Examining Code-switching in Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language Through Distance Education

Öz

Code-switching has been recognized as an effective pedagogical strategy in multilingual classrooms, yet its role in teaching Turkish as a foreign language within online learning environments remains understudied. This study investigates the role of code-switching in teaching Turkish as a foreign language (TFL) in digital contexts. Conducted as a qualitative case study, the research is based on a 172-minute video recording of an online B1-level Turkish class. The recording was orthographically transcribed and analyzed through content analysis. During the coding process, instances of code-switching were categorized according to their formal level, direction, initiator, and pedagogical function. The findings indicate that code-switching in online Turkish classes was largely initiated by the teacher and occurred mostly at the word level, serving to facilitate learners’ understanding of the target language. English was used as a supportive tool in pedagogical contexts such as grammar explanation, vocabulary clarification, and giving instructions. The limited use of code-switching by students highlights the teacher’s guiding role in managing interaction. Overall, code-switching functions as a planned and purposeful communicative strategy in online Turkish teaching and serves as an important means of sustaining interaction. The study underscores the pedagogical potential of multilingualism in digital learning environments and offers practical implications for future research and instructional design.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Code-switching
• teaching Turkish as a foreign language
• distance education
• vide-mediated interaction

Uzaktan Eğitim Yoluyla Türkçenin Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğretiminde Diller Arası Geçişin İncelenmesi

Öz

Diller arası geçiş, çok dilli sınıflarda etkili bir pedagojik strateji olarak kabul edilmesine rağmen çevrim içi eğitim ortamlarında Türkçenin yabancı dil olarak öğretimi bağlamındaki işlevi alan yazında sınırlı düzeyde ele alınmıştır. Bu araştırmada dijital ortamlarda Türkçenin yabancı dil olarak öğretiminde (TYDÖ) diller arası geçişin rolü incelenmektedir. Nitel araştırma desenlerinden durum çalışması yöntemiyle yürütülen araştırmanın verisi, Türkçenin B1 düzeyinde yabancı dil olarak öğretildiği çevrim içi bir dersin 172 dakikalık video kaydından elde edilmiştir. Kayıt ortografik olarak çevri yazıya aktarılmış, ardından içerik analizi yöntemiyle çözümlenmiştir. Kodlama sürecinde diller arası geçişin örnekleri biçimsel düzey, yön, başlatıcı ve pedagojik işlev kategorileri altında değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, çevrim içi Türkçe derslerinde diller arası geçişin büyük ölçüde öğretmen tarafından başlatıldığını, çoğunlukla kelime düzeyinde ve hedef dilin anlaşılmasını kolaylaştırmaya yönelik kullanıldığını göstermektedir. Bu bağlamda İngilizce, dil bilgisi açıklamaları, kelime tanımlamaları ve yönerge verme gibi pedagojik işlevlerde ve bağlamlarda destekleyici bir araç olarak kullanılmıştır. Öğrencilerin diller arası geçişin sınırlı biçimde kullanmaları öğretmenin etkileşimdeki yönlendirici rolünü ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuç olarak, diller arası geçiş çevrim içi Türkçe öğretiminde planlı ve işlevsel bir iletişim stratejisi olarak kullanılmakta ve etkileşimin sürdürülmesi açısından önemli bir araç işlevi görmektedir. Araştırma, dijital öğrenme ortamlarında çok dilliliğin pedagojik potansiyeline dikkat çekmekte ve gelecekteki çalışmalar için uygulamaya dönük çıkarımlar sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Diller arası geçiş
• Türkçenin yabancı dil olarak öğretilmesi
• uzaktan eğitim
• video aracılı etkileşim

Kaynakça

1. Amorim, R. (2017). Code switching in student-student interaction; functions and reasons!. Linguística: Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto, 7, 177-195. Retrieved from https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/EL/article/view/2727
2. Balaman, U., and Sert, O. (2017). The coordination of online L2 interaction and orientations to task interface for epistemic progression. Journal of Pragmatics, 115, 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.015
3. Badem-Korkmaz, F., and Balaman, U. (2024). Eliciting student participation in video-mediated EFL classroom interactions: Focus on teacher response-pursuit practices. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(7), 1881-1903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2127772
4. Bonacina, F., and Gafaranga, J. (2011). ‘Medium of instruction’vs.‘medium of classroom interaction’: Language choice in a French complementary school classroom in Scotland. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14(3), 319-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2010.502222
5. Bozbıyık, M., Balaman, U., and Işık-Güler, H. (2024). Displays of co-constructed content knowledge using translanguaging in breakout and main sessions of online EMI classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 80, 101275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2024.101275
6. Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Routledge.
7. Cenoz, J., and Gorter, D. (2017). Minority languages and sustainable translanguaging: Threat or opportunity?. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural development, 38(10), 901-912. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1284855
8. Cenoz, J., and Gorter, D. (2020a). Pedagogical translanguaging: An introduction. System, 92, 102269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102269

9. Cenoz, J., and Gorter, D. (2020b). Teaching English through pedagogical translanguaging. World Englishes, 39(2), 300-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12462
10. Ferguson, G. (2003). Classroom code-switching in post-colonial contexts: Functions, attitudes and policies. AILA review, 16(1), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.16.05fer
11. Gafaranga, J. (2000). Medium repair vs. other-language repair: Telling the medium of a bilingual conversation. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4(3), 327-350. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069000040030301
12. Gafaranga, J. (2010). 'Medium request: Talking language shift into being'. Language in Society, 39(2), 241-270. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000047
13. Grosjean, F. (1982). Life with two languages: an introduction to bilingualism. Harvard University Press.
14. Ho, W. Y. J. (2022). The construction of translanguaging space through digital multimodal composing: A case study of students' creation of instructional videos. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 58, 101134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101134
15. Hornberger, N. H., and Link, H. (2012). Translanguaging and transnational literacies in multilingual classrooms: a biliteracy lens. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2012.658016
16. Karaca Turhan, F. (2024). Uzaktan eğitim yoluyla Türkçenin yabancı dil olarak öğretiminde sınıf içi etkileşimin konuşma çözümlemesi yöntemiyle incelenmesi (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
17. Karaca Turhan, F., Baş, B., ve Balaman, U. (2024). Video aracılı etkileşimde onarım mekanizmaları. Journal of History School, 17(68), 248-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/joh.74354
18. Karaca Turhan, F., Baş, B., and Turhan, O. (2021). Investigating code-switching in teacher talk in Turkish as a foreign language classrooms. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 36(4), 840-854. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2020062999
19. Karaca, F. (2019). Türkçenin yabancı dil olarak öğretildiği sınıflarda öğretmenlerin kullandıkları dil değişimi fonksiyonları üzerine bir durum çalışması: A1 örneği. (Yayımlanmış yüksek lisans tezi). Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
20. Kirsch, C. (2020). Opening minds to translanguaging pedagogies. System, 92, 102271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102271
21. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications. Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/class/comm1a/readings/krippendorf-ch1and4.pdf
22. Kurt, O. (2023). Teaching Turkish as a foreign language and translanguaging. International Journal of Education and Philology (IJEP), 4(1). 151–157. Retrieved from https://ijep.ibupress.com/articles/teaching-turkish-as-a-foreign-language-and-translanguaging
23. Larsen–Freeman, D. (2019). On language learner agency: A complex dynamic systems theory perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12536
24. Lin, A. M. Y., and He, P. (2017). Translanguaging as dynamic activity flows in CLIL classrooms. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 16(4), 228-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2017.1328283
25. Lin, S. H. C., and Leung, A. H. C. (2024). ESL classroom interactions in a translanguaging space. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(6), 2397-2425. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0202
26. Lombard, M., Snyder‐Duch, J., and Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587-604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
27. Macaro, E. (2005). Codeswitching in the L2 Classroom: A Communication and Learning Strategy. In: Llurda E. (eds) Non-Native Language Teachers (s. 63-84). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24565-0_5
28. Maulidiyah, F. (2018). To use or not to use Google Translate. JLT: Jurnal Linguistik Terapan, 8(2), 1-6. Retrieved from https://jurnal.polinema.ac.id/index.php/jlt/article/view/178
29. Melo-Pfeifer, S., and Araújo e Sá, M. H. (2018). Multilingual interaction in chat rooms: translanguaging to learn and learning to translanguage. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(7), 867-880. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1452895
30. Moorhouse, B. L., Li, Y., and Walsh, S. (2023). E-Classroom Interactional Competencies: Mediating and Assisting Language Learning During Synchronous Online Lessons. RELC Journal, 54(1), 114-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220985274
31. Myers‐Scotton, C. (2017). Code‐switching. In: Coulmas F. (Ed.) The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. (s. 217-237). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405166256.ch13
32. Nie, M., Lu, J., Zheng, Y., and Shen, Q. (2024). Facilitating learners’ participation through classroom translanguaging: Comparing a translanguaging classroom and a monolingual classroom in Chinese language teaching. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(4), 1507-1529. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0136
33. Paul Sun, P., and Jun Zhang, L. (2022). Effects of Translanguaging in Online Peer Feedback on Chinese University English-as-a-Foreign-Language Students’ Writing Performance. RELC Journal, 53(2), 325-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221089051
34. Poplack, S. (1980). Sometimes i’ll start a sentence in Spanish Y TERMINO EN ESPAÑOL: toward a typology of code-switching1. Linguistics. 18(7-8), 581-618. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1980.18.7-8.581
35. Sapitri, N. M., Batan, I. G., and Myartawan, I. P. N. W. (2018). Functions of teachers’ translanguaging in the EFL classroom at two junior high schools in Singaraja. Lingua Scientia, 25(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.23887/ls.v25i1.18821
36. Satar, H. M. (2016). Meaning-making in online language learner interactions via desktop videoconferencing. ReCALL, 28(3): 305-325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344016000100
37. Sert, O. (2015). Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburgh University Press.
38. Silalahi, R. M. P., Widianingtyas, N., Murniati, M., Novia, J., Sanjaya, F. A., and Karlin, G. (2023). The perceptions of the use of translanguaging as a form of oral feedback in Indonesian Tertiary English Language Teaching Context. Studies in Media and Communication, 11(7), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v11i7.6284
39. Subaşı, M., ve Okumuş, K. (2017). Bir Araştırma Yöntemi Olarak Durum Çalışması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(2), 419-426. https://izlik.org/JA84JY63PW
40. Wang, Y., and Li, D. (2022). Translanguaging pedagogy in tutor’s oral corrective feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ argumentative writing. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00170-5
41. Yuvayapan, F. (2019). Translanguaging in EFL classrooms: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(2), 678-694. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.586811
42. Yüzlü, M. Y., and Dikilitaş, K. (2022). Translanguaging in the development of EFL learners’ foreign language skills in Turkish context. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(2), 176-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1892698