İlahi buyruk teorisi

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 53 Sayı: 2, 199 - 210, 01.08.2012

John E. Hare Terkan Fehrullah Çev:

https://doi.org/10.1501/Ilhfak_0000001371

Cited By: 2

Öz

kaynaklanır. O, Anselm’den iradenin iki temel temayülü olduğu teorisini alır, ki Anselm bunları “faydaya yönelik temayül” (affection for advantage) ve “adalete yönelik temayül” (affection for justice) olarak adlandırmaktadır. Fayda temayülü, eylemi yapan kişinin kendi mutluluğu ve kemaline yönelik dürtüdür. Adalet temayülü, eylemi yapan kişiden bağımsız olarak, kendi içinde iyi olan şeye yönelik dürtüdür. Hepimizin bu iki tür istekleri de vardır ve bunun yanlış olan bir yanı yoktur. Cennette bile bu iki

Kaynakça

• Adams, Robert M. Finite and Infinite Goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
• Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae. İng. Terc. English Dominicans. London: Burns, Oates, ve Washbourne,1912-36.
• Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. İng.Terc. Roger Crisp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
• el-Eş arī. Kitāb al-Luma . İng. Terc. Richard McCarthy, The Theology of Al-Ash arī (Beyrouth: Impremerie Catholique, 1953) içinde.
• Evans, C. Stephen. Kierkegaard’s Ethic of Love. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
• Hare, John. Plato’s Euthyphro. Bryn Mawr, PA: Bryn Mawr Commentaries, 1985.
• -------. God’s Call. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2001.
• -------. God and Morality. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.
• Kant, Immanuel. “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals and Critique of Practical Reason,” Mary J. Gregor (terc. ve ed.), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996) içinde.
• -------. “Religion within the Bounds of Mere Reason,” Allen Wood and George di Giovanni (terc. ve ed.), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Religion and Rational Theology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996) içinde.
• Kierkegaard, Sİren. Works of Love. İng. terc. ve ed., Howard V. Hong ve Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.
• Korsgaard, Christine. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
• Maimonides, Moses. The Guide for the Perplexed. İng. terc. M. Friedländer. New York: Dover Publications, 1956.
• Quinn, Philip. Divine Commands and Moral Requirements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.
• Plato. “Euthyphro,” Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns (ed.), Collected Dialogues (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963) içinde.
• Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
• -------. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
• Scotus, John Duns. Duns Scotus on the Will and Morality, ed. ve terc. Allan B. Wolter, Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1986.
• Wainwright, William. Religion and Morality. Aldershott, HANTS: Ashgate, 2005.
• Zagzebski, Linda Trinkaus. Divine Motivation Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
• Önerilen Okumalar (yukarıdakilere ilaveten)
• Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.
• Hare, John. The Moral Gap. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
• Hourani, G. F. Reason and Tradition in Islamic Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
• Irwin, Terence. The Development of Ethics, c.1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
• Murphy, Mark C. An Essay on Divine Authority. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002.
• O’Donovan, Oliver. Resurrection and Moral Order. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1994.
• Porter, Jean. Nature as Reason. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005.
• Spero, Shubert. Morality, Halakha and the Jewish Tradition. New York: Ktav, 1983.