T. (2007). Rethinking Tourism in Asia, Annals of Tourism Research, 34 (1): 27-44.
• Yang, Z. Cai, J. ve Sliuzas, R. (2010). Agro-Tourism Enterprises as a Form of Multi-Functional Urban Agriculture for Peri-Urban Development in China, Habitat International, 34 (4): 374-385.