Critical scale construction in geography

Öz

The main purpose of this study is to examine the discussions and conceptualisations on the concept of scale in the critical human geography period within the context of Anglo-American geography. In addition, the study aims to contribute to the conceptual debates in Turkey on the concept of scale, which has a history of approximately 50 years in the international literature. In the period between 1980-1990, the debates on the concept were shaped by the political economy tradition. In the 1990s-2000s, on the other hand, in addition to political economy, the impact of social reproduction and consumption processes on the production of scale is emphasised. In this period, households and the body were added to the scale distinctions of the first period (local, regional, national and global). After the 2000s, conceptualisations of scale have become more questioned. In addition to the hierarchical scale theory emphasised in previous periods, actor-network theory was also used to explain the social construction of scale. In addition, in this period, studies adopting a post-structuralist approach criticising dialectical scale conceptualisations started to be conducted.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Production of scale
• Critical human geography
• Epistemological category
• Ontological approach
• Social construction of scale

Coğrafyada Ölçeğe İlişkin Eleştirel Perspektifler ve Teorik Tartışmalar

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, eleştirel beşeri coğrafya döneminde ölçek kavramı üzerine yapılan tartışmaları ve kavramlaştırmaları Anglo-Amerikan coğrafyacılığı kapsamında incelemektir. Ayrıca çalışma, uluslararası literatürde yaklaşık 50 yıllık bir geçmişe sahip olan ölçek kavramına ilişkin, Türkiye'deki kavramsal tartışmalara da katkı sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır Yapılan çalışmaları üç dönemde incelemek mümkündür. 1980-1990 arası dönemde kavrama ilişkin tartışmalar ekonomi politik geleneği tarafından şekillendirilmiştir. 1990-2000'li yıllarda ise ölçeğin üretiminde ekonomi politiğin yanı sıra toplumsal yeniden üretim ve tüketim süreçlerinin etkisi üzerinde durulmaktadır. Bu dönemde, ilk dönemdeki ölçek ayrımlarına (yerel, bölgesel, ulusal ve küresel) hane ve beden de eklenmiştir. 2000'li yıllardan sonra ölçek kavramlaştırmaları daha fazla sorgulanır hale gelmiştir. Önceki dönemlerde vurgulanan hiyerarşik ölçek teorisine ek olarak aktör-ağ teorisi de ölçeğin sosyal inşasını açıklamak için kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca bu dönemde diyalektik ölçek kavramlaştırmalarını eleştiren post-yapısalcı yaklaşımı benimseyen çalışmalar da yapılmaya başlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ölçeğin üretimi
• Eleştirel beşeri coğrafya
• Epistemolojik kategori
• Ontolojik yaklaşım
• Ölçeğin sosyal inşası

Kaynakça

1. Berg, L. D. (2010). Critical Human Geography. In Warf, B. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Geography. SAGE. 616-622.
2. Bekaroğlu, E. (2016). Modern dünya-sisteminin bilgi yapıları bağlamında coğrafya disiplini için bir dışsal tarih okuması. Toplum ve Bilim, 136, 117-146.
3. Bilgin, T. (1985). Genel Kartografya – II. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Coğrafya Enstitüsü.
4. Brenner, N. (1998a). Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales. Environment and Planning D; Society and Space. 16(4) 459-481. doi:10.1068/d1604
5. Brenner, N. (1998b). Global cities, glocal states: Global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary Europe. Review of International Political Economy, 5(1), 1-37. doi:10.1080/096922998347633
6. Brenner, N. (2000). The urban question as a scale question: reflections on Henri Lefebvre, urban theory and the politics of scale. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2), 361-378. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00234
7. Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591– 614. doi:10.1191/03091320168268895
8. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. Laws, J. (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (196-233). London: Routledge.

9. Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In: Laws, J. (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays in Power, Technology and Domination. (133-161). London: Routledge.
10. Collinge, C. (2005) The différance between society and space: Nested scales and the returns of spatial fetishism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23(2), 189–206. doi:10.1068/d36
11. Collinge, C. (2006). Flat ontology and the deconstruction of scale: A response to Marston, Jones and Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(2), 244–251. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3804385 adresinden alınmıştır.
12. Cox, K. R., Mair, A. (1989). Levels of abstraction in locality studies. Antipode, 21(2), 121-132. https://antipodeonline.org/about-the-journal-and-foundation/a-radical-journal-of-geography/ adresinden alınmıştır.
13. Cox, K. R. (1998). Representation and power in the politics of scale. Political Geography,17(1), 41-44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/political-geography adresinden alımnmıştır.
14. Cox, K. R. (2002). Globalization, the Regulation Approach, and the Politics of Scale. In: Herod, A., Wright, M. W. (Ed.), Geographies of Power: Placing Scale, (85-114).Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Delaney, D., Leitner, H. (1997). The political construction of scale. Political Geography, 16(2), 93-97. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(96)00045-5
16. Herod, A. (1991). The production of scale in United States labour relations. Area, 23(1), 82-88. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20002923 adresinden alınmıştır.
17. Herod, A. (1995). The Practice of international labor solidarity and the geography of the global economy. Economic Geography, 71(4), 341- 363. doi.org/10.2307/144422.
18. Herod, A. (1997). Labor’s spatial praxis and the geography of contract bargaining in the US East Coast longshore industry, 1953 - 1989. Political Geography, 16(2), 145-169. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(96)00048-0 Herod, A. (2011). Scale. Abingdon: Routledge.
19. Johnston, R. (2010). Human geography (Beşeri coğrafya). In Backhouse, R., Fontaine, P. (Ed.), The History of the Social Sciences since 1945, 155-183. (Çev. Suat Yazan, Erdem Bekaroğlu). içinde 20.Yüzyılda Amerikan Coğrafyasının Gelişimi. Yılmaz Arı (Ed.). 2. Baskı, 2018. s.251-283. Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi.
20. Jonas, A. E.G. (2006). Pro scale: Further reflections on the ‘scale debate’ in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 31(3), 399–406. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00210.x
21. Jones, K. (1998). Scale as epistemology. Political Geography 17(1), 25–28. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(97)00049-8
22. Jones, J. P., Leitner, H., Marston, S. A, Sheppard, E. (2016). Neil Smith's scale. Antipode, 49(3), 138-152. doi:10.1111/anti.12254
23. Kaygalak, İ. (2011). Postmodern eleştirilerin coğrafi düşünce ve yeni mekân kavrayışları üzerine yansımaları. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 1-10. doi:10.1501/Cogbil_0000000114
24. Koç, H., Ergün, A. (Ed.) (2021). Bilginin Görsel İfadesi Haritalar. Pegem Akademi.
25. Kurtz, H. (2002). The politics of environmental justice as the politics of scale: St. James Parish, Louisiana, and the Shintech siting controversy. In: Herod, A., Wright, M. W. (Ed.), Geographies of Power: Placing Scale, (249-273).Oxford: Blackwell.
26. Kurtz, H. (2003). Scale frames and counter-scale frames: constructing the problem of environmental injustice. Political Geography, 22, 887–916. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2003.09.001
27. Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In: Law, J., Hassard, J. (Ed.), Actor Network Theory and After, (1-14).Oxford: Blackwell.
28. Latham, A. (2002). Retheorizing the scale of globalization: Topologies, actornetworks, and cosmopolitanism. In: Herod, A., Wright, M. W. (Ed.), Geographies of Power: Placing Scale, (115-144). Oxford: Blackwell.
29. Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. In: Law, J., Hassard, J. (Ed.), Actor Network Theory and After, Oxford: Blackwell, 15-25.
31. Leitner, H., Miller, B. (2007). Scale and the limitations of ontological debate: A Commentary on Marston, Jones and Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 116–125. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4640005 adresinden alınmıştır.
32. Leitner, H., Pavlik C., Sheppard E. (2002). Networks, Governance, and the Politics of Scale: Inter-urban Networks and the European Union. In Herod, A., Wright, M. W. (Ed.), Geographies of Power: Placing Scale, Oxford: Blackwell, 274-303.
33. Marston, S. A. (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24(2), 219- 242. doi:10.1191/0309132006740862
34. Marston, S. A., Smith, N. (2001). States, scales and households: limits to scale thinking? A response to Brenner. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 615-619. doi:10.1191/030913201682688968
35. Marston, S.A. (2004). A Long Way from Home: Domesticating the Social Production of Scale. In: Sheppard, E., Mcmaster, R. B. (Ed.), Scale and Geographic Inquiry Nature, Society, and Method, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 170-190.
36. Marston, S. A., Jones, J. P., Woodward, K. (2005). Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(4), 416-432. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00180.x
37. Marston, S. A., Woodward, K., Jones, J.P. (2007). Flattening ontologies of globalization: The nollywood case. Globalizations, 4(1), 45-63. doi:10.1080/14747730701245608
38. Moore, A. (2008). Rethinking scale as a geographical category: From analysis to practice. Progress in Human Geography, 32(2), 203-225. doi:10.1177/0309132507087647
39. Sheppard, E., Mcmaster, R., B. (2004). Introduction: Scale and geographic inquiry. In: Sheppard, E., McMaster, R., B. (Ed.), Scale and Geographic Inquiry:Nature, Society and Method. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1-22.
40. Smith, N. (1982). Gentrification and uneven development. Economic Geography, 58(2), 39-155. doi:10.2307/143793
41. Smith, N., Dennis, W. (1987). The restructuring of geographical scale: coalescence and fragmentation of the northern core region. Economic Geography, 63(2), 160–82. doi:10.2307/144152
42. Smith, N. (1988). The region is dead! Long live the region! Political Geography Quarterly, 7(2), 141–52. doi:10.1016/0260-9827(88)90025-0
43. Smith, N. (1992a). Contours of a spatialized politics: homeless vehicles and the production of geographical scale. Social Text, 33, 55–81. doi:10.2307/466434
44. Smith, N. (1992b). Geography, difference, and the politics of scale. In: Doherty, J., Graham, E., Malek, M. (Ed.), Postmodernism and the Social Sciences. (57-79). London: Macmillan.
45. Smith, N. (1993). Homeless/global: Scaling places. In: Bird, J., Curtis, B., Tim Putnam, T., Roberstson, G., Tickner, L. (Ed.), Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change, (87-120). London:Routledge.
46. Smith N. (1995). Remaking scale: competition and cooperation in prenational and post-national Europe. In: Eskelinen, H., Snickars, F., (Ed). Competitive European Peripheries, (59-74). Berlin, Springer.
47. Smith, N. (1996). Spaces of vulnerability: The space of flows and the politics of scale. Critique of Anthropology, 16(1), 63-77. doi:10.1177/0308275X960160010
48. Smith, N. (2008). Eşitsiz Gelişim Doğa, Sermaye ve Mekânın Üretimi. (Çev. E. Soğancılar). İstanbul: Sel Yayıncılık. Springer, S. (2014). Human geography without hierarchy. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 402-419. doi: 10.1177/0309132513508208
49. Swyngedouw, E. (1997a). Excluding the other: The production of scale and scaled politics. In: Lee, R., Wills, J. (Ed.), Geographies of Economies, (167-176). London:Arnold.
50. Swyngedouw, E. (1997b). Neither global nor local: ‘Glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In: Cox, K. (Ed.), Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local, (137-166). New York: Guilford Press.
51. Swyngedouw, E. (2004a). Globalisation or glocalisation? Networks, territories and rescaling, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(1), 25-48. doi: 10.1080/0955757042000203632.
52. Swyngedouw, E. (2004b). Scaled Geographies: Nature, place, and the politics of scale. In: Sheppard, E., McMaster, R., B. (Ed.), Scale and Geographic Inquiry:Nature, Society and Method, (129-153). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
53. Taylor, P. J. (1981). Geographical Scales within the World-Economy Approach. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 5(1), 3-11. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40241189 adresinden alınmıştır.
54. Taylor, P. J. (1982). A materialist interpretation for political geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 7, 15-34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/621909 adresinden alınmıştır.
55. Taylor, P. J. (1987). The paradox of geographical scale in Marx’s politics. Antipode, 19(3), 287-306. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.1987.tb00376.