Examining Mountaineering as an Outdoor Leisure Activity: A Qualitative Study

Yıl 2022, , 16 - 26, 25.02.2022

Mehmet Ertaş

https://doi.org/10.53353/atrss.1017301

Öz

Dağcılık, son zamanlarda çok popüler hale gelen bir açık hava eğlence etkinliğidir. Bu boş zaman etkinliği, keyifli vakit geçirmenin yanı sıra risk, zorluk ve mücadeleyi de içermektedir. Bazen dağlar oldukça tehlikeli yerler olabilir. Örneğin çığ düşmesi, bir kayanın kırılması veya aşırı düşük sıcaklıklarla uğraşma bu boş zaman etkinliğinin zorlu kısımlarıdır. Bu çalışma insanların dağcılık faaliyetlerine katılma nedenlerini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Veriler, düzenli olarak dağcılık faaliyetlerine katılan 12 dağcı ile görüşme yöntemi kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Oluşturulan kategori ve kod ağaçları ile verilerin analizinde MAXQDA 2020 nitel veri analiz programı kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak dağcılar günlük yaşamlarından uzaklaşma, yeni insanlarla tanışma, sosyalleşme, deneyim kazanma ve paylaşma, doğada olma, özgürlük ve kaçış gibi nedenlerle dağcılık faaliyetlerine katıldıkları görülmüştür. Ayrıca dağcılık aktivitelerinin kişilerin psikolojik iyi oluşları üzerinde olumlu etkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Son olarak çalışma, boş zaman, açık hava boş zaman aktiviteleri ve dağcılık literatürüne önemli katkılar sağlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dağcılık, Dağcılar, Boş Zaman Aktivitesi, İyi Olma, Türkiye

Examining Mountaineering as an Outdoor Leisure Activity: A Qualitative Study

Öz

Mountaineering is an outdoor leisure activity that has become very popular recently. This leisure activity includes risk, difficulties, and struggle as well as having a pleasant time. Sometimes mountains can be quite dangerous places. For instance, falling an avalanche, breaking off a boulder, or dealing with extremely low temperatures are the tough parts of this leisure activity. In this direction, this study aims to reveal the reasons for people's participation in mountaineering activities. Data were collected using the method of interviewing 12 mountaineers who regularly participate in mountaineering activities. MAXQDA 2020 qualitative data analysis program was used in the analysis of the data and the created category and code trees. As a result, mountaineers participate in mountaineering activities for reasons such as getting away from their daily lives, meeting new people, socializing, gaining, and sharing experience, being in nature, freedom, and escape. Besides, mountaineering activities were found to have a positive effect on people's psychological well-being. Finally, the study makes important contributions to leisure, outdoor leisure activities, and mountaineering literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mountaineering, mountaineers, leisure activity, well-being, Turkey

Kaynakça

• Allen-Collinson, J., Crust, L., & Swann, C. (2019). Embodiment in high-altitude mountaineering: Sensing and working with the weather. Body & Society, 25(1), 90-115. DOI: 10.1177/1357034X18812947.
• Apollo, M. (2017). The true accessibility of mountaineering: the case of the High Himalaya. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 17, 29-43. DOI: /10.1016/j.jort.2016.12.001.
• Beedie, P., & Hudson, S. (2003). Emergence of mountain-based adventure tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(3), 625-643. DOI: 10.1016/S0160-7383(03)00043-4.
• Chen, C. M., Li, C. T., Liu, S., Wu, T. Y., & Pan, J. S. (2017). A provable secure private data delegation scheme for mountaineering events in emergency system. Ieee Access, 5, 3410-3422. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2675163.
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. California: Sage Publications.
• Crockett, L. J., Murray, N. P., & Kime, D. B. (2020). Self-determination strategy in mountaineering: Collecting Colorado’s highest peaks. Leisure Sciences, 1-20. DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2020.1738968.
• Crust, L. (2020). Personality and mountaineering: A critical review and directions for future research. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, 1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110073.
• Ewert, A. (1985). Why people climb: The relationship of participant motives and experience level to mountaineering. Journal of Leisure Research, 17(3), 241-250. DOI: 10.1080/00222216.1985.11969634.
• Ewert, A. W. (1994). Playing the edge: Motivation and risk taking in a high-altitude wilderness like environment. Environment and Behavior, 26(1), 3-24. DOI: 10.1177/0013916594261001.
• Faullant, R., Matzler, K., & Mooradian, T. A. (2011). Personality, basic emotions, and satisfaction: Primary emotions in the mountaineering experience. Tourism Management, 32(6), 1423-1430. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2011.01.004.
• Groves, M. R., & Varley, P. J. (2020). Critical mountaineering decisions: technology, expertise and subjective risk in adventurous leisure. Leisure Studies, 39(5), 706-720. DOI: 10.1080/02614367.2020.1754887.
• Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries, Educational Communication and Technology. A Journal of Theory, Research, and Development, 29(2), 75- 91. DOI: 10.1007/BF02766777.
• Hartemann, F. V., & Hauptman, R. (2005). The mountain encyclopedia: An A to Z compendium of over 2,250 terms, concepts, ideas, and people. New York: Taylor Trade Publishing.
• Hemmington, N. (1999). Sampling. In B. Brotherton (Ed.), The handbook of contemporary hospitality management research. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Jackman, P. C., Hawkins, R. M., Burke, S. M., Swann, C., & Crust, L. (2020). The psychology of mountaineering: A systematic review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1-39. DOI: 10.1080/1750984X.2020.1824242.
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. California: Sage Publications.
• Moore, K., Vizzard, N., Coleman, C., McMahon, J., Hayes, R., & Thompson, C. J. (2001). Extreme altitude mountaineering and type 1 diabetes; the Diabetes Federation of Ireland Kilimanjaro Expedition. Diabetic Medicine, 18(9), 749-755. DOI: 10.1046/j.0742-3071.2001.00568.x.
• Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75. DOI: 10.3233/EFI-2004-22201.
• Wickens, C. D., Keller, J. W., & Shaw, C. (2015). Human factors in high-altitude mountaineering. Journal of Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 12(1), 1-19. DOI: 10.7771/2327-2937.1065.