Regional Determinants and Spatial Differentiation of Innovation in Turkey

Öz

This study investigates the spatial distribution and regional determinants of innovation in Turkey. In this study, we applied regression analysis which is called global (GR) and geographically weighted regression (GWR). The empirical analyses show that human capital as an internal resource and export as an external resource/openness are the determinants of innovation in the Turkish case. GWR showed that these predictors do not affect innovation in every region. Our method differentiates us from other studies in the literature. The research depicted an important image reflecting the policymakers' urging to take the local and regional dynamics into account and their top-down policies on innovation. The present study proves empirically that place-based approaches are needed in innovation policy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Innovation
• Spatial determinants
• Geographically weighted regression

Türkiye’de İnovasyonun Bölgesel Belirleyicileri ve Mekansal Farklılaşması

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türkiye'de inovasyonun mekansal dağılımını ve bölgesel belirleyicilerini incelemektedir. Araştırmada global (GR) ve coğrafi ağırlıklı regresyon (GWR) olarak adlandırılan regresyon analizleri uygulanmıştır. GR’ye dayalı olarak elde edilen bulgular, beşerî sermaye ile ihracatın/dışa açıklığın inovasyonu yordadığını göstermektedir. GWR analizine dayalı bulgular ise söz konusu yordayıcıların her bölgede inovasyon üzerinde aynı etkiye sahip olmadığını göstermektedir. Kullanılan bu yöntem çalışmayı literatürdeki diğer çalışmalardan farklılaştırmaktadır. Bu bulgular, politika yapıcılar tarafından uygulanan yukarıdan aşağıya inovasyon politikalarına ek olarak yerel ve bölgesel dinamiklerin de dikkate alınmasının gerekliliğini ortaya koymaktadır. Buradan hareketle bu çalışma, inovasyon politikasında yer temelli yaklaşımlara ihtiyaç olduğunu ampirik olarak ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İnovasyon
• Mekansal belirleyiciler
• Coğrafi ağırlıklandırılmış regresyon analizi

Kaynakça

1. Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L., Varga, A. (2002). Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31(2002), 1069-1085. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6
2. Altuğ, F., Yılmaz, M. (2018). Farklı bilgi tabanlarına sahip sektörlerde yakınlık türlerinin bilgi, öğrenme ve yenilik/inovasyon süreçlerine etkisi: Eskişehir örneği. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 58(1), 844-881. doi: 10.33171/dtcfjournal.2018.58.1.40
3. Andersson, M., Lööf, H. (2009). Learning‐by‐exporting revisited: The role of intensity and persistence. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 111(4), 893-916. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40587817
4. Andersson, M., Johansson, B. (2008). Innovation ideas and regional characteristics: product innovations and export entrepreneurship by firms in Swedish regions. Growth and Change, 39(2), 193-224. https://www.econbiz.de/Record/innovation-ideas-and-regional-characteristics-product-innovations-and-export-entrepreneurship-by-firms-in-swedish-regions-andersson-martin/10003713384
5. Andersson, M., Lööf, H., Johansson, S. (2008). Productivity and international trade: Firm level evidence from a small open economy. Review of World Economics, 144(4), 774-801. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10290-008-0169-5
6. Asheim, B. r. T. (1996). Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’: a condition for prosperity. European Planning Studies, 4(4), 379-400. doi: 10.1080/09654319608720354
7. Audretsch, D. B., Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630-640. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118216
8. Barca, F., McCann, P., Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: place‐based versus place‐neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134-152. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x

9. Bathelt, H., Henn, S. (2014). The geographies of knowledge transfers over distance: toward a typology. Environment and Planning A, 46(6), 1403-1424. doi: 10.1068/a46115
10. Bathelt, H., Li, P.-F. (2013). Global cluster networks—foreign direct investment flows from Canada to China. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(1), 45-71. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbt005
11. Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31-56. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
12. Bathelt, H., Schuldt, N. (2008). Between luminaires and meat grinders: International trade fairs as temporary clusters. Regional Studies, 42(6), 853-868.
13. Baycan, T., Nijkamp, P., Stough, R. (2017). Spatial Spillovers Revisited: Innovation, Human Capital and Local Dynamics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(6), 962-975. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12557
14. Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
15. Boschma, R., Martin, R. (2010). The aims and scope of evolutionary economic geography. https://ideas.repec.org/p/egu/wpaper/1001.html
16. Bougrain, F., Haudeville, B. (2002). Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities. Research Policy, 31(5), 735-747. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00144-5
17. Buesa, M., Heijs, J., Baumert, T. (2010). The determinants of regional innovation in Europe: A combined factorial and regression knowledge production function approach. Research Policy, 39(6), 722-735. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v39y2010i6p722-735.html
18. Cantner, U., Meder, A., Ter Wal, A. L. (2010). Innovator networks and regional knowledge base. Technovation, 30(9-10), 496-507.
19. Capello, R. (2017). Towards a new conceptualization of innovation in space: territorial patterns of innovation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(6), 976-996. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12556
20. Capello, R., Lenzi, C. (2013). Territorial patterns of innovation: a taxonomy of innovative regions in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science, 51(1), 119-154. doi:10.1007/S00168-012-0539-8
21. Capello, R., Varga, A. (2013). Knowledge creation and knowledge diffusion in space and regional innovation performance: introductory remarks. The Annals of Regional Science, 51(1), 113-118. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00168-013-0569-x
22. Clark, W. A. E., Hosking, P. L. (1986). Statistical Methods for Geographers. New York: John Wiley and Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Statistical+Methods+for+Geographers-p-9780471818076
23. Cooke, P., Morgan, K. (1994). Growth regions under duress: renewal strategies in Baden-Württemberg and Emilia Romagna. Globalization, institutions, and regional development in Europe, 91-117.
24. Cornish, S. (1997). Product innovation and the spatial dynamics of market intelligence: Does proximity to markets matter? Economic Geography, 73(2), 143-165. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.1997.tb00065.x
25. Crescenzi, R., Jaax, A. (2017). Innovation in Russia: The Territorial Dimension. Economic Geography, 93(1), 66-88. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2016.1208532
26. Crescenzi, R., Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2017). The Geography of Innovation in China and India. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(6), 1010-1027. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12554
27. Crescenzi, R., Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). R & D, Socio‐Economic Conditions, and Regional Innovation in the U. S. Growth and Change, 44(2), 287-320. doi: 10.1111/grow.12011
28. Crescenzi, R., Rodríguez-Pose, A., Storper, M. (2007). The territorial dynamics of innovation: a Europe–United States comparative analysis. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(6), 673-709. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbm030
29. Crescenzi, R., Pose, A., R., Storper, M. (2012). The Territorial Dynamics of Innovation in China and India. Journal of Economic Geography, 12, 1055-1085. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26158632
30. Dicken, P., Kelly, P. F., Olds, K., Wai‐Chung Yeung, H. (2001). Chains and networks, territories and scales: towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global Networks, 1(2), 89-112. doi: 10.1111/1471-0374.00007
31. Dorfman, N. S. (1983). Route 128: the development of a regional high technology economy. Research Policy, 12(6), 299-316. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(83)90009-4
32. Eceral, T. Ö. (2016). Türk Savunma Sanayinin Küresel ve Yerel Dinamikleri: Ankara ve Eskişehir Bölgelerinde Mekânsal Yığılma, Üretim Organizasyonu, Bilgi Ağları ve Yönetişim. Retrieved from Ankara: https://trdizin.gov.tr/publication/projectDetail.xhtml
33. Eceral, T. Ö. (2017). Türk Savunma ve Havacılık Sanayisinin Küresel, Ulusal ve Yerel Dinamikleri: Ankara Örneği. Gazi Akademik Bakış, 11(21), 87-106. doi: 10.19060/gav.379581
34. Elçi, Ş., Karataylı, İ., Karaata, S. (2008). Bölgesel İnovasyon Merkezleri: Türkiye İçin Bir Model Önerisi. TUSİAD Yayınları.
35. Eraydın, A. (2002). Yeni sanayi odakları: Yerel kalkınmanın yeniden kavramlaştırılması. Ankara: ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi.
36. Erciş, A., Ünalan, M. (2016). Innovation: A comparative case study of Turkey and South Korea. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 701-708. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.071
37. Faggian, A. (2005). Human Capital. In R. Caves (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of the city. New York, NY.: Routledge.
38. Fassio, C. (2017). Export-led innovation: the role of export destinations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(1), 149-171. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtx028
39. Feldman, M. P., Florida, R. (1994). The geographic sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(2), 210-229. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1994.tb01735.x
40. Fischer, M. M., Scherngell, T., Jansenberger, E. (2009). Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers: evidence from high-tech patent citations in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science, 43(4), 839. doi:10.1007/s00168-009-0300-0
41. Florida, R. L., Kenney, M. (1988). Venture capital, high technology and regional development. Regional Studies, 22(1), 33-48. doi: 10.1080/00343408812331344750
42. Fosfuri, A., Rønde, T. (2004). High-tech clusters, technology spillovers, and trade secret laws. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(1), 45-65. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7187(03)00123-1
43. Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. https://www.worldcat.org/title/geographically-weighted-regression-the-analysis-of-spatially-varying-relationships/oclc/51520402
44. Giuliani, E. (2011). Role of technological gatekeepers in the growth of industrial clusters: Evidence from Chile. Regional Studies, 45(10), 1329-1348. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.619973
45. Goncalves, E., Almeida, E. (2009). Innovation and Spatial Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from Brazilian Patent Data. Regional Studies, 43(4), 513-528. doi: 10.1080/00343400701874131
46. Gordon, I. R., McCann, P. (2005). Innovation, agglomeration, and regional development. Journal of Economic Geography, 5(5), 523-543. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbh072
47. Griliches, Z. (1998). Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. In R&D and productivity: the econometric evidence (pp. 287-343): University of Chicago Press.
48. Guerro, D., C., Sero, M., A. (2011). Spatial Distribution of Patents in Spain: Determining Factors and Consequences on Regional Development. Regional Studies, 31(4), 381-390. doi: 10.1080/00343409750132982
49. Hansen, N. (1990). Innovative regional milieux, small firms, and regional development: Evidence from Mediterranean France. The Annals of Regional Science, 24(2), 107-123. https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/anresc/v24y1990i2p107-23.html
50. Harris, R. I. D. (1988). Technological change and regional development in the UK: evidence from the SPRU database on innovations. Regional Studies, 22(5), 361-374. doi: 10.1080/00343408812331345050
51. Henn, S. (2012). Transnational entrepreneurs, global pipelines and shifting production patterns. The example of the Palanpuris in the diamond sector. Geoforum, 43(3), 497-506. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.10.009
52. Hu, T. S. (2008). Interaction among high-tech talent and its impact on innovation performance: A comparison of Taiwanese science parks at different stages of development. European Planning Studies, 16(2), 163-187. doi: 10.1080/09654310701814462
53. Humphrey, J., Schmitz, H. (2002). How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017-1027. doi: 10.1080/0034340022000022198
54. Iqbal, M. J., Rasli, A., Heng, L. H., Ali, M. B. B., Hassan, I., Jolaee, A. (2011). Academic staff knowledge sharing intentions and university innovation capability. African Journal of Business Management, 5(27), 11051-11059. doi: 10.5897/AJBM11.576
55. Işık, N., Efe Can, K. (2011). Bölgesel Kalkınma’da Ar‐Ge ve İnovasyonun Önemi: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/65513
56. Jung, S., Imm, K.-Y. (2002). The patent activities of Korea and Taiwan: a comparative case study of patent statistics. World Patent Information, 24(4), 303-311. doi: 10.1016/S0172-2190(02)00069-8
57. Kanama, D., Nishikawa, K. (2017). Does an extrinsic reward for R & D employees enhance innovation outcomes? Evidence from a J apanese innovation survey. R&D Management, 47(2), 198-211. doi: 10.1111/radm.12165
58. Kaygalak, I., Reid, N. (2016). Innovation and knowledge spillovers in Turkey: The role of geographic and organizational proximity. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 8(1-2), 45-60. doi: 10.1111/rsp3.12072
59. Kebir, L., Peyrache-Gadeau, V., Crevoisier, O., Costa, P. (2017). Introduction: Sustainability, innovative milieus and territorial development. In L. Kebir, O. Crevoisier, P. Costa, & V. Peyrache-Gadeau (Eds.), Sustainable Innovation and Regional Development (pp. 1-24): Edward Elgar Publishing.
60. Keeble, D. (1997). Small firms, innovation and regional development in Britain in the 1990s. Regional Studies, 31(3), 281-293. doi: 10.1080/00343409750134692
61. Keeble, D., Wilkinson, F. (1999). Collective learning and knowledge development in the evolution of regional clusters of high technology SMEs in Europe. Regional Studies, 33(4), 295-303. doi: 10.1080/00343409950081167
62. Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/geography-and-trade
63. Kuştepeli, Y., Balkir, C., Akgüngör, S., Gülcan, Y., Beyzatlar, M. A., Kalaycıoğlu, Ş. G. (2013). Turkish-German economic relations via foreign direct investment and patents. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 1(2), 23-50. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jeim/issue/52617/692665
64. Küçüksille, E. (2017). Çoklu Doğrusal Regresyon Modeli. In E. Kalaycı (Ed.), SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatitik Teknikleri (pp. 237-254). Ankara: Dinamik Akademi.
65. Larsen, H. B. (2014). Governance, quality conventions, and product innovation in a value chain: the case of the Spanish salted fish market. Growth and Change. 45(3), 412-429. doi: 10.1111/grow.12052
66. Lim, U. (2003). The Spatial Distribution of Inovative Activitiy in U.S. Metropolitan Areas: Evidence from Patent Data. The Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 33(2), 97-126. https://jrap.scholasticahq.com/article/9388
67. Liu, F., Sun, Y. (2009). A Comparison of the Spatial Distribution of Innovative Activities in China and the U.S. Technological forecasting & Social Change, 76, 797-805. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.12.002
68. Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., Rhind, D. W. (2011). Geographic information systems and science. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
69. López-Bazo, E., Motellón, E. (2018). Firm exports, innovation and the regional dimension in Spain. Regional Studies, 52(4), 490-502. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1332406
70. Makkonen, T. (2012). Geography of innovation in Europe and Finland: Empirical studies on innovation indicators and regional development. (Dissertation). University of Helsinki Department of Geosciences and Geography, Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-10- 8298-6
71. Malmberg, A., Maskell, P. (2002). The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 34(3), 429-449. doi: 10.1068/a3457
72. Martin, C., Granados, C., M., Sanz, I. (2005). Spatial Distribution of R&D Expenditure and Patent Aplications Across EU Regions and Its Impact on Economic Cohesion. Investigaciones Regionales, 6, 41-61.
73. Maskell, P. (2001). Towards a knowledge‐based theory of the geographical cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 921-943. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.921
74. Maskell, P., Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. (2006). Building global knowledge pipelines: The role of temporary clusters. European Planning Studies, 14(8), 997-1013. doi: 10.1080/09654310600852332
75. Maskell, P., Malmberg, A. (1999). Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 167-185. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23599582
76. Meir, A. (1981). Innovation diffusion and regional economic development: The spatial diffusion of automobiles in Ohio. Regional Studies, 15(2), 111-122. doi: 10.1080/09595238100185131
77. Miguelez, E., Moreno, R. (2018). Relatedness, external linkages and regional innovation in Europe. Regional Studies, 52(5), 688-701. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1360478
78. Morgan, K. (1997). The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal AU - Morgan, Kevin. Regional Studies, 31(5), 491-503. doi:10.1080/00343409750132289
79. Morgan, K., Cooke, P. (1998). The associational economy: firms, regions, and innovation.
80. Moulaert, F., Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial innovation models: a critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289-302. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000065442
81. Movahedi, M., Shahbazi, K., Gaussens, O. (2017). Innovation and willingness to export: Is there an effect of conscious self-selection? Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 11(2017-25), 1-22. doi: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2017-25
82. Müller, P., Franz, M. (2019). Transnational labour migration and the offshoring of knowledge-intensive business services within global production networks: The case of a German automotive company in Turkey. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(6), 1350-1369. doi: 10.1177/0308518X18811353
83. Nazari, F., Anaraki, A. R., Taghavi, S. S., Ghasemi, B. (2020). The relationship among knowledge-based dynamic process capabilities, innovation processes and innovation performance: an empirical study of knowledge-based high-tech companies in Iran. Kybernetes. doi: 10.1108/K-03-2020-0147
84. Oakey, R. (1984). Innovation and regional growth in small high technology firms: evidence from Britain and the USA. Regional Studies, 18(3), 237-251. doi: 10.1080/09595238400185231
85. Oakey, R., Thwaites, A., Nash, P. (1982). Technological change and regional development: some evidence on regional variations in product and process innovation. Environment and Planning A, 14(8), 1073-1086. doi: 10.1068/a141073
86. OECD. (2011). OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry Economic Analysis and Statistics Division. In ISIC Rev. 3 Technology Intensity Definition: OECD.
87. OECD. (2018). Gross domestic spending on R&D. Retrieved from https://data.oecd.org/rd/gross-domestic-spending-on-r-d.htm
88. Oslo-Kılavuzu. (2006). Yenilik verilerinin toplanması ve yorumlanması için ilkeler. çev. TÜBİTAK. https://www.worldcat.org/title/oslo-klavuzu-yenilik-verilerinin-toplanmas-ve-yorumlanmas-icin-ilkeler/oclc/66899435
89. Özdamar, K. (2009). Paket Programlar İle İstatistiksel Veri Analizi. Kaan Kitabevi, Eskişehir. https://www.kitapyurdu.com/kitap/paket-programlar-ile-istatistiksel-veri-analizi-1/72412.html
90. Piergiovanni, R., Santarelli, E. (2001). Patents and the geographic localization of R&D spillovers in French manufacturing. Regional Studies, 35(8), 697-702. doi: 10.1080/00343400120101434
91. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press. https://hbr.org/1990/03/the-competitive-advantage-of-nations
92. Quatraro, F. (2009). Diffusion of Regional Innovation Capabilities: Evidence from Italian Patent Data. Regional Studies, 43(10), 1333-1348. doi: 10.1080/00343400802195162
93. Reiffenstein, T. (2009). Specialization, Centralization, and the Distribution of Patent Intermediaries in the USA and Japan. Regional Studies, 43(4), 571-588. doi: 10.1080/00343400701874255
94. Rinallo, D., Golfetto, F. (2011). Exploring the knowledge strategies of temporary cluster organizers: A longitudinal study of the EU fabric industry trade shows (1986–2006). Economic Geography, 87(4), 453-476. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01127.x
95. Rodil, Ó., Vence, X., del Carmen Sánchez, M. (2016). The relationship between innovation and export behaviour: The case of Galician firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 248-265. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.002
96. Rodríguez-Pose, A., Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42(1), 51-67. doi: 10.1080/00343400701654186
97. Salomon, R. M. (2006). Spillovers to foreign market participants: assessing the impact of export strategies on innovative productivity. Strategic Organization, 4(2), 135-164.
98. Salomon, R. M., Shaver, J. M. (2005). Learning by exporting: New insights from examining firm innovation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(2), 431-460. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2005.00047.x
99. Saxenian, A. (1983). The genesis of silicon valley. Built Environment (1978-), 7-17.
100. Saxenian, A. (1985). Silicon Valley and Route 128: regional prototypes or historic exceptions. Urban Affairs Annual Reviews, 28, 81-105.
101. Saxenian, A. (1989). The Cheshire cat's grin: innovation, regional development and the Cambridge case. Economy and Society, 18(4), 448-477. doi: 10.1080/03085148900000022
102. Saxenian, A. (1990). Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 33(1), 89-112. doi: 10.2307/41166640
103. Sayili, K. (2020). Retaining skilled employees: A human capital model with innovation and entrepreneurship. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(6), 911-923. doi: 10.1002/mde.3147
104. Smith, N., Thomas, E. (2017). Regional conditions and innovation in Russia: the impact of foreign direct investment and absorptive capacity. Regional Studies, 51(9), 1412-1428. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1164307
105. Storper, M., Scott, A. (1988). The Geographical Foundations and Social Regulation of Flexible Production Complexes. In W. J. and D. M. (Eds.), The Power of Geography. London: Allen & Unwin. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315819457-8/geographical-foundations-social-regulation-flexible-production-complexes-michael-storper-allen-scott
106. Sun, Y. (2000). Spatial Distribution of Patents in China. Regional Studies, 35(5), 441-454. doi: 10.1080/00343400050058693
107. Şahinli, M. A., Kılınç, E. (2013). İnovasyon ve inovasyon göstergeleri: AB ülkeleri ve Türkiye Karşılaştırması. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 13(25), 329-356. https://atif.sobiad.com/index.jsp?modul=makale-goruntule&id=AWWPqWszHDbCZb_mQuJm
108. Tan, D., Cheng, C., Lei, M., Zhao, Y. (2017). Spatial Distributions and Determinants of Regional Innovation in China: Evidence from Chinese Metropolitan Data. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53(6), 1442-1454. doi: 10.1080/1540496X.2017.1283215
109. Torre, A., Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47-59. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320842
110. Seyfettinoğlu, Ü. K., Arık, Ş., Çağatay, S. (2020). Determinants of Industry and Region Based Open Innovation in Turkey. Istanbul Business Research, 49(1), 1-35. doi: 10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0029
111. Xie, X. M., Zeng, S. X., Tam, C. M. (2011). Towards continuous innovation for regional high-tech industrial clusters. Innovation, 13(3), 361-375. doi: 10.5172/impp.2011.13.3.361
112. Yang, C. H., Lin, H. L. (2012). Openness, absorptive capacity, and regional innovation in China. Environment and Planning A, 44(2), 333-355. doi:10.1068/a44182
113. Yokura, Y., Matsubara, H., Sternberg, R. (2013). R&D networks and regional innovation: a social network analysis of joint research projects in J apan. Area, 45(4), 493-503. doi: 10.1111/area.12055
114. Zemtsov, S., Muradov, A., Wade, I., Barinova, V. (2016). Determinants of Regional Innovation in Russia: Are People or Capital More Important? Foresight and STI Governance, 10(2), 29-42. doi: 10.17323/1995-459X.2016.2.29.42