Çevik Okul Ölçeğinin (ÇOÖ) Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Yıl 2022, , 777 - 807, 30.11.2022

Emrah Kaya , Murat Özdemir

https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.1082454

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, okulların örgütsel çevikliğini belirlemeye elverişli, geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı geliştirmektir. Bu amaçla ilk aşamada, örgütsel çeviklik ile ilgili ilgili alanyazın taranmış ve buna bağlı olarak otuz beş maddelik maddelik bir madde havuzu oluşturulmuştur. Daha sonra hazırlanan maddeler eğitim yönetimi ve ölçme-değerlendirme alanlarında 11 uzmana gönderilmiştir. Uzmanlardan gelen öneriler doğrultusunda yeniden düzenlenen 23 maddelik taslak ölçek Ankara ilindeki altı farklı ilçeden toplam 376 yönetici ve öğretmene uygulanmıştır. Çevik Okul Ölçeği’nin (ÇOÖ) yapı geçerliğini belirlemek amacıyla birinci çalışma grubu ile (175 katılımcı) Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi (AFA), ikinci çalışma grubu ile de (349 katılımcı) ikinci düzey Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) yapılmıştır. AFA sonucunda üç faktörden ve 21 maddeden oluşan bir model ortaya çıkmıştır. Her bir faktör sırasıyla ‘’esneklik’’, teknoloji’’ ve ‘’hız’’ olarak isimlendirilmiştir. Daha sonra üç faktörlü bu model DFA’da doğrulanmıştır. Ölçeğe ait Cronbach Alpha, Spearman Brown, Guttman ve test tekrar test hesaplamaları ise ölçeğin güvenilir bir veri toplama aracı olduğunu göstermiştir. Tüm bu bulgulara dayalı olarak ÇOÖ’nün okulların dijital yönetim özelliklerini belirlemeye elverişli, geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çevik, Çeviklik, Okul, Çevik Okul

Kaynakça

• Al-Faouri, A. H., Al-Nsour, M. M., ve Al-Kasasbeh, M. M. (2014). The impact of workforce agility on organizational memory. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12(4), 432-442.
• Almahamid, S., Awwad, A., ve McAdams, A. C. (2010). Effects of organizational agility and knowledge sharing on competitive advantage: An empirical study in Jordan. International Journal of Management, 27(3), 387.
• Anderson, J. C. ve Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2),
• Anthony, S. D., Viguerie, S. P., ve Waldeck, A. (2016). Corporate longevity: Turbulence ahead for large organizations. Strategy & Innovation, 14(1), 1-9.
• Belasco, J. A. (1990). Teaching an elephant to dance: Empowering change in your organization. New York: Crown. Breu, K., Hemingway, C. J., Strathern, M., ve Bridger, D. (2002). Workforce agility: the new employee strategy for the knowledge economy. Journal of Information technology, 17(1), 21-31.
• Briggs, S. (2014). Agile based learning: What is it and how can it change education. Sydney: informED. Retrieved August, 28, 2018.
• Bushey, N. (2019). Enhancing Organizational Agility Within the Human Resources Function. Pepperdine University. Doctoral Thesis. ProQuest Dissertations (22615450)
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., ve Demirel, F. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık
• Chakravarty, A., Grewal, R., ve Sambamurthy, V. (2013). Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: Enabling and facilitating roles. Information systems research, 24(4), 976-997.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., ve Morrison, K. (2021). Eğitimde Araştırma Yöntemler. (Çev. Ed. Erkan Dinç ve Kasım Kıroğlu). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık
• Costello, A. B. ve Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research ve evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.
• Crocitto, M., ve Youssef, M. (2003). The human side of organization agility. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103, 388-397. Cummings, T. G., ve Worley, C. G. (2009). Organizational development and change (9th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal Bilimler için Çok Değişkenli İstatik: SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları.Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık
• Denning , S. (2016), How to make the whole organization “Agile” Strategy & Leadership, (44)4 10-17
• Doğan, H. (1997). Mesleki ve Teknik Eğitimin Yeniden Yapılandırılması. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 30 (1), 1-26.
• Dove, R. (1999). Knowledge management, response ability, and the agile enterprise. Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 18-35.
• Falance, T. (2012). Cultivating Organizational Agility. The Columbia Group.
• Felipe, C. M., Roldán, J. L., ve Leal-Rodríguez, A. L. (2017). Impact of organizational culture values on organizational agility. Sustainability, 9(12), 2354
• Fowler, M., ve Highsmith, J. (2001). The agile manifesto.Software Development, 9(8), 28-35.
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallend, N. E. ve Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw Hill.
• Galés, N. L., ve Gallon, R. (2019). Educational agility. Rethinking Teacher Education for the 21st Century. Trends, Challenges and New Directions, 98-111.
• Ganguly, A., Nilchiani, R., ve Farr, J. V. (2009). Evaluating agility in corporate enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(2), 410-423. Gaulden, J., ve Gottlieb, A. (2017). The age of agility: Education pathways for the future of work. Denver: America Succeeds.
• Glenn, M., ve Stahl, G. (2009). Organisational agility: How business can survive and thrive in turbulent times. A report from the Economist Intelligence Unit, The Economist.
• Gliner, j. A., Morgan, G.A. ve Leech, N.L. (2015). Uygulamada Araştırma Yöntemleri: Desen ve Analizi Bütünleştiren Yaklaşım. (Çev. Ed. Selahattin Turan). Ankara: Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık
• Hair Jr, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., William, C. ve Black (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings. New Jersy: Prentice Hall.
• Harmozi, A.M., 2001. Agile manufacturing: the next logical step. Benchmarking 8 (2), 132–143.
• Harraf, A., Wanasika, I., Tate, K., ve Talbott, K. (2015). Organizational agility. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 31(2), 675-686.
• Harraf, A., Wanasika, I., Tate, K., ve Talbott, K. (2015). Organizational agility. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 31(2), 675-686.
• Hatch, N. (2016). 10 critical culture change elements in agile transformation. Erişim Tarihi: 12.02.2022. https://www.insight.com/en_US/content-and-resources/blog/10- critical-culture-change-elements-in-agile-transformation.html
• Henson, R. K. ve Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393-416.
• Holbeche, L. (2015). The agile organization: How to build an innovative, sustainable and resilient business. London, UK: Kogan Page.
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. ve Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
• Huang, C. C. (1999). An agile approach to logical network analysis in decision support systems. Decision Support Systems, 25(1), 53-70.
• Joiner, B. (2019). Leadership agility for organizational agility. Journal of Creating Value, 5(2), 139-149.
• Kharabe, A. T. (2012). Organizational agility and complex enterprise system innovations: A mixed methods study of the effects of enterprise systems on organizational agility (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (1143247461)
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford
• Latham, L. J. (2014). Organizational agility: Exploring impact of adoption on team performance from the human resource perspective (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (1526000640)
• Lopes, K. J. (2009). Organizational agility: Exploring how the U.S. coast guard chooses and implements effective courses of action (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (304831927)
• Lunenberg, C.F. ve Ornstein, A.C. (2000). Educational Administration: Concepts and Practices. (3rd ed.).Belmont: Wardsworth Thomson Learning.
• Maskell, B., (2001) The age of agile manufacturing. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 6(1), 5–11.
• Mason, A. J. (2010). Inside the black box: Investigating agility as a dynamic capability for sustaining a competitive advantage within consulting firms (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University). Meredith, S. ve Francis, D. (2000). Journey towards agility: the agile wheel explored. The TQM Magazine, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 137-43.
• Meyer, P. (2015). The agility shift: Creating agile and effective leaders, teams and organizations. Brookline, MA: Bibliomotion.
• Morgan, G. (2006). Enactment as a form of narcissism. Images of organization. Sage Publications, Thousand oaks CA, 246-247.
• Mulhern, J. K. (2008). An exploratory case study of organizational agility in a consortium of small private college libraries (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (304404536)
• Nafei, W. A. (2016). Organizational agility: The key to organizational success. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(5), 296-309.
• Najrani, M. (2016). The endless opportunity of organizational agility. Strategic Direction, 32(3), 37–38.
• Pitafi, A. H., Liu, H., ve Cai, Z. (2018). Investigating the relationship between workplace conflict and employee agility: The role of enterprise social media. Telematics and Informatics, 35(8), 2157-2172.
• Reed, K., ve Blunsdon, B. (1998). Organizational flexibility in Australia. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(3), 457-477.
• Rigby, D. K., Sutherland, J., ve Noble, A. (2018). Agile at scale. Harvard Business Review, 96(3), 88-96.
• Scalia, A. E. (2011) Identity as the foundation for change in school systems. (Unpublishing doctoral thesis) Pepperdine University.
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., ve Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
• Segal, M. (1974). Organization and environment: A typology of adaptability and structure. Public Administration Review, 34, 212-220.
• Senge, P. M. (2004). Beşinci Disiplin, (Çev.Ayşegül İldeniz-Ahmet Doğukan) Yapı Kredi Yayınları. İstanbul.
• Setili, A. (2014). The agility advantage: How to identify and act on opportunities in a fast-changing world. John Wiley & Sons.
• Shafer, R. A. (1997). Creating organizational agility: The human resource dimension (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (304345905)
• Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., ve Layer, J. K. (2007). A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes.International Journal of industrial ergonomics, 37(5), 445-460.
• Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., ve Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol.5) 481-498. Boston, MA: pearson.
• Weber, Y., ve Tarba, S. Y. (2014). Strategic agility: A state of the art introduction to the special section on strategic agility. California management review, 56(3), 5-12.
• Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L. ve Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. National Institutes of Health, 76(6)
• Worley, C. G., Williams, T., ve Lawler, E. E, III. (2014). The agility factor: Building adaptable organizations for superior performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Worley, C. G., Williams, T., ve Lawler, E. E. (2016). Creating management processes built for change. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(1), 77.
• Yusuf, Y. Y., Sarhadi, M., ve Gunasekaran, A. (1999). Agile manufacturing: The drivers, concepts and attributes. International Journal of Production Economics, 62, 33-43.
• Zaheer, A., ve Zaheer, S. (1997). Catching the wave: Alertness, responsiveness, and market influence in global electronic networks. Management science, 43(11), 1493- 1509.
• Zhang, Z., ve Sharifi, H. (2000). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations. international Journal of operations & Production management. (20) 496-512
• Žitkienė, R., ve Deksnys, M. (2018). Organizational agility conceptual model. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14(2), 115-129.