Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 341 - 347, 28.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17183109

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Bamford, J., & Bondi, M. (Eds.). (2005). Dialogue within Discourse Communities: Metadiscursive Perspectives on Academic Genres. De Gruyter. Elsayed, I. F. A. (2023). Dilçilik-Языкознание. Бакы.
  • Freddi, M. (2005a). Arguing linguistics: Corpus investigation of one functional variety of academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4 (1), 5–26.
  • Freddi, M. (2005b). From corpus to register: The construction of evaluation and argumentation in linguistics textbooks. In Strategies in Academic Discourse (pp. 133–151). John Benjamins.
  • Haegeman, L. (2009). Thinking syntactically: A guide to argumentation and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Həmzəyeva, L. (2021). Koqnitiv dilçilik. Türk Dillərinin Və Ədəbiyyatinin Tədqiqi Və Tədrisinin Aktual Problemləri, 653–654.
  • Murshudzada, N. (2023, July). Dılçılık və Sosıolınqvıstıka. In Publisher. agency: Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific Conference «Foundations and Trends in Research»(July 13-14, 2023). Copenhagen, Denmark, 2023. 137p (p. 67). Danish School of Media and Journalism.
  • Nasution, H. S. (2024). Toulmin Model Based Argument Diagnosing: Constructing and Evaluating in The Argumentation Essay in Indonesia EFL Textbook. Indonesian Journal of Education, 3 (2), 67–74.
  • Oswald, S., Herman, T., & Jacquin, J. (Eds.). (2018). Argumentation and Language—Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations (Vol. 32). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73972-4
  • Qaraşova, Y. (2013). Struktur dilçilik. Bakı Dövlət Universiteti İlahiyyat Fakültəsinin Elmi Məcmuəsi, 10 (19), 211–217.
  • Tirkkonen-Condit, S. (1985). Argumentative text structure and translation. https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/69760
  • Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Johnson, R. H., Plantin, C., & Willard, C. A. (2013). Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Routledge.
  • Wachsmuth, H., Stede, M., El Baff, R., Al Khatib, K., Skeppstedt, M., & Stein, B. (2018). Argumentation synthesis following rhetorical strategies. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 3753–3765.

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 341 - 347, 28.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17183109

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Bamford, J., & Bondi, M. (Eds.). (2005). Dialogue within Discourse Communities: Metadiscursive Perspectives on Academic Genres. De Gruyter. Elsayed, I. F. A. (2023). Dilçilik-Языкознание. Бакы.
  • Freddi, M. (2005a). Arguing linguistics: Corpus investigation of one functional variety of academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4 (1), 5–26.
  • Freddi, M. (2005b). From corpus to register: The construction of evaluation and argumentation in linguistics textbooks. In Strategies in Academic Discourse (pp. 133–151). John Benjamins.
  • Haegeman, L. (2009). Thinking syntactically: A guide to argumentation and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Həmzəyeva, L. (2021). Koqnitiv dilçilik. Türk Dillərinin Və Ədəbiyyatinin Tədqiqi Və Tədrisinin Aktual Problemləri, 653–654.
  • Murshudzada, N. (2023, July). Dılçılık və Sosıolınqvıstıka. In Publisher. agency: Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific Conference «Foundations and Trends in Research»(July 13-14, 2023). Copenhagen, Denmark, 2023. 137p (p. 67). Danish School of Media and Journalism.
  • Nasution, H. S. (2024). Toulmin Model Based Argument Diagnosing: Constructing and Evaluating in The Argumentation Essay in Indonesia EFL Textbook. Indonesian Journal of Education, 3 (2), 67–74.
  • Oswald, S., Herman, T., & Jacquin, J. (Eds.). (2018). Argumentation and Language—Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations (Vol. 32). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73972-4
  • Qaraşova, Y. (2013). Struktur dilçilik. Bakı Dövlət Universiteti İlahiyyat Fakültəsinin Elmi Məcmuəsi, 10 (19), 211–217.
  • Tirkkonen-Condit, S. (1985). Argumentative text structure and translation. https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/69760
  • Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Johnson, R. H., Plantin, C., & Willard, C. A. (2013). Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Routledge.
  • Wachsmuth, H., Stede, M., El Baff, R., Al Khatib, K., Skeppstedt, M., & Stein, B. (2018). Argumentation synthesis following rhetorical strategies. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 3753–3765.

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 341 - 347, 28.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17183109

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Bamford, J., & Bondi, M. (Eds.). (2005). Dialogue within Discourse Communities: Metadiscursive Perspectives on Academic Genres. De Gruyter. Elsayed, I. F. A. (2023). Dilçilik-Языкознание. Бакы.
  • Freddi, M. (2005a). Arguing linguistics: Corpus investigation of one functional variety of academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4 (1), 5–26.
  • Freddi, M. (2005b). From corpus to register: The construction of evaluation and argumentation in linguistics textbooks. In Strategies in Academic Discourse (pp. 133–151). John Benjamins.
  • Haegeman, L. (2009). Thinking syntactically: A guide to argumentation and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Həmzəyeva, L. (2021). Koqnitiv dilçilik. Türk Dillərinin Və Ədəbiyyatinin Tədqiqi Və Tədrisinin Aktual Problemləri, 653–654.
  • Murshudzada, N. (2023, July). Dılçılık və Sosıolınqvıstıka. In Publisher. agency: Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific Conference «Foundations and Trends in Research»(July 13-14, 2023). Copenhagen, Denmark, 2023. 137p (p. 67). Danish School of Media and Journalism.
  • Nasution, H. S. (2024). Toulmin Model Based Argument Diagnosing: Constructing and Evaluating in The Argumentation Essay in Indonesia EFL Textbook. Indonesian Journal of Education, 3 (2), 67–74.
  • Oswald, S., Herman, T., & Jacquin, J. (Eds.). (2018). Argumentation and Language—Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations (Vol. 32). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73972-4
  • Qaraşova, Y. (2013). Struktur dilçilik. Bakı Dövlət Universiteti İlahiyyat Fakültəsinin Elmi Məcmuəsi, 10 (19), 211–217.
  • Tirkkonen-Condit, S. (1985). Argumentative text structure and translation. https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/69760
  • Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Johnson, R. H., Plantin, C., & Willard, C. A. (2013). Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Routledge.
  • Wachsmuth, H., Stede, M., El Baff, R., Al Khatib, K., Skeppstedt, M., & Stein, B. (2018). Argumentation synthesis following rhetorical strategies. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 3753–3765.

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 341 - 347, 28.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17183109

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Bamford, J., & Bondi, M. (Eds.). (2005). Dialogue within Discourse Communities: Metadiscursive Perspectives on Academic Genres. De Gruyter. Elsayed, I. F. A. (2023). Dilçilik-Языкознание. Бакы.
  • Freddi, M. (2005a). Arguing linguistics: Corpus investigation of one functional variety of academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4 (1), 5–26.
  • Freddi, M. (2005b). From corpus to register: The construction of evaluation and argumentation in linguistics textbooks. In Strategies in Academic Discourse (pp. 133–151). John Benjamins.
  • Haegeman, L. (2009). Thinking syntactically: A guide to argumentation and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Həmzəyeva, L. (2021). Koqnitiv dilçilik. Türk Dillərinin Və Ədəbiyyatinin Tədqiqi Və Tədrisinin Aktual Problemləri, 653–654.
  • Murshudzada, N. (2023, July). Dılçılık və Sosıolınqvıstıka. In Publisher. agency: Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific Conference «Foundations and Trends in Research»(July 13-14, 2023). Copenhagen, Denmark, 2023. 137p (p. 67). Danish School of Media and Journalism.
  • Nasution, H. S. (2024). Toulmin Model Based Argument Diagnosing: Constructing and Evaluating in The Argumentation Essay in Indonesia EFL Textbook. Indonesian Journal of Education, 3 (2), 67–74.
  • Oswald, S., Herman, T., & Jacquin, J. (Eds.). (2018). Argumentation and Language—Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations (Vol. 32). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73972-4
  • Qaraşova, Y. (2013). Struktur dilçilik. Bakı Dövlət Universiteti İlahiyyat Fakültəsinin Elmi Məcmuəsi, 10 (19), 211–217.
  • Tirkkonen-Condit, S. (1985). Argumentative text structure and translation. https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/69760
  • Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Johnson, R. H., Plantin, C., & Willard, C. A. (2013). Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Routledge.
  • Wachsmuth, H., Stede, M., El Baff, R., Al Khatib, K., Skeppstedt, M., & Stein, B. (2018). Argumentation synthesis following rhetorical strategies. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 3753–3765.

Argumentation in Linguistics Textbooks in English

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 341 - 347, 28.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17183109

Öz

The aim of this paper is to explore the issue of argumentation in linguistics textbooks in English. The paper also examines the principles of argumentation. Throughout history, language has been both a unique characteristic of ethnicity and an entity fulfilling its core functions. From ancient times to the present, language has been socially manifested, and it is impossible to conceive of language as an entity separate from humans. Argumentation is the process of justifying and expressing one’s ideas, positions, or perspectives. This process does not merely deal with simple yes/no questions that do not have a definitive answer, but rather it requires the application of logic and evidence to support one’s stance on controversial issues. The article employs comparison and analysis methods in its writing process.

Kaynakça

  • Bamford, J., & Bondi, M. (Eds.). (2005). Dialogue within Discourse Communities: Metadiscursive Perspectives on Academic Genres. De Gruyter. Elsayed, I. F. A. (2023). Dilçilik-Языкознание. Бакы.
  • Freddi, M. (2005a). Arguing linguistics: Corpus investigation of one functional variety of academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4 (1), 5–26.
  • Freddi, M. (2005b). From corpus to register: The construction of evaluation and argumentation in linguistics textbooks. In Strategies in Academic Discourse (pp. 133–151). John Benjamins.
  • Haegeman, L. (2009). Thinking syntactically: A guide to argumentation and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Həmzəyeva, L. (2021). Koqnitiv dilçilik. Türk Dillərinin Və Ədəbiyyatinin Tədqiqi Və Tədrisinin Aktual Problemləri, 653–654.
  • Murshudzada, N. (2023, July). Dılçılık və Sosıolınqvıstıka. In Publisher. agency: Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific Conference «Foundations and Trends in Research»(July 13-14, 2023). Copenhagen, Denmark, 2023. 137p (p. 67). Danish School of Media and Journalism.
  • Nasution, H. S. (2024). Toulmin Model Based Argument Diagnosing: Constructing and Evaluating in The Argumentation Essay in Indonesia EFL Textbook. Indonesian Journal of Education, 3 (2), 67–74.
  • Oswald, S., Herman, T., & Jacquin, J. (Eds.). (2018). Argumentation and Language—Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations (Vol. 32). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73972-4
  • Qaraşova, Y. (2013). Struktur dilçilik. Bakı Dövlət Universiteti İlahiyyat Fakültəsinin Elmi Məcmuəsi, 10 (19), 211–217.
  • Tirkkonen-Condit, S. (1985). Argumentative text structure and translation. https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/69760
  • Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Johnson, R. H., Plantin, C., & Willard, C. A. (2013). Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Routledge.
  • Wachsmuth, H., Stede, M., El Baff, R., Al Khatib, K., Skeppstedt, M., & Stein, B. (2018). Argumentation synthesis following rhetorical strategies. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 3753–3765.

İngilizce Dilbilim Ders Kitaplarında Argümantasyon

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 341 - 347, 28.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17183109

Öz

Bu makalenin amacı İngilizce dilbilim ders kitaplarında argümantasyon konusunu incelemektir. Makale aynı zamanda argümantasyon ilkelerini de incelemektedir. Tarih boyunca dil, hem etnisitenin eşsiz bir özelliği hem de temel işlevlerini yerine getiren bir varlık olmuştur. Antik çağlardan günümüze, dil sosyal olarak kendini göstermiştir ve dili insanlardan ayrı bir varlık olarak düşünmek mümkün değildir. Argümantasyon, bir kişinin fikirlerini, pozisyonlarını veya bakış açılarını gerekçelendirme ve ifade etme sürecidir. Bu süreç yalnızca kesin bir cevabı olmayan basit evet/hayır sorularıyla ilgilenmez, daha ziyade tartışmalı konularda kişinin duruşunu desteklemek için mantık ve kanıt uygulamasını gerektirir. Makale, yazım sürecinde karşılaştırma ve analiz yöntemlerini kullanmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Bamford, J., & Bondi, M. (Eds.). (2005). Dialogue within Discourse Communities: Metadiscursive Perspectives on Academic Genres. De Gruyter. Elsayed, I. F. A. (2023). Dilçilik-Языкознание. Бакы.
  • Freddi, M. (2005a). Arguing linguistics: Corpus investigation of one functional variety of academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4 (1), 5–26.
  • Freddi, M. (2005b). From corpus to register: The construction of evaluation and argumentation in linguistics textbooks. In Strategies in Academic Discourse (pp. 133–151). John Benjamins.
  • Haegeman, L. (2009). Thinking syntactically: A guide to argumentation and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Həmzəyeva, L. (2021). Koqnitiv dilçilik. Türk Dillərinin Və Ədəbiyyatinin Tədqiqi Və Tədrisinin Aktual Problemləri, 653–654.
  • Murshudzada, N. (2023, July). Dılçılık və Sosıolınqvıstıka. In Publisher. agency: Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific Conference «Foundations and Trends in Research»(July 13-14, 2023). Copenhagen, Denmark, 2023. 137p (p. 67). Danish School of Media and Journalism.
  • Nasution, H. S. (2024). Toulmin Model Based Argument Diagnosing: Constructing and Evaluating in The Argumentation Essay in Indonesia EFL Textbook. Indonesian Journal of Education, 3 (2), 67–74.
  • Oswald, S., Herman, T., & Jacquin, J. (Eds.). (2018). Argumentation and Language—Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations (Vol. 32). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73972-4
  • Qaraşova, Y. (2013). Struktur dilçilik. Bakı Dövlət Universiteti İlahiyyat Fakültəsinin Elmi Məcmuəsi, 10 (19), 211–217.
  • Tirkkonen-Condit, S. (1985). Argumentative text structure and translation. https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/69760
  • Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Johnson, R. H., Plantin, C., & Willard, C. A. (2013). Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Routledge.
  • Wachsmuth, H., Stede, M., El Baff, R., Al Khatib, K., Skeppstedt, M., & Stein, B. (2018). Argumentation synthesis following rhetorical strategies. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 3753–3765.
Toplam 12 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular İngiliz ve İrlanda Dili, Edebiyatı ve Kültürü
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Turkan Guluzade Bu kişi benim 0009-0006-9255-452X

Gönderilme Tarihi 16 Mart 2025
Kabul Tarihi 20 Mayıs 2025
Erken Görünüm Tarihi 21 Haziran 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Temmuz 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Guluzade, T. (2025). Argumentation in Linguistics Textbooks in English. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 12(3), 341-347. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17183109

Copyright and Licensing Policy

All articles published in the Journal of Academic History and Ideas / Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi are copyrighted by the journal. The journal’s content is made available as open access under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Under this license: Content may be shared and reproduced in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided that proper scholarly attribution is given. Modification, adaptation, translation, or the creation of derivative works is not permitted (ND). Requests for commercial reuse, translation, or republication must be directed to the Editorial Board at akademiktarihvedusunce@gmail.com. The scientific, legal, and ethical responsibility for published works rests entirely with the author(s); the editors and Editorial Board assume no liability for the content.
 
©  ATDD Tüm Hakları Saklıdır