Coğrafyaya Erkeklik Kavramının Yerleşmesi Ve Hegemonik Erkekliğe Yaklaşımlar

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2

Miyase Yalçın

https://doi.org/10.33688/aucbd.1446520

Öz

Bu çalışma, erkeklik kavramının coğrafya disiplinine yerleşmesi ve hegemonik erkekliğin mekân ver yerlerde nasıl oluştuğunu açıklamaktadır. Erkeklik disiplinler arası bir konu olduğu için sosyolog ve feminist sosyal ve kültürel coğrafyacıların çalışmalarından faydalanılmıştır. Coğrafya ve hegemonik erkeklik; hegemonik erkekliği organize etmek; radikal feminizm ve erkeklik; yer, ataerkillik ve heteronormativite bölümlerinden oluşmaktadır. Cinsiyetlendirilmiş ve cinselleştirilmiş bedenlerin üretiminde mekânlar merkezi olmuştur. Mekânlardaki gizli odalar (closet), toplumsal cinsiyet ve cinsellik performanslarının gerçekleştirildiği bir yer haline gelmiştir. Birbirlerine bağlı olan gizli odalarda erkeklik ilişkisel olarak inşa edilmiş böylece ataerkillik ve heteronormativite yeniden üretilmiştir. Bu durum gizli odalardaki eşcinsel erkeklerin ve kadınların baskılanmasına ve kadınların ikincilleştirilmesine neden olmuştur. Bu çalışmanın amacı da Türkiye’deki coğrafya çalışmalarında bu konuların tartışılmasına katkıda bulunmak, literatürü derlemek ve bu kavramların özellikle Türkçede yerleşmesi için ortam oluşturmaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Coğrafya, Toplumsal cinsiyet, Ataerkillik, Heteronormativite, Hegemonik erkeklik

Kaynakça

• Akay, S. (2023). Tarihi coğrafyada feminist sorgulamalar. International Journal of Geography and Geography Education (IGGE), 48 (7) 127-144. doi.org/10.32003/igge.1124193
• Akyüz, S. (2021). A Feminist Geographic Reading of Masculinities: Syrian Entrepreneurs in İzmir. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi/ Turkish Journal of Geographical Sciences, 19 (1), 312-330. doi.org/10.33688/aucbd.901437
• Allen, L. (2007). Sensitive and real macho all at the same time: Young heterosexual men and romance. Men and Masculinities, 10 (2), 137-152. doi.org/10.1177/1097184X05284221
• Anderson, E. (2009). Inclusive Masculinity: The Changing Nature of Masculinities. New York: Routledge.
• Bachelard, G. (1994). The Poetics of Space. Boston: Beacon Press.
• Beauvoir, S. (1949). The Second Sex, (translated by C. Borde and S. Malovany-Chevallier (2009)). New York: Vintage Books.
• Bell, D., Valentine, G. (Ed.) (1995). Mapping Desire: Geographies of Sexualities. London and New York: Routledge
• Berg, L.D., Gahman, L., Nunn, N. (2014). Masculinities and Place. Andrew Gorman-Murray, Peter Hopkins (Ed.), In Neoliberalism, Masculinities and Academic Knowledge Production: Towards a Theory of Academic Masculinities (57-74). England: Ashgate Publishing.
• Berg, L., Longhurst, R. (2003). Placing masculinities and geography. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 10 (4), 351-360. doi.org/10.1080/0966369032000153322
• Bilgili, M. (2017). Coğrafyanın bilimsel kimliğine postyapısalcı bir yaklaşım. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 35 (10), 101-109. doi.org/10.14781/mcd.291173
• Bilgili, M. (2020). Coğrafyada mekân felsefesi üzerine yaklaşımlar. lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education, 41 (6), 88-102. doi.org/10.32003/igge.674936
• Bilgili, M., Kocalar, A.O. (2023). Mekân ve materyal odaklı mekânsal bakış açısı. International Journal of Geography and Geography Education (IGGE), 50 (10), 184-200. doi.org/10.32003/igge.1371709
• Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Bridges, T., Pascoe, C. J. (2018). On the Elasticity of Gender Hegemony: Why Hybrid Masculinities Fail to Undermine Gender and Sexual Inequality. James Messerschmidt, Patricia Martin, Michael Messner, Raewyn Connell (Ed.), In Gender Reckonings: New Social Theory and Research (164-176). New York: New York University Press.
• Brown, M.P. (2000). Closet Space: Geographies of Metaphor from the Body to the Globe. London: Routledge.
• Browne, K., Lim, J. (2007). Geographies of Sexualities: Theory, Practices and Politics. Aldershot: Ashgate.
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. London: Routledge.
• Carrigan, T., Connell, R.W., Lee, J. (1987). Toward a new sociology of masculinity. Harry Brod (Ed.), In The Making of Masculinities: The New Men’s Studies (63-102). Boston: Allen and Unwin.
• Cockburn, C. (1983). Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change. London: Pluto
• Connell, R.W. (1982). Class, Patriarchy, and Sartre’s Theory of Practice. Theory and Society, 11 (3), 305-320. doi.org/10.1007/BF00211660
• Connell, R.W. (1983). Which Way Is Up? Essays on Sex, Class and Culture. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
• Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Polity Press. Cambridge.
• Connell, R. W. (1993). The big picture: masculinities in recent world history. Theory and Society 22 (5), 597-623. doi.org/10.1007/BF00993538
• Connell, R.W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity.
• Connell, R.W. (2005). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity.
• Connell, R.W., Messeschmidt, J.W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19 (6), 829-859. doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639
• Connell, R.W., Hearn, J., Kimmel, M. (2005). Introduction. Michael Kimmel, Jeff Hearn, Robert Connell (Ed.), In Handbook on Studies on Men and Masculinities (1-12). London: Sage Publications.
• Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A Short Introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Demetriou, D. (2001). Connell’s Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: A Critique. Theory and Society, 30 (3), 337-361. doi.org/10.1023/A:1017596718715
• Deniz, A. (2018). Feminist Coğrafya: Cinsiyetin Coğrafyası & Coğrafyanın Cinsiyeti. Nurettin Özgen (Ed.), Sosyal Coğrafya içinde (251-284). Anakara: Pegem Akademi.
• Donaldson, M. (1993). What is hegemonic masculinity? Theory and Society, 22 (5), 643-657. doi.org/10.1007/BF00993540
• Duncan, N. (1996). Renegotiating gender and sexuality in public and private spaces. Nancy Duncan (Ed.), In BodySpace (127-145). London: Routledge.
• Edley, N., Wetherell, M. (1995). Men in Perspective: Practice, Power and Identity. London: Prentice Hall.
• England, K. (1993). Suburban Pink Collar Ghettos: The Spatial Entrapment of Women? Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 83 (2), 225-242. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1993.tb01933.x
• Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality. New York: Pantheon Books.
• Halberstam, J. (2005). In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York: New York University Press.
• Hearn, J., Biricik, A., Joelsson, T. (2014). Masculinities and Place. Andrew Gorman-Murray, Peter Hopkins (Ed.), In Theorising, Men, Masculinities, Place and Space: Local, National and Transnational Contexts and Interrelations (17-41). England: Ashgate Publishing.
• Hemmings, C. (2002). Bisexual Spaces: A Geography of Sexuality and Gender. London: Routledge.
• Herdt, G. H. (1981). Guardians of the Flutes: Idioms of Masculinity. New York: McGrawHill.
• Hopkins, P., Noble, G. (2009). Masculinities in place: situated identities, relations and intersectionality. Social and Cultural Geography, 10 (8), 811-819. doi.org/10.1080/14649360903305817
• van Hoven, B., Hörschelmann, K. (2005). Introduction: from geographies of men to geographies of women and back again? Bettina van Hoven and Kathrin Hörschelmann (Ed.), In Spaces of Masculinities (1-16). London: Routledge.
• Howson, R. (2006). Challenging Hegemonic Masculinity. New York: Routledge.
• Hubbard, P. (2007). Between transgression and complicity (Or: can the straight guy have a queer eye?). Kath Browne, Jason Lim, Gavin Brown. (Ed.), Geographies of Sexualities: Theory, Practices and Politics (151-156). Burlington: Ashgate.
• Hunt, P. (1980). Gender and Class Consciousness. London: Macmillan.
• Jackson, P. (1989). Maps of Meaning. London: Unwin Hyman.
• Jackson, P. (1991). The cultural politics of masculinity: towards a social geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 16 (2), 199-213. doi.org/10.2307/622614
• Jackson, P. (1994). Black male: advertising and the cultural politics of masculinity. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 1 (1), 49-59. doi.org/10.1080/09663699408721200
• Johnston, L. (1996). Flexing Femininity: Female Body-Builders Refiguring The Body. Gender, Place and Culture, 3 (3), 327-340. doi.org/10.1080/09663699625595
• Kimmel, M. (1987). Rethinking masculinity: new directions in research. Michael Kimmel (Ed.), In Changing Men: New Directions in Research on Men and Masculinity (9-24). London: Sage Publications.
• Kimmel, M. (1994). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. Harry Brod, Michael Kaufman (Ed.), In Theorizing masculinities (119-141). London: Sage.
• Kinsman, G. (1993). The Regulation of Desire: Homo and Hetero Sexualities. Montreal: Black Rose Books.
• Kobayashi, A. (2002). A generation later and still two per cent: changing the culture of Canadian geography. Canadian Geographer, 46 (3), 245-248. doi.org/10.1111/j.15410064.2002.tb00745.x
• Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space, (translated by D. Nicholson-Smith). Oxford, UK and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
• Logan, T. D. (2010). Personal Characteristics, Sexual Behaviors, and Male Sex Work: A Quantitative Approach. American Sociological Review 75 (5), 679-704. doi.org/10.1177/0003122410379581
• Longhurst, R. (2000). Geography and gender: masculinities, male identity and men. Progress in Human Geography, 24 (3), 439-444. doi.org/10.1191/030913200701540519
• Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• MacKinnon, C. (1989). Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Marx, K. (1971). Value, Price and Profit. New York: Routledge.
• McDowell, L. (1999). Gender, Identity and Place. US: University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis.
• Messerschmidt, J.W. (2018). Hegemonic Masculinity: Formulation, Reformulation, and Amplification. Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Rowman and Littlefield.
• McDowell, L. (1990). Sex and power in academia. Area, 22 (4), 323-332.
• McDowell, L. (1999). Gender, Place and Identity: Understanding Feminist Geographies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• McDowell, L. (2003). Redundant Masculinities? Employment Change and White Working Class Youth. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Millett, K. (1971). Sexual politics. London: Hart-Davis.
• Mirioğlu, G. (2018). Kentlere Feminist Coğrafya Perspektifinden Bakmak. Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, 27 (2), 183-194
• Nash, C. J., Gorman-Murray, A. (Ed.) (2019). The Geographies of Digital Sexuality. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Oakley, A. (1972). Sex, Gender, and Society. San Francisco: Harper and Row.
• Okur, M. (2023). Beden, cinsiyet ve mekân. Marmara Üniversitesi Kadın ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7 (1), 22-43.
• Osborn, T. (1996). Coming Home: A Roadmap to Gay and Lesbian Empowerment. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
• Özgüç, N. (2008). Gender representation in academic geography in Turkey, The Arab World Geographer, 11 (4), 232-250. doi.org/10.5555/arwg.11.4.w4172146v8718203
• Peake, L. (1993). Race and Sexuality: Challenging the Patriarchal Structuring of Urban Social Space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11 (4), 415–432. doi.org/10.1068/d110415
• Pratt, G., Hanson, S. (1994). Geography and the Construction of Difference. Gender, Place and Culture, 1 (1), 5-30. doi.org/10.1080/09663699408721198
• Pronger, B. (1990). The arena of masculinity: Sports, homosexuality, and the meaning of sex. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
• Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5 (4), 631–660. doi.org/10.1086/493756
• Rose, G. (1993). Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Rose, G. (1996). As If the Mirrors Had Bled: Masculine Dwelling, Masculinist Theory and Feminist Masquerade. Nancy Duncan (Ed.), Body Space: Destabilizing Geographies of Gender and Sexuality (56-74). New York: Routledge.
• Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic in women: notes on the political economy of sex. Rayna Reiter (Ed.), In Toward an Anthropology of Women (157-210). New York: Monthly Review Press.
• Savran, D. (1996). The sadomasochist in the closet: white masculinity and the culture of victimization. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 8 (2), 127-152. doi.org/10.1215/10407391-8-2-127
• Sedgwick, E.K. (1990). Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Tuncer, S. (2012). Beşeri coğrafyaya feminist itirazlar. Fe Dergi, 4 (1), 79-90. doi.org/10.1501/Fe0001_0000000065
• Tyner, J. (2012). Space, Place and Violence. New York: Routledge.
• Valentine, G. (1989). The Geography of Women’s Fear. Area 21 (4), 385-390.
• Vance, C. S. (1995). Social construction theory and sexuality. Maurice Berger, Brian Wallis, Simon Watson (Ed.), In Constructing Masculinity (37-49). New York: Routledge.
• Vaughan, G., Hogg, M. (1995). Introduction to Social Psychology. Sydney: Prentice Hall.
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society Volume One. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Whitehead, S.M. (2002). Men and Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Wielgosz, A. (1996). The topography of writing: Raymond Federman’s The Voice in the Closet. Critique, 37 (2), 108-113. doi.org/10.1080/00111619.1996.9936484
• Willis, P. (1977). Learning to Labor: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. Farnborough, UK: Saxon House.
• Yüceşahin, M.M. (2016). Toplumsal cinsiyet ve mekânın karşılıklı ilişkisi: Patriyarkanın sosyal mekânı örgütleyişine dair bir tartışma. Kadın/Women 2000: Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi. 17 (1), 73-101. doi.org/10.33831/jws.v17i1.70