İngilizce Dil Öğreniminde Temel Psikolojik İhtiyaçların Engellenmesi: Cinsiyet, Yeterlilik ve Başarı Deneyimlerinin Rolünün İncelenmesi

Öz

Öz-belirleme Kuramına göre öğrenenler, bireyin temel psikolojik ihtiyaçları olan yeterlilik, özerklik ve bağlılık gereksinimleri karşılanmadığında öğrenme motivasyonları azalır ve dil öğrenme süreçleri sekteye uğrar. Bu nedenle bu temel ihtiyaçların karşılanması ve engellenmemesi yabancı dil öğreniminde büyük öneme sahiptir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’de yabancı dil olarak İngilizce öğrenen üniversite öğrencilerinin temel psikolojik ihtiyaçlar açısından yaşadıkları hayal kırıklıklarını cinsiyetlerine, dil yeterlilik düzeylerine ve başarısızlık deneyimlerine göre incelemektir. Araştırmanın amaçları doğrultusunda katılımcıların belirlenmesinde amaçlı örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmış ve çalışma Türkiye’deki bir devlet üniversitesinin hazırlık programında öğrenim gören 317 öğrenciden toplanan verilerle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre öğrencilerin cinsiyetleri ve yabancı dil düzeyleri temel psikolojik ihtiyaçların engellenmesi açısından anlamlı bir etkiye sahip değilken, katılımcıların geçmişteki başarısızlık deneyimlerinin özerkliğin engellenmesi açısından anlamlı bir fark yarattığı saptanmıştır. Katılımcıların en yüksek engellenme puanlarını özerklik engellenmesi alt boyutundan aldıkları görülürken, en düşük engellenme puanı ise bağlılığın engellenmesi alt boyutunda gözlemlenmiştir. Çalışma sonuçlarına göre İngilizce öğrenenlerin özerkliklerinin artırılması ve temel psikolojik ihtiyaçlarının engellenmesinin ortadan kaldırılması için ders içeriklerinin öğretim yöntemlerinin ve eğitmen yeterliliklerinin artırılması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İngilizce öğrenme
• öz-belirleme kuramı
• temel psikolojik ihtiyaçların engellenmesi
• üniversite öğrencileri

Basic Psychological Needs Frustration in English Language Learning: Exploring the Role of Gender, Proficiency, and Failure Experiences

Öz

According to Self-determination Theory, when learners feel frustrated in the core dimensions of the basic psychological needs as competence, autonomy, and relatedness, their learning motivation decreases and the language learning process fails. This study aims to examine the frustrations of university students learning English as a foreign language in Türkiye in terms of basic psychological needs according to their gender, language proficiency level and failure experiences. In line with the research objectives, criterion sampling method was adopted while determining the participants. Adopting a correlational research design, the study was conducted with data collected from 317 students studying in the English language prepratory program at a state university in Türkiye. According to the results of the research, the students’ gender and foreign language level do not have an effect in terms of frustration of basic psychological needs. However, the fact that students receive education at the same language level again due to their past failures creates a significant difference in terms of frustration of autonomy. While it was observed that the participants received the highest frustration scores from the frustration of autonomy subscale, the lowest was the frustration of relatedness. According to the results of the study, it is recommended that course content, teaching methods and instructor competencies be increased in order to increase learner autonomy, and eliminate the frustration of the basic psychological needs of English language learners.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• basic psychological needs frustration
• English language learning
• self-determination theory
• university students

Kaynakça

1. Ahmed, S. H. (2022). Sudanese tertiary staff’s perceptions towards global awareness. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(2).
2. Alkharusi, H., Kazem, A. M., & Al-Musawai, A. (2011). Knowledge, skills, and attitudes of preservice and inservice teachers in educational measurement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2011.560649
3. Arikan, A. (2009). Environmental peace education in foreign language learners’ English grammar lessons. Journal of Peace Education, 6(1), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400200802655064
4. Arslangilay, A. S., & Taspinar, M. (2017). The metaphorical perceptions of teacher candidates attending the pedagogical formation program on academic staff--Gazi university sample. International Education Studies, 10(11), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n11p33
5. Author#1 & Author#2 (2023). Names removed for peer review.
6. Balbağ, N. L., & Türkcan, B. (2017). Elementary school 4th grade students and teachers’ perception of global citizenship. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 8(2), 216-249. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.270274
7. Baris, Y., & Hasan, A. (2019). Teacher Education in China, Japan and Turkey. Educational research and reviews, 14(2), 51-55. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2018.3661
8. Barrett, B. (2019). Global education connections and strategies: Do these connect, share or separate educational systems?. In Luis Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, I. Candel Torres (Eds.), EDULEARN19: 11th international conference on education and new learning technologies (pp. 26-31). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019

9. Başarır, F. (2017). Examining the perceptions of English instructors regarding the incorporation of global citizenship education into ELT. International Journal of Languages' Education and Teaching, 5(4), 409-425. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.2127
10. Byker, E. J. (2016). Developing global citizenship consciousness: Case studies of critical cosmopolitan theory. Journal of Research in Curriculum and Instruction, 20(3), 264-275. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2016.20.3.264
11. Byram, M. (2021). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800410251
12. Cates, K. A. (1997). New trends in global issues and English teaching. The Language Teacher, 21, 39–41. https://jalt-publications.org/old_tlt/files/97/may/cates.html
13. Cheng, C. C., & Huang, K. H. (2023). Study abroad And pre-service teachers’ global competence. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 81(2), 172-175. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/23.81.172
14. Çokçalışkan, H., & Çelik, Ö. (2017). Investigation of pre-service classroom teachers’ environmental awareness and attitudes. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 7(2), 73-83. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/iejeegreen/issue/75809/1235194
15. Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002
16. Denzin, N.K. (2009). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.
17. Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford university press.
18. Ebere, W. S., & Isaac, O. E. (2023). Fostering teacher’s education competencies for global competitiveness: A motivational approach. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy , 7(1), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.36348/jaep.2023.v07i01.005
19. Flammia, M., Sadri, H., & Mejia, C. (2019). An internalization project to develop global competency across the disciplines. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(2), 332-345. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1224379
20. Francisco, J. C. (2024). Student-centric perspectives of the 'Why' and' How' of fostering global competence in education. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 24(3), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i3.6834
21. Goren, H., & Yemini, M. (2016). Global citizenship education in context: Teacher perceptions at an international school and a local Israeli school. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(5), 832-853. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2015.1111752
22. Grant, C.A. (1992). Research in multicultural education: From the margins to the mainstream. Routledge.
23. Gursoy, E., & Saglam, G. T. (2011). ELT teacher trainees attitudes towards environmental education and their tendency to use it in the language classroom. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 7(4), 47-52. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v7i4.6046
24. Gürsoy, E. (2010). Implementing environmental education to foreign language teaching to young learners. Educational Research, 1(8), 232-238. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eltrj/issue/5483/74460
25. Gürsoy, E., & Salı, P. (2014). A language course within the scheme of socially responsible teaching: ELT trainees’ expectations. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(2), 355-365.
26. Hashizaki, Y., & Kawaguchi, H. (2012). Japanese student teachers’ perceptions about teaching global issues. In P. Cunningham, & N. Pretwell (Eds.), Creating communities: local, national and global (pp.58-71). CiCE.
27. Heilman, E. E. (2007). (Dis)Locating imaginative and ethical aims of global education. In K. Roth, & I. Gur-Ze-ev, (Eds.), Education in the era of globalization. Philosophy and education (pp. 83-104). Springer.
28. Idrissi, H., Engel, L., & Pashby, K. (2020). The diversity conflation and action ruse: a critical discourse analysis of the OECD’s framework for global competence. Comparative and International Education, 49(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.5206/cie-eci.v49i1.13435
29. Jacobs, G. M., & Cates, K. (2012). Global education in second language teaching. International Journal of Physical and Social Sciences, 2(8), 1-22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.1.1.44-56
30. Jing, H. (2013). Global Awareness: Foreign Language Teachers' Beliefs and Practices. Intercultural Communication Studies, 22(1).
31. Karadağ, Y., & Özden, D. Ö. (2020). Çokkültürlü eğitim ortamlarına geleceğin sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerini hazırlamak: Öğretmen adaylarının çokkültürlü yeterlikleri. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Education Faculty, 39(2), 179-201. https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.764913
32. Karanikola, Z. (2022a). Measuring global competence of undergraduate and postgraduate students. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 10(8), 27-39. https://10.37745/ijeld.2013vo10n8pp2739
33. Karanikola, Z. (2022b). Teachers’ perceptions on global competence. Investigating its basic dimensions. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 10(7), 1174-1189. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v10i7.sh01
34. Karanikola, Z. (2022c). Global competence measurement in non-formal educational settings. European Journal of Development Studies, 2(4), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejdevelop.2022.2.4.125
35. Kaymakci, S. (2012). Global education in the Turkish social studies teacher training programme. Croatian Journal of Education: Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje, 14(4), 817-854. https://hrcak.srce.hr/94325
36. Kılınç, E., & Korkmaz, U. (2015). From national to global citizenship: Turkish perspectives on the meaning of global citizenship. In M. Merryfield, T. Augustine, & J. Harshman (Eds.), Research in Global Citizenship Education (pp. 163-188). Information Age Publishing.
37. Kirkwood, T. F. (2001). Our global age requires global education: Clarifying definitional ambiguities. The social studies, 92(1), 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377990109603969
38. Kjellgren, B., & Richter, T. (2021). Education for a sustainable future: Strategies for holistic global competence development at engineering institutions. Sustainability, 13(20), 11184. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011184
39. Kruger, F. (2012). The role of TESOL in educating for peace. Journal of Peace Education, 9(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2011.623769
40. Liu, Y., Yin, Y., & Wu, R. (2020). Measuring graduate students’ global competence: Instrument development and an empirical study with a Chinese sample. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100915
41. Merryfield, M. M. (1991). Preparing American secondary social studies teachers to teach with a global perspective: A status report. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 11-20. doi.org/10.1177/002248719104200103
42. Merryfield, M. M. (2000). Why aren't teachers being prepared to teach for diversity, equity, and global interconnectedness? A study of lived experiences in the making of multicultural and global educators. Teaching and teacher education, 16(4), 429-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00004-4
43. OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/projects/edu/education-2040/concept-notes/Skills_for_2030_concept_note.pdf
44. Oguro, S., & Harbon, L. (2021). Enhancing pre-service teachers' global competencies through interdisciplinary study abroad. In Interdisciplinary Approaches Toward Enhancing Teacher Education (pp. 20-32). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4697-0.ch002
45. Öcal, A. & Yakar, H. (2015). 1968-2005 Sosyal bilgiler ders programlarında küresel farkındalık eğitimi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 307-327.
46. Parmigiani, D., Jones, S.L., Kunnari, I., & Nicchia, E. (2022). Global competence and teacher education programmes. A European perspective. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2022996
47. Polat, İ., & Kılıç, E. (2013). Türkiye’de çokkültürlü eğitim ve çokkültürlü eğitimde öğretmen yeterlilikleri. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 352-372.
48. Recepoğlu, S. (2022). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin küresel okuryazarlığa ilişkin görüşleri. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 1013-1041. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.930435
49. Sağlam, G. T., & Gürsoy, E. (2010). ELT teacher trainees’ awareness on environmental issues and their integration to the curriculum. In Proceedings of the ICONTE – International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (pp. 131–136). Antalya, Türkiye.
50. Salı, P., & Gürsoy, E. (2014). Evaluation of a language course within the framework of socially responsible teaching. ELT Research Journal, 3(3), 140-152.
51. Sleeter, C. E. (1992). Keepers of the American dream : a study of staff development and multicultural education. Falmer Press.
52. Standish, A. (2014). What is global education and where is it taking us?. Curriculum Journal, 25(2), 166-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2013.870081
53. Ting, S. H. (2023). Cross-cultural competence in the volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous world. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v13i1.9207
54. Tomšik, R. (2019). Power Comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Jarque-Bera Tests. Scholars Journal of Research in Mathematics and Computer Science, 3(3), 238-243.
55. Topkaya, Y., & Coşkun, K. (2016). Küresel vatandaşlık bilinci üzerinde sosyal bilgiler öğretim programında yer alan değerlerin etki boyutu. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(11), 238-252.
56. UNESCO. (2013). Global citizenship education: Topics and learning objectives. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/DRHC3544
57. Waktola, D. K. (2009). Challenges and opportunities in mainstreaming environmental education into the curricula of teachers' colleges in Ethiopia. Environmental Education Research, 15(5), 589-605.
58. Weyant, E. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches In J. W. Creswell & J. D. Creswell (Eds.). Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 19(1–2), 54–55. Sage.
59. Yaccob, N. S., Yunus, M. M., & Hashim, H. (2022). Globally competent teachers: English as a second language teachers’ perceptions on global competence in English lessons. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 925160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925160
60. Yakovchuk, N. (2004). Global issues and global values in foreign language education: Selection and awareness-raising. English Language Teacher Education and Development, 8, 28-47.
61. Yılmaz, E. (2022). Between Turkey (1960-1980) important features in demographic structure. Socıal Sciences Studies Journal (SSSJournal), 8(96), 1141-1145. http://dx.doi.org/10.26449/sssj.3925
62. Zhao, Y. (2010). Preparing globally competent teachers: A new imperative for teacher education. Journal of teacher education, 61(5), 422-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110375802