Pırlantam Olmadan Asla: Kadınların Bireysel Kimlik ve Pırlanta Evlilik Yüzüğü İlişkileri

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2, 67 - 84, 15.06.2017

Şenay Sabah

https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.417242

Cited By: 2

Öz

 Tüketim, özellikle sosyal olarak tüketilen ürünler açısından bireysel kimliğin önemli bir unsurunu oluşturmaktadır. Bu kapsamda kullandıkları ürünlerden ve onların sosyal ve bireysel anlamlarından bireyler kimlik inşaasında yararlanmaktadır. Bu çerçevede, tüketim ve kimlik ilişkisi ve ürünlerin sahip olduğu sembolik değer, literatürde de oldukça yaygın olarak ele alınan bir konudur. Bu noktada, sembolik tüketimin önemli bir aracı olan değerli taşlar ve mücevher, toplumun büyük kesimi açısından kimlik oluşturmada kullanılan önemli araçlardan biridir. Dahası, kimi ürünlere, bir ritüelin parçası olduklarından veya başka kimi kültürel nedenlerle kimlik ile ilişkili olarak daha fazla anlam yüklenebilmektedir. Bu durum evlilik teklifi sırasında erkeğin kadına hediye ettiği pırlanta yüzük için de doğrudur. Bu kapsamda, kadınların kimliklerini pırlanta yüzük kapsamında nasıl kurdukları çalışmanın konusunu oluşturmaktadır. Bu çerçevede kartopu ve maksimum çeşitlilik yöntemi ile belirlenmiş altı kadınla derinlemesine görüşme yapılmıştır. Görüşmeler Miles ve Huberman (1984)’ ün nitel veri analizi için geliştirdikleri model kapsamında analiz edilmiş ve oluşturulan temalar tablolar yardımıyla sunulmuştur. Buna göre, çalışmada kadınların benliklerini pırlanta yüzük çerçevesinde dört ana başlık etrafında oluşturdukları düşünülmektedir. Bunlar, (i) genişletilmiş benlik, (ii) çelişen kimlikler, (iii) başkalarının etkisi ve (iv) bir ritüel biçimi olarak hediyedir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kimlik, Pırlanta Yüzük, Evlilik

Kaynakça

• Aaker, J.&Akutsu, S. (2009). Why Do People Give? The Role of Identity in Giving. Journal of consumer psychology, 19, 267-270.
• Ahuvia, A. C. (2005). Beyond the Extended Self: Loved Objects and Consumers’ Identity Narratives. Journal of consumer research, 32(1), 171-184.
• Belk, R. W. (1990). The Role of Possessions in Constructing and Maintaining a Sense of Past. M. E. Goldberg, G. Gorn & R. W. Pollay (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research içinde (s. 669-676). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
• Bengry-Howell, A.&Griffin, C. (2007). Self-Made Motormen: The Material Construction of Working-Class Masculine Identities Through Car Modification. Journal of Youth Studies, 10(4), 439-458.
• Berzonsky, M. D.&Neimeyer, G. J. (1994). Ego Identity Status and Identity Processing Orientation: The Moderating Role of Commitment. Journal of Research in Personality, 28(4), 425-435.
• Boden, S. (2001). ‘Superbrides’: Wedding Consumer Culture and the Construction of Bridal Identity. Sociological Research Online, 6(1). Retrieved from http://socresonline.org.uk/6/1/boden.html website.
• Bond, N., Falk, J.&. (2012). Tourism and Identity‐Related Motivations: Why am I Here (and not there)?, International Journal of Tourism Research, 15, 430-442.
• Borgerson, J. (2005). Materiality, Agency, and The Constitution of Consuming Subjects: Insights For Consumer Research. Advances in consumer research, 32, 439-443.
• Camerer, C. (1988). Gifts as economic Signals and Social Symbols. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 180-214.
• Corneo, G.&Jeanne, O. (1997). Conspicuous Consumption, Snobbism and Conformism. Journal of Public Economics, 66(1), 55-71.
• Currie, D. H. (1993). “Here Comes the Bride”: The Making of a” Modern Traditional” Wedding in Western Culture. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 24(3), 403-421.
• Cushman, P. (1990). Why the Self is Empty: Toward A Historically Situated Psychology. American psychologist, 45(5), 599-610.
• Çomak, N. A., Pembecioğlu Öcel, N. & Çağlayan, İ. (2007) “Gold vs. Diamond-Traditions vs. Modernity”, International Symposium Communication ın the Milennium, USA.
• Dobscha, S. & Foxman, E. . (1998). Women and Wedding Gowns: Exploring A Discount Shopping Experience. E. Fischer & D. Wardlow (Ed.), Gender, marketing and consumer behavior: Fourth conference proceedings içinde (s. 131-142). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
• Downey, L., Rosengren, D. B.&Donovan, D. M. (2000). To Thine Own Self Be True: Self-Concept and Motivation For Abstinence Among Substance Abusers. Addictive Behaviors, 25(5), 743-757.
• Elliott, R. (1997). Existential Consumption and Irrational Desire. European Journal of Marketing, 31(3-4), 285-296.
• Elliott, R.&Wattanasuwan, K. (1998). Brands as Symbolic Resources For the Construction of Identity. International Journal of Advertising, 17, 131-144.
• Escalas, J. E. & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 378-389.
• Fearon, J. D. (1999). What is Identity (As We Now Use The Word). Unpublished Manuscript. Stanford University. Stanford, Calif.
• Fernandez, K. V. & Veer, E. (2004). The Gold that Binds: The Ritualistic Use of Jewelry in A Hindu Wedding. Advances in Consumer Research, 31, 55.
• Ger, G. & Belk, R. W. (1999). Accounting for Materialism in Four Cultures. Journal of Material Culture, 4(2), 183-204.
• Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A Theory Relating Self and Affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340.
• Ingraham, C. (2002). Heterosexuality: It’s just not natural. D. Richardson & S. Seidman (Ed.), Handbook of Lesbian and Gay Studies içinde (s. 73-82). London: Sage Publications.
• Jenkins, R. (2000). Categorization: Identity, Social Process and Epistemology. Current Sociology, 48(3), 7-25.
• Kirmani, A. (2009). The Self and the Brand. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 271-275.
• Kleine III, R. E., Kleine, S. S.&Kernan, J. B. . (1993). Mundane Consumption and the Self: A Social-Identity Perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology: The Official Journal of The Society For Consumer Psychology, 2(3), 209-235.
• Kleine, S. S., Kleine III, R. E.&Allen, C. T. (1995). How is a Possession” Me” or” Not Me”? Characterizing Types and an Antecedent of Material Possession Attachment. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 327-343.
• Lewis, John. (2009). Redefining Qualitative Methods: Believability in the Fifth Moment. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(2).
• Merriam, S. (1995). What Can You Tell From An N ofl?: Issues of Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Research. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 4, 50-60.
• Miles, Matthew B&Huberman, A Michael. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook: Sage Publications.
• Miller, D. (1995). Consumption and Commodities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 141-161.
• Mittal, B. (2006). I, Me, And Mine-How Products Become Consumers’ Extended Selves. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5(6), 550-562.
• Nelson, M.&Deshpande, S. (2003). Love Without Borders: An Examination of Cross-Cultural Wedding Rituals. C. C. Otnes & T. M. Lowrey (Ed.), Contemporary Consumption Rituals: An Interdisciplinary Research Anthology (pp. 125-148) içinde (s. 125-148). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Ogletree, S. M. (2010). With this Ring, I Thee Wed: Relating Gender Roles and Love Styles to Attitudes towards Engagement Rings and Weddings. Gender Issues, 27(1-2), 67-77.
• Otnes, C.&Lowrey, T. M. (1993). Til Debt Do Us Part: The Selection and Meaning of Artifacts in the American Wedding. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 325-329.
• Otnes, C.&Scott, L. M. (1996). Something Old, Something New: Exploring the Interaction between Ritual and Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 25(1), 33-50.
• Oyserman, D. (2009). Identity-based Motivation and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 276-279.
• Park, C. (1998). Consumer Ritualization: Exploring The Relationships Between “Dressing-Up” and Clothing Buying Behaviors. Asia Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, 3, 113-119.
• Parsons, A. G. (2002). Brand Choice in Gift-giving: Recipient Influence. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 11(4), 237-249.
• Penner, B. (2004). A Vision of Love and Luxury: The Commercialization of Nineteenth-Century American Weddings. Winterthur Portfolio, 39(1), 1-20.
• Pointon, M. (1997). Intriguing Jewellery: Royal Bodies and Luxurious Consumption. Textual Practice, 11(3), 493-516.
• Purinton, E. F. (2012). An Analysis of Consumers’ Attitudes about Artificial Diamonds and Artificial Love. Behavioral Sciences, 24(3), 68-78.
• Reed II, A., Forehand, M., Puntoni, S.&Warlop, L. (2012). Identity-Based Consumer Behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29, 310-321.
• Richins, M. L.&Dawson, S. (1992). A Consumer Values Orientation For Materialism and Its Measurement: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303-316.
• Rook, D. W. (1985). The Ritual Dimension of Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 251-264.
• Sandikci, O.&Omeraki, S. (2007). Globalization and Rituals: Does Ramadan Turn into Christmas? , Advances in Consumer Research, 34, 610-615.
• Schweingruber, D., Anahita, S.&Berns, N. (2004). “Popping the Question” When the Answer is Known: The Engagement Proposal as Performance. Sociological Focus, 37(2), 143-161.
• Schweingruber, D., Cast, A. D.&Anahita, S. (2008). “A Story and a Ring”: Audience Judgments About Engagement Proposals. Sex Roles, 58(3-4), 165-178.
• Shavitt, S., Torelli, C. J.&Wong, J. (2009a). Identity-Based Motivation: Constraints and Opportunities in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 261-266.
• Shavitt, S., Torelli, C. J.&Wong, J. (2009b). Identity-Based Motivation: Constraints and Opportunities in Consumer Research. Journal of consumer psychology: the official journal of the Society for Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 261-266.
• Stryker, S.&Burke, P. J. (2000). The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284-297.
• Therkelsen, A.&Gram, M. (2008). The Meaning of Holiday Consumption Construction of Self Among Mature Couples. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(2), 269-292.
• Toder-Alon, A., Brunel, F. F.&Siegal, W. L. S. (2005). Ritual Behavior and Community Change: Exploring the Social-Psychological Roles of Net Rituals in the Developmental Processes of Online Consumption Communities. C. P. Haugtvedt, K. A. Machleit & R. Yalch (Ed.), Online Consumer Psychology: Understanding and Influencing Consumer Behavior in the Virtual World içinde (s. 7-33). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
• Van De Mieroop, D. (2008). Co-Constructing Identities in Speeches: How the Construction of an ‘Other’ Identity is Defining For the ‘Self’ Identity and Vice Versa. Pragmatics, 18(3), 491-509.
• Ward, M. K.&Broniarczyk, S. M. (2011). It’s Not Me, It’s You: How Gift Giving Creates Giver Identity Threat as a Function of Social Closeness. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 164-181.
• Wong, P. K.&Hogg, M. (2009). Changes in Self and Interpersonal Relationships Over Time: A Study of Important Gifts from Gift-Recipients’ Perspectives. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 273-278.