Üniversite İdari Personelinin Psikolojik Sözleşme Algısının İş Doyumlarına Etkisi: Kamu Hizmeti Güdüsünün Aracı Rolü

Yıl 2021, , 175 - 203, 01.04.2021

Tuncer Fidan

https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.569385

Cited By: 1

Öz

Kamu örgütleri yetersiz kaynaklar ile yüksek nitelikte kamu hizmeti üretme baskısı altındaki örgütlerdir. Kamu örgütlerinde çalışma yaşamı bir yandan örgütsel ilişkileri şekillendiren dinamiklerin, diğer yandan da kamu hizmetine ilişkin genel kabul görmüş değerlerin ve inançların etkisi altındadır. Psikolojik sözleşmenin örgütsel ilişkilere ilişkin dinamikleri, kamu hizmeti güdüsünün ise kamu hizmetine ilişkin değerleri ve inançları yansıttığı söylenebilir. Bu araştırmada üniversite idari personelinin psikolojik sözleşme algılarının iş doyumlarına etkisini ve kamu hizmeti güdüsünün bu ilişkideki aracı rolünü sınamak amacıyla yordama deseni kullanılmıştır. Araştırma Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesinde görev yapan 416 memur ve sürekli işçinin katılımıyla yapılmıştır. Veri toplama araçları olarak Psikolojik Sözleşme Ölçeği, Kamu Hizmeti Güdüsü Ölçeği ve İş Doyumu Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre ilişkisel sözleşme eğiliminin iş doyumu üzerinde olumlu bir etkisinin bulunduğu, kamu hizmeti güdüsünün ise anlamlı bir aracı olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuçlara dayalı olarak bir yandan kamu hizmet standartlarının korunmasını sağlayacak diğer yandan da çalışan-örgüt arasındaki ilişkinin, ilişkisel sözleşmenin temel öğelerini kapsayacak düzeyde nitelikli kılınması ve bireysel özellikleri göz ardı eden genel uygulamalar yerine birey odaklı uygulamalara olanak tanıyan insan kaynakları yönetimi politikalarının uygulanması önerilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Üniversite, idari personel, psikolojik sözleşme, kamu hizmeti güdüsü, iş doyumu

The Effect of Psychological Contract Perceptions of University Administrative Personnel on their Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Public Service Motivation

Öz

Public institutions are the organizations that feel the pressure of producing high quality public service with scarce resources. Work life in public organizations is under the influences of the dynamics shaping organizational relationships and widely-accepted values and ideologies regarding public service. It is argued that psychological contract portrays dynamics regarding organizational relationships while public service motivation depicts values and ideologies regarding public service. A prediction design was used to examine the relationship of psychological contract perceptions of university administrative personnel to their job satisfaction and the mediating role of public service motivation in this relationship. A psychological contract scale, a public service motivation scale and a job satisfaction scale were administered to collect data. Consequently, it was found that relational contract orientation had a positive effect on job satisfaction; yet public service motivation was not a significant mediator in this relationship. Based on these results, increasing the quality of employee-organization relationship to enable the protection of public service standards and to cover basic elements of the relational contract and using human resources procedures allowing individual-focused applications instead of general level ones that ignore individual differences was recommended.

Anahtar Kelimeler

University, administrative personnel, psychological contract, public service motivation, job satisfaction

Kaynakça

• Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding organizational behavior. Homewood, IU.: Dorsey Press.
• Aydın, İ., Demirkasımoğlu, N., Demir, T. G., ve Erdemli, Ö. (2017). Kamu hizmeti motivasyonu ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 50(2), 105-126.
• Balcı, A. (1983). İş doyumu ve eğitim yönetimine uygulanması. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 575-586.
• Balcı, A. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma: Yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Beins, B. C. (2017). Research method: A tool for life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, D. C. : Georgetown University Press.
• Brewer, G. A., and Selden, S. C. (1998). Whistle blowers in the federal civil service: New evidence of the public service ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(3), 413-440.
• Bright, L. (2005). Public employees with high levels of public service motivation: Who are they, where are they, and what do they want?. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 25(2), 138-154.
• Bryson, A., Cappellari, L., and Lucifora, C. (2004). Does union membership really reduce job satisfaction?. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42(3), 439-459.
• Callea, A., Urbini, F., Ingusci, E., and Chirumbolo, A. (2016). The relationship between contract type and job satisfaction in a mediated moderation model: The role of job insecurity and psychological contract violation. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 37(2), 399-420.
• Camilleri, E., and Van Der Heijden, B. I. (2007). Organizational commitment, public service motivation, and performance within the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(2), 241-274.
• Chambel, M. J., and Alcover, C. M. (2011). The psychological contract of call-centre workers: Employment conditions, satisfaction and civic virtue behaviours. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 32(1), 115-134.
• Christensen, G. (2009). The psychological contract: Managing and developing professional groups. New York, NY: Open University Press.
• Conway, N., and Briner, R. B. (2009). Fifty years of psychological contract research: What do we know and what are the main challenges. Gerard P. Hodkinson and J. Kevin Ford (Eds.), International Review of İndustrial and Organizational Psychology, Volume 24 (pp. 71-131). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Cooper, C. A., Carpenter, D., Reiner, A., and McCord, D. M. (2014). Personality and job satisfaction: Evidence from a sample of street-level bureaucrats. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(3), 155-162.
• Coyle‐Shapiro, J., and Kessler, I. (2000). Consequences of the psychological contract for the employment relationship: A large scale survey. Journal of Management Studies, 37(7), 903-930.
• Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M., and Kessler, I. (2003). The employment relationship in the uk public sector: A psychological contract perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 213-230.
• De Cooman, R., De Gieter, S., Pepermans, R., and Jegers, M. (2011). A cross-sector comparison of motivation-related concepts in for-profit and not-for-profit service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(2), 296-317.
• Dikili, A., ve Bayraktaroğlu, S. (2013). Psikolojik sözleşme ile iş tatmini ilişkisine yönelik bir araştırma. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 205-222.
• Frederickson, H. G., and Hart, D. K. (1985). The public service and the patriotism of benevolence. Public Administration Review, 45(5), 547-553.
• Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing statistical assumptions. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates Publishing.
• Gomez-Mejia, L. R., and Balkin, D. B. (1984). Faculty satisfaction with pay and other job dimensions under union and nonunion conditions. Academy of Management Journal, 27(3), 591-602.
• Guest, D. E., and Conway, N. (2000). The psychological contract in the public sector: The results of the 2000 CIPD survey of the employment relationship. London: CIPD Publishing.
• Guest, D. E., and Conway, N. (2002). Communicating the psychological contract: An employer perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 12(2), 22-38.
• Hu, L. T., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
• Hulin, C. (1991). Adaptation, persistence, and commitment in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette and L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of ındustrial and organizational psychology (pp. 445-505). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
• Jeffries, F. L., and Reed, R. (2000). Trust and adaptation in relational contracting. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 873-882.
• Judge, T. A., Parker, S., Colbert, A. E., Heller, D., and Ilies, R. (2001). Job satisfaction: A cross-cultural review. In Neil Anderson, Deniz S. Ones, Handan Kepir Sinangil and Chockalingam Viswesvaram (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology 2 (pp. 25-52). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
• Kjeldsen, A. M., and Jacobsen, C. B. (2012). Public service motivation and employment sector: Attraction or socialization?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(4), 899-926.
• Knoke, D., and Wright-Isak, C. (1982). Individual motives and organizational incentive systems. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1(2), 209-254.
• Koç, M. H. (2019). An exploration of career adaptation of teachers: A comparison between public and private school teachers. In Tuncer Fidan (Ed.), Vocational ıdentity and career construction in education (pp. 141-159). IGI Global.
• Kula, S. (2011). Occupational Stress and Work Related Wellbeing Of Turkish National Police (TNP) Members (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Central Florida, Orlando.
• Liu, B., Tang, N., and Zhu, X. (2008). Public service motivation and job satisfaction in china: An investigation of generalisability and instrumentality. International Journal of Manpower, 29(8), 684-699.
• Liu, B., Tang, T. L. P., and Yang, K. (2015). When does public service motivation fuel the job satisfaction fire? The joint moderation of person–organization fit and needs–supplies fit. Public Management Review, 17(6), 876-900.
• Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of ındustrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297–1349). Chicago: Rand McNally.
• McDonald, D. J., and Makin, P. J. (2000). The psychological contract, organisational commitment and job satisfaction of temporary staff. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 21(2), 84-91.
• Maguire, H. (2002). psychological contracts: Are they still relevant?. Career Development International, 7(3), 167-180.
• Millward, L. J., and Hopkins, L. (1998). Psychological contracts, organizational and job commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(16), 1530–1556.
• Mimaroğlu, H. (2008). Psikolojik Sözleşmenin Personelin Tutum ve Davranışlarına Etkileri: Tıbbi Satış Temsilcileri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana.
• Naff, K. C., and Crum, J. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a difference?. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(4), 5-16.
• Overvold, M. C. (1980). Self-interest and the concept of self-sacrifice. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 10(1), 105-118.
• Perry, J. L., and Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367-373.
• Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5-22.
• Perry, J. L. (1997). Antecedents of public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(2), 181-197.
• Perry, J. L., and Vandenabeele, W. (2008). Behavioral dynamic: Institutions, identities, and self regulation. In J. L. Perry ve A. Hondeghem (eds), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 56–79). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Raja, U., Johns, G., and Ntalianis, F. (2004). The ımpact of personality on psychological contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 350-367.
• Ritz, A. (2011). Attraction to public policy‐making: A qualitative ınquiry into ımprovements in psm measurement. Public Administration, 89(3), 1128-1147.
• Rousseau, D. M., and Parks, J. M. (1993). The contracts of ındividuals and organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 15(1), 1-43.
• Rousseau, D. M. (1998). The ‘problem’of the psychological contract considered. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 19(1), 665-671.
• Rousseau, D. M. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 511-541.
• Saavedra, R., and Kwun, S. K. (2000). Affective states in job characteristics theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 21(2), 131-146.
• Simpson, A. V., Clegg, S. R., and Freeder, D. (2013). Compassion, power and organization. Journal of Political Power, 6(3), 385-404.
• Spector, P. E. (1985). Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the job satisfaction survey. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13(6), 693-713.
• Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Needham Height, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Tatsuse, T., and Sekine, M. (2011). Explaining global job satisfaction by facets of job satisfaction: The japanese civil servants study. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 16(2), 133.
• Thomas, D. C., Au, K., and Ravlin, E. C. (2003). Cultural variation and the psychological contract. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24(5), 451-471.
• Voon, M. L., Lo, M. C., Ngui, K. S., and Ayob, N. B. (2011). The ınfluence of leadership styles on employees’ job satisfaction in public sector organizations in Malaysia. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Sciences, 2(1), 24-32.
• Westover, J. H., and Taylor, J. (2010). International differences in job satisfaction: The effects of public service motivation, rewards and work relations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59(8), 811-828.
• Wright, B. E., and Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public service motivation and the assumption of person—organization fit: Testing the mediating effect of value congruence. Administration & Society, 40(5), 502-521.