Evidence Based Practice on Psychological Interventions: A Literature Review on Current Situation

Yıl 2024, , 205 - 232, 31.05.2024

Ezgi Uncu , Orçun Yorulmaz

https://doi.org/10.31682/ayna.1374203

Öz

Numerous psychological interventions and psychotherapy approaches claim they are effective and functional. To prevent confusion and potential misuse, the American Psychological Association (APA) has established objective criteria for the efficiency and functionality of these approaches that were also internationally agreed upon. Then, it ultimately announced the Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) approach in clinical psychology. This approach merges robust scientific research findings highlighting influential outcomes on certain psychological problems with client preferences and clinician features. In order to raise awareness in the field of clinical psychology in Turkey, this article first outlines the fundamental characteristics and basics of the EBP, as well as its historical context. Moreover, the Society of Clinical Psychology website is the 12th section of the APA that includes a list of psychological interventions announced as Empirically Supported Treatments and relevant resources. Finally, general findings and discussions obtained in the scientific literature review on the concept of the EBP were presented, and later, an evaluation of studies on the dissemination and implementation of the EBP was focused. Relevant implications were also presented based on the current findings of this article.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Emprically Supported Treatments, awareness, Evidence Based Practice, implementation, dissemination

Psikolojik Müdahalelerde Kanıt Temelli Uygulamalar: Güncel Duruma Dair Genel Bir Bakış

Öz

Günümüzde işe yarar ve de etkili olduğunu iddia eden pek çok farklı psikolojik müdahale veya psikoterapi yaklaşımı ile karşılaşmak mümkündür. Bu karmaşayı ve kötüye kullanma olasılığını gidermek üzere Amerikan Psikoloji Derneği (APA), özellikle işe yararlık ve etkililiğin ne olduğu uluslararası alanda da kabul gören objektif ölçütler belirlemiş; bunları da geliştirerek Kanıt Temelli Uygulamalar (KTU) yaklaşımını başlatmıştır. Bu yaklaşımda tek başına belirli sorunlara özgü etkin sonuçlar ürettiğini ispatlayan nitelikli bilimsel araştırma bulguları ile danışan tercihleri ve terapist özelliklerinin de harmanlanması temel alınmaktadır. Bu makalede, Türkiye’de klinik psikoloji alanında bu yaklaşıma yönelik farkındalığın arttırılması amacıyla, yaklaşımın tarihsel arka planı ve temel prensipleri detaylıca açıklanmıştır. Buna ek olarak, APA’nın 12. Birimi olan Klinik Psikoloji Topluluğu’nun internet sayfasında yer alan ve KTU yaklaşımının temelini oluşturan Ampirik Olarak Desteklenen Tedavi Yöntemleri listesinden bahsedilmiş; ardından alanyazında KTU yaklaşımına yönelik var olan bilimsel çalışmalar derlenmiştir. Son olarak, alanyazındaki çalışmalardan hareketle KTU yaklaşımının tanınması ve uygulanır hale gelmesi adına atılabilecek adımlara yönelik belli çıkarımlarda bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ampirik Olarak Desteklenen Tedavi Yöntemleri, farkındalık, Kanıt Temelli Uygulamalar, uygulama, yayılma

Kaynakça

• Aarons, G. (2004). Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: The evidence-based practice attitude scale (EBPAS). Mental Health Services Research, 6(2), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MHSR.0000024351.12294.65
• Aarons, G. A., Cafri, G., Lugo, L. ve Sawitzky, A. (2012). Expanding the domains of attitudes towards evidence based practice: The evidencebased practice attitude scale-50. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 39(5), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0302-3
• American Psychological Association. (1947). Committee on training in clinical psychology. Recommended graduate training program in clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 2(12), 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058236
• American Psychological Association. (1995). Template for developing guidelines: Interventions for mental disorders and psychosocial aspects of physical disorders (1. Basım). Washington DC: Author.
• American Psychological Association. (2002). Criteria for evaluating treatment guidelines. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1052–1059. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.57.12.1052
• American Psychological Association. (2023). Advisory steering committee for development of clinical practice guidelines. Amerikan Psikoloji Derneği (American Psychological Association) sitesinden alınmıştır: https://www.apa.org/about/offices/directorates/guidelines/steering-committee
• APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. The American Psychologist, 61(4), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271
• Babione, J. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice in psychology: An ethical framework for graduate education, clinical training, and maintaining professional competence. Ethics & Behavior, 20(6), 443-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2010.521446
• Baker, M. ve Kleijnen, J. (2000). The drive towards evidence-based health care. İçinde N. Rowland ve S. Goss (Edl.), Evidence-based Counseling and Psychological Therapies: Research and applications (ss. 13–33). Routledge.
• Barrett, J., Gonsalvez, C. J. ve Shires, A. (2019). Evidence‐based practice within supervision during psychology practitioner training: A systematic review. Clinical Psychologist, 24(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/cp.12196
• Bearman, S. K., Wadkins, M., Bailin, A. ve Doctoroff, G. (2015). Pre-practicum training in professional psychology to close the research–practice gap: Changing attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 9(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000052
• Beidas, R. S. ve Kendall, P. C. (2010). Training therapists in evidencebased practice: A critical review of studies from a systemscontextual perspective. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17(1), 1 – 30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01187.x
• Beutler, L. E. (1998). Identifying empirically supported treatments: What if we didn't? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.66.1.113
• Booth, A., Clarke, M., Dooley, G., Ghersi, D., Moher, D., Petticrew, M. ve Stewart, L. (2012). The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 1(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-2
• Chambless, D. L. ve Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.66.1.7
• Clark, D. M., Layard, R., Smithies, R., Richard, D. A., Suckling, R. ve Wright, B. (2009). Improving access to psychological therapy: Initial evaluation of two UK demonstration sites. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47(11), 910–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.07.010
• Cuijpers, P. (2019). Targets and outcomes of psychotherapies for mental disorders: an overview. World Psychiatry, 18(3), 276-285. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20661
• Çay, M. ve Daşbaş, S. (2020). Kanıta Dayalı Uygulama Ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 31(4), 1514-1546. https://doi.org/10.33417/tsh.733462
• DiLillo, D. ve McChargue, D. (2007). Implementing elements of evidence‐based practice into scientist practitioner training at the University of Nebraska‐Lincoln. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(7), 671-684. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20375
• Djulbegovic, B. ve Guyatt, G. H. (2014). Evidence-based practice is not synonymous with delivery of uniform health care. Jama, 312(13), 1293-1294. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.10713
• Fairburn, C. G. (2013). Overcoming binge eating (2. Basım). Guilford Press.
• Fairburn, C. G., Marcus, M.D. ve Wilson, G. T. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for binge eating and bulimia nervosa: A comprehensive treatment manual. İçinde C. G. Fairburn ve G. T. Wilson (Edl.), Binge eating: Nature, assessment and treatment (ss. 361-404). Guilford Press.
• Foa, E. B., Yadin, E. ve Lichner, T. K. (2012). Exposure and response (ritual) prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: Therapist guide (2. Basım). Oxford University Press.
• Frank, G. (1984). The Boulder model: History, rationale, and critique. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 15(3), 417. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.15.3.417
• Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P. ve Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Bmj, 336(7650), 924-926. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
• Hadjistavropoulos, H. D., Kehler, M. D., Peluso, D., Loutzenhiser, L. ve Hadjistavropoulos, T. (2010). Case presentations: A key method for evaluating core competencies in Professional psychology? Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 51(4), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021735
• Hamill, N. R. ve Wiener, K. K. K. (2018). Attitudes of Psychologists in Australia towards evidence‐based practice in psychology. Australian Psychologist, 53(6), 477-485. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12342
• Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovic, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., Sterne, J. A. C., Cochrane Bias Methods Group ve Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. British Medical Journal, 343(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
• Higgins, J. P. ve Green, S. (Edl.). (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (1. Basım). Wiley- Blackwell.
• Hollon, S. D., Areán, P. A., Craske, M. G., Crawford, K. A., Kivlahan, D. R., Magnavita, J. J., Ollendick, T. H., Sexton, T. L., Spring, B., Bufka, L. F., Galper, D. I. ve Kurtzman, H. (2014). Development of clinical practice guidelines. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 213-241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185529
• Hunsley, J. ve Lee, C. M. (2007). Informed benchmarks for psychological treatments: Efficacy studies, effectiveness studies, and beyond. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.38.1.21
• Jiménez-Pérez, A. L. ve Vargas-Contreras, E. (2020). Transfer of learning for evidence-based practice in psychology. International Education Studies, 13(5), 72-79. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n5p72
• Jones, J. L. ve Mehr, S. L. (2007). Foundations and assumptions of the scientist-practitioner model. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(6), 766–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764206296454
• Kagee, A. ve Lund, C. (2012). Psychology training directors' reflections on evidence-based practice in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 42(1), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124631204200111
• Kazdin, A. E. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63(3), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.146
• Lander, B. ve Balka, E. (2019). Exploring how evidence is used in care through an organizational ethnography of two teaching hospitals. JMIR Yayınları (JMIR Publications) sitesinden alınmıştır: https://www.jmir.org/2019/3/e10769
• Le Grange, D. ve Lock, J. (2007). Treating bulimia in adolescents: A family-based approach (1. Basım). Guilford Press
• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen J. ve Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ Publishing Group sitesinden alınmıştır: https://www.bmj.com/content/339/bmj.b2700
• Lilienfeld, S. O., Ritschel, L. A., Lynn, S. J., Cautin, R. L. ve Latzman, R. D. (2013). Why many clinical psychologists are resistant to evidence-based practice: Root causes and constructive remedies. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(7), 883-900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.008
• Luebbe, A. M., Radcliffe, A. M., Callands, T. A., Green, D. ve Thorn, B. E. (2007). Evidence‐based practice in psychology: Perceptions of graduate students in scientist–practitioner programs. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(7), 643-655. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20379
• Luoma, J. B., Hayes, S. C. ve Walser, R. D. (2007). Learning ACT: An acceptance and commitment therapy skills-training manual for therapists (1. Basım). Harbinger Publications.
• March, J. S., Silva, S. G., Compton, S., Shapiro, M., Califf, R. ve Krishnan, R. (2005). The case for practical clinical trials in psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(5), 836-846. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.836
• McHugh, R. K. ve Barlow, D. H. (2010). The dissemination and implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments: a review of current efforts. American Psychologist, 65(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018121
• Middleton, J. C., Kalogeropoulos, C. ve Drapeau, M. (2020). What is evidence-based practice? A survey of psychotherapy service providers and leaders in psychology about evidence-based practice in psychology. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy sitesinden alınmıştır: https://cjc-rcc.ucalgary.ca/article/view/61212/53847
• Moseley, A. ve Tierney, S. (2005). Evidence-based practice in the real world. Evidence & Policy, 1(1), 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1332/1744264052703212
• Mozdzierz, G. J., Peluso, P. R. ve Lisiecki, J. (2011). Evidence-based psychological practices and therapist training: At the crossroads. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 51(4), 439-464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167810386959
• Mozdzierz, G. J., Peluso, P. ve Lisiecki, J. (2014). Principles of counseling and psychotherapy: Learning the essential domains and nonlinear thinking of master practitioners (2. Basım). Routledge.
• Newnham, E. A. ve Page, A. C. (2010). Bridging the gap between best evidence and best practice in mental health. Clinical psychology review, 30(1), 127-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.10.004
• NICE. (2023). About. Ulusal Sağlıkta ve Bakımda Mükemmellik Enstitüsü (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) sitesinden alınmıştır: https://www.nice.org.uk/about
• Norcross, J. C. (Ed). (2002). Psychotherapy Relationships That Work: Therapist Contributions and Responsiveness to Patients. (ss. 300- 311). Oxford University Press.
• Norcross, J. C. ve Wampold, B. E. (2011). Evidence based therapy relationships: Research conclusions and clinical practices. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 98–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022161
• Padmanabhanunni, A. ve Sui, X. C. (2017). Mental healthcare providers’ attitudes towards the adoption of evidence-based practice in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 47(2), 198-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246316673244
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5. Basım). Free Press.
• Rubin, A. (2008). Practitioner’s guide to using research for evidence-based practice (2. Basım). John Wiley.
• Ruzek, J. I., Karlin, B. E. ve Zeiss, A. M. (2012). Implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments in the Veterans Health Administration. İçinde R. K. McHugh ve D. H. Barlow (Edl.), Dissemination of evidence-based psychological treatments (ss. 78–96). Oxford University Press.
• Rye, M., Torres, E. M., Friborg, O., Skre, I. ve Aarons, G. A. (2017). The Evidence-based Practice Attitude Scale-36 (EBPAS-36): A brief and pragmatic measure of attitudes to evidence-based practice validated in US and Norwegian samples. Implementation Science, 12(1), 1-11. https://doi.org./10.1186/s13012-017-0573-0
• Savovic, J., Jones, H. E., Altman, D. G., Harris, R. J., Juni, P., Pildal, J., Als- Nielsen, B., Balk, E. M., Gluud, C., Gluud, L. L., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Schulz, K. F., Beynon, R., Welton, N. J., Wood, L., Moher, D., Deeks, J. J. ve Sterne, J. A. C. (2012). Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Annals of Internal Medicine, 157(6), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819- 157-6-201209180-00537
• Shea, B. J., Hamel, C., Wells, G. A., Bouter, L. M., Kristjansson, E., Grimshaw, J., Henry, D. A. ve Boers, M. (2009). AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1013–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009
• Society of Clinical Psychology. (2022). Professional Home of Clinical & Health Service Psychologists. Klinik Psikoloji Topluluğu (Society of Clinical Psychology) sitesinden alınmıştır: https://div12.org/
• Spring, B. (2007). Evidence‐based practice in clinical psychology: What it is, why it matters; what you need to know. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(7), 611-631. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20373
• Steketee, G. (Ed). (2011). The Oxford handbook of obsessive compulsive and spectrum disorders. (pp. 1-545). Oxford University Press.
• Stice, E. ve Presnell, K. (2007). The Body Project: Promoting body acceptance and preventing eating disorders, facilitators guide (1. Basım). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Stuart, S. ve Robertson, M. (2012). Interpersonal psychotherapy: A clinician's guide (2. Basım). CRC Press.
• The GRADE Working Group. (2023). What is GRADE. GRADE Çalışma Grubu (The GRADE Working Group) sitesinden alınmıştır: https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/
• Tolin, D. F. (2014). Evidence-based practice: Three-legged stool or filter system. Klinik Psikoloji Topluluğu (Society of Clinical Psychology) sitesinden alınmıştır: https://www.div12.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/TCP_Summer2014_FINAL1.pdf
• Tolin, D. F., McKay, D., Forman, E. M., Klonsky, E. D. ve Thombs, B. D. (2015). Empirically supported treatment: Recommendations for a new model. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 22(4), 317. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101729
• Wachtel, P. L. (2010). Beyond “ESTs”: Problematic assumptions in the pursuit of evidence-based practice. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 27(3), 251. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020532
• Wampold, B. E., Goodheart, C. D. ve Levant, R. F. (2007). Clarification and elaboration on evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 62(6), 616–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X62.6.616
• Wilson, J. L., Armoutliev, E., Yakunina, E. ve Werth Jr, J. L. (2009). Practicing psychologists’ reflections on evidence-based practice in psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(4), 403. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016247
• Yates, C. (2013). Evidence-based practice: The components, history, and process. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 4(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150137812472193
• Yıldız, E. ve Güngörmüş, Z. (2016). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of The Evidence-based Practice Evaluation Competence Questionnaire. Nurse Education Today, 45(1), 91-95. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.05.030