Okulöncesi Öğretmenlerine Yönelik Fen Eğitimi Dersi: Lisans Düzeyindeki Öğretmen Eğitimi için Bir Model Önerisi

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 1 - 26, 01.12.2012

Mesut Sackes Berrin Akman; Kathy Cabe Trundle Berrin Akman

Öz

Araştırmalar çocukların doğa hakkında gözlem yapma ve düşünmeye yönelik bir eğilimi olduğu ve bu yatkınlığın okulöncesi dönemde etkili bilim öğrenme fırsatları sunularak geliştirilmesi gerektiğini önermektedir. Çocuklara zengin ve etkili bilim öğrenme deneyimleri sağlamada okulöncesi öğretmenlerine önemli rol düşmektedir. Bununla birlikte, okulöncesi öğretmen adaylarının bilim öğrenimi ve öğretimine yönelik deneyimleri oldukça sınırlıdır. Pek çok öğretmen adayı için bu deneyim erken çocukluk döneminde bilim eğitiminin önemi hakkında farkındalık yaratmak açısından önemli olmakla beraber kendilerini çocuklara bilim öğrenme fırsatları oluşturmada yeterli hissettirme ve bilimsel ve pedagojik alan bilgisi ile donatma açısından yetersiz kalmaktadır. Bu makalede okul öncesi öğretmenliği lisans programlarının üçüncü yılında verilen fen eğitimi dersine yönelik bir model önerisinde bulunulmaktadır. Makalede alan yazın temelinde öğretmen adaylarının bilimsel ve pedagojik alan bilgilerinin geliştirilmesine yönelik öneriler sunulmuş ve fen eğitimi dersi süresince adayların duyuşsal ve bilişsel alanlardaki gelişmelerini desteklemeye yönelik stratejiler önerilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

okulöncesi öğretmen adayları, fen eğitimi dersi, bilim eğitimi, öğretmen eğitimi, erken çocukluk eğitimi.

Kaynakça

• Akerson, V. (2004). Designing a science methods course for early childhood preservice teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 16(2), 19-32.
• Akerson, V., Buck, G., Donnelly, L., Nargund-Joshi, V., & Weiland, I. (2011). The importance of teaching and learning nature of science in the early childhood years. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 537-549.
• Akkoyunlu, B., Akman, B., & Tuğrul, B. (2002). Investigation of kindergarten children’s computer literacy skills. Journal of Qafqaz University, 1(9), 43-52.
• Akman, B. (2003). Okulöncesinde fen eğitimi. Yaşadıkça Eğitim, 79, 14-16.
• Aktaş Arnas, Y. (2002). Okulöncesi dönemde fen eğitiminin amaçları. Çocuk Gelişimi ve Eğitimi Dergisi, 6-7, 1-6.
• Anderson, R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. In Handbook of Research on Science Education (eds. S. Abell and N. Lederman), pp. 807-830. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
• Appleton, K. (1992). Discipline knowledge and confidence to teach science: self-perceptions of primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 22(1), 11-19.
• Ayvacı, H.Ş., Devecioğlu, Y., Yiğit, N. (2002). Okulöncesi öğretmenlerinin fen ve doğa etkinliklerindeki yeterliliklerinin belirlenmesi. 5. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresinde sunulmuş bildiri, 16-18 Eylül, ODTÜ, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Beeth, M. E. (1998). Teaching for conceptual change: Using status as a metacognitive tool. Science Education, 82, 343-356.
• Bell, B. (1993). Children’s Science, Constructivism and Learning in Science. Victoria: Deakin University.
• Bell, R. L. (2007). Teaching the nature of science through process skills: Activities for grades 3-8. Allyn & Bacon.
• Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30-33.
• Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (1994) The Berlin-White integrated science and mathematics model. School Science and Mathematics, 94(1), 2-4.
• Bloom, S. B.(1995). İnsan nitelikleri ve okulda öğrenme. (Çev. Durmuş Ali Özçelik). İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi
• Buldu, M. (2006). Young children's perceptions of scientists: A preliminary study. Educational Research, 48(1), 121-132.
• Butler, D. (2002). Individualized instruction in self-regulated learning. Theory Into Practice, 41, 81-92.
• Büyüktaşkapu, S., Çeliköz, N., & Akman, B. (2012). Yapılandırmacı bilim öğretim programının 6 yaş çocuklarının bilimsel süreç becerilerine etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(165), 275-292.
• Cady, J. A., & Rearden, K. (2007). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about knowledge, mathematics, and science. School Science and Mathematics, 107(6), 237-245.
• Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S. (1994). Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change. In L.A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, (pp. 169-201). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Chambers, D.W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255-265.
• Charlesworth, R. (2005). Prekindergarten mathematics: Connecting with standards. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(4), 229-236.
• Curtis, D. (2002). The power of projects. Educational Leadership, 60(1), 50-54.
• Czerniak, C. M., Weber, W. B., Sandmann, A. J., & Ahern, J. (1999). A literature review of science and mathematics integration. School Science and Mathematics, 99(8), 421- 430.
• Coulson, R. (1992). Development of an instrument for measuring attitudes of early childhood educators towards science. Research in Science Education, 22, 101–105.
• Çamlıbel Çakmak, Ö. (2006). Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının fene ve fen öğretimine yönelik tutumları ile bazı fen kavramlarını anlama düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bolu.
• Davies, D., & Howe, A. (2003), Teaching science and design and technology in the early years. London: David Fulton Publishers.
• Demirbaş, M. & Yağbasan, R. (2004). Fen bilgisi öğretiminde, duyuşsal özelliklerin değerlendirilmesinin işlevi ve öğretim süreci içinde, öğretmen uygulamalarının analizi üzerine bir araştırma. Gazi Üniversitesi Kirşehir Eğitim Fakültesi, 5(2), 177- 193
• Devecioğlu, Y., Akdeniz, A. R., & Ayvacı, H. Ş. (2005). Öğretmen Adaylarının Geliştirdikleri Materyallerin Uygulanabilirliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi, XIV. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, 28-30 Eylül 2005, Denizli.
• Douville, P., Pugalee, D. K., & Wallace, J. D. (2003). Examining instructional practices of elementary science teachers for mathematics and literacy integration. School Science and Mathematics, 103(8), 388-396.
• Ehrlen, K. (2009). Drawings as representations of children’s conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 31(1), 41-57.
• Ekinci-Vural, D., & Hamurcu, H. (2008). Okul öncesi ögretmen adaylarinin fen ögretimi dersine yönelik öz yeterlik inançlari ve görüsleri. İlkögretim Online, 7 (2), 456-467.
• Erden, F. T., & Sönmez, S. (2010). Study of Turkish preschool teachers’ attitudes toward science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1149-1168.
• Farland-Smith, D. (2012). Development and field test of the modified draw-a-scientist test and the draw-a-scientist rubric. School Science and Mathematics, 112(2), 109-116.
• Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 335-345.
• Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Cramond, B. L. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the draw-a-scientist test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195- 205.
• Flavell, J. H. (1986). The development of children's knowledge about the appearance-reality distinction. American Psychologist, 41, 418-425.
• French, L. (2004). Science as the center of a coherent, integrated early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 138-149.
• Ginsburg, H. P. (1997). Entering the Child’s Mind: The Clinical Interview in Psychological Research and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Ginsburg, H. P., & Golbeck, S. L. (2004). Thoughts on the future of research on mathematics and science learning and education. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 190– 200.
• Gönen, M., & Dalkılıç, N. U. (2000). Çocuk eğitiminde drama yöntem ve uygulamalar. İstanbul: Epsilon Yayınları.
• Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Maier, M., & Fuccilo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20(2), 238-264.
• Güler, T., & Akman, B. (2006). 6 year old children’s views on science and scientists. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 31, 55-66.
• Güler, D., & Bıkmaz, F. H. (2002). Anasınıflarda fen etkinliklerinin gerçekleştirilmesine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama, 1(2), 249-267.
• Hamurcu, H. (2006). Okulöncesi öğretmen adaylarının fen öğretimi hakkındaki görüşleri. 7. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Ankara: 7-9 Eylül 2006.
• Harlan. J .D., & Rivkin, M. S. (2000). Science experiences for the early childhood years: An Integrated Approach (7th ed.). Ohio: Prentice Hall.
• Heikkila, A., & Lonka, K. (2006). Studying in higher education: students' approaches to learning, self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 31(1), 99-117.
• Henriques, L., & Chidsey, J. L. (1997). Analyzing and using children’s literature to connect school science with parents and home. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AETS, Cincinnati, OH.
• Herron, M. D. (1971). The nature of scientific inquiry. School Review, 79(2), 171-212.
• Hobson, S. M., Trundle, K. C., & Sackes, M. (2010). Using a planetarium software program to promote conceptual change with young children. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(2), 165-176.
• Hofer, B. K., & Yu, S. L. (2003). Teaching self-regulated learning through a “learning to learn” course. Teaching of Psychology, 30(1), 30-33.
• Inan, H. Z., Trundle, K. C., & Kantor. R. (2010). Understanding natural sciences education in a Regio Emilia-inspired school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 1186- 1208.
• Ivarsson, J., Schoultz, J., & Saljo, R. (2002). Map reading versus mind reading: Revisiting children’s understanding of the shape of the earth. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice (59-76). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Katz, L. G., & Chard, S. C. (2000). Engaging Children’s Minds: The Project Approach (2nd ed.). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
• Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2001). Pre-school teachers’ content knowledge in science: Their understandings of elementary science concepts and of issues raised by children’s questions. International Journal of Early Years Education, 9(3), 165-177.
• Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experimental and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 40, 75-86.
• Koballa, J. R., & Crowley, F. E. (1985). The influences of attitude on science teaching and learning. School Science and Teaching, 20(4), 222-232.
• Koirala, H. P., & Bowman, J. K. (2003). Preparing middle level preservice teachers to integrate mathematics and science: Problems and possibilities. School Science and Mathematics, 10(3), 145-154.
• Küçüközer, H., & Bostan, A., (2010). Ideas of kindergarten students on the day-night cycles, the seasons and the moon Phases. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 6(2), 267-280.
• Kuhn, D., & Pearsall, S. (2000). Developmental origins of scientific thinking. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 113-129.
• Lind, K. K. (2000). Exploring science in early childhood education (3rd.ed.). Albany: Delmar. Albany Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strike rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14-19.
• Morrow, L. M., Pressley, M., Smith, J. K., & Smith, M. (1997). The effect of a literaturebased program integrated into literacy and science instruction with children from diverse backgrounds. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 54-76.
• Metz, K. E. (1997). On the complex relation between cognitive developmental research and children’s science curricula. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 151-163.
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2010). Okullarımızda neden niçin nasıl kaynaştırma yönetici öğretmen ve aile kılavuzu. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Özel Eğitim Rehberlik ve Danışma Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü: Ankara.
• Nayfeld, I., Brenneman, K., & Gelman, R. (2011). Science in the classroom: Finding a balance between autonomous exploration and teacher-led instruction in preschool settings. Early Education & Development, 22(6), 970-988.
• Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reason for studying: motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5(4), 269-287.
• Opfer, J. E., & Siegler, R. S. (2004). Revisiting preschoolers’ living things concept: A microgenetic analysis of conceptual change in basic biology. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 301-332.
• Özbey, S., & Alisinanoglu, F. (2008). Identifying the general ideas attitudes and expectations pertaining to science activities of the teachers employed in preschool education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 5(2), 82-94.
• Patrick, H., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Samarapungavan, A. (2009). Motivation for learning science in kindergarten: Is there a gender gap and does integrated inquiry and literacy instruction make a difference. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 166- 191.
• Pedersen, J. E., & McCurdy, D. W. (1992). The effects of hands-on, minds-on teaching experiences on attitudes of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 76(2), 141-46.
• Piaget, J. (1972). Child’s Conceptions of the World (J. and A. Tomlinson, Trans.). Lanham, Maryland: Littlefield Adams.
• Quigley, C., Pongsanon, K., & Akerson, V. (2011). If we teach them, they can learn: Young students views of nature of science during an informal science education program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(2), 129-149.
• Romainville, M. (1994). Awareness of cognitive strategies: The relationship between university students' metacognition and their performance. Studies in Higher Education, 19(3), 359-366.
• Rosenthal, D. B. (1993). Images of scientists: A comparison of biology and liberal studies majors. School Science and Mathematics, 93(4), 212-216.
• Saçkes, M. (Baskıda/a). How often do early childhood teachers teach science concepts? Determinants of the frequency of science teaching in kindergarten. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal.
• Saçkes, M. (Baskıda/b). Children’s competencies in process skills in kindergarten and their impact on academic achievement in third grade. Early Education and Development.
• Saçkes, M. (2010). The role of cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational variables in conceptual change: Preservice early childhood teachers' conceptual understanding of the cause of lunar phases. Unpublished Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
• Saçkes, M. (2011). The influence of metacognitive strategy use on preservice early childhood teachers’ coherency of conceptual understandings. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 2(4), 44-54.
• Saçkes, M. Flevares, L. M., Gonya, M., & Trundle, K. C. (2012). Preservice early childhood teachers’ sense of efficacy for integrating mathematics and science: Impact of a methods course. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 33(4), 349-364.
• Saçkes, M., Trundle, K. C., Bell, R. L., & O'Connell, A. A. (2011). The influence of early science experience in kindergarten on children’s immediate and later science achievement: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 217-235.
• Saçkes, M., Trundle, K. C., & Flevares, L. M. (2009a). Using children’s literature to teach standard-based science concepts in early years. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(5), 415-422.
• Saçkes, M., Trundle, K. C., & Flevares, L. (2009b). Using children’s books to teach inquiry skills. Young Children, 64(6), 24-31.
• Settlage, J. (2000). Understanding the learning cycle: Influences on abilities to embrace the approach by preservice elementary school teachers. Science Education, 84(1), 43-50.
• Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as a part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139.
• Simpson, R. D. & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74, 1-18.
• Sucuoğlu, B. (2004). Türkiye’de kaynaştırma uygulamaları: Yayınlar/araştırmalar (1980- 2005). Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 5(2), 15-23.
• Thomas, J. W., & Rohwer, W. D. (1986). Academic studying: the role of learning strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21(1&2), 19-41.
• Trundle, K. C., & Saçkes, M. (2010). Look! It is going to rain: Using books and observations to promote young children’s understanding of clouds. Science and Children, 47(8), 29-31
• Trundle, K. C., & Saçkes, M. (2012). Science and early education. In R. C. Pianta, W. S. Barnett, L. M. Justice, & S. M. Sheridan (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood education. New York: Guilford Press.
• Tu, T. (2006). Preschool science environment: What is available in a preschool classroom? Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(4), 245-251.
• Türkmen, H. (2006). Öğrenme döngüsü yaklaşımıyla ilköğretimde fen nasıl öğretilmelidir? İlköğretim Online, 5(2), 1-15.
• Ucar, S. (2012). How do pre-service science teachers’ views on science, scientists, and science teaching change over time in a science teacher training program? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(2), 255-266.
• Ucar, S., Trundle, K. C., & Krissek, L. A. (2011). Inquiry-based instruction with archived, online data: An intervention study with preservice teachers. Research in Science Education,41 (2), 261-282.
• Ünal, M., & Akman, B. (2006). Okulöncesi öğretmenlerinin fen eğitimine karşı gösterdikleri tutumlar. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 66-73.
• Wolters, C. A. (1999). The relationship between high school students' motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 3(3), 281-299.
• Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11, 381-419.
• Vosniadou, S., Skopeliti, I., & Ikospentaki, K. (2005). Reconsidering the role of artifacts in reasoning: Children’s understanding of the globe as a model of the earth. Learning and Instruction, 15, 331-351.