Socialization Spaces in Students' Eyes: The Key to Sense of Belonging and Psychological Well-Being

Öz

This research aims to examine whether students’ satisfaction with socialization areas at universities would be related to an increased sense of belonging to their units (faculties) and greater psychological well-being. Present study hypothesized that high levels of satisfaction with socialization spaces would predict increased sense of belonging, which would in turn enhance psychological well-being. 549 university students (Mage = 21. 20, SDage = 3.32) completed an online survey where they rated their satisfaction with socialization spaces in their units and completed the scales of sense of belonging and psychological well-being. There was no direct relationship between satisfaction with socialization spaces and psychological well-being. However, students’ satisfaction with socialization spaces indirectly predicted higher levels of psychological well-being through increased sense of belonging. These results remained significant after controlling for students’ age, gender, and class. Although this study is based on a single large university sample, it emphasizes that the findings can provide important discussion points for both academics and practitioners.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Socialization Spaces
• Satisfaction with Social Spaces
• Sense of Belonging
• Psychological Well-Being

Öğrencilerin Gözünden Sosyalleşme Alanları: Aidiyet Hissi ve Psikolojik İyi Oluşun Anahtarı

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, üniversitelerdeki sosyalleşme alanlarından duyulan memnuniyetin, öğrencilerin kendi birimlerine (fakültelerine) olan aidiyet hissi ve psikolojik iyi oluşları ile ilişkilerini araştırmaktır. Öğrencilerin, birimlerindeki sosyalleşme alanlarından yüksek düzeyde memnuniyet duymalarının daha yüksek düzeyde aidiyet hissiyle ilişkili olması ve böylece daha yüksek psikolojik iyi oluş skorları raporlaması beklenmektedir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, 549 üniversite öğrencisi (Ortyaş = 21.20, SSyaş = 3.32) çevrimiçi bir ölçek çalışmasına katılmıştır. Katılımcılar, kendi birimlerindeki sosyalleşme alanlarından duydukları memnuniyeti değerlendirmiş ve ayrıca aidiyet hissi ve psikolojik iyi oluşlarını ölçen ölçekleri doldurmuştur. Sosyalleşme alanlarından duyulan memnuniyet ile psikolojik iyi oluş arasında doğrudan bir ilişki gözlenmemiştir. Ancak öğrencilerin sosyalleşme alanlarından duydukları memnuniyet, kendi birimlerine olan aidiyet hissini artırma yoluyla dolaylı olarak daha yüksek psikolojik iyi oluş düzeylerini yordamıştır. Bu sonuçlar öğrencilerin yaşları, cinsiyetleri, sınıf düzeyleri kontrol edildikten sonra da anlamlılığını korumuştur. Bu çalışma, tek bir büyük üniversite örneğine dayanmasına rağmen, bulguların hem akademisyenler hem de uygulamacılar için önemli tartışma konuları sunabileceğini vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sosyalleşme Alanları
• Sosyal Alan Memnuniyeti
• Aidiyet Hissi
• Psikolojik İyi Oluş

Kaynakça

1. Adachi, M., Rohde, C. ve Kendle, A. (2000). Effects of floral and foliage displays on human emotions. Horttechnology, 10(1), 59-63. https://doi.org/10.21273/horttech.10.1.59
2. Ahn, M. Y. ve Davis, H. H. (2020). Four domains of students’ sense of belonging to university, Studies in Higher Education, 45(3), 622-634. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1564902
3. Al Ansari, A. I. (2022). Designing student lounge at university: Fostering place attachment, socialization, and restoration. Journal of Arts & Applied Sciences, 9(2), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.21608/maut.2022.245059
4. Alsubaie, M. M., Stain, H. J., Webster, L. A. D. ve Wadman, R. (2019). The role of sources of social support on depression and quality of life for university students. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 24(4), 484-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1568887
5. Asante, K. (2012). Social support and the psychological wellbeing of people living with HIV/AIDS in Ghana. African Journal of Psychiatry, 15(5), 340-345. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajpsy.v15i5.42
6. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
7. Aydın, A., Kahraman, N. ve Hiçdurmaz, D. (2017). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin algılanan sosyal destek ve psikolojik iyi olma düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, 8(1), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.14744/phd.2017.95967
8. Ballantine, J. H. ve Hammack, F. M. (2009). The sociology of education: A systematic analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

9. Baumeister, R. F. ve Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
10. Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74(3), 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024835
11. Bernstein, B. (2003). Class code and control: Towards a theory of educational transmissions (Vol. 3). London: Routledge.
12. Billig, M. (2006). Is my home my castle? Place attachment, risk perception, and religious faith. Environment and Behavior, 38(2), 248-265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505277608
13. Caligiuri, P., DuBois, C. L., Lundby, K. ve Sinclair, E. A. (2020). Fostering international students’ sense of belonging and perceived social support through a semester-long experiential activity. Research in Comparative and International Education, 15(4), 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499920954311
14. Capone, V., Caso, D., Donizzetti, A. R. ve Procentese, F. (2020). University student mental well-being during COVID-19 outbreak: What are the relationships between information seeking, perceived risk and personal resources related to the academic context?. Sustainability, 12(17), 7039. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177039
15. Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G. ve Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045-1060. https://doi.org/doi:10.1037/a0016239
16. Chua, A. (2002). The influence of social interaction on knowledge creation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(4), 375-392. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930210448297
17. Cobo-Rendón, R., López-Angulo, Y., Pérez-Villalobos, M. V. ve Díaz-Mujica, A. (2020). Perceived social support and its effects on changes in the affective and eudaimonic well-being of Chilean university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 590513. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.590513
18. Cohen, D. ve Prusak, L. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
19. Cohen, S. E. ve Syme, S. I. (1985). Social support and health. London: Academic Press.
20. Collado S., Staats H., Corraliza J.A., Hartig T. (2017) Restorative environments and health. G. Fleury-Bahi, E. Pol ve O. Navarro (Ed.), Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research. International handbooks of quality-of life içinde (s. 127-148). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31416- 7_7
21. Cotterell, J. (1996). Social networks and social influences in adolescence. London: Routledge.
22. Coulson, J., Roberts, P. ve Taylor, I. (2022). University trends: Contemporary campus design. New York: Routledge.
23. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G. ve Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 ve 4), 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
24. Demir, Y. ve Kutlu, M. (2016). Üniversite öğrencilerinde sosyal etkileşim kaygısı ile mutluluk arasındaki ilişki: yalnızlığın aracı rolü. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(1), 195-210. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gefad/issue/29791/320344#article_cite
25. Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and education. The Educational Forum, 50(3), 241-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131728609335764
26. Dixon, J. ve Durrheim, K. (2004). Dislocating identity: Desegregation and the transformation of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 455-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.09.004.
27. Doğru, N. (2018). Üniversite öğrencilerinin psikolojik iyi oluş düzeylerinin stres, stresle başa çıkma tarzları ve sosyal destek değişkenleri bakımından incelenmesi (Doktora tezi), Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
28. Dost, G. ve Mazzoli Smith, L. (2023). Understanding higher education students’ sense of belonging: A qualitative meta-ethnographic analysis. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(6), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2023.2191176
29. Düzenli, T., Mumcu, S. ve Akyol, D. (2017). Üniversite kampüsü açık mekânlarının gençler tarafından kullanım amaçlarının belirlenmesi. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(49), 766-772. Erişim adresi: https://www.sosyalarastirmalar.com/articles/determining-the-usage-purposes-of-university-campus-open-spaces-by-youth.pdf
30. Edwards, A. L. ve Klockars, A. J. (1981). Significant others and self-evaluation: Relationships between perceived and actual evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(2), 244-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728172010
31. Erbil, Y. ve Sezer, F. S. (2016). User satisfaction of environmental quality in university buildings. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(3), 476-488. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2016.v5n3p476
32. Ellemers, N., Spears, R. and Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 161-186. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228.
33. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. ve Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
34. Finlay, J., Esposito, M., Kim, M. H., Gomez-Lopez, I. ve Clarke, P. (2019). Closure of ‘third places’? Exploring potential consequences for collective health and wellbeing. Health &Place, 60, 102225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102225
35. Fisher, K. E., Landry, C. F. ve Naumer, C. (2007). Social spaces, casual interactions, meaningful exchanges: 'information ground' characteristics based on the college student experience. Information Research, 12(2), 0-0. Erişim adresi: https://informationr.net/ir/12-2/paper291.html
36. Furrer, C. ve Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148
37. Gibbons, F. X. ve Gerrard, M. (1995). Predicting young adults' health risk behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(3), 505-517. https://doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.505
38. Girang, B. C., Chu, D. P., Endrinal, M. I. ve Canoy, N. (2022). Spatializing psychological well-being: A photovoice approach on the experience of stress alleviation among university students. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 19(2), 539-564. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1716424
39. Good, C., Rattan, A. ve Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700-717. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026659
40. Goodnow, C. (1992). Strengthening the links between educational psychology and the study of social contexts. Educational Psychologist, 27(2), 177-196. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2702_4
41. Graupensperger, S., Panza, M. J., Budziszewski, R. ve Evans, M. B. (2020). Growing into “Us”: Trajectories of social identification with college sport teams predict subjective well ‐ being. Applied Psychology: Health and Well ‐ Being, 12(3), 787-807. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12207
42. Greenaway, K. H., Cruwys, T., Haslam, S. A. ve Jetten, J. (2016). Social identities promote well‐being because they satisfy global psychological needs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(3), 294-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2169
43. Gunty, A. L., Frazier, P. A., Tennen, H., Tomich, P., Tashiro, T. ve Park, C. (2011). Moderators of the relation between perceived and actual posttraumatic growth. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 3(1), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020485
44. Hanan, H. (2013). Open space as meaningful place for students in ITB campus. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 85(2013), 308-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.361
45. Haslam, C., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., Cruwys, T. ve Steffens, N. K. (2021). Life change, social identity, and health. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 635-661. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-060120-111721
46. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
47. Helliwell, J. F. ve Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well–being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1435-1446. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1522
48. Hidalgo, M. C. ve Hernandez, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 273-281. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0221
49. Hurst, B., Wallace, R. R. ve Nixon, S. B. (2013). The impact of social interaction on student learning. Reading Horizons, 52(4), 375-398. doi ya erişim adresi eksik.
50. Hopkins, N. ve Dixon, J. (2006). Space, place, and identity: Issues for political psychology. Political Psychology, 27(2), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00001.x.
51. İraz, R., Arıbaş, A. N. ve Özşahin, F. (2021). Algılanan sosyal destek ve psikolojik iyi oluş ilişkisi: Üniversite öğrencileri örneği. Stratejik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(2), 363-376. https://doi.org/10.30692/sisad.930302
52. Jetten, J., Haslam, C., Haslam, S. A. ve Branscombe, N.R. (2009). The social cure. Scientific American Mind, 20(5), 26-33. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/scientificamericanmind0909-26 Jetten, J., Haslam, C. ve Haslam, S. A. (Eds.). (2012). The social cure: Identity, health and well-being. Psychology Press.
53. Joing, I., Vors, O. ve Potdevin, F. (2020). The subjective well-being of students in different parts of the school premises in French middle schools. Child Indicators Research, 13, 1469-1487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-019-09714-7
54. Junker, N. M., van Dick, R., Avanzi, L., Häusser, J. A. ve Mojzisch, A. (2019). Exploring the mechanisms underlying the social identity–ill‐health link: Longitudinal and experimental evidence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(4), 991-1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12308
55. Kärnä, S. ve Julin, P. (2015). A framework for measuring student and staff satisfaction with university campus facilities. Quality Assurance in Education, 23(1), 47-66. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-10-2013-0041
56. Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D. ve Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007-1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
57. Kohlberg, L. (1971). Stages of moral development. Moral Education, 1(51), 23-92. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442656758-004
58. Kroenke, C. H., Quesenberry, C., Kwan, M. L., Sweeney, C., Castillo, A. ve Caan, B. J. (2013). Social networks, social support, and burden in relationships, and mortality after breast cancer diagnosis in the Life After Breast Cancer Epidemiology (LACE) study. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 137(1), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2253-8
59. Kurtoğlu, A. (2010). Kampüs tasarımında eylem yönlendiricisi ile sosyal etkileşimin değerlendirilmesi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
60. Levendosky, A., Bogat, G., Theran, S., Trotter, J., Eye, A. ve Davidson, W. (2004). The social networks of women experiencing domestic violence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34(1-2), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:ajcp.0000040149.58847.10
61. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001
62. Linton, M. J., Dieppe, P. ve Medina-Lara, A. (2016). Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time. BMJ open, 6(7), e010641.
63. Littleton, K. (2011). Social interaction and learning. S. Järvelä (Ed.), Social and emotional aspects of learning (s.149-155) içinde. Oxford: Elsevier.
64. Manzo, L. C. (2003). Beyond house and haven: Toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00074-9,
65. Markus, H. R. ve Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
66. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
67. Matthews, K. E., Andrews, V. ve Adams, P. (2011). Social learning spaces and student engagement. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(2), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.512629
68. McLaughlin, P. ve Faulkner, J. (2012). Flexible spaces[…]what students expect from university facilities. Journal of Facilities Management, 10(2), 140-149. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961211218776
69. Minam, H. ve Tanaka, K. (1995). Social and environmental psychology: Transaction between physical space and group-dynamic processes. Environment and Behavior, 27(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659502700104
70. Morton, T. A., van der Bles, A. M. ve Haslam, S. A. (2017). Seeing our self reflected in the world around us: The role of identity in making (natural) environments restorative. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 49, 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.11.002
71. Muhammad, S., Sapri, M. ve Sipan, I. (2014). Academic buildings and their influence on students’ wellbeing in higher education institutions. Social Indicators Research, 115, 1159-1178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0262-6
72. Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M. ve Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18(10), 879-885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x
73. Negm, H., Taha, D. S. ve Saadallah, D. M. (2020). The effect of the physical environment on social interaction: The case of educational campuses. Proceedings of REAL CORP 2020, 25th International Conference on Urban Development, Regional Planning and Information Society içinde (s. 847-857). Aachen: RWTH Publications.
74. Neuman, D. J. (2013). Building type basics for college and university facilities (Vol. 22). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
75. Nosek, B., Banaji, M. ve Greenwald, A. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.44
76. Oyanedel, J.C. ve Paez, D. (2021). Social belongingness and well-being: International perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.735507.
77. Oyserman, D., Brickman, D., Bybee, D. ve Celious, A. (2006). Fitting in matters. Psychological Science, 17(10), 854–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01794.x
78. Pascarella, E. T. ve Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
79. Paulhus, D. L. ve Vazire, S. (2007). The self-report method. R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley ve R. F. Krueger (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in personality içinde (s. 224-239). London, England: Guilford.
80. Peatross, F. D. ve Peponis, J. (1995). Space, education, and socialization. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 12(4), 366-385. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43029178
81. Pettigrew, K.E. (1999). Waiting for chiropody: contextual results from an ethnographic study of the information behavior among attendees at community clinics. Information Processing & Management, 3(6), 801-817. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00027-8
82. Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K. ve Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-8
83. Ribak-Rosenthal, N. ve Russell, T. T. (1994). Dealing with religious differences in december: a school counselor’s role. Elementary School Guidance & Counseling, 28(4), 295-301. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42871131
84. Rollero, C. ve De Piccoli, N. (2010). Does place attachment affect social well-being?. European Review of Applied Psychology, 60(4), 233-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2010.05.00
85. Ross, C. M. (1992). A study of academic and social integration in predicting student persistence at a residential, two-year college (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). The Florida State University, USA.
86. Ryan, R. M. ve Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
87. Ryan, R. M. ve Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
88. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.57.6.1069
89. Ryff, C. D. ve Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719-727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
90. Schwarzer, R. ve Knoll, N. (2007). Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview. International Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590701396641
91. Shumaker, S. A. ve Brownell, A. (1984). Toward a theory of social support: Closing conceptual gaps. Journal of Social Issues, 40(4), 11-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1984.tb01105.x
92. Sun, J., Harris, K. ve Vazire, S. (2020). Is well-being associated with the quantity and quality of social interactions?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(6), 1478-1496. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000272
93. Steadman, C. ve de Jong, A. (2022). Atmospheres of belonging? Exploring ambient power through Manchester’s craft beer festivals. A. Smith, G. Osborn ve B. Quinn (Ed.), Festivals and the city içinde (s. 111-128). London: University of Westminster Press.
94. Steffens, N. K., Jetten, J., Haslam, C., Cruwys, T. ve Haslam, S. A. (2016). Multiple social identities enhance health post-retirement because they are a basis for giving social support. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1519, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01519
95. Şahin, G. N. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinin kendini açma, öznel iyi oluş ve algıladıkları sosyal destek düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.
96. Tajfel, H. ve Turner, J.C. (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. S. Worchel ve W.G. Austin (Ed.), Psychology of intergroup relation içinde (s. 7-24). Chicago: Hall Publishers.
97. Temple, P. (2008). Learning spaces in higher education: an under-researched topic. London Review of Education, 6(3), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460802489363
98. Thompson, M., Kaslow, N., Kingree, J., Rashid, A., Puett, R., Jacobs, D. ve Matthews, A. (2000). Partner violence, social support, and distress among inner-city African American women. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(1), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005198514704
99. Tinto, V., Russo, P. ve Kadel, S. (1994). Constructing educational communities: Increasing retention in challenging circumstances. Community College Journal, 64(4), 26-29. Erişim adresi: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ478131
100. Van Horn, E. J. (2019). The design of happiness: Redesigning interior spaces to improve user health and wellness (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). University of Alberta, Alberta.
101. Vaske, J. J. ve Kobrin, K. C. (2001). Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), 16-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960109598658
102. Walton, G. M. ve Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, gender, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 82-96. doi:10.1037/e633962013-253
103. Walton, G. M. ve Cohen, G. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447-1451. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198364
104. Walton, G. M., Logel, C., Peach, J. M., Spencer, S. J. ve Zanna, M. P. (2015). Two brief interventions to mitigate a “chilly climate” transform women’s experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 468-485. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037461
105. Walton, G. M., Cohen, G. L., Cwir, D. ve Spencer, S. J. (2012). Mere belonging: The power of social connections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 513-532. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025731 Weidman, J. C. (1979). Nonintellective undergraduate socialization in academic departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 50(1), 48-62. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981355
106. Wilcox, P., Winn, S. ve FyvieGauld, M. (2005). It was nothing to do with the university, it was just the people: the role of social support in the first-year experience of higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 30(6), 707-722. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500340036
107. Wing Yan Man, T. ve Wai Mui Yu, C. (2007). Social interaction and adolescent's learning in enterprise education: An empirical study. Education+Training, 49(8/9), 620-633. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910710834058
108. Wortman, P. M. ve Napoli, A. R. (1996). A meta-analysis of the impact of academic and social integration of persistence of community college students. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 4(1), 5-21. Erişim adresi: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ561571
109. Ybarra, O., Winkielman, P., Yeh, I., Burnstein, E. ve Kavanagh, L. (2011). Friends (and sometimes enemies) with cognitive benefits: What types of social interactions boost executive functioning?. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(3), 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610386808
110. Yilmaz, C., Selcuk, E., Gunaydin, G., Cingöz-Ulu, B., Filiztekin, A. ve Kent, O. (2022). You mean the world to me: The role of residential mobility in centrality of romantic relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(7), 1151-1162. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211061017