Sürücü Davranışlarının Kişiler Arası Döngüsel Model Üzerindeki Temsilleri

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, sürücü davranışlarının kişiler arası döngüsel model (KDM) üzerindeki konumlarını kişiler arası problemler temelinde saptamaktır. Sürücü davranışlarının pek çok farklı faktörle ilişkisini araştıran birçok çalışma olmasına rağmen, bu davranışlar doğrudan kişiler arası problemlerle ilişkilendirilerek incelenmemiştir. Çalışmaya toplam 355 sürücü (109 kadın, 246 erkek) katılmıştır ve katılımcılardan Sürücü Davranışları Ölçeği, Pozitif Sürücü Davranışları Ölçeği ve Kişiler Arası Problemler Envanterini doldurmaları istenmiştir. Çalışma değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek amacıyla sürücü davranışlarının KDM üzerindeki konumları incelenmiştir. KDM’de sürücü davranışlarının konumlarını saptamak için ipsatize veri yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar, sürücü davranışları ve kişiler arası problemler arasındaki ilişkilerin KDM üzerindeki konumlandırılmasının bu iki değişkenin alt ölçeklerinin özelliklerine uygun bir şekilde gözlemlendiğini göstermektedir. Kişiler arası problemlerin ve sapkın/pozitif sürücü davranışları arasındaki ilişkinin açıklanması, trafik bağlamında kişilik ve kişiler arası ilişkileri araştıran literatüre katkı sağlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sürücü davranışları,kişiler arası problemler,kişiler arası döngüsel model

Representations of Driver Behaviors on the Interpersonal Circumplex Model

Öz

The aim of the current study was to investigate the relationship between driver behaviors and interpersonal behaviors and detecting the positions of driver behaviors on interpersonal circumplex (IPC). Although there were many studies that explore the associations of driver behaviors with many different individual factors, driver behaviors are not studied directly with interpersonal problems. A total of 355 drivers (109 females, 246 males) participated in this study and they were given The Driver Behavior Questionnaire with the Positive Driver Behaviors Scale and Inventory of Interpersonal Problems for measuring the variables of the study. Ipsatized data method was used for detecting the positions of drivers in the IPC. Results showed that, the characteristics of the relationship between driver behaviors and interpersonal problems are in accordance with the representations of the driver behaviors on the IPC. Evidencing the interpersonal problems and aberrant / positive driver behaviors relationship was a theoretical contribution to the literature investigating personality and interpersonal relationships at traffic context.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Driver behaviors,interpersonal problems,interpersonal circumplex

Kaynakça

1. M. (2012). Cognitive Aspects of Personality Disorders: Influences of Basic Personality Traits, Cognitive Emotion Regulation, and Interpersonal Problems (Doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University.
2. Akyunus, M., & Gençöz, T. (2016). Kişilerarası Problemler Envanteri-Döngüsel Ölçekler Kısa Formu psikometrik özellikleri: Güvenilirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Düşünen Adam: Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, 29(1), 36-48.
3. Akyunus, M., & Gençöz, T. (2016). Kişilik Bozukluğu İnanışlarının Kişilerarası Döngüsel Model Üzerindeki Temsili. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 31(77), 1.
4. Alden, L. E., & Capreol, M. J. (1993). Avoidant personality disorder: Interpersonal problems as predictors of treatment response. Behavior Therapy, 24(3), 357-376. doi:10.1016/s0005- 7894(05)80211-4
5. Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1990). Construction of circumplex scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(3-4), 521-536.
6. Borkovec, T.D., Newman, M.G., Pincus, A. L., & Lytle, R. (2002). A component analysis of cognitive-behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder and the role of interpersonal problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(2), 288-98.
7. Çabuk, O. C. (2015). The Roles of Childhood Trauma, Personality Characteristics, and Interpersonal Problems on Psychological Well-Being (Master’s Thesis). Middle East Technical University.
8. Dahlen, E. R., & White, R. P. (2006). The Big Five factors, sensation seeking, and driving anger in the prediction of unsafe driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(5), 903-915.

9. Elander, J., West, R., & French, D. (1993). Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road- traffic crash risk: An examination of methods and findings. Psychological Bulletin, 113(2), 279.
10. Foa, U. G. (1961). Convergences in the analysis of the structure of interpersonal behavior. Psychological Review, 68(5), 341.
11. Forgas, J. P. (2002). Feeling and doing: Affective influences on interpersonal behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 13(1), 1-28.
12. Gurtman, M. B., & Pincus, A. L. (2003). The Circumplex Model: Methods and Research Applications. Handbook of Psychology. doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0216
13. Hansen, N. B., & Lambert, M. J. (1996). Brief report: Assessing clinical significance using the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Assessment, 3(2), 133-136.
14. Horowitz, L. M., Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (2003). Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Manual. The Psychological Corporation: Texas.
15. Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureño, G., & Villaseñor, V. S. (1988). Inventory of interpersonal problems: psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical psychology, 56(6), 885.
16. Horowitz, L. M., Wilson, K. R., Turan, B., Zolotsev, P., Constantino, M. J., & Henderson, L. (2006). How interpersonal motives clarify the meaning of interpersonal behavior: A revised circumplex model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 67-86.
17. Jones, E. E. (1986). Interpreting interpersonal behavior: The effects of expectancies. Science, 234, 41- 47.
18. Lajunen, T., Sümer, N., & Özkan, T. (2003). The Turkish Driver Behavior Questionnaire (T- DBQ): validity and norms. Unpublished manuscript.
19. Lawton, R., Parker, D., Manstead, A. S. R., & Stradling, S. G. (1997). The role of affect in predicting social behaviors: the case of road traffic violations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1258-1276.
20. Lejuez, C. W., Daughters, S. B., Nowak, J. A., Lynch, T., Rosenthal, M. Z., & Kosson, D. (2003). Examining the inventory of interpersonal problems as a tool for conducting analogue studies of mechanisms underlying borderline personality disorder. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 34(3), 313-324.
21. Locke, K. D. (2010). Circumplex Measures of Interpersonal Constructs. Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions, 313.
22. Mesken, J., Lajunen, T., & Summala, H. (2002). Interpersonal violations, speeding violations and their relation to accident involvement in Finland. Ergonomics, 45(7), 469-483.
23. Muran, J. C., Segal, Z. V., Samstag, L. W., & Crawford, C. E. (1994). Patient pretreatment interpersonal problems and therapeutic alliance in short-term cognitive therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(1), 185-190. doi:10.1037//0022-006x.62.1.185
24. Oltedal, S., & Rundmo, T. (2006). The effects of personality and gender on risky driving behaviour and accident involvement. Safety science, 44(7), 621-628.
25. Öz, B., Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2014). Trip-focused organizational safety climate: investigating the relationships with errors, violations and positive driver behaviours in professional driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26, 361-369.
26. Özkan, T. (2006). The regional differences between countries in traffic safety: a cross-cultural study and Turkish case. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. (http://ethesis.helsinki.fi/julkaisut/kay/psyko/vk/ozkan/theregio.pdf).
27. Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2005). A new addition to DBQ: Positive Driver Behaviours Scale. Transportation Research Part F, 8, 355–368.
28. Pincus, A. L., & Ansell, E. B. (2003). Interpersonal Theory of Personality. Handbook of Psychology. doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0509
29. Reason, J., Manstead, A., Stradling, S., Baxter, J., & Campbell, K. (1990). Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction?. Ergonomics, 33(10-11), 1315-1332.
30. Reimer, B., D’Ambrosio, L. A., Gilbert, J., Coughlin, J. F., Biederman, J., Surman, C., ... & Aleardi, M. (2005). Behavior differences in drivers with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: The driving behavior questionnaire. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37(6), 996- 1004.
31. Rimmö, P. A., & Åberg, L. (1999). On the distinction between violations and errors: sensation seeking associations. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2(3), 151-166.
32. Road traffic injuries. (WHO). Retrieved January 14, 2018, from http://who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_traffic/en/
33. Stern, B. L., Kim, Y., Trull, T. J., Scarpa, A., & Pilkonis, P. (2000). Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Personality Disorder Scales: Operating Characteristics and Confirmatory Factor Analysis in Nonclinical Samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74(3), 459-471. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa7403_9
34. Wallén Warner, H. (2006). Factors Influencing Drivers' Speeding Behaviour (Doctoral dissertation, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis).
35. Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1989). Conceptions of personality disorders and dimensions of personality. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1(4), 305. (n.d.). Retrieved January 14, 2018, from http://www.trafik.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Istatistikler/Genel- Kaza.aspx