Regional Determinants and Spatial Differentiation of Innovation in Turkey

Yıl 2022, , 45 - 66, 29.04.2022

Suat Tuysuz , Fatih Altuğ

https://doi.org/10.33688/aucbd.1041133

Cited By: 1

Öz

This study investigates the spatial distribution and regional determinants of innovation in Turkey. In this study, we applied regression analysis which is called global (GR) and geographically weighted regression (GWR). The empirical analyses show that human capital as an internal resource and export as an external resource/openness are the determinants of innovation in the Turkish case. GWR showed that these predictors do not affect innovation in every region. Our method differentiates us from other studies in the literature. The research depicted an important image reflecting the policymakers' urging to take the local and regional dynamics into account and their top-down policies on innovation. The present study proves empirically that place-based approaches are needed in innovation policy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Innovation, Spatial determinants, Geographically weighted regression

Türkiye’de İnovasyonun Bölgesel Belirleyicileri ve Mekansal Farklılaşması

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türkiye'de inovasyonun mekansal dağılımını ve bölgesel belirleyicilerini incelemektedir. Araştırmada global (GR) ve coğrafi ağırlıklı regresyon (GWR) olarak adlandırılan regresyon analizleri uygulanmıştır. GR’ye dayalı olarak elde edilen bulgular, beşerî sermaye ile ihracatın/dışa açıklığın inovasyonu yordadığını göstermektedir. GWR analizine dayalı bulgular ise söz konusu yordayıcıların her bölgede inovasyon üzerinde aynı etkiye sahip olmadığını göstermektedir. Kullanılan bu yöntem çalışmayı literatürdeki diğer çalışmalardan farklılaştırmaktadır. Bu bulgular, politika yapıcılar tarafından uygulanan yukarıdan aşağıya inovasyon politikalarına ek olarak yerel ve bölgesel dinamiklerin de dikkate alınmasının gerekliliğini ortaya koymaktadır. Buradan hareketle bu çalışma, inovasyon politikasında yer temelli yaklaşımlara ihtiyaç olduğunu ampirik olarak ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İnovasyon, Mekansal belirleyiciler, Coğrafi ağırlıklandırılmış regresyon analizi

Kaynakça

• Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L., Varga, A. (2002). Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31(2002), 1069-1085. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6
• Altuğ, F., Yılmaz, M. (2018). Farklı bilgi tabanlarına sahip sektörlerde yakınlık türlerinin bilgi, öğrenme ve yenilik/inovasyon süreçlerine etkisi: Eskişehir örneği. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 58(1), 844-881. doi: 10.33171/dtcfjournal.2018.58.1.40
• Andersson, M., Lööf, H. (2009). Learning‐by‐exporting revisited: The role of intensity and persistence. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 111(4), 893-916. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40587817
• Andersson, M., Johansson, B. (2008). Innovation ideas and regional characteristics: product innovations and export entrepreneurship by firms in Swedish regions. Growth and Change, 39(2), 193-224. https://www.econbiz.de/Record/innovation-ideas-and-regional-characteristics-product-innovations-and-export-entrepreneurship-by-firms-in-swedish-regions-andersson-martin/10003713384
• Andersson, M., Lööf, H., Johansson, S. (2008). Productivity and international trade: Firm level evidence from a small open economy. Review of World Economics, 144(4), 774-801. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10290-008-0169-5
• Asheim, B. r. T. (1996). Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’: a condition for prosperity. European Planning Studies, 4(4), 379-400. doi: 10.1080/09654319608720354
• Audretsch, D. B., Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630-640. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118216
• Barca, F., McCann, P., Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: place‐based versus place‐neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134-152. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
• Bathelt, H., Henn, S. (2014). The geographies of knowledge transfers over distance: toward a typology. Environment and Planning A, 46(6), 1403-1424. doi: 10.1068/a46115
• Bathelt, H., Li, P.-F. (2013). Global cluster networks—foreign direct investment flows from Canada to China. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(1), 45-71. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbt005
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31-56. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
• Bathelt, H., Schuldt, N. (2008). Between luminaires and meat grinders: International trade fairs as temporary clusters. Regional Studies, 42(6), 853-868.
• Baycan, T., Nijkamp, P., Stough, R. (2017). Spatial Spillovers Revisited: Innovation, Human Capital and Local Dynamics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(6), 962-975. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12557
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
• Boschma, R., Martin, R. (2010). The aims and scope of evolutionary economic geography. https://ideas.repec.org/p/egu/wpaper/1001.html
• Bougrain, F., Haudeville, B. (2002). Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities. Research Policy, 31(5), 735-747. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00144-5
• Buesa, M., Heijs, J., Baumert, T. (2010). The determinants of regional innovation in Europe: A combined factorial and regression knowledge production function approach. Research Policy, 39(6), 722-735. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v39y2010i6p722-735.html
• Cantner, U., Meder, A., Ter Wal, A. L. (2010). Innovator networks and regional knowledge base. Technovation, 30(9-10), 496-507.
• Capello, R. (2017). Towards a new conceptualization of innovation in space: territorial patterns of innovation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(6), 976-996. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12556
• Capello, R., Lenzi, C. (2013). Territorial patterns of innovation: a taxonomy of innovative regions in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science, 51(1), 119-154. doi:10.1007/S00168-012-0539-8
• Capello, R., Varga, A. (2013). Knowledge creation and knowledge diffusion in space and regional innovation performance: introductory remarks. The Annals of Regional Science, 51(1), 113-118. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00168-013-0569-x
• Clark, W. A. E., Hosking, P. L. (1986). Statistical Methods for Geographers. New York: John Wiley and Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Statistical+Methods+for+Geographers-p-9780471818076
• Cooke, P., Morgan, K. (1994). Growth regions under duress: renewal strategies in Baden-Württemberg and Emilia Romagna. Globalization, institutions, and regional development in Europe, 91-117.
• Cornish, S. (1997). Product innovation and the spatial dynamics of market intelligence: Does proximity to markets matter? Economic Geography, 73(2), 143-165. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.1997.tb00065.x
• Crescenzi, R., Jaax, A. (2017). Innovation in Russia: The Territorial Dimension. Economic Geography, 93(1), 66-88. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2016.1208532
• Crescenzi, R., Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2017). The Geography of Innovation in China and India. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(6), 1010-1027. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12554
• Crescenzi, R., Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). R & D, Socio‐Economic Conditions, and Regional Innovation in the U. S. Growth and Change, 44(2), 287-320. doi: 10.1111/grow.12011
• Crescenzi, R., Rodríguez-Pose, A., Storper, M. (2007). The territorial dynamics of innovation: a Europe–United States comparative analysis. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(6), 673-709. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbm030
• Crescenzi, R., Pose, A., R., Storper, M. (2012). The Territorial Dynamics of Innovation in China and India. Journal of Economic Geography, 12, 1055-1085. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26158632
• Dicken, P., Kelly, P. F., Olds, K., Wai‐Chung Yeung, H. (2001). Chains and networks, territories and scales: towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global Networks, 1(2), 89-112. doi: 10.1111/1471-0374.00007
• Dorfman, N. S. (1983). Route 128: the development of a regional high technology economy. Research Policy, 12(6), 299-316. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(83)90009-4
• Eceral, T. Ö. (2016). Türk Savunma Sanayinin Küresel ve Yerel Dinamikleri: Ankara ve Eskişehir Bölgelerinde Mekânsal Yığılma, Üretim Organizasyonu, Bilgi Ağları ve Yönetişim. Retrieved from Ankara: https://trdizin.gov.tr/publication/projectDetail.xhtml
• Eceral, T. Ö. (2017). Türk Savunma ve Havacılık Sanayisinin Küresel, Ulusal ve Yerel Dinamikleri: Ankara Örneği. Gazi Akademik Bakış, 11(21), 87-106. doi: 10.19060/gav.379581
• Elçi, Ş., Karataylı, İ., Karaata, S. (2008). Bölgesel İnovasyon Merkezleri: Türkiye İçin Bir Model Önerisi. TUSİAD Yayınları.
• Eraydın, A. (2002). Yeni sanayi odakları: Yerel kalkınmanın yeniden kavramlaştırılması. Ankara: ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi.
• Erciş, A., Ünalan, M. (2016). Innovation: A comparative case study of Turkey and South Korea. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 701-708. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.071
• Faggian, A. (2005). Human Capital. In R. Caves (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of the city. New York, NY.: Routledge.
• Fassio, C. (2017). Export-led innovation: the role of export destinations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(1), 149-171. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtx028
• Feldman, M. P., Florida, R. (1994). The geographic sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(2), 210-229. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1994.tb01735.x
• Fischer, M. M., Scherngell, T., Jansenberger, E. (2009). Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers: evidence from high-tech patent citations in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science, 43(4), 839. doi:10.1007/s00168-009-0300-0
• Florida, R. L., Kenney, M. (1988). Venture capital, high technology and regional development. Regional Studies, 22(1), 33-48. doi: 10.1080/00343408812331344750
• Fosfuri, A., Rønde, T. (2004). High-tech clusters, technology spillovers, and trade secret laws. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(1), 45-65. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7187(03)00123-1
• Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. https://www.worldcat.org/title/geographically-weighted-regression-the-analysis-of-spatially-varying-relationships/oclc/51520402
• Giuliani, E. (2011). Role of technological gatekeepers in the growth of industrial clusters: Evidence from Chile. Regional Studies, 45(10), 1329-1348. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.619973
• Goncalves, E., Almeida, E. (2009). Innovation and Spatial Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from Brazilian Patent Data. Regional Studies, 43(4), 513-528. doi: 10.1080/00343400701874131
• Gordon, I. R., McCann, P. (2005). Innovation, agglomeration, and regional development. Journal of Economic Geography, 5(5), 523-543. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbh072
• Griliches, Z. (1998). Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. In R&D and productivity: the econometric evidence (pp. 287-343): University of Chicago Press.
• Guerro, D., C., Sero, M., A. (2011). Spatial Distribution of Patents in Spain: Determining Factors and Consequences on Regional Development. Regional Studies, 31(4), 381-390. doi: 10.1080/00343409750132982
• Hansen, N. (1990). Innovative regional milieux, small firms, and regional development: Evidence from Mediterranean France. The Annals of Regional Science, 24(2), 107-123. https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/anresc/v24y1990i2p107-23.html
• Harris, R. I. D. (1988). Technological change and regional development in the UK: evidence from the SPRU database on innovations. Regional Studies, 22(5), 361-374. doi: 10.1080/00343408812331345050
• Henn, S. (2012). Transnational entrepreneurs, global pipelines and shifting production patterns. The example of the Palanpuris in the diamond sector. Geoforum, 43(3), 497-506. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.10.009
• Hu, T. S. (2008). Interaction among high-tech talent and its impact on innovation performance: A comparison of Taiwanese science parks at different stages of development. European Planning Studies, 16(2), 163-187. doi: 10.1080/09654310701814462
• Humphrey, J., Schmitz, H. (2002). How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017-1027. doi: 10.1080/0034340022000022198
• Iqbal, M. J., Rasli, A., Heng, L. H., Ali, M. B. B., Hassan, I., Jolaee, A. (2011). Academic staff knowledge sharing intentions and university innovation capability. African Journal of Business Management, 5(27), 11051-11059. doi: 10.5897/AJBM11.576
• Işık, N., Efe Can, K. (2011). Bölgesel Kalkınma’da Ar‐Ge ve İnovasyonun Önemi: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/65513
• Jung, S., Imm, K.-Y. (2002). The patent activities of Korea and Taiwan: a comparative case study of patent statistics. World Patent Information, 24(4), 303-311. doi: 10.1016/S0172-2190(02)00069-8
• Kanama, D., Nishikawa, K. (2017). Does an extrinsic reward for R & D employees enhance innovation outcomes? Evidence from a J apanese innovation survey. R&D Management, 47(2), 198-211. doi: 10.1111/radm.12165
• Kaygalak, I., Reid, N. (2016). Innovation and knowledge spillovers in Turkey: The role of geographic and organizational proximity. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 8(1-2), 45-60. doi: 10.1111/rsp3.12072
• Kebir, L., Peyrache-Gadeau, V., Crevoisier, O., Costa, P. (2017). Introduction: Sustainability, innovative milieus and territorial development. In L. Kebir, O. Crevoisier, P. Costa, & V. Peyrache-Gadeau (Eds.), Sustainable Innovation and Regional Development (pp. 1-24): Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Keeble, D. (1997). Small firms, innovation and regional development in Britain in the 1990s. Regional Studies, 31(3), 281-293. doi: 10.1080/00343409750134692
• Keeble, D., Wilkinson, F. (1999). Collective learning and knowledge development in the evolution of regional clusters of high technology SMEs in Europe. Regional Studies, 33(4), 295-303. doi: 10.1080/00343409950081167
• Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/geography-and-trade
• Kuştepeli, Y., Balkir, C., Akgüngör, S., Gülcan, Y., Beyzatlar, M. A., Kalaycıoğlu, Ş. G. (2013). Turkish-German economic relations via foreign direct investment and patents. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 1(2), 23-50. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jeim/issue/52617/692665
• Küçüksille, E. (2017). Çoklu Doğrusal Regresyon Modeli. In E. Kalaycı (Ed.), SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatitik Teknikleri (pp. 237-254). Ankara: Dinamik Akademi.
• Larsen, H. B. (2014). Governance, quality conventions, and product innovation in a value chain: the case of the Spanish salted fish market. Growth and Change. 45(3), 412-429. doi: 10.1111/grow.12052
• Lim, U. (2003). The Spatial Distribution of Inovative Activitiy in U.S. Metropolitan Areas: Evidence from Patent Data. The Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 33(2), 97-126. https://jrap.scholasticahq.com/article/9388
• Liu, F., Sun, Y. (2009). A Comparison of the Spatial Distribution of Innovative Activities in China and the U.S. Technological forecasting & Social Change, 76, 797-805. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.12.002
• Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., Rhind, D. W. (2011). Geographic information systems and science. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
• López-Bazo, E., Motellón, E. (2018). Firm exports, innovation and the regional dimension in Spain. Regional Studies, 52(4), 490-502. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1332406
• Makkonen, T. (2012). Geography of innovation in Europe and Finland: Empirical studies on innovation indicators and regional development. (Dissertation). University of Helsinki Department of Geosciences and Geography, Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-10- 8298-6
• Malmberg, A., Maskell, P. (2002). The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 34(3), 429-449. doi: 10.1068/a3457
• Martin, C., Granados, C., M., Sanz, I. (2005). Spatial Distribution of R&D Expenditure and Patent Aplications Across EU Regions and Its Impact on Economic Cohesion. Investigaciones Regionales, 6, 41-61.
• Maskell, P. (2001). Towards a knowledge‐based theory of the geographical cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 921-943. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.921
• Maskell, P., Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. (2006). Building global knowledge pipelines: The role of temporary clusters. European Planning Studies, 14(8), 997-1013. doi: 10.1080/09654310600852332
• Maskell, P., Malmberg, A. (1999). Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 167-185. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23599582
• Meir, A. (1981). Innovation diffusion and regional economic development: The spatial diffusion of automobiles in Ohio. Regional Studies, 15(2), 111-122. doi: 10.1080/09595238100185131
• Miguelez, E., Moreno, R. (2018). Relatedness, external linkages and regional innovation in Europe. Regional Studies, 52(5), 688-701. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1360478
• Morgan, K. (1997). The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal AU - Morgan, Kevin. Regional Studies, 31(5), 491-503. doi:10.1080/00343409750132289
• Morgan, K., Cooke, P. (1998). The associational economy: firms, regions, and innovation.
• Moulaert, F., Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial innovation models: a critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289-302. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000065442
• Movahedi, M., Shahbazi, K., Gaussens, O. (2017). Innovation and willingness to export: Is there an effect of conscious self-selection? Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 11(2017-25), 1-22. doi: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2017-25
• Müller, P., Franz, M. (2019). Transnational labour migration and the offshoring of knowledge-intensive business services within global production networks: The case of a German automotive company in Turkey. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(6), 1350-1369. doi: 10.1177/0308518X18811353
• Nazari, F., Anaraki, A. R., Taghavi, S. S., Ghasemi, B. (2020). The relationship among knowledge-based dynamic process capabilities, innovation processes and innovation performance: an empirical study of knowledge-based high-tech companies in Iran. Kybernetes. doi: 10.1108/K-03-2020-0147
• Oakey, R. (1984). Innovation and regional growth in small high technology firms: evidence from Britain and the USA. Regional Studies, 18(3), 237-251. doi: 10.1080/09595238400185231
• Oakey, R., Thwaites, A., Nash, P. (1982). Technological change and regional development: some evidence on regional variations in product and process innovation. Environment and Planning A, 14(8), 1073-1086. doi: 10.1068/a141073
• OECD. (2011). OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry Economic Analysis and Statistics Division. In ISIC Rev. 3 Technology Intensity Definition: OECD.
• OECD. (2018). Gross domestic spending on R&D. Retrieved from https://data.oecd.org/rd/gross-domestic-spending-on-r-d.htm
• Oslo-Kılavuzu. (2006). Yenilik verilerinin toplanması ve yorumlanması için ilkeler. çev. TÜBİTAK. https://www.worldcat.org/title/oslo-klavuzu-yenilik-verilerinin-toplanmas-ve-yorumlanmas-icin-ilkeler/oclc/66899435
• Özdamar, K. (2009). Paket Programlar İle İstatistiksel Veri Analizi. Kaan Kitabevi, Eskişehir. https://www.kitapyurdu.com/kitap/paket-programlar-ile-istatistiksel-veri-analizi-1/72412.html
• Piergiovanni, R., Santarelli, E. (2001). Patents and the geographic localization of R&D spillovers in French manufacturing. Regional Studies, 35(8), 697-702. doi: 10.1080/00343400120101434
• Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press. https://hbr.org/1990/03/the-competitive-advantage-of-nations
• Quatraro, F. (2009). Diffusion of Regional Innovation Capabilities: Evidence from Italian Patent Data. Regional Studies, 43(10), 1333-1348. doi: 10.1080/00343400802195162
• Reiffenstein, T. (2009). Specialization, Centralization, and the Distribution of Patent Intermediaries in the USA and Japan. Regional Studies, 43(4), 571-588. doi: 10.1080/00343400701874255
• Rinallo, D., Golfetto, F. (2011). Exploring the knowledge strategies of temporary cluster organizers: A longitudinal study of the EU fabric industry trade shows (1986–2006). Economic Geography, 87(4), 453-476. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01127.x
• Rodil, Ó., Vence, X., del Carmen Sánchez, M. (2016). The relationship between innovation and export behaviour: The case of Galician firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 248-265. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.002
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42(1), 51-67. doi: 10.1080/00343400701654186
• Salomon, R. M. (2006). Spillovers to foreign market participants: assessing the impact of export strategies on innovative productivity. Strategic Organization, 4(2), 135-164.
• Salomon, R. M., Shaver, J. M. (2005). Learning by exporting: New insights from examining firm innovation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(2), 431-460. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2005.00047.x
• Saxenian, A. (1983). The genesis of silicon valley. Built Environment (1978-), 7-17.
• Saxenian, A. (1985). Silicon Valley and Route 128: regional prototypes or historic exceptions. Urban Affairs Annual Reviews, 28, 81-105.
• Saxenian, A. (1989). The Cheshire cat's grin: innovation, regional development and the Cambridge case. Economy and Society, 18(4), 448-477. doi: 10.1080/03085148900000022
• Saxenian, A. (1990). Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 33(1), 89-112. doi: 10.2307/41166640
• Sayili, K. (2020). Retaining skilled employees: A human capital model with innovation and entrepreneurship. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(6), 911-923. doi: 10.1002/mde.3147
• Smith, N., Thomas, E. (2017). Regional conditions and innovation in Russia: the impact of foreign direct investment and absorptive capacity. Regional Studies, 51(9), 1412-1428. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1164307
• Storper, M., Scott, A. (1988). The Geographical Foundations and Social Regulation of Flexible Production Complexes. In W. J. and D. M. (Eds.), The Power of Geography. London: Allen & Unwin. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315819457-8/geographical-foundations-social-regulation-flexible-production-complexes-michael-storper-allen-scott
• Sun, Y. (2000). Spatial Distribution of Patents in China. Regional Studies, 35(5), 441-454. doi: 10.1080/00343400050058693
• Şahinli, M. A., Kılınç, E. (2013). İnovasyon ve inovasyon göstergeleri: AB ülkeleri ve Türkiye Karşılaştırması. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 13(25), 329-356. https://atif.sobiad.com/index.jsp?modul=makale-goruntule&id=AWWPqWszHDbCZb_mQuJm
• Tan, D., Cheng, C., Lei, M., Zhao, Y. (2017). Spatial Distributions and Determinants of Regional Innovation in China: Evidence from Chinese Metropolitan Data. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53(6), 1442-1454. doi: 10.1080/1540496X.2017.1283215
• Torre, A., Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47-59. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320842
• Seyfettinoğlu, Ü. K., Arık, Ş., Çağatay, S. (2020). Determinants of Industry and Region Based Open Innovation in Turkey. Istanbul Business Research, 49(1), 1-35. doi: 10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0029
• Xie, X. M., Zeng, S. X., Tam, C. M. (2011). Towards continuous innovation for regional high-tech industrial clusters. Innovation, 13(3), 361-375. doi: 10.5172/impp.2011.13.3.361
• Yang, C. H., Lin, H. L. (2012). Openness, absorptive capacity, and regional innovation in China. Environment and Planning A, 44(2), 333-355. doi:10.1068/a44182
• Yokura, Y., Matsubara, H., Sternberg, R. (2013). R&D networks and regional innovation: a social network analysis of joint research projects in J apan. Area, 45(4), 493-503. doi: 10.1111/area.12055
• Zemtsov, S., Muradov, A., Wade, I., Barinova, V. (2016). Determinants of Regional Innovation in Russia: Are People or Capital More Important? Foresight and STI Governance, 10(2), 29-42. doi: 10.17323/1995-459X.2016.2.29.42