COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE OF SELF-ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENTS USED FOR FIBER POST CEMENTATION

Öz

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of four self-adhesive resin cements used for fiber post cementation with fluid filtration method. Material and Method: In the study, 50 upper human canine teeth extracted for periodontal reasons were used. The root lengths of the teeth were mesured and standardized. Root canals were enlarged with rotary instruments (Protaper, Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaquies, Switzerland) and filling was achieved using lateral compaction technique. The specimens were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=10). The fiber post (Exacto Glass Fiber posts, Angelus Industria de Produtos Odontologicos S/A, Londrina-PR-Brasil) cementations are completed with the fallowing materials: Variolink II Professional Pack (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) (Control), G-Cem Automix (GC, Tokyo, Japan), Panavia SA Cement (Kuraray, Okayama, Japan), Smart Cem 2 (Dentsply DeTrey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany) and Rely X U200 (3M ESPE, Neuss, Germany). The measurement of microleakage was performed at 2nd, 4th, 6th and 8th minutes. The data was analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey tests (p<0.05). Results: The best results were obtained in Rely X U200 and Panavia SA Cement groups, while the most leakage was seen in G-Cem Automix and Smart Cem 2 groups (p<0,05). There was statistically significant difference between Rely X U200 and Panavia SA Cement groups compared to the control group (p<0,05). The control group was found to have statistically less microleakage than G-Cem Automix and Smart Cem 2 groups (p<0,05). Conclusion: From the point of microleakage, some self adhesive resin cements used for fiber post cementation were found to be more reliable than the control group material

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Self-adhesive resin cements, fiber post, post endodontic restorations

FİBER POST SİMANTASYONUNDA KULLANILAN SELF-ADEZİV REZİN SİMANLARIN MİKROSIZINTILARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, fiber post simantasyonunda kullanılan dört self-adeziv rezin simanın mikrosızıntılarını sıvı filtrasyon yöntemi ile karşılaştırmaktır.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada, periodontal nedenlerle çekilmiş 50 adet insan üst  çene kanin dişi kullanıldı. Dişlerin kök boyları ölçülerek standardize edildi. Dişler döner eğelerle (Protaper, Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaquies, İsviçre) genişletilip, lateral kompaksiyon yöntemiyle dolduruldu. Örnekler rastgele 5 gruba ayrıldı (n=10). Fiber post (Exacto Glass Fiber posts, Angelus Industria de Produtos Odontologicos S/A, Londrina-PR-Brezilya) simantasyonları şu materyallerle yapıldı:

Variolink II Professional Pack (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) (Kontrol), G-Cem Automix (GC, Tokyo, Japonya), Panavia SA Cement (Kuraray, Okayama, Japonya), Smart Cem 2 (Dentsply DeTrey GmbH, Konstanz, Almanya) ve Rely X U200 (3M ESPE, Neuss, Almanya). Mikrosızıntı ölçümleri 2, 4, 6 ve 8. dakikalarda gerçekleştirildi.

Veriler istatistiksel olarak ANOVA ve Tukey testleri ile değerlendirildi (p<0.05). 

Bulgular: En iyi sonuçlara Rely X U200 ve Panavia SA Cement’te rastlanırken, en fazla mikrosızıntı da G-Cem Automix ve Smart Cem 2’de gözlendi (p<0,05). Rely X U200 ve Panavia SA Cement grupları, kontrol grubuyla karşılaştırıldığında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede daha sızdırmaz sonuçlar gösterdi (p<0,05). G-Cem Automix ve Smart Cem 2 grupları kontrol grubuyla karşılaştırıldığında, kontrol grubu bu gruplardan istatistiksel olarak daha sızdırmaz bulundu (p<0,05).

Sonuç: Fiber post simantasyonunda kullanılan bazı self-adeziv rezin simanlar, kontrol grubu materyaliyle karşılaştırıldığında mikrosızıntı açısından daha güvenilir bulundu.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Self-adeziv rezin simanlar, fiber post, post endodontik restorasyonlar

Kaynakça

1. Ray HA, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J. 1995;28:12-8.
2. Madison S, Swanson K, Chiles SA. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part II. Sealer types. J Endod. 1987;13:109- 12.
3. Smith CT, Schuman NS. Prefabricated post and core systems: An overview. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 1998;19:1013-8.
4. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Apr;89:360-7.
5. Barjau-Escribano A, Sancho-Bru JL, Forner-Navarro L, Rodríguez-Cervantes PJ, Pérez-Gonzáles A, Sánchez-Marin FT. Influence of prefabricated post material on restored teeth: Fracture strength and stress distribution. Oper Dent 2006 ;3: 47-54.
6. Schwartz RS. Adhesive dentistry and endodontics. Part 2: bonding in the root canal system - the promise and the problems: a review. J Endod. 2006;32:1125-34.
7. Pedreira APRV, Pegoraro LF, Góes MF, Pegoraro TA, Carvalho RM. Microhardness of resin cements in the intraradicular environment: effects of water storage and softening treatment. Dent Mater 2009;25:868-76.
8. Duarte S Jr, Botta AC, Meire M, Sadan A. Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self- etch resin cements to intact and etched enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:203-10.

9. Akgungor G, Akkayan B. Influence of dentin bonding agents and polymerization modes on the bond strength between translucent fibre posts and three dentin regions within a post space. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:368-78.
10. Monticelli F, Ferrari M, Toledano M. Cement system and surface treatment selection for fiber post luting. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008; 13:214-21.
11. Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Rosentritt M, Beuer F, Meyer-Lückel H, Frankenberger R. Self-adhesive cements as core build-ups for one-stage post- endodontic restorations? Int Endod J 2011; 44:195-202.
12. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:2518.
13. Çilingir ÇA, Gömeç Y. Self-adesif reçine simanlar. İst Üniv Diş Hek Fak Dergisi 2008;42:31-40.
14. Viotti RG, Kasaz A, Pena CE, Alexandre RS, Arrais CA, Reis AF. Microtensile bond strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:306- 12.
15. Derkson GD, Pashley DH, Derkson ME. Microleakage measurement of selected restorative materials: a new in vitro method, J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:435-40.
16. Wu MK, De Gee AJ, Wesselink PR, Moore WR. Fluid transport and bacterial panetration along root canal fillings, Int Endod J 1993;26:203-8.
17. VanMeerbek B, Landuyt KV, DeMunck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K, Biomat L. Technique sensivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater 2005; 24:1-13.
18. Swift EJ. Dentin/enamel adhesives: Review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:456-61.
19. Pashley DH, Carvolho RM. Dentin permeability and dentin adhesion. J Dent. 1997;25:355–72.
20. Sabatini C. Effect of phosphoric acid etching on the shear bond strength of two self-etch adhesives. J Appl Oral Sci 2013;21:56-62.
21. Goracci C, Cury AH, Cantoro A, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self- adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:327-35.
22. Viotti RG, Kasaz A, Pena CE, Alexandre RS, Arrais CA, Reis AF. Microtensile bond strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:306- 12.
23. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, et al. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin Oper Dent 2005;30:627–35.
24. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Lambrechts P, et al. Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modeling approach. J Endod 2005;31:584–9.
25. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, et al. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res 1999;78:898–905.
26. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, et al. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996;21:17–24.
27. Roulet JF. Marginal integrity: clinical significance. J Dent 1994;22:9–12.
28. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215–35.
29. Bouillaguet S, Troesh S, Krejci I, Wataha JC, Meyer JM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root-canal dentin. Dent Mater 2003;19:199–205.
30. Vano M, Cury AH, Goracci C, Chieffi N, Gabriele M, Tay FR, et al. The effect of immediate versus delayed cementation on the retention of different types of fiber post in canals obturated using a eugenol sealer. J Endod 2006;32:882–5.
31. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco MC, Mjor IA. Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent 2000;13:255–60.
32. Bachica WS, Di Fiore PM, Miller DA, Lautenschlager EP, Pashley DH. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with posts. J Endod 1998;11:703–8.
33. Goodacre JC, Spolnikn KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part I. J Prosthodont 1994;3:243–50.
34. Wu MK, Pehlivan Y, Kontakiotis EG, Wesselink PR. Microleakage along apical root canal filling and cemented posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:264–9.
35. Pommel L, Camps J. Effects of pressure and measurement time fluid-filtration methods in endodontics. J Endod 2001;27:256–8.
36. Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Holt J, Pashley DH. Dentinal fluid dynamics in human teeth, in vivo. J Endod 1995;21:191–4.
37. Bouillaguet S, Ciucchi B, Duroux B, Sano H. Ability of adhesive systems to seal dentin surfaces: an in vitro study. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:201–8.
38. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004;20:963–71.
39. Lekatou A, Faidi SE, Ghidasui D, Lyon SB, Newman RC. Effect of water and its activity on transport properties of glass/epoxy particulate composites. Composite 1997;28:223-36.
40. Fan PL, Edahl A, Leung RG, Stanford JW. Alternative interpretations of water sorption values of composite resins. J Dent Res 1985; 64: 78-80.
41. Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Fuentes V, Prati C, GarciaGodoy F. Sorption and solubility of resin- based restorative dental materials. J Dent 2003;31:13-50.
42. Erdemir U, Mumcu E, Topcu FT, Yildiz E, Yamanel K, Akyol M. Micro push-out bond strengths of 2 fiber post types luted using different adhesive strategies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radio. Endod. 2010;110:534-44.
43. Schmage P, Cakir FY, Nergiz I, Pfeiffer P. Effect of surface conditioning on the retentive bond strengths of fiberreinforced composite posts. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 102:368-77.
44. Balbosh A., Ludwig K., Kern M. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:227-33.
45. Bitter K, Paris S, Pfuertner C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:326-33.
46. Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, Kanjuparambil JP, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine. Int Endod J 2006;39:809-18.
47. Zorba YO, Erdemir A, Turkyilmaz A, Eldeniz AU. Effects of different curing units and luting agents on push-out bond strength of translucent posts. J Endod 2010;36:1521-5.
48. Lindblad RM, Lassila LV, Salo V, Vallittu PK, Tjäderhane L. Effect of chlorhexidine on initial adhesion of fiber-reinforced post to root canal. J Dent 2010;38:796-801.
49. Schmage P, Pfeiffer P, Pinto E, Platzer U, Nergiz I. Influence of oversized dowel space preparation on the bond strengths of FRC posts. Oper Dent 2009;34:93-101.
50. Bitter K, Priehn K, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strengths of various luting agents to tooth-colored posts. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:302-10.