The Relationship Between Purpose of Using Facebook and Interest with Facebook Ads

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 4, 83 - 94, 01.12.2014

Ömer Torlak , Ufuk Ay

https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.76064

Cited By: 5

Öz

This study aims to determine whether or not there is a relationship between interest with Facebook ads and purpose of using Facebook. The survey was applied to 283 people on internet for this purpose. The findings of research confirm relationship between interest with Facebook ads and “social searching” and “social browsing” defining as purposes of using Facebook.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social Media Advertising, Facebook Ads, Social Networking Sites

Facebook’ta Bulunma Amacı ve Facebook Reklamlarına Duyulan İlgi Arasındaki İlişki

Öz

Bu araştırmada Facebook’ta bulunma amaçları ile Facebook reklamlarına duyulan ilgi arasında bir ilişki olup olmadığı ölçülmüştür. Bu amaçla internet üzerinden 283 kişiye anket uygulanmıştır. Araştırmanın bulguları Facebook’ta bulunma amaçları olarak tanımlanan “sosyal arama” ve “sosyal tarama” değişkenleriyle Facebook reklamlarına duyulan ilgi arasında anlamlı ilişkiler olduğunu destekler niteliktedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal Medya Reklamcılığı, Facebook Reklamları, Sosyal Ağ Siteleri

Kaynakça

• Barnes, N. G., ve Mattson, E. (2009). Social Media in the 2009 Inc 500: new tools and new trends. Jour- nal of New Communucation Research, 4(2).
• Beauchamp, M. B. (2013). Don’t Invade My Personal Space: Facebook’s Advertising Dilemma. The Jour- nal of Applied Business Research, 29(1), 91-96.
• Boyd, D. M., ve Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social Network Sites: Definition,History, Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communacition(13), 210-230.
• Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of Psychological Reactan- ce. New York: Academic Press.
• Cohen, D. (2012). Brands, maintain a facebook page, but don’t bother me, http://allfacebook.com/face- book-page-consumers_b78793. (Erişim Tarihi: 20.08.2014)
• Delozier, M. W. (1976). The Marketing Communucati- on Process. New York: MCGraw-Hill Book.
• Elden, M. (2003). Reklamcılığın Yeni Yüzü: İnternet Reklamcılığı. İstanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), 247-278.
• Golder, S. A., Wilkinson, D. M., Huberman, B. A. (2007). Rhythms of Social Interaction: Messaging Within a Massive Online Network. Communities and Technologies 2007, 41-66.
• Greenberg, B. S., ve Brand, J. E. (1993). Television news and advertising in schools: The “Channel One’’ contoversy. Journal of Communication, 43(1), 143- 151.
• Kaplan, A. M., ve Haenlin, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite The challenges and oppurtunites of social media. Business Horizon, 53(1), 59-68.
• Lampe, C., Ellison, N., Steinfield, C. (2006). A Face- book in the Crowd: Social Searching vs. Social Browsing. Proceedins of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supporter cooperative work (pp. 167-170). New York: ACM Press.
• Laricy, R. W., Tinkham, S. F., Sweetser, K. D. (2011). Kids these days: examining differences in po- litical uses and gratifications, internet political participation,political information efficacy,and cynicism on the basis of age. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(6), 749-764.
• Logan, K., Bright, L., Gangadharbatla, H. (2012). Face- book versus television: advertisin value pereptions among females. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 6(3), 164-179.
• Lukka, V., ve James, P. T. (2014). Attitudes toward Fa- cebook advertising. Journal of management and Marketing Research, 1, 1-26.
• Murugesan, S. (2007). Understanding Web 2.0. IT Pro- fessional, 9(4), 34-41.
• Odabaşı, Y., ve Oyman, M. (2005). Pazarlama İletişimi Yönetimi (9. Baskı ed.). İstanbul: MediaCat.
• Roberts, K. K. (2010). Privacy and Perceptions: How Facebook Advertising Affects its Users. The Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communica- tions, 1(1), 24-34.
• Shomaker, P. J. (1996). Using biological and cultural evolution to explain the surveillance function. Jo- urnal of Communication, 46(3).
• Sunden, J. (2003). Material Virtualities. New York: Pe- ter Lang.
• Taylor, D. G., Lewin, J. E., Strutton, D. (2011). Friends, Fans and Followers: Do ads Work on Social Net- works? How gender and Agge Shape Receptivity. Journal of Advertising Research, 1, 258-275.
• TÜİK. (2012). Hanehalkı Bilişim Teknolojileri Kul- lanım Araştırması 2012. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/ PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=10880 (Erişim tarihi: 26.02.2013)
• Varnalı, K. (2012). Dijital Kabilelerin İzinde. İstanbul: Kapital Medya Hizmetleri.
• Vasalou, A., Joinson, A. N., Courvoisier, D. (2010). Cultural Diffrence, Experience with Social Net- works and The Nature of “true commitment”in Fa- cebook. İnternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 719-728.
• Vejacka, M. (2013). Facebook Advertising and Its Effi- ciency on the Slovak Market. Economy and Mana- gement, 1(1), 116-126.
• Whiting, A., ve Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Jour- nal, 16(4), 362-369.
• Yousif, R. O. (2012). The Extent of Facebook Users’ Interest in the Advertising Messages. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 4(3), 122-133.
• http://www.ntvmsnbc.com/id/25342821/ (Erişim Ta- rihi: 17.04.2013)
• http://www.socialbakers.com/facebook-pages/brands/ (Erişim Tarihi: 17.04.2013)