Insider/Outsider Perspectives

Öz

It has been highly controversial from the beginning of the study of religion to the present day whether it is insiders who follow that religion or outsiders who understand the religion studied the best. It is also questioned if it is really possible to study a religion objectively whether the one who studies is an insider or outsider to that religion. This topic also brings with it the issues that need to be considered, such as emic/ethical positions, ‘experience-near’ and ‘experience-distant’ and the process of reflexivity. In this article, Kim Knott examines the problem of insider and outsider by considering the accounts of different researchers who have adopted the roles of complete participant, observer as participant, participant as observer and complete observer within the framework of these concepts.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• History of Religions
• The Study of Religion
• Methodology
• Insiders
• Outsiders

İçeriden ve Dışarıdan Bakış Açıları

Öz

Konu din çalışmaları olunca objektiflik her zaman ana kriter olsa da içeriden/dışarıdan bireylerin bir dini ne kadar objektif olarak ele alabilecekleri ve konu olan dinin, o dine mensup içeridekilerin mi yoksa dışarıdakilerin mi en iyi şekilde çalışabileceği meselesi din incelemesinin başından günümüze kadar tartışmalı bir konu olagelmiştir. Bu konu, emik/etik anlatım, yakın/ uzak tecrübe ve düşünümsellik gibi üzerine düşünülmesi gereken olguları da beraberinde getirmektedir. Kim Knott, bu makalesinde bu kavramlar çerçevesinde tam katılımcı, katılımcı olarak gözlemci, gözlemci olarak katılımcı ve tam gözlemci rollerini benimsemiş farklı araştırmacıların anlatılarını ele alarak içeriden ve dışarıdan sorununu incelemiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dinler Tarihi
• Din İncelemesi
• Metodoloji
• İçeridekiler
• Dışarıdakiler

Kaynakça

1. Barker, Eileen. The Making of a Moonie: Brainwashing or Choice? Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.
2. Collins, Peter J. “Connecting anthropology and Quakerism”. Theorising Faith: The Insider/Outsider Problem in the Study of Ritual. ed. Elisabeth Arweck - Martin Stringer. 77-95. Birmingham: Birmingham University Press, 2002.
3. Comstock, Gary L. Religious Autobiographies. Belmont CA: Wadsworth., 1995.
4. Davies, Charlotte Aull. Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Researching Selves and Others. London: Routledge, 1999.
5. Festinger, Leon vd. When Prophecy Fails. New York: Harper & Row, 1956. http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=8922e85064b463907ffc664587640944
6. Fitzgerald, Timothy. The Ideology of Religious Studies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=e77296658815150300f92c88bf34e80b
7. Flood, Gavin. Beyond Phenomenology: Rethinking the Study of Religion. London: Cassell, 1999.
8. Gold, Raymond L. “Roles in Sociological Field Observations”. Social Forces 36/3 (1958), 217-223. https://doi.org/10.2307/2573808

9. Grewal, J.S. Contesting Interpretations of the Sikh Tradition. New Delhi: Manohar, 1998.
10. Kristensen, William Brede. The Meaning of Religion,. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960.
11. Leeuw, Gerardus van der. Religion in Essence and Manifestation. 2 Cilt. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1963.
12. Mandair, Arvind-Pal Singh. “Thinking differently about religion and history: issues for Sikh Studies”. Sikh Religion, Culture and Ethnicity. ed. Christopher Shackle vd. 47-71. 2001, ts.
13. McCutcheon, Russell T. Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse of Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia. New York ve Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
14. McCutcheon, Russell T. The Insider/Outsider Problem in the Study of Religion: A Reader. thk. Russell T. McCutcheon. Londan ve New York: Cassel, 1999.
15. Mernissi, Fatima. Women and Islam: An Historical and Theological Enquiry. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.
16. Pearson, Jo. “‘Going native in reverse’: the insider as researcher in British Wicca”. Theorising Faith: The Insider/Outsider Problem in the Study of Ritual. ed. Elisabeth Arweck - Martin Stringer. 97-113. Birmingham: Birmingham University Press, 2002.
17. Pike, Kenneth. Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behaviour. The Hague: Mouton, 2. Basım, 1967.
18. Segal, Robert A. “In Defense of Reductionism”. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 51/1 (1983), 97-124.
19. Shaw, Rosalind. “Feminist anthropology and the gendering of religious studies”. Religion and Gender. ed. Ursula King. 65-76. London: Blackwell, 1995.
20. Singh, Darshan. Western Perspective on the Sikh Religion. New Delhi: Sehgal Publishers Service, 1991.
21. Singh, Justice Gurdev (ed.). Perspectives on the Sikh Tradition. Patiala: Siddharth Publications, 1986.
22. Smart, Ninian. The Science of Religion and the Sociology of Knowledge: Some Methodological Questions. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973.
23. Tiele, Cornelius P. Elements of the Science of Religion. 2 Cilt. Edinburgh/London: Blackwood and Sons, 1897.
24. Wiebe, Donald. “Does understanding religion require religious understanding?” Current Progress in the Methodology of the Science of Religions. ed. Witold Tyloch. Warsaw: Scientific Publishers, 1985.
25. Postcolonialism, Feminism and Religious Discourse. thk. Kwok Pui-Lan - Laura E. Donaldson. New York ve London: Routledge, 2002.