Cohort Effect on Food Away From Home in Turkey: A Double Hurdle Approach

Öz

The objective of this study is to examine age, cohort and year effects on food away from home (FAFH) expenditure of Turkish households, employing double hurdle approach for the period of 2002-2005. Results show that both the decision to participate in FAFH market and the actual FAFH expenditure of Turkish households change according to cohort, age and time. It is determined that the households with younger household heads have higher probability to participate in the FAFH market than the households with older household heads. Cohort effects for younger generations, on the other hand, are positive and significant in FAFH market participation while they have significant but negative effect on FAFH expenditures. Cohort effects for probability of market participation of FAFH for older generations are found to be positive but statistically insignificant. The findings also indicate that year effects play a positive role in FAFH market participation and FAFH expenditures. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Food away from home,cohort effect,double hurdle,Turkey

Türkiye’de Ev Dışı Gıda Tüketiminde Kuşak Etkisi: Double Hurdle Yaklaşımı

Öz

Bu çalışmada 2002-2005 dönemi için Türkiye’de hanehalkı ev dışı gıda tüketimi üzerinde yaş, kuşak ve yıl etkileri ayrıştırılarak Double Hurdle modeli ile incelenmiştir. Türkiye’de hanehalkı ev dışı gıda tüketimi için hem pazara katılım kararının ve hem de ev dışı gıda harcama kararının yaş, kuşak ve yıla bağlı olarak değiştiği saptanmıştır. Türkiye’de hanehalkı reisinin genç olduğu hanelerin, hanehalkı reisinin yaşlı olduğu hanelere göre ev dışı gıda tüketimi için piyasaya katılım olasılıklarının daha yüksek olduğunu belirlenmiştir. Bununla birlikte, kuşak etkisi ev dışı gıda tüketimi için pazara katılım olasılığı üzerinde genç kuşaklar için istatistiki olarak anlamlı ve pozitif etkili, ev dışı gıda harcaması eşitliğinde ise istatistiki olarak anlamlı olmakla birlikte negatif etkili olduğu görülmüştür. Yaşlı kuşaklar için ev dışı gıda tüketimine katılım olasılığı pozitif işaretli olmakla birlikte istatistiki olarak anlamsız bulunmuştur. Son olarak, yıllara bağlı olarak Türkiye’de hanehalkı ev dışı gıda tüketim piyasasına katılım ve tüketim düzeyi kararları pozitif yönde etkilenmektedir.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ev dışı gıda tüketimi,kuşak etkisi,çift eşik modeli,Türkiye

Kaynakça

1. Akbay, C., Boz, I. (2005) Economic analysis of food at home and food away from home consumption and consumer behavior in Kahramanmaras, KSU Journal of Science and Engineering, 8 (1), 122-131.
2. Amemiya, T. (1984) Tobit models: a survey, Journal of Econometrics. 3-61.
3. Angulo, A. M., Gil, J. M., Mur, J. (2007) Spanish demand for food away from home: analysis of panel data, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58.2: 289-307.
4. Arabmazar, A., Schmidt, P. (1981) Further evidence on the robustness of the Tobit estimator to heteroscedasticity, Journal of Econometrics,17(2), 253-258.
5. Aristei, D., Perali, F., Pieroni, L. (2008) Cohort, age and time effects in alcohol consumption by Italian households: a double-hurdle approach, Empirical Economics, 35.1: 29-61.
6. Bai, J., Wahl, T. I., Lohmar, B. T., Huang, J. (2010) Food away from home in Beijing: effects of wealth, time and free meals, China Economic Review, 462-471.
7. Blisard, N. (2001) Income and food expenditures decomposed by cohort, age, and time effects. USDA.
8. Bozoğlu, M., Bilgiç, A., Yen, S. T., & Huang, C. L. (2013) Household food expenditure at home and away from home in Turkey, In Selected paper prepared for presentation at the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (AAEA) and CAES joint Annual Meeting. Washington DC.

9. Browning, M., Deaton, A., Irish, M. (1985) A profitable approach to labor supply and commodity demands over the life-cycle. Econometrica: journal of the econometric society, 503-543.
10. Byrne, P. J., Capps, O., Saha A. (1996) Analysis of food-away-from-home expenditure patterns for U.S households, 1982-89. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 614-627.
11. Cragg, J. G. (1971) Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods, Econometrica, 829-844.
12. Deaton, A., Irish, M. (1984) Statistical models for zero expenditure in household budgets, Journal of Public Economics, 59-80.
13. Deaton, A. (1985) Panel data from time series of cross-sections, Journal of Econometrics, 109-126.
14. Deaton, A., Paxson, C. (1994) Intertemporal choice and inequality, Journal of Political Economy, 102, 437-467.
15. Deaton, A. (1997) The analysis of household surveys: a microeconometric approach to development policy, World Bank Publications.
16. Drescher, L. S., Roosen, J. (2010) An analysis of the retirement-consumption Puzzle for food-at-home and away-from-home expenditures in Germany. In contributed paper, 1st Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar “The Economics of Food, Food Choice and Health”.
17. Gardes, F., Duncan, G. J., Gaubert, P., Gurgand, M., Starzec, C. (2005) Panel and pseudo-panel estimation of cross-sectional time series elasticities of food consumption: The case of American and Polis Data, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 242-253.
18. Godfrey, L. (1978) Testing against general autoregressive and moving average error models when the repressors include lagged dependent variables, Econometrica, 46, 1293-1302
19. Harris, J. M., Blisard, N. (2000) Decomposing red meat, poultry and fish expenditures into age, time, and cohort effects. In 2000 Annual meeting, 30 July-August 2, Tampa, FL (No.21805). American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
20. Jensen, H. H., Yen, S. T. (1996) Food expenditures away from home by type of meal, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67-80.
21. Kinsey, J., Wendt, M. (2007) Do eating patterns follow a cohort or change over a lifetime? answers emerging from the literature. Working Paper 2007-01. The Food Industry Center, University of Minnesota.
22. Maddala, G. S. (1983) Limited and qualitative dependent variables in Econometrics. Econometric Society Monographs, 3.
23. Mutlu, S., Gracia, A. (2006) Spanish food expenditure away from home (FAFH): by type of meal, Applied Economics, 1037-1047.
24. Norum, P. S. (2003) Examination of generational differences in household apparel expenditures. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 32(1), 52-75.
25. Prochaska, F. J., Schrimper, R. A. (1973) Opportunity cost of time and other socioeconomic effects on away from home, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 595-603.
26. Stewart, H., & Blisard, N. (2008) Are younger cohorts demanding less fresh vegetables? Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 30(1), 43-60.
27. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/MicroVeri/GYKA_2011/english/meta-data /concept/equivalence-scale/index.html.
28. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/MicroVeri/GYKA_2011/english/meta-data /concept/equivalence-scale/index.html.
29. Tobin, J. (1958) Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables, Econometrica, 24-36
30. Wang, H., Mok, C. F. J., Fox, J. (1995) Food expenditure patterns of elderly consumers: a question of time allocation, Family Economics and Resource Management Biennial.
31. Uzunoz, M., Akçay, Y., Aslan, C. (2011) Factors affecting consumer preferences of food away from home in Tokat Province of Turkey, Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 17(5), 597-605.
32. Yen, S. T., Su, S. J. (1995) Modeling U.S. butter consumption with zero observations, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 47-55.
33. Zan, H. U. A., Fan, J. X. (2010) Cohort effects of household expenditures on food away from home. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44(1), 213-233.