BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ULUSLARARASI İNSAN HAKLARI HUKUKU VE DİPLOMATİK HİMAYE HAKKI

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 57 Sayı: 4, 219 - 236, 01.12.2008
https://doi.org/10.1501/Hukfak_0000001553

Öz

İnsan haklarının uluslararası korunmasının gelişiminin, diplomatik himaye kurumunun işlevselliği ve temel kuralları üzerindeki etkileri, son yıllarda yoğun bir tartışma konusu haline gelmiştir. Bu alanda geleneksel anlayışın ifade ettiği düşüncelerin aksine, diplomatik himaye mekanizması ile insan hakları mekanizmalarının birbirini destekleyen ve karşılıklı etkileşim içinde olan mekanizmalar olduğu artık geniş ölçüde kabul edilmektedir. Böylece bir yandan, diplomatik himaye insan hakları alanında koruyucu bir rol üstlenirken, diğer yandan da insan hakları hukuku diplomatik himayenin niteliğini ve kullanım koşullarını etkilemektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, diplomatik himaye ile insan hakları arasındaki etkileşimin niteliğine ve boyutlarına ışık tutmaktır

Kaynakça

  • Condorelli, L.(2003), “L’evolution du champ d’ application de la protection diplomatique”, in La Protection Diplomatique, (dir.J.F.Flauss), Bruylant, 2003, s.3.
  • Ress, G.(2003), “La pratique allemande de la protection diplomatique”, in La Protection diplomatique, Bruylant, 2003, s.121.
  • Ridruejo, J.P. (2003), “ La pratique espagnole de la protection diplomatique”, in La Protection diplomatique, Bruylant, 2003, s.109.
  • Flauss, J.F (2003), Vers un aggiornamento des conditions d’exercice de la protection diplomatique”, in La Protection diplomatique, Bruylant, 2003, s.29.
  • Caflish, L. (2003), “La pratique suisse de la protection diplomatique”, in La Protection diplomatique, Bruylant, 2003, s.73.
  • Malenovsky, J.(2003), “La pratique de la protection diplomatique dans les P.E.C.O”, in La Protection diplomatique, Bruylant, 2003, s.93.
  • Dugard, J.(2000), Premier rapport sur la protection diplomatique AGNU, Document. A/CN.4/506 (7 mars 2000).
  • Rapport de la Commission du droit international, cinquante-troisiéme session, 23 avril-1’er juin et 2 julliet-10 aout 2001, doc.A/56/10 s.252.
  • Thierry, H (1990), L’ evolution du droit international public, RCADI, , 1990, t.III , S.105.
  • Condorelli, L. (1995), droit international public, Geneve, 1995.
  • Reiterer, M. (1985), “The Protection of Refugees by the State of Asylum”, Braumüller, Wien, 1985.
  • Orrega- Vacuna, F. (2000), “Interim report on The Changing Law of Nationality of claims”, International Law Association, London Conference 2000, s.631.
  • Bouony, L. (1997), “Regard sur la commission d’indemnisation des Nations- Unies”, AFDI, 1997, s.116.
  • Chappez, J. (1995), “La protection diplomatique”, Jurisclausseur de droit international, 1995, Fasc. 250.
  • Wyler, E. (1990), La regle dite de la continuite de nationalite dans le contentieux internaional, PUF, Paris, 1990.
  • Dugard, J. (2000), Premier rapport sur la protection diplomatique Additif, Doc. A/CN.4/506/Add.1.
  • Bennouna, M.(1998). “La protection diplomatique, droit de l’Etat Liber Amicorum, Boutros-Ghali, Bruylant 1998, s.245.
  • Pellet, a. (2001), “Droits-de l’hommisme et droit international”, droits fondamentaux (Rev. Electronique), Juillet-Decembre 2001, No:1.
  • Carreau, D.(2001), droit international Public, Pedone, Paris, 2001.
  • Flauss, J.F. (2004), “Contentieux europeen des droits de l’homme et protection diplomatique”, Melanges G.Cohen-Jonathan, Bruylant, 2004, s.813.
  • Cohen-Jonathan, G (2000), “La territorialisation de la Convention europeenne des droits de l’homme”, RTDH, 2002, s.1069.
  • Projet d’articles sur la protection diplomatique adopté par la C.D.I, A.G., doc.off., 59’eme ses., 2004, A/59/10.

International Human Rights Law and Diplomatic Protection

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 57 Sayı: 4, 219 - 236, 01.12.2008
https://doi.org/10.1501/Hukfak_0000001553

Öz

The development of the safeguarding of international human rights and the functioning of the institution of diplomatic protection and their effects on fundamental rules, has become an issue of contention in recent years. It is now widely accepted that the mechanisms of diplomatic protection and human rights support and mutually affect each other, contrary to the traditional views held in this field. While undertaking the protection of human rights on one hand, on the other it is affecting the characteristics of diplomatic protection and the rules of its use. The aim of this work is to highlight the characteristics and dimensions of the interaction between diplomatic protection and human rights

Kaynakça

  • Condorelli, L.(2003), “L’evolution du champ d’ application de la protection diplomatique”, in La Protection Diplomatique, (dir.J.F.Flauss), Bruylant, 2003, s.3.
  • Ress, G.(2003), “La pratique allemande de la protection diplomatique”, in La Protection diplomatique, Bruylant, 2003, s.121.
  • Ridruejo, J.P. (2003), “ La pratique espagnole de la protection diplomatique”, in La Protection diplomatique, Bruylant, 2003, s.109.
  • Flauss, J.F (2003), Vers un aggiornamento des conditions d’exercice de la protection diplomatique”, in La Protection diplomatique, Bruylant, 2003, s.29.
  • Caflish, L. (2003), “La pratique suisse de la protection diplomatique”, in La Protection diplomatique, Bruylant, 2003, s.73.
  • Malenovsky, J.(2003), “La pratique de la protection diplomatique dans les P.E.C.O”, in La Protection diplomatique, Bruylant, 2003, s.93.
  • Dugard, J.(2000), Premier rapport sur la protection diplomatique AGNU, Document. A/CN.4/506 (7 mars 2000).
  • Rapport de la Commission du droit international, cinquante-troisiéme session, 23 avril-1’er juin et 2 julliet-10 aout 2001, doc.A/56/10 s.252.
  • Thierry, H (1990), L’ evolution du droit international public, RCADI, , 1990, t.III , S.105.
  • Condorelli, L. (1995), droit international public, Geneve, 1995.
  • Reiterer, M. (1985), “The Protection of Refugees by the State of Asylum”, Braumüller, Wien, 1985.
  • Orrega- Vacuna, F. (2000), “Interim report on The Changing Law of Nationality of claims”, International Law Association, London Conference 2000, s.631.
  • Bouony, L. (1997), “Regard sur la commission d’indemnisation des Nations- Unies”, AFDI, 1997, s.116.
  • Chappez, J. (1995), “La protection diplomatique”, Jurisclausseur de droit international, 1995, Fasc. 250.
  • Wyler, E. (1990), La regle dite de la continuite de nationalite dans le contentieux internaional, PUF, Paris, 1990.
  • Dugard, J. (2000), Premier rapport sur la protection diplomatique Additif, Doc. A/CN.4/506/Add.1.
  • Bennouna, M.(1998). “La protection diplomatique, droit de l’Etat Liber Amicorum, Boutros-Ghali, Bruylant 1998, s.245.
  • Pellet, a. (2001), “Droits-de l’hommisme et droit international”, droits fondamentaux (Rev. Electronique), Juillet-Decembre 2001, No:1.
  • Carreau, D.(2001), droit international Public, Pedone, Paris, 2001.
  • Flauss, J.F. (2004), “Contentieux europeen des droits de l’homme et protection diplomatique”, Melanges G.Cohen-Jonathan, Bruylant, 2004, s.813.
  • Cohen-Jonathan, G (2000), “La territorialisation de la Convention europeenne des droits de l’homme”, RTDH, 2002, s.1069.
  • Projet d’articles sur la protection diplomatique adopté par la C.D.I, A.G., doc.off., 59’eme ses., 2004, A/59/10.
Toplam 22 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA72HE45UY
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Mahmut Göçer Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2008
Gönderilme Tarihi 1 Aralık 2008
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2008 Cilt: 57 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

Chicago Göçer, Mahmut. “ULUSLARARASI İNSAN HAKLARI HUKUKU VE DİPLOMATİK HİMAYE HAKKI”. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 57, sy. 4 (Aralık 2008): 219-36. https://doi.org/10.1501/Hukfak_0000001553.
.