Fitness Dopingine Yönelik Psiko-Sosyal ve Sosyo-Kültürel Süreçleri Anlamak: Bir Meta-Sentez Çalışması

Öz

Doping, sağlık üzerinde potansiyel riskler taşıması ve spor etiği ilkelerine uygun olmamasına rağmen rekabetçi spor ortamlarında karşılaşılan bir olgu olarak bilinmektedir. Fakat araştırmalar rekabetçi sporun dışında da gym/fitness/rekreasyonel spor ortamlarında kontrolsüz ve yoğun Performans Arttırıcı Madde (PES) kullanımının görüldüğünü ve topluma yayılmış bir doping riskini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışma, fiziksel egzersiz ortamlarındaki PES kullanımına yönelik psiko-sosyal ve sosyo-kültürel durumu literatür çerçevesinde anlamayı ve yorumlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu kapsamda, Web of Science, Scopus ve Sportdiscus veri tabalarından önceden belirlenmiş dışlama ve dahil etme kriterleri temel alınarak dokuz nitel makale belirlenmiştir. Bu makaleler nitel araştırma istatistik programı Nvivo'da analiz edilmiş ve bulgular sentezlenmiştir. Araştırmanın amacı kapsamında incelenen makalelerden önceden oluşturulan üst temalar altında şu temalar tespit edilmiştir: “Demografik değişim”, “cinsiyete dayalı direnç”, “hegemonik erkeklik”, “görünüm”, “teşvik”, “çıkış noktası”, “performans”, “kendini geliştirme”, “sosyal onay”, “erkek bedeni”, “eşcinsellik”, “sınırlamalar” ve “dönüşüm”. İnsan ve toplum sağlığı üzerinde olumsuz etkileri olabilecek tüm madde ve yöntemlerin bu ortamlarda kullanımının uygun önlemlerle azaltılması veya engellenmesi önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Performans geliştirme
• halk sağlığı
• rekreasyonel spor

Understanding Psychosocial and Socio-Cultural Processes Towards Fitness Doping: A Meta-Synthesis Study

Öz

Research indicates that the unregulated and excessive utilisation of Performance Enhancing Substances (PES) is also prevalent in physical exercise contexts beyond the domain of competitive sports, thereby raising concerns about the potential for doping to permeate broader society. The objective of this study is to gain insight into and elucidate the psycho-social and socio-cultural context surrounding the utilisation of Performance Enhancing Substances (PES) in physical exercise settings, within the framework of existing literature. In this context, nine qualitative articles were selected based on predetermined exclusion and inclusion criteria from the Web of Science, Scopus and SportDiscus databases. Subsequently, the articles were subjected to qualitative data analysis using the Nvivo research statistics programme, and the findings were synthesised. The following themes were identified from the articles examined: “Demographic change”, “gendered resistance”, “hegemonic masculinity”, “appearance”, “encouragement”, “exit point”, “performance”, “self-enhancement”, “social approval”, “the body of man”, “homosexuality”, “limitations” and “transformation”. It is recommended that the use of all substances and methods that may have negative effects on human and public health should be reduced or prevented in these environments with appropriate measures.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Performance enhancement
• public health
• recreational sport

Kaynakça

1. Andreasson, J. (2015). Reconceptualising the gender of fitness doping: performing and negotiating masculinity through drug-use practices. Social Sciences, 4(3), 546-562. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci4030546
2. Andreasson, J., & Johansson, T. (2020). (Un) becoming a fitness doper: negotiating the meaning of illicit drug use in a gym and fitness context. Journal of sport and social issues, 44(1), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723519867589
3. Andreasson, J., & Johansson, T. (2021). Negotiating female fitness doping: gender, identity and transgressions. Sport in Society, 24(3), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2019.1672152
4. Aspfors, J., ve Fransson, G. (2015). Research on mentor education for mentors of newly qualified teachers: A qualitative meta-synthesis.Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.004
5. CASP. (2016). Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklists. Accessed Address (10.12.2023: http://www.casp-uk.net/-!casp-tools-checklists/c18f8
6. Connor, J., Woolf, J., & Mazanov, J. (2013). Would they dope? Revisiting the Goldman dilemma. British journal of sports medicine, 47(11), 697-700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2012-091826
7. Coquet, R., Roussel, P., & Ohl, F. (2018). Understanding the paths to appearance-and performance-enhancing drug use in bodybuilding. Frontiers in psychology, 1431. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01431
8. Dresen, A., Klaber, M., & Dietz, P. (2014). Use of performance-enhancing drugs and the Internet. Criminological reflections on a culture of communication in sport. Sportwissenschaft, 44, 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-014-0339-7

9. de Siqueira Nogueira, F. R., de Freitas Brito, A., de Oliveira, C. V. C., Vieira, T. I., & Beniz Gouveia, R. L. (2014). Anabolic–androgenic steroid use among Brazilian bodybuilders. Substance use & misuse, 49(9), 1138-1145. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2014.912062
10. Gomez, J. (2005). Use of performance-enhancing substances. Pediatrics, 115(4), 1103-1106. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-0085
11. Güneş, D., & Erdem, R. (2022). Nitel Araştırmaların Analizi: Meta-Sentez. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(Özel Sayı 2), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1227313
12. Henning, A., & Andreasson, J. (2021). “Yay, another lady starting a log!”: Women’s fitness doping and the gendered space of an online doping forum. Communication & Sport, 9(6), 988-1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479519896326
13. Johnson, M. D., Jay, M. S., Shoup, B., & Rickert, V. I. (1989). Anabolic steroid use by male adolescents. Pediatrics, 83(6), 921-924. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.83.6.921
14. Landis, J. R. ve Koch, G. G. (1977). “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data”. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
15. Macho, J., Mudrak, J., & Slepicka, P. (2021). Enhancing the self: amateur bodybuilders making sense of experiences with appearance and performance-enhancing drugs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 648467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648467
16. Mazzoni, I., Barroso, O., & Rabin, O. (2017). Anti-doping challenges with novel psychoactive substances in sport. O. Corazza & A. Roman-Urrestarazu (Ed.) Novel psychoactive substances: Policy, economics and drug regulations. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60600-24
17. Monaghan, L. F. (2002). Vocabularies of motive for illicit steroid use among bodybuilders. Social science & medicine, 55(5), 695-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00195-2
18. Mooney, R., Simonato, P., Ruparelia, R., Roman‐Urrestarazu, A., Martinotti, G., & Corazza, O. (2017). The use of supplements and performance and image enhancing drugs in fitness settings: A exploratory cross‐sectional investigation in the United Kingdom. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 32(3), e2619. https://doi.org/10.1002/hup.2619
19. Peters Jr, R. J., Adams, L. F., Barnes, J. B., Hines, L. A., Jones, D. E., Krebs, K. M., & Kelder, S. H. (2005). Beliefs and social norms about ephedra onset and perceived addiction among college male and female athletes. Substance use & misuse, 40(1), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-200030517
20. Sagoe, D., Molde, H., Andreassen, C. S., Torsheim, T., & Pallesen, S. (2014). The global epidemiology of anabolic-androgenic steroid use: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. Annals of epidemiology, 24(5), 383-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.01.009
21. Sandvik, M. R., Bakken, A., & Loland, S. (2018). Anabolic–androgenic steroid use and correlates in Norwegian adolescents. European journal of sport science, 18(6), 903-910. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2018.1459869
22. Sverkersson, E. (2022). ’I’m quite tired of people saying that I don’t do enough or know anything’: male hegemony and resistance in the context of women’s online communication on doping. Sport in Society, 25(6), 1176-1192. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2022.2064107
23. Sverkersson, E., Andreasson, J., & Johansson, T. (2020). ‘Sis Science’and fitness doping: Ethnopharmacology, gender and risk. Social Sciences, 9(4), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9040055
24. Tavares, A. S. R., Carolino, E., Rosado, A., Calmeiro, L., & Serpa, S. (2022). Characteristics of gym-goers performance-enhancing substance use. Sustainability, 14(5), 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052868
25. Tavares, A. S. R., Serpa, S., Horta, L., Carolino, E., & Rosado, A. (2020). Prevalence of performance-enhancing substance use and associated factors among Portuguese gym/fitness users. Substance Use & Misuse, 55(7), 1059-1067. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2020.1726392
26. Tavares, A. S., Serpa, S., Horta, L., & Rosado, A. (2019). Psychosocial factors and performance enhancing substances in gym users: A systematic review. Revista de psicología del deporte, 28(1), 131-142.
27. Wazaify, M., Bdair, A., Al-Hadidi, K., & Scott, J. (2014). Doping in gymnasiums in amman: The other side of prescription and nonprescription drug abuse. Substance Use & Misuse, 49(10), 1296-1302. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2014.891625
28. World Anti-Doping Code, WADA (2023). Accessed Address (27.11.2023): https://www.wadaama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/2021_wada_code.pdf